oe-kbuild-all.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1905:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl'
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 16:42:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202311021613.I5dZri9c-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

Hi Yonghong,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   21e80f3841c01aeaf32d7aee7bbc87b3db1aa0c6
commit: 36d8bdf75a93190e5669b9d1d95994e13e15ba1d bpf: Add alloc/xchg/direct_access support for local percpu kptr
date:   8 weeks ago
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20231102 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231102/202311021613.I5dZri9c-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231102/202311021613.I5dZri9c-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311021613.I5dZri9c-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1891:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_obj_new_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_obj_new_impl(u64 local_type_id__k, void *meta__ign)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1905:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl(u64 local_type_id__k, void *meta__ign)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1933:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_obj_drop_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void bpf_obj_drop_impl(void *p__alloc, void *meta__ign)
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1941:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl(void *p__alloc, void *meta__ign)
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1947:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_refcount_acquire_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_refcount_acquire_impl(void *p__refcounted_kptr, void *meta__ign)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1992:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_list_push_front_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_front_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2002:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_list_push_back_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2035:35: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_list_pop_front' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_front(struct bpf_list_head *head)
                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2040:35: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_list_pop_back' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_back(struct bpf_list_head *head)
                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2045:33: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rbtree_remove' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_remove(struct bpf_rb_root *root,
                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2101:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rbtree_add_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc int bpf_rbtree_add_impl(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node *node,
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2111:33: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rbtree_first' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_first(struct bpf_rb_root *root)
                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2124:33: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_task_acquire' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p)
                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2135:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_task_release' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p)
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2224:33: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_task_from_pid' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_task_from_pid(s32 pid)
                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2265:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_slice' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_dynptr_slice(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, u32 offset,
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2349:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, u32 offset,
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2380:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_adjust' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc int bpf_dynptr_adjust(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, u32 start, u32 end)
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2398:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_is_null' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_dynptr_is_null(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2403:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2411:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_size' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc __u32 bpf_dynptr_size(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2419:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_clone' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc int bpf_dynptr_clone(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr,
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2432:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(void *obj)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2437:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rdonly_cast' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_rdonly_cast(void *obj__ign, u32 btf_id__k)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2442:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rcu_read_lock' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void bpf_rcu_read_lock(void)
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2447:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rcu_read_unlock' [-Wmissing-declarations]
    __bpf_kfunc void bpf_rcu_read_unlock(void)
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl +1905 kernel/bpf/helpers.c

  1904	
> 1905	__bpf_kfunc void *bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl(u64 local_type_id__k, void *meta__ign)
  1906	{
  1907		u64 size = local_type_id__k;
  1908	
  1909		/* The verifier has ensured that meta__ign must be NULL */
  1910		return bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_percpu_ma, size);
  1911	}
  1912	
  1913	/* Must be called under migrate_disable(), as required by bpf_mem_free */
  1914	void __bpf_obj_drop_impl(void *p, const struct btf_record *rec)
  1915	{
  1916		if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 &&
  1917		    !refcount_dec_and_test((refcount_t *)(p + rec->refcount_off))) {
  1918			/* Object is refcounted and refcount_dec didn't result in 0
  1919			 * refcount. Return without freeing the object
  1920			 */
  1921			return;
  1922		}
  1923	
  1924		if (rec)
  1925			bpf_obj_free_fields(rec, p);
  1926	
  1927		if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0)
  1928			bpf_mem_free_rcu(&bpf_global_ma, p);
  1929		else
  1930			bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, p);
  1931	}
  1932	
  1933	__bpf_kfunc void bpf_obj_drop_impl(void *p__alloc, void *meta__ign)
  1934	{
  1935		struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign;
  1936		void *p = p__alloc;
  1937	
  1938		__bpf_obj_drop_impl(p, meta ? meta->record : NULL);
  1939	}
  1940	
> 1941	__bpf_kfunc void bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl(void *p__alloc, void *meta__ign)
  1942	{
  1943		/* The verifier has ensured that meta__ign must be NULL */
  1944		bpf_mem_free_rcu(&bpf_global_percpu_ma, p__alloc);
  1945	}
  1946	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

             reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-02  8:42 kernel test robot [this message]
2023-11-02  9:06 ` kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1905:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl' Philip Li
2023-11-02 15:36   ` Yonghong Song
2023-11-02 16:19     ` Philip Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202311021613.I5dZri9c-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).