* [PULL 01/11] target/arm/monitor: Introduce qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 02/11] tests: arm: Introduce cpu feature tests Peter Maydell
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Add support for the query-cpu-model-expansion QMP command to Arm. We
do this selectively, only exposing CPU properties which represent
optional CPU features which the user may want to enable/disable.
Additionally we restrict the list of queryable cpu models to 'max',
'host', or the current type when KVM is in use. And, finally, we only
implement expansion type 'full', as Arm does not yet have a "base"
CPU type. More details and example queries are described in a new
document (docs/arm-cpu-features.rst).
Note, certainly more features may be added to the list of advertised
features, e.g. 'vfp' and 'neon'. The only requirement is that we can
detect invalid configurations and emit failures at QMP query time.
For 'vfp' and 'neon' this will require some refactoring to share a
validation function between the QMP query and the CPU realize
functions.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20191031142734.8590-2-drjones@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
qapi/machine-target.json | 6 +-
target/arm/monitor.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
docs/arm-cpu-features.rst | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
diff --git a/qapi/machine-target.json b/qapi/machine-target.json
index 55310a6aa22..04623224720 100644
--- a/qapi/machine-target.json
+++ b/qapi/machine-target.json
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
##
{ 'struct': 'CpuModelExpansionInfo',
'data': { 'model': 'CpuModelInfo' },
- 'if': 'defined(TARGET_S390X) || defined(TARGET_I386)' }
+ 'if': 'defined(TARGET_S390X) || defined(TARGET_I386) || defined(TARGET_ARM)' }
##
# @query-cpu-model-expansion:
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
# query-cpu-model-expansion while using these is not advised.
#
# Some architectures may not support all expansion types. s390x supports
-# "full" and "static".
+# "full" and "static". Arm only supports "full".
#
# Returns: a CpuModelExpansionInfo. Returns an error if expanding CPU models is
# not supported, if the model cannot be expanded, if the model contains
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
'data': { 'type': 'CpuModelExpansionType',
'model': 'CpuModelInfo' },
'returns': 'CpuModelExpansionInfo',
- 'if': 'defined(TARGET_S390X) || defined(TARGET_I386)' }
+ 'if': 'defined(TARGET_S390X) || defined(TARGET_I386) || defined(TARGET_ARM)' }
##
# @CpuDefinitionInfo:
diff --git a/target/arm/monitor.c b/target/arm/monitor.c
index 6457c3c87f7..560970de7f5 100644
--- a/target/arm/monitor.c
+++ b/target/arm/monitor.c
@@ -21,8 +21,16 @@
*/
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "hw/boards.h"
#include "kvm_arm.h"
+#include "qapi/error.h"
+#include "qapi/visitor.h"
+#include "qapi/qobject-input-visitor.h"
+#include "qapi/qapi-commands-machine-target.h"
#include "qapi/qapi-commands-misc-target.h"
+#include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
+#include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h"
+#include "qom/qom-qobject.h"
static GICCapability *gic_cap_new(int version)
{
@@ -81,3 +89,141 @@ GICCapabilityList *qmp_query_gic_capabilities(Error **errp)
return head;
}
+
+/*
+ * These are cpu model features we want to advertise. The order here
+ * matters as this is the order in which qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion
+ * will attempt to set them. If there are dependencies between features,
+ * then the order that considers those dependencies must be used.
+ */
+static const char *cpu_model_advertised_features[] = {
+ "aarch64", "pmu",
+ NULL
+};
+
+CpuModelExpansionInfo *qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion(CpuModelExpansionType type,
+ CpuModelInfo *model,
+ Error **errp)
+{
+ CpuModelExpansionInfo *expansion_info;
+ const QDict *qdict_in = NULL;
+ QDict *qdict_out;
+ ObjectClass *oc;
+ Object *obj;
+ const char *name;
+ int i;
+
+ if (type != CPU_MODEL_EXPANSION_TYPE_FULL) {
+ error_setg(errp, "The requested expansion type is not supported");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (!kvm_enabled() && !strcmp(model->name, "host")) {
+ error_setg(errp, "The CPU type '%s' requires KVM", model->name);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ oc = cpu_class_by_name(TYPE_ARM_CPU, model->name);
+ if (!oc) {
+ error_setg(errp, "The CPU type '%s' is not a recognized ARM CPU type",
+ model->name);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (kvm_enabled()) {
+ const char *cpu_type = current_machine->cpu_type;
+ int len = strlen(cpu_type) - strlen(ARM_CPU_TYPE_SUFFIX);
+ bool supported = false;
+
+ if (!strcmp(model->name, "host") || !strcmp(model->name, "max")) {
+ /* These are kvmarm's recommended cpu types */
+ supported = true;
+ } else if (strlen(model->name) == len &&
+ !strncmp(model->name, cpu_type, len)) {
+ /* KVM is enabled and we're using this type, so it works. */
+ supported = true;
+ }
+ if (!supported) {
+ error_setg(errp, "We cannot guarantee the CPU type '%s' works "
+ "with KVM on this host", model->name);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (model->props) {
+ qdict_in = qobject_to(QDict, model->props);
+ if (!qdict_in) {
+ error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_TYPE, "props", "dict");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ obj = object_new(object_class_get_name(oc));
+
+ if (qdict_in) {
+ Visitor *visitor;
+ Error *err = NULL;
+
+ visitor = qobject_input_visitor_new(model->props);
+ visit_start_struct(visitor, NULL, NULL, 0, &err);
+ if (err) {
+ visit_free(visitor);
+ object_unref(obj);
+ error_propagate(errp, err);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ i = 0;
+ while ((name = cpu_model_advertised_features[i++]) != NULL) {
+ if (qdict_get(qdict_in, name)) {
+ object_property_set(obj, visitor, name, &err);
+ if (err) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!err) {
+ visit_check_struct(visitor, &err);
+ }
+ visit_end_struct(visitor, NULL);
+ visit_free(visitor);
+ if (err) {
+ object_unref(obj);
+ error_propagate(errp, err);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ expansion_info = g_new0(CpuModelExpansionInfo, 1);
+ expansion_info->model = g_malloc0(sizeof(*expansion_info->model));
+ expansion_info->model->name = g_strdup(model->name);
+
+ qdict_out = qdict_new();
+
+ i = 0;
+ while ((name = cpu_model_advertised_features[i++]) != NULL) {
+ ObjectProperty *prop = object_property_find(obj, name, NULL);
+ if (prop) {
+ Error *err = NULL;
+ QObject *value;
+
+ assert(prop->get);
+ value = object_property_get_qobject(obj, name, &err);
+ assert(!err);
+
+ qdict_put_obj(qdict_out, name, value);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!qdict_size(qdict_out)) {
+ qobject_unref(qdict_out);
+ } else {
+ expansion_info->model->props = QOBJECT(qdict_out);
+ expansion_info->model->has_props = true;
+ }
+
+ object_unref(obj);
+
+ return expansion_info;
+}
diff --git a/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst b/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c79dcffb555
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+================
+ARM CPU Features
+================
+
+Examples of probing and using ARM CPU features
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+CPU features are optional features that a CPU of supporting type may
+choose to implement or not. In QEMU, optional CPU features have
+corresponding boolean CPU proprieties that, when enabled, indicate
+that the feature is implemented, and, conversely, when disabled,
+indicate that it is not implemented. An example of an ARM CPU feature
+is the Performance Monitoring Unit (PMU). CPU types such as the
+Cortex-A15 and the Cortex-A57, which respectively implement ARM
+architecture reference manuals ARMv7-A and ARMv8-A, may both optionally
+implement PMUs. For example, if a user wants to use a Cortex-A15 without
+a PMU, then the `-cpu` parameter should contain `pmu=off` on the QEMU
+command line, i.e. `-cpu cortex-a15,pmu=off`.
+
+As not all CPU types support all optional CPU features, then whether or
+not a CPU property exists depends on the CPU type. For example, CPUs
+that implement the ARMv8-A architecture reference manual may optionally
+support the AArch32 CPU feature, which may be enabled by disabling the
+`aarch64` CPU property. A CPU type such as the Cortex-A15, which does
+not implement ARMv8-A, will not have the `aarch64` CPU property.
+
+QEMU's support may be limited for some CPU features, only partially
+supporting the feature or only supporting the feature under certain
+configurations. For example, the `aarch64` CPU feature, which, when
+disabled, enables the optional AArch32 CPU feature, is only supported
+when using the KVM accelerator and when running on a host CPU type that
+supports the feature.
+
+CPU Feature Probing
+===================
+
+Determining which CPU features are available and functional for a given
+CPU type is possible with the `query-cpu-model-expansion` QMP command.
+Below are some examples where `scripts/qmp/qmp-shell` (see the top comment
+block in the script for usage) is used to issue the QMP commands.
+
+(1) Determine which CPU features are available for the `max` CPU type
+ (Note, we started QEMU with qemu-system-aarch64, so `max` is
+ implementing the ARMv8-A reference manual in this case)::
+
+ (QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"max"}
+ { "return": {
+ "model": { "name": "max", "props": {
+ "pmu": true, "aarch64": true
+ }}}}
+
+We see that the `max` CPU type has the `pmu` and `aarch64` CPU features.
+We also see that the CPU features are enabled, as they are all `true`.
+
+(2) Let's try to disable the PMU::
+
+ (QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"max","props":{"pmu":false}}
+ { "return": {
+ "model": { "name": "max", "props": {
+ "pmu": false, "aarch64": true
+ }}}}
+
+We see it worked, as `pmu` is now `false`.
+
+(3) Let's try to disable `aarch64`, which enables the AArch32 CPU feature::
+
+ (QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"max","props":{"aarch64":false}}
+ {"error": {
+ "class": "GenericError", "desc":
+ "'aarch64' feature cannot be disabled unless KVM is enabled and 32-bit EL1 is supported"
+ }}
+
+It looks like this feature is limited to a configuration we do not
+currently have.
+
+(4) Let's try probing CPU features for the Cortex-A15 CPU type::
+
+ (QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"cortex-a15"}
+ {"return": {"model": {"name": "cortex-a15", "props": {"pmu": true}}}}
+
+Only the `pmu` CPU feature is available.
+
+A note about CPU feature dependencies
+-------------------------------------
+
+It's possible for features to have dependencies on other features. I.e.
+it may be possible to change one feature at a time without error, but
+when attempting to change all features at once an error could occur
+depending on the order they are processed. It's also possible changing
+all at once doesn't generate an error, because a feature's dependencies
+are satisfied with other features, but the same feature cannot be changed
+independently without error. For these reasons callers should always
+attempt to make their desired changes all at once in order to ensure the
+collection is valid.
+
+A note about CPU models and KVM
+-------------------------------
+
+Named CPU models generally do not work with KVM. There are a few cases
+that do work, e.g. using the named CPU model `cortex-a57` with KVM on a
+seattle host, but mostly if KVM is enabled the `host` CPU type must be
+used. This means the guest is provided all the same CPU features as the
+host CPU type has. And, for this reason, the `host` CPU type should
+enable all CPU features that the host has by default. Indeed it's even
+a bit strange to allow disabling CPU features that the host has when using
+the `host` CPU type, but in the absence of CPU models it's the best we can
+do if we want to launch guests without all the host's CPU features enabled.
+
+Enabling KVM also affects the `query-cpu-model-expansion` QMP command. The
+affect is not only limited to specific features, as pointed out in example
+(3) of "CPU Feature Probing", but also to which CPU types may be expanded.
+When KVM is enabled, only the `max`, `host`, and current CPU type may be
+expanded. This restriction is necessary as it's not possible to know all
+CPU types that may work with KVM, but it does impose a small risk of users
+experiencing unexpected errors. For example on a seattle, as mentioned
+above, the `cortex-a57` CPU type is also valid when KVM is enabled.
+Therefore a user could use the `host` CPU type for the current type, but
+then attempt to query `cortex-a57`, however that query will fail with our
+restrictions. This shouldn't be an issue though as management layers and
+users have been preferring the `host` CPU type for use with KVM for quite
+some time. Additionally, if the KVM-enabled QEMU instance running on a
+seattle host is using the `cortex-a57` CPU type, then querying `cortex-a57`
+will work.
+
+Using CPU Features
+==================
+
+After determining which CPU features are available and supported for a
+given CPU type, then they may be selectively enabled or disabled on the
+QEMU command line with that CPU type::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,pmu=off
+
+The example above disables the PMU for the `max` CPU type.
+
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* [PULL 02/11] tests: arm: Introduce cpu feature tests
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 01/11] target/arm/monitor: Introduce qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 03/11] target/arm: Allow SVE to be disabled via a CPU property Peter Maydell
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Now that Arm CPUs have advertised features lets add tests to ensure
we maintain their expected availability with and without KVM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20191031142734.8590-3-drjones@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
tests/Makefile.include | 5 +-
tests/arm-cpu-features.c | 253 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tests/arm-cpu-features.c
diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include
index 56f73b46e2a..534ee487436 100644
--- a/tests/Makefile.include
+++ b/tests/Makefile.include
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ check-qtest-sparc64-$(CONFIG_ISA_TESTDEV) = tests/endianness-test$(EXESUF)
check-qtest-sparc64-y += tests/prom-env-test$(EXESUF)
check-qtest-sparc64-y += tests/boot-serial-test$(EXESUF)
+check-qtest-arm-y += tests/arm-cpu-features$(EXESUF)
check-qtest-arm-y += tests/microbit-test$(EXESUF)
check-qtest-arm-y += tests/m25p80-test$(EXESUF)
check-qtest-arm-y += tests/test-arm-mptimer$(EXESUF)
@@ -269,7 +270,8 @@ check-qtest-arm-y += tests/boot-serial-test$(EXESUF)
check-qtest-arm-y += tests/hexloader-test$(EXESUF)
check-qtest-arm-$(CONFIG_PFLASH_CFI02) += tests/pflash-cfi02-test$(EXESUF)
-check-qtest-aarch64-y = tests/numa-test$(EXESUF)
+check-qtest-aarch64-y += tests/arm-cpu-features$(EXESUF)
+check-qtest-aarch64-y += tests/numa-test$(EXESUF)
check-qtest-aarch64-y += tests/boot-serial-test$(EXESUF)
check-qtest-aarch64-y += tests/migration-test$(EXESUF)
# TODO: once aarch64 TCG is fixed on ARM 32 bit host, make test unconditional
@@ -841,6 +843,7 @@ tests/test-qapi-util$(EXESUF): tests/test-qapi-util.o $(test-util-obj-y)
tests/numa-test$(EXESUF): tests/numa-test.o
tests/vmgenid-test$(EXESUF): tests/vmgenid-test.o tests/boot-sector.o tests/acpi-utils.o
tests/cdrom-test$(EXESUF): tests/cdrom-test.o tests/boot-sector.o $(libqos-obj-y)
+tests/arm-cpu-features$(EXESUF): tests/arm-cpu-features.o
tests/migration/stress$(EXESUF): tests/migration/stress.o
$(call quiet-command, $(LINKPROG) -static -O3 $(PTHREAD_LIB) -o $@ $< ,"LINK","$(TARGET_DIR)$@")
diff --git a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6ebb03d7ad6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+/*
+ * Arm CPU feature test cases
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat Inc.
+ * Authors:
+ * Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
+ * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
+ */
+#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "libqtest.h"
+#include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h"
+#include "qapi/qmp/qjson.h"
+
+#define MACHINE "-machine virt,gic-version=max,accel=tcg "
+#define MACHINE_KVM "-machine virt,gic-version=max,accel=kvm:tcg "
+#define QUERY_HEAD "{ 'execute': 'query-cpu-model-expansion', " \
+ " 'arguments': { 'type': 'full', "
+#define QUERY_TAIL "}}"
+
+static bool kvm_enabled(QTestState *qts)
+{
+ QDict *resp, *qdict;
+ bool enabled;
+
+ resp = qtest_qmp(qts, "{ 'execute': 'query-kvm' }");
+ g_assert(qdict_haskey(resp, "return"));
+ qdict = qdict_get_qdict(resp, "return");
+ g_assert(qdict_haskey(qdict, "enabled"));
+ enabled = qdict_get_bool(qdict, "enabled");
+ qobject_unref(resp);
+
+ return enabled;
+}
+
+static QDict *do_query_no_props(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
+{
+ return qtest_qmp(qts, QUERY_HEAD "'model': { 'name': %s }"
+ QUERY_TAIL, cpu_type);
+}
+
+static QDict *do_query(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type,
+ const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ QDict *resp;
+
+ if (fmt) {
+ QDict *args;
+ va_list ap;
+
+ va_start(ap, fmt);
+ args = qdict_from_vjsonf_nofail(fmt, ap);
+ va_end(ap);
+
+ resp = qtest_qmp(qts, QUERY_HEAD "'model': { 'name': %s, "
+ "'props': %p }"
+ QUERY_TAIL, cpu_type, args);
+ } else {
+ resp = do_query_no_props(qts, cpu_type);
+ }
+
+ return resp;
+}
+
+static const char *resp_get_error(QDict *resp)
+{
+ QDict *qdict;
+
+ g_assert(resp);
+
+ qdict = qdict_get_qdict(resp, "error");
+ if (qdict) {
+ return qdict_get_str(qdict, "desc");
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+#define assert_error(qts, cpu_type, expected_error, fmt, ...) \
+({ \
+ QDict *_resp; \
+ const char *_error; \
+ \
+ _resp = do_query(qts, cpu_type, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ g_assert(_resp); \
+ _error = resp_get_error(_resp); \
+ g_assert(_error); \
+ g_assert(g_str_equal(_error, expected_error)); \
+ qobject_unref(_resp); \
+})
+
+static bool resp_has_props(QDict *resp)
+{
+ QDict *qdict;
+
+ g_assert(resp);
+
+ if (!qdict_haskey(resp, "return")) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ qdict = qdict_get_qdict(resp, "return");
+
+ if (!qdict_haskey(qdict, "model")) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ qdict = qdict_get_qdict(qdict, "model");
+
+ return qdict_haskey(qdict, "props");
+}
+
+static QDict *resp_get_props(QDict *resp)
+{
+ QDict *qdict;
+
+ g_assert(resp);
+ g_assert(resp_has_props(resp));
+
+ qdict = qdict_get_qdict(resp, "return");
+ qdict = qdict_get_qdict(qdict, "model");
+ qdict = qdict_get_qdict(qdict, "props");
+
+ return qdict;
+}
+
+#define assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature) \
+({ \
+ QDict *_resp = do_query_no_props(qts, cpu_type); \
+ g_assert(_resp); \
+ g_assert(resp_has_props(_resp)); \
+ g_assert(qdict_get(resp_get_props(_resp), feature)); \
+ qobject_unref(_resp); \
+})
+
+#define assert_has_not_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature) \
+({ \
+ QDict *_resp = do_query_no_props(qts, cpu_type); \
+ g_assert(_resp); \
+ g_assert(!resp_has_props(_resp) || \
+ !qdict_get(resp_get_props(_resp), feature)); \
+ qobject_unref(_resp); \
+})
+
+static void assert_type_full(QTestState *qts)
+{
+ const char *error;
+ QDict *resp;
+
+ resp = qtest_qmp(qts, "{ 'execute': 'query-cpu-model-expansion', "
+ "'arguments': { 'type': 'static', "
+ "'model': { 'name': 'foo' }}}");
+ g_assert(resp);
+ error = resp_get_error(resp);
+ g_assert(error);
+ g_assert(g_str_equal(error,
+ "The requested expansion type is not supported"));
+ qobject_unref(resp);
+}
+
+static void assert_bad_props(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
+{
+ const char *error;
+ QDict *resp;
+
+ resp = qtest_qmp(qts, "{ 'execute': 'query-cpu-model-expansion', "
+ "'arguments': { 'type': 'full', "
+ "'model': { 'name': %s, "
+ "'props': false }}}",
+ cpu_type);
+ g_assert(resp);
+ error = resp_get_error(resp);
+ g_assert(error);
+ g_assert(g_str_equal(error,
+ "Invalid parameter type for 'props', expected: dict"));
+ qobject_unref(resp);
+}
+
+static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
+{
+ QTestState *qts;
+
+ qts = qtest_init(MACHINE "-cpu max");
+
+ /* Test common query-cpu-model-expansion input validation */
+ assert_type_full(qts);
+ assert_bad_props(qts, "max");
+ assert_error(qts, "foo", "The CPU type 'foo' is not a recognized "
+ "ARM CPU type", NULL);
+ assert_error(qts, "max", "Parameter 'not-a-prop' is unexpected",
+ "{ 'not-a-prop': false }");
+ assert_error(qts, "host", "The CPU type 'host' requires KVM", NULL);
+
+ /* Test expected feature presence/absence for some cpu types */
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "pmu");
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "cortex-a15", "pmu");
+ assert_has_not_feature(qts, "cortex-a15", "aarch64");
+
+ if (g_str_equal(qtest_get_arch(), "aarch64")) {
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "aarch64");
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "cortex-a57", "pmu");
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "cortex-a57", "aarch64");
+
+ /* Test that features that depend on KVM generate errors without. */
+ assert_error(qts, "max",
+ "'aarch64' feature cannot be disabled "
+ "unless KVM is enabled and 32-bit EL1 "
+ "is supported",
+ "{ 'aarch64': false }");
+ }
+
+ qtest_quit(qts);
+}
+
+static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
+{
+ QTestState *qts;
+
+ qts = qtest_init(MACHINE_KVM "-cpu max");
+
+ /*
+ * These tests target the 'host' CPU type, so KVM must be enabled.
+ */
+ if (!kvm_enabled(qts)) {
+ qtest_quit(qts);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (g_str_equal(qtest_get_arch(), "aarch64")) {
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "aarch64");
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "pmu");
+
+ assert_error(qts, "cortex-a15",
+ "We cannot guarantee the CPU type 'cortex-a15' works "
+ "with KVM on this host", NULL);
+ } else {
+ assert_has_not_feature(qts, "host", "aarch64");
+ assert_has_not_feature(qts, "host", "pmu");
+ }
+
+ qtest_quit(qts);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
+
+ qtest_add_data_func("/arm/query-cpu-model-expansion",
+ NULL, test_query_cpu_model_expansion);
+ qtest_add_data_func("/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion",
+ NULL, test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm);
+
+ return g_test_run();
+}
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* [PULL 03/11] target/arm: Allow SVE to be disabled via a CPU property
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 01/11] target/arm/monitor: Introduce qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 02/11] tests: arm: Introduce cpu feature tests Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties Peter Maydell
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Since 97a28b0eeac14 ("target/arm: Allow VFP and Neon to be disabled via
a CPU property") we can disable the 'max' cpu model's VFP and neon
features, but there's no way to disable SVE. Add the 'sve=on|off'
property to give it that flexibility. We also rename
cpu_max_get/set_sve_vq to cpu_max_get/set_sve_max_vq in order for them
to follow the typical *_get/set_<property-name> pattern.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20191031142734.8590-4-drjones@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/cpu.c | 3 ++-
target/arm/cpu64.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
target/arm/monitor.c | 2 +-
tests/arm-cpu-features.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index ab3e1a03616..72a27ec4b0e 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -200,7 +200,8 @@ static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *s)
env->cp15.cpacr_el1 = deposit64(env->cp15.cpacr_el1, 16, 2, 3);
env->cp15.cptr_el[3] |= CPTR_EZ;
/* with maximum vector length */
- env->vfp.zcr_el[1] = cpu->sve_max_vq - 1;
+ env->vfp.zcr_el[1] = cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu) ?
+ cpu->sve_max_vq - 1 : 0;
env->vfp.zcr_el[2] = env->vfp.zcr_el[1];
env->vfp.zcr_el[3] = env->vfp.zcr_el[1];
/*
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index d7f5bf610a7..89a8ae77fe8 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -256,15 +256,23 @@ static void aarch64_a72_initfn(Object *obj)
define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo);
}
-static void cpu_max_get_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
- void *opaque, Error **errp)
+static void cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+ void *opaque, Error **errp)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
- visit_type_uint32(v, name, &cpu->sve_max_vq, errp);
+ uint32_t value;
+
+ /* All vector lengths are disabled when SVE is off. */
+ if (!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
+ value = 0;
+ } else {
+ value = cpu->sve_max_vq;
+ }
+ visit_type_uint32(v, name, &value, errp);
}
-static void cpu_max_set_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
- void *opaque, Error **errp)
+static void cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+ void *opaque, Error **errp)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
Error *err = NULL;
@@ -279,6 +287,34 @@ static void cpu_max_set_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
error_propagate(errp, err);
}
+static void cpu_arm_get_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+ void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+ ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
+ bool value = cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu);
+
+ visit_type_bool(v, name, &value, errp);
+}
+
+static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+ void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+ ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
+ Error *err = NULL;
+ bool value;
+ uint64_t t;
+
+ visit_type_bool(v, name, &value, &err);
+ if (err) {
+ error_propagate(errp, err);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ t = cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0;
+ t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE, value);
+ cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = t;
+}
+
/* -cpu max: if KVM is enabled, like -cpu host (best possible with this host);
* otherwise, a CPU with as many features enabled as our emulation supports.
* The version of '-cpu max' for qemu-system-arm is defined in cpu.c;
@@ -391,8 +427,10 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
#endif
cpu->sve_max_vq = ARM_MAX_VQ;
- object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_vq,
- cpu_max_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+ object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
+ cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+ object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
+ cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
}
}
diff --git a/target/arm/monitor.c b/target/arm/monitor.c
index 560970de7f5..2209b27b9a0 100644
--- a/target/arm/monitor.c
+++ b/target/arm/monitor.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ GICCapabilityList *qmp_query_gic_capabilities(Error **errp)
* then the order that considers those dependencies must be used.
*/
static const char *cpu_model_advertised_features[] = {
- "aarch64", "pmu",
+ "aarch64", "pmu", "sve",
NULL
};
diff --git a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
index 6ebb03d7ad6..d5e18eb6662 100644
--- a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
+++ b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
if (g_str_equal(qtest_get_arch(), "aarch64")) {
assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "aarch64");
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "sve");
assert_has_feature(qts, "cortex-a57", "pmu");
assert_has_feature(qts, "cortex-a57", "aarch64");
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 03/11] target/arm: Allow SVE to be disabled via a CPU property Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-12 10:23 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 05/11] target/arm/kvm64: Add kvm_arch_get/put_sve Peter Maydell
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Introduce cpu properties to give fine control over SVE vector lengths.
We introduce a property for each valid length up to the current
maximum supported, which is 2048-bits. The properties are named, e.g.
sve128, sve256, sve384, sve512, ..., where the number is the number of
bits. See the updates to docs/arm-cpu-features.rst for a description
of the semantics and for example uses.
Note, as sve-max-vq is still present and we'd like to be able to
support qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion with guests launched with e.g.
-cpu max,sve-max-vq=8 on their command lines, then we do allow
sve-max-vq and sve<N> properties to be provided at the same time, but
this is not recommended, and is why sve-max-vq is not mentioned in the
document. If sve-max-vq is provided then it enables all lengths smaller
than and including the max and disables all lengths larger. It also has
the side-effect that no larger lengths may be enabled and that the max
itself cannot be disabled. Smaller non-power-of-two lengths may,
however, be disabled, e.g. -cpu max,sve-max-vq=4,sve384=off provides a
guest the vector lengths 128, 256, and 512 bits.
This patch has been co-authored with Richard Henderson, who reworked
the target/arm/cpu64.c changes in order to push all the validation and
auto-enabling/disabling steps into the finalizer, resulting in a nice
LOC reduction.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20191031142734.8590-5-drjones@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
include/qemu/bitops.h | 1 +
target/arm/cpu.h | 19 ++++
target/arm/cpu.c | 19 ++++
target/arm/cpu64.c | 192 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
target/arm/helper.c | 10 +-
target/arm/monitor.c | 12 +++
tests/arm-cpu-features.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
docs/arm-cpu-features.rst | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
8 files changed, 606 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/qemu/bitops.h b/include/qemu/bitops.h
index 3f0926cf40c..ee76552c062 100644
--- a/include/qemu/bitops.h
+++ b/include/qemu/bitops.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#define BITS_PER_LONG (sizeof (unsigned long) * BITS_PER_BYTE)
#define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr))
+#define BIT_ULL(nr) (1ULL << (nr))
#define BIT_MASK(nr) (1UL << ((nr) % BITS_PER_LONG))
#define BIT_WORD(nr) ((nr) / BITS_PER_LONG)
#define BITS_TO_LONGS(nr) DIV_ROUND_UP(nr, BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(long))
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index d844ea21d8d..a044d6028b6 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -184,8 +184,13 @@ typedef struct {
#ifdef TARGET_AARCH64
# define ARM_MAX_VQ 16
+void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
+uint32_t arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t vq);
#else
# define ARM_MAX_VQ 1
+static inline void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp) { }
+static inline uint32_t arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t vq)
+{ return 0; }
#endif
typedef struct ARMVectorReg {
@@ -918,6 +923,18 @@ struct ARMCPU {
/* Used to set the maximum vector length the cpu will support. */
uint32_t sve_max_vq;
+
+ /*
+ * In sve_vq_map each set bit is a supported vector length of
+ * (bit-number + 1) * 16 bytes, i.e. each bit number + 1 is the vector
+ * length in quadwords.
+ *
+ * While processing properties during initialization, corresponding
+ * sve_vq_init bits are set for bits in sve_vq_map that have been
+ * set by properties.
+ */
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, ARM_MAX_VQ);
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_init, ARM_MAX_VQ);
};
void arm_cpu_post_init(Object *obj);
@@ -1837,6 +1854,8 @@ static inline int arm_feature(CPUARMState *env, int feature)
return (env->features & (1ULL << feature)) != 0;
}
+void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
+
#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
/* Return true if exception levels below EL3 are in secure state,
* or would be following an exception return to that level.
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index 72a27ec4b0e..17d1f2b2894 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -1198,6 +1198,19 @@ static void arm_cpu_finalizefn(Object *obj)
#endif
}
+void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
+{
+ Error *local_err = NULL;
+
+ if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
+ arm_cpu_sve_finalize(cpu, &local_err);
+ if (local_err != NULL) {
+ error_propagate(errp, local_err);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
{
CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
@@ -1254,6 +1267,12 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
return;
}
+ arm_cpu_finalize_features(cpu, &local_err);
+ if (local_err != NULL) {
+ error_propagate(errp, local_err);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64) &&
cpu->has_vfp != cpu->has_neon) {
/*
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index 89a8ae77fe8..34b0ba2cf6f 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -256,6 +256,151 @@ static void aarch64_a72_initfn(Object *obj)
define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo);
}
+void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
+{
+ /*
+ * If any vector lengths are explicitly enabled with sve<N> properties,
+ * then all other lengths are implicitly disabled. If sve-max-vq is
+ * specified then it is the same as explicitly enabling all lengths
+ * up to and including the specified maximum, which means all larger
+ * lengths will be implicitly disabled. If no sve<N> properties
+ * are enabled and sve-max-vq is not specified, then all lengths not
+ * explicitly disabled will be enabled. Additionally, all power-of-two
+ * vector lengths less than the maximum enabled length will be
+ * automatically enabled and all vector lengths larger than the largest
+ * disabled power-of-two vector length will be automatically disabled.
+ * Errors are generated if the user provided input that interferes with
+ * any of the above. Finally, if SVE is not disabled, then at least one
+ * vector length must be enabled.
+ */
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(tmp, ARM_MAX_VQ);
+ uint32_t vq, max_vq = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Process explicit sve<N> properties.
+ * From the properties, sve_vq_map<N> implies sve_vq_init<N>.
+ * Check first for any sve<N> enabled.
+ */
+ if (!bitmap_empty(cpu->sve_vq_map, ARM_MAX_VQ)) {
+ max_vq = find_last_bit(cpu->sve_vq_map, ARM_MAX_VQ) + 1;
+
+ if (cpu->sve_max_vq && max_vq > cpu->sve_max_vq) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot enable sve%d", max_vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "sve%d is larger than the maximum vector "
+ "length, sve-max-vq=%d (%d bits)\n",
+ max_vq * 128, cpu->sve_max_vq,
+ cpu->sve_max_vq * 128);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Propagate enabled bits down through required powers-of-two. */
+ for (vq = pow2floor(max_vq); vq >= 1; vq >>= 1) {
+ if (!test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
+ set_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map);
+ }
+ }
+ } else if (cpu->sve_max_vq == 0) {
+ /*
+ * No explicit bits enabled, and no implicit bits from sve-max-vq.
+ */
+ if (!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
+ /* SVE is disabled and so are all vector lengths. Good. */
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Disabling a power-of-two disables all larger lengths. */
+ if (test_bit(0, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot disable sve128");
+ error_append_hint(errp, "Disabling sve128 results in all vector "
+ "lengths being disabled.\n");
+ error_append_hint(errp, "With SVE enabled, at least one vector "
+ "length must be enabled.\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ for (vq = 2; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; vq <<= 1) {
+ if (test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ max_vq = vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ ? vq - 1 : ARM_MAX_VQ;
+
+ bitmap_complement(cpu->sve_vq_map, cpu->sve_vq_init, max_vq);
+ max_vq = find_last_bit(cpu->sve_vq_map, max_vq) + 1;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Process the sve-max-vq property.
+ * Note that we know from the above that no bit above
+ * sve-max-vq is currently set.
+ */
+ if (cpu->sve_max_vq != 0) {
+ max_vq = cpu->sve_max_vq;
+
+ if (!test_bit(max_vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map) &&
+ test_bit(max_vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot disable sve%d", max_vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "The maximum vector length must be "
+ "enabled, sve-max-vq=%d (%d bits)\n",
+ max_vq, max_vq * 128);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Set all bits not explicitly set within sve-max-vq. */
+ bitmap_complement(tmp, cpu->sve_vq_init, max_vq);
+ bitmap_or(cpu->sve_vq_map, cpu->sve_vq_map, tmp, max_vq);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We should know what max-vq is now. Also, as we're done
+ * manipulating sve-vq-map, we ensure any bits above max-vq
+ * are clear, just in case anybody looks.
+ */
+ assert(max_vq != 0);
+ bitmap_clear(cpu->sve_vq_map, max_vq, ARM_MAX_VQ - max_vq);
+
+ /* Ensure all required powers-of-two are enabled. */
+ for (vq = pow2floor(max_vq); vq >= 1; vq >>= 1) {
+ if (!test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map)) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot disable sve%d", vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "sve%d is required as it "
+ "is a power-of-two length smaller than "
+ "the maximum, sve%d\n",
+ vq * 128, max_vq * 128);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Now that we validated all our vector lengths, the only question
+ * left to answer is if we even want SVE at all.
+ */
+ if (!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot enable sve%d", max_vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "SVE must be enabled to enable vector "
+ "lengths.\n");
+ error_append_hint(errp, "Add sve=on to the CPU property list.\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* From now on sve_max_vq is the actual maximum supported length. */
+ cpu->sve_max_vq = max_vq;
+}
+
+uint32_t arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t vq)
+{
+ uint32_t bitnum;
+
+ /*
+ * We allow vq == ARM_MAX_VQ + 1 to be input because the caller may want
+ * to find the maximum vq enabled, which may be ARM_MAX_VQ, but this
+ * function always returns the next smaller than the input.
+ */
+ assert(vq && vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ + 1);
+
+ bitnum = find_last_bit(cpu->sve_vq_map, vq - 1);
+ return bitnum == vq - 1 ? 0 : bitnum + 1;
+}
+
static void cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
void *opaque, Error **errp)
{
@@ -287,6 +432,44 @@ static void cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
error_propagate(errp, err);
}
+static void cpu_arm_get_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+ void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+ ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
+ uint32_t vq = atoi(&name[3]) / 128;
+ bool value;
+
+ /* All vector lengths are disabled when SVE is off. */
+ if (!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
+ value = false;
+ } else {
+ value = test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map);
+ }
+ visit_type_bool(v, name, &value, errp);
+}
+
+static void cpu_arm_set_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+ void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+ ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
+ uint32_t vq = atoi(&name[3]) / 128;
+ Error *err = NULL;
+ bool value;
+
+ visit_type_bool(v, name, &value, &err);
+ if (err) {
+ error_propagate(errp, err);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (value) {
+ set_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map);
+ } else {
+ clear_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map);
+ }
+ set_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init);
+}
+
static void cpu_arm_get_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
void *opaque, Error **errp)
{
@@ -323,6 +506,7 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
+ uint32_t vq;
if (kvm_enabled()) {
kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
@@ -426,11 +610,17 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
cpu->dcz_blocksize = 7; /* 512 bytes */
#endif
- cpu->sve_max_vq = ARM_MAX_VQ;
object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+
+ for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
+ char name[8];
+ sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
+ object_property_add(obj, name, "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve_vq,
+ cpu_arm_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 63815fc4cfc..be67e2c66d6 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -5361,6 +5361,13 @@ int sve_exception_el(CPUARMState *env, int el)
return 0;
}
+static uint32_t sve_zcr_get_valid_len(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t start_len)
+{
+ uint32_t start_vq = (start_len & 0xf) + 1;
+
+ return arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1) - 1;
+}
+
/*
* Given that SVE is enabled, return the vector length for EL.
*/
@@ -5378,7 +5385,8 @@ uint32_t sve_zcr_len_for_el(CPUARMState *env, int el)
if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
zcr_len = MIN(zcr_len, 0xf & (uint32_t)env->vfp.zcr_el[3]);
}
- return zcr_len;
+
+ return sve_zcr_get_valid_len(cpu, zcr_len);
}
static void zcr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
diff --git a/target/arm/monitor.c b/target/arm/monitor.c
index 2209b27b9a0..fa054f8a369 100644
--- a/target/arm/monitor.c
+++ b/target/arm/monitor.c
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ GICCapabilityList *qmp_query_gic_capabilities(Error **errp)
return head;
}
+QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(ARM_MAX_VQ > 16);
+
/*
* These are cpu model features we want to advertise. The order here
* matters as this is the order in which qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion
@@ -98,6 +100,9 @@ GICCapabilityList *qmp_query_gic_capabilities(Error **errp)
*/
static const char *cpu_model_advertised_features[] = {
"aarch64", "pmu", "sve",
+ "sve128", "sve256", "sve384", "sve512",
+ "sve640", "sve768", "sve896", "sve1024", "sve1152", "sve1280",
+ "sve1408", "sve1536", "sve1664", "sve1792", "sve1920", "sve2048",
NULL
};
@@ -186,6 +191,9 @@ CpuModelExpansionInfo *qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion(CpuModelExpansionType type,
if (!err) {
visit_check_struct(visitor, &err);
}
+ if (!err) {
+ arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARM_CPU(obj), &err);
+ }
visit_end_struct(visitor, NULL);
visit_free(visitor);
if (err) {
@@ -193,6 +201,10 @@ CpuModelExpansionInfo *qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion(CpuModelExpansionType type,
error_propagate(errp, err);
return NULL;
}
+ } else {
+ Error *err = NULL;
+ arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARM_CPU(obj), &err);
+ assert(err == NULL);
}
expansion_info = g_new0(CpuModelExpansionInfo, 1);
diff --git a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
index d5e18eb6662..7fd01f0ea3f 100644
--- a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
+++ b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -9,10 +9,17 @@
* See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
*/
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "qemu/bitops.h"
#include "libqtest.h"
#include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h"
#include "qapi/qmp/qjson.h"
+/*
+ * We expect the SVE max-vq to be 16. Also it must be <= 64
+ * for our test code, otherwise 'vls' can't just be a uint64_t.
+ */
+#define SVE_MAX_VQ 16
+
#define MACHINE "-machine virt,gic-version=max,accel=tcg "
#define MACHINE_KVM "-machine virt,gic-version=max,accel=kvm:tcg "
#define QUERY_HEAD "{ 'execute': 'query-cpu-model-expansion', " \
@@ -175,6 +182,183 @@ static void assert_bad_props(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
qobject_unref(resp);
}
+static uint64_t resp_get_sve_vls(QDict *resp)
+{
+ QDict *props;
+ const QDictEntry *e;
+ uint64_t vls = 0;
+ int n = 0;
+
+ g_assert(resp);
+ g_assert(resp_has_props(resp));
+
+ props = resp_get_props(resp);
+
+ for (e = qdict_first(props); e; e = qdict_next(props, e)) {
+ if (strlen(e->key) > 3 && !strncmp(e->key, "sve", 3) &&
+ g_ascii_isdigit(e->key[3])) {
+ char *endptr;
+ int bits;
+
+ bits = g_ascii_strtoll(&e->key[3], &endptr, 10);
+ if (!bits || *endptr != '\0') {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (qdict_get_bool(props, e->key)) {
+ vls |= BIT_ULL((bits / 128) - 1);
+ }
+ ++n;
+ }
+ }
+
+ g_assert(n == SVE_MAX_VQ);
+
+ return vls;
+}
+
+#define assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, expected_vls, fmt, ...) \
+({ \
+ QDict *_resp = do_query(qts, cpu_type, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ g_assert(_resp); \
+ g_assert(resp_has_props(_resp)); \
+ g_assert(resp_get_sve_vls(_resp) == expected_vls); \
+ qobject_unref(_resp); \
+})
+
+static void sve_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
+{
+ /*
+ * With no sve-max-vq or sve<N> properties on the command line
+ * the default is to have all vector lengths enabled. This also
+ * tests that 'sve' is 'on' by default.
+ */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, BIT_ULL(SVE_MAX_VQ) - 1, NULL);
+
+ /* With SVE off, all vector lengths should also be off. */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, 0, "{ 'sve': false }");
+
+ /* With SVE on, we must have at least one vector length enabled. */
+ assert_error(qts, cpu_type, "cannot disable sve128", "{ 'sve128': false }");
+
+ /* Basic enable/disable tests. */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, 0x7, "{ 'sve384': true }");
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, ((BIT_ULL(SVE_MAX_VQ) - 1) & ~BIT_ULL(2)),
+ "{ 'sve384': false }");
+
+ /*
+ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * power-of-two(vq) all-power- can can
+ * of-two(< vq) enable disable
+ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * vq < max_vq no MUST* yes yes
+ * vq < max_vq yes MUST* yes no
+ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * vq == max_vq n/a MUST* yes** yes**
+ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * vq > max_vq n/a no no yes
+ * vq > max_vq n/a yes yes yes
+ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+ *
+ * [*] "MUST" means this requirement must already be satisfied,
+ * otherwise 'max_vq' couldn't itself be enabled.
+ *
+ * [**] Not testable with the QMP interface, only with the command line.
+ */
+
+ /* max_vq := 8 */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, 0x8b, "{ 'sve1024': true }");
+
+ /* max_vq := 8, vq < max_vq, !power-of-two(vq) */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, 0x8f,
+ "{ 'sve1024': true, 'sve384': true }");
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, 0x8b,
+ "{ 'sve1024': true, 'sve384': false }");
+
+ /* max_vq := 8, vq < max_vq, power-of-two(vq) */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, 0x8b,
+ "{ 'sve1024': true, 'sve256': true }");
+ assert_error(qts, cpu_type, "cannot disable sve256",
+ "{ 'sve1024': true, 'sve256': false }");
+
+ /* max_vq := 3, vq > max_vq, !all-power-of-two(< vq) */
+ assert_error(qts, cpu_type, "cannot disable sve512",
+ "{ 'sve384': true, 'sve512': false, 'sve640': true }");
+
+ /*
+ * We can disable power-of-two vector lengths when all larger lengths
+ * are also disabled. We only need to disable the power-of-two length,
+ * as all non-enabled larger lengths will then be auto-disabled.
+ */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, 0x7, "{ 'sve512': false }");
+
+ /* max_vq := 3, vq > max_vq, all-power-of-two(< vq) */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, 0x1f,
+ "{ 'sve384': true, 'sve512': true, 'sve640': true }");
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, cpu_type, 0xf,
+ "{ 'sve384': true, 'sve512': true, 'sve640': false }");
+}
+
+static void sve_tests_sve_max_vq_8(const void *data)
+{
+ QTestState *qts;
+
+ qts = qtest_init(MACHINE "-cpu max,sve-max-vq=8");
+
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", BIT_ULL(8) - 1, NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Disabling the max-vq set by sve-max-vq is not allowed, but
+ * of course enabling it is OK.
+ */
+ assert_error(qts, "max", "cannot disable sve1024", "{ 'sve1024': false }");
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0xff, "{ 'sve1024': true }");
+
+ /*
+ * Enabling anything larger than max-vq set by sve-max-vq is not
+ * allowed, but of course disabling everything larger is OK.
+ */
+ assert_error(qts, "max", "cannot enable sve1152", "{ 'sve1152': true }");
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0xff, "{ 'sve1152': false }");
+
+ /*
+ * We can enable/disable non power-of-two lengths smaller than the
+ * max-vq set by sve-max-vq, but, while we can enable power-of-two
+ * lengths, we can't disable them.
+ */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0xff, "{ 'sve384': true }");
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0xfb, "{ 'sve384': false }");
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0xff, "{ 'sve256': true }");
+ assert_error(qts, "max", "cannot disable sve256", "{ 'sve256': false }");
+
+ qtest_quit(qts);
+}
+
+static void sve_tests_sve_off(const void *data)
+{
+ QTestState *qts;
+
+ qts = qtest_init(MACHINE "-cpu max,sve=off");
+
+ /* SVE is off, so the map should be empty. */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0, NULL);
+
+ /* The map stays empty even if we turn lengths off. */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0, "{ 'sve128': false }");
+
+ /* It's an error to enable lengths when SVE is off. */
+ assert_error(qts, "max", "cannot enable sve128", "{ 'sve128': true }");
+
+ /* With SVE re-enabled we should get all vector lengths enabled. */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", BIT_ULL(SVE_MAX_VQ) - 1, "{ 'sve': true }");
+
+ /* Or enable SVE with just specific vector lengths. */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0x3,
+ "{ 'sve': true, 'sve128': true, 'sve256': true }");
+
+ qtest_quit(qts);
+}
+
static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
{
QTestState *qts;
@@ -198,9 +382,12 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
if (g_str_equal(qtest_get_arch(), "aarch64")) {
assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "aarch64");
assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "sve");
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "sve128");
assert_has_feature(qts, "cortex-a57", "pmu");
assert_has_feature(qts, "cortex-a57", "aarch64");
+ sve_tests_default(qts, "max");
+
/* Test that features that depend on KVM generate errors without. */
assert_error(qts, "max",
"'aarch64' feature cannot be disabled "
@@ -250,5 +437,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
qtest_add_data_func("/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion",
NULL, test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm);
+ if (g_str_equal(qtest_get_arch(), "aarch64")) {
+ qtest_add_data_func("/arm/max/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-max-vq-8",
+ NULL, sve_tests_sve_max_vq_8);
+ qtest_add_data_func("/arm/max/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-off",
+ NULL, sve_tests_sve_off);
+ }
+
return g_test_run();
}
diff --git a/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst b/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
index c79dcffb555..2ea4d6e90c0 100644
--- a/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
+++ b/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
@@ -48,18 +48,31 @@ block in the script for usage) is used to issue the QMP commands.
(QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"max"}
{ "return": {
"model": { "name": "max", "props": {
- "pmu": true, "aarch64": true
+ "sve1664": true, "pmu": true, "sve1792": true, "sve1920": true,
+ "sve128": true, "aarch64": true, "sve1024": true, "sve": true,
+ "sve640": true, "sve768": true, "sve1408": true, "sve256": true,
+ "sve1152": true, "sve512": true, "sve384": true, "sve1536": true,
+ "sve896": true, "sve1280": true, "sve2048": true
}}}}
-We see that the `max` CPU type has the `pmu` and `aarch64` CPU features.
-We also see that the CPU features are enabled, as they are all `true`.
+We see that the `max` CPU type has the `pmu`, `aarch64`, `sve`, and many
+`sve<N>` CPU features. We also see that all the CPU features are
+enabled, as they are all `true`. (The `sve<N>` CPU features are all
+optional SVE vector lengths (see "SVE CPU Properties"). While with TCG
+all SVE vector lengths can be supported, when KVM is in use it's more
+likely that only a few lengths will be supported, if SVE is supported at
+all.)
(2) Let's try to disable the PMU::
(QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"max","props":{"pmu":false}}
{ "return": {
"model": { "name": "max", "props": {
- "pmu": false, "aarch64": true
+ "sve1664": true, "pmu": false, "sve1792": true, "sve1920": true,
+ "sve128": true, "aarch64": true, "sve1024": true, "sve": true,
+ "sve640": true, "sve768": true, "sve1408": true, "sve256": true,
+ "sve1152": true, "sve512": true, "sve384": true, "sve1536": true,
+ "sve896": true, "sve1280": true, "sve2048": true
}}}}
We see it worked, as `pmu` is now `false`.
@@ -75,7 +88,22 @@ We see it worked, as `pmu` is now `false`.
It looks like this feature is limited to a configuration we do not
currently have.
-(4) Let's try probing CPU features for the Cortex-A15 CPU type::
+(4) Let's disable `sve` and see what happens to all the optional SVE
+ vector lengths::
+
+ (QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"max","props":{"sve":false}}
+ { "return": {
+ "model": { "name": "max", "props": {
+ "sve1664": false, "pmu": true, "sve1792": false, "sve1920": false,
+ "sve128": false, "aarch64": true, "sve1024": false, "sve": false,
+ "sve640": false, "sve768": false, "sve1408": false, "sve256": false,
+ "sve1152": false, "sve512": false, "sve384": false, "sve1536": false,
+ "sve896": false, "sve1280": false, "sve2048": false
+ }}}}
+
+As expected they are now all `false`.
+
+(5) Let's try probing CPU features for the Cortex-A15 CPU type::
(QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"cortex-a15"}
{"return": {"model": {"name": "cortex-a15", "props": {"pmu": true}}}}
@@ -131,7 +159,133 @@ After determining which CPU features are available and supported for a
given CPU type, then they may be selectively enabled or disabled on the
QEMU command line with that CPU type::
- $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,pmu=off
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,pmu=off,sve=on,sve128=on,sve256=on
-The example above disables the PMU for the `max` CPU type.
+The example above disables the PMU and enables the first two SVE vector
+lengths for the `max` CPU type. Note, the `sve=on` isn't actually
+necessary, because, as we observed above with our probe of the `max` CPU
+type, `sve` is already on by default. Also, based on our probe of
+defaults, it would seem we need to disable many SVE vector lengths, rather
+than only enabling the two we want. This isn't the case, because, as
+disabling many SVE vector lengths would be quite verbose, the `sve<N>` CPU
+properties have special semantics (see "SVE CPU Property Parsing
+Semantics").
+
+SVE CPU Properties
+==================
+
+There are two types of SVE CPU properties: `sve` and `sve<N>`. The first
+is used to enable or disable the entire SVE feature, just as the `pmu`
+CPU property completely enables or disables the PMU. The second type
+is used to enable or disable specific vector lengths, where `N` is the
+number of bits of the length. The `sve<N>` CPU properties have special
+dependencies and constraints, see "SVE CPU Property Dependencies and
+Constraints" below. Additionally, as we want all supported vector lengths
+to be enabled by default, then, in order to avoid overly verbose command
+lines (command lines full of `sve<N>=off`, for all `N` not wanted), we
+provide the parsing semantics listed in "SVE CPU Property Parsing
+Semantics".
+
+SVE CPU Property Dependencies and Constraints
+---------------------------------------------
+
+ 1) At least one vector length must be enabled when `sve` is enabled.
+
+ 2) If a vector length `N` is enabled, then all power-of-two vector
+ lengths smaller than `N` must also be enabled. E.g. if `sve512`
+ is enabled, then the 128-bit and 256-bit vector lengths must also
+ be enabled.
+
+SVE CPU Property Parsing Semantics
+----------------------------------
+
+ 1) If SVE is disabled (`sve=off`), then which SVE vector lengths
+ are enabled or disabled is irrelevant to the guest, as the entire
+ SVE feature is disabled and that disables all vector lengths for
+ the guest. However QEMU will still track any `sve<N>` CPU
+ properties provided by the user. If later an `sve=on` is provided,
+ then the guest will get only the enabled lengths. If no `sve=on`
+ is provided and there are explicitly enabled vector lengths, then
+ an error is generated.
+
+ 2) If SVE is enabled (`sve=on`), but no `sve<N>` CPU properties are
+ provided, then all supported vector lengths are enabled, including
+ the non-power-of-two lengths.
+
+ 3) If SVE is enabled, then an error is generated when attempting to
+ disable the last enabled vector length (see constraint (1) of "SVE
+ CPU Property Dependencies and Constraints").
+
+ 4) If one or more vector lengths have been explicitly enabled and at
+ at least one of the dependency lengths of the maximum enabled length
+ has been explicitly disabled, then an error is generated (see
+ constraint (2) of "SVE CPU Property Dependencies and Constraints").
+
+ 5) If one or more `sve<N>` CPU properties are set `off`, but no `sve<N>`,
+ CPU properties are set `on`, then the specified vector lengths are
+ disabled but the default for any unspecified lengths remains enabled.
+ Disabling a power-of-two vector length also disables all vector
+ lengths larger than the power-of-two length (see constraint (2) of
+ "SVE CPU Property Dependencies and Constraints").
+
+ 6) If one or more `sve<N>` CPU properties are set to `on`, then they
+ are enabled and all unspecified lengths default to disabled, except
+ for the required lengths per constraint (2) of "SVE CPU Property
+ Dependencies and Constraints", which will even be auto-enabled if
+ they were not explicitly enabled.
+
+ 7) If SVE was disabled (`sve=off`), allowing all vector lengths to be
+ explicitly disabled (i.e. avoiding the error specified in (3) of
+ "SVE CPU Property Parsing Semantics"), then if later an `sve=on` is
+ provided an error will be generated. To avoid this error, one must
+ enable at least one vector length prior to enabling SVE.
+
+SVE CPU Property Examples
+-------------------------
+
+ 1) Disable SVE::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve=off
+
+ 2) Implicitly enable all vector lengths for the `max` CPU type::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max
+
+ 3) Only enable the 128-bit vector length::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve128=on
+
+ 4) Disable the 512-bit vector length and all larger vector lengths,
+ since 512 is a power-of-two. This results in all the smaller,
+ uninitialized lengths (128, 256, and 384) defaulting to enabled::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve512=off
+
+ 5) Enable the 128-bit, 256-bit, and 512-bit vector lengths::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve128=on,sve256=on,sve512=on
+
+ 6) The same as (5), but since the 128-bit and 256-bit vector
+ lengths are required for the 512-bit vector length to be enabled,
+ then allow them to be auto-enabled::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve512=on
+
+ 7) Do the same as (6), but by first disabling SVE and then re-enabling it::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve=off,sve512=on,sve=on
+
+ 8) Force errors regarding the last vector length::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve128=off
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve=off,sve128=off,sve=on
+
+SVE CPU Property Recommendations
+--------------------------------
+
+The examples in "SVE CPU Property Examples" exhibit many ways to select
+vector lengths which developers may find useful in order to avoid overly
+verbose command lines. However, the recommended way to select vector
+lengths is to explicitly enable each desired length. Therefore only
+example's (1), (3), and (5) exhibit recommended uses of the properties.
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-12 10:23 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-13 20:17 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-12 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: QEMU Developers
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 08:51, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>
> Introduce cpu properties to give fine control over SVE vector lengths.
> We introduce a property for each valid length up to the current
> maximum supported, which is 2048-bits. The properties are named, e.g.
> sve128, sve256, sve384, sve512, ..., where the number is the number of
> bits. See the updates to docs/arm-cpu-features.rst for a description
> of the semantics and for example uses.
>
Hi; Coverity complains (CID 1407217) about an "overflowed return value":
> +static uint32_t sve_zcr_get_valid_len(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t start_len)
> +{
> + uint32_t start_vq = (start_len & 0xf) + 1;
> +
> + return arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1) - 1;
"Subtract operation overflows on operands
arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1U) and 1U"
Certainly it looks as if arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller() can
return 0, and claiming the valid length to be UINT_MAX
seems a bit odd in that case.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties
2019-11-12 10:23 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-13 20:17 ` Richard Henderson
2019-11-13 21:30 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2019-11-13 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell, QEMU Developers
On 11/12/19 11:23 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> +static uint32_t sve_zcr_get_valid_len(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t start_len)
>> +{
>> + uint32_t start_vq = (start_len & 0xf) + 1;
>> +
>> + return arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1) - 1;
>
> "Subtract operation overflows on operands
> arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1U) and 1U"
>
> Certainly it looks as if arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller() can
> return 0, and claiming the valid length to be UINT_MAX
> seems a bit odd in that case.
The lsb is always set in the map, the minimum number we send to next_smaller is
2 -> so the minimum number returned from next_smaller is 1.
We should never return UINT_MAX.
> return bitnum == vq - 1 ? 0 : bitnum + 1;
But yes, this computation doesn't seem right.
The beginning assert should probably be (vq >= 2 ...)
and here we should assert bitnum != vq - 1.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties
2019-11-13 20:17 ` Richard Henderson
@ 2019-11-13 21:30 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-15 8:29 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-13 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: QEMU Developers
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 20:17, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/12/19 11:23 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> +static uint32_t sve_zcr_get_valid_len(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t start_len)
> >> +{
> >> + uint32_t start_vq = (start_len & 0xf) + 1;
> >> +
> >> + return arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1) - 1;
> >
> > "Subtract operation overflows on operands
> > arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1U) and 1U"
> >
> > Certainly it looks as if arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller() can
> > return 0, and claiming the valid length to be UINT_MAX
> > seems a bit odd in that case.
>
> The lsb is always set in the map, the minimum number we send to next_smaller is
> 2 -> so the minimum number returned from next_smaller is 1.
>
> We should never return UINT_MAX.
>
> > return bitnum == vq - 1 ? 0 : bitnum + 1;
>
> But yes, this computation doesn't seem right.
>
> The beginning assert should probably be (vq >= 2 ...)
> and here we should assert bitnum != vq - 1.
Coverity may also be looking at the case where
TARGET_AARCH64 is not defined. The fallback definition
of arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller() for that situation
always returns 0.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties
2019-11-13 21:30 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-15 8:29 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2019-11-15 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: QEMU Developers
On 11/13/19 10:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Coverity may also be looking at the case where
> TARGET_AARCH64 is not defined. The fallback definition
> of arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller() for that situation
> always returns 0.
Yeah, that makes more sense.
I think we can make the fallback g_assert_not_reached().
Testing a patch for all this.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [PULL 05/11] target/arm/kvm64: Add kvm_arch_get/put_sve
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 06/11] target/arm/kvm64: max cpu: Enable SVE when available Peter Maydell
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
These are the SVE equivalents to kvm_arch_get/put_fpsimd. Note, the
swabbing is different than it is for fpsmid because the vector format
is a little-endian stream of words.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Message-id: 20191031142734.8590-6-drjones@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/kvm64.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 156 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
index 28f6db57d5e..4c0b11d105a 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
@@ -671,11 +671,12 @@ int kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
bool kvm_arm_reg_syncs_via_cpreg_list(uint64_t regidx)
{
/* Return true if the regidx is a register we should synchronize
- * via the cpreg_tuples array (ie is not a core reg we sync by
- * hand in kvm_arch_get/put_registers())
+ * via the cpreg_tuples array (ie is not a core or sve reg that
+ * we sync by hand in kvm_arch_get/put_registers())
*/
switch (regidx & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) {
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE:
+ case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE:
return false;
default:
return true;
@@ -721,10 +722,8 @@ int kvm_arm_cpreg_level(uint64_t regidx)
static int kvm_arch_put_fpsimd(CPUState *cs)
{
- ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
- CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
+ CPUARMState *env = &ARM_CPU(cs)->env;
struct kvm_one_reg reg;
- uint32_t fpr;
int i, ret;
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
@@ -742,17 +741,73 @@ static int kvm_arch_put_fpsimd(CPUState *cs)
}
}
- reg.addr = (uintptr_t)(&fpr);
- fpr = vfp_get_fpsr(env);
- reg.id = AARCH64_SIMD_CTRL_REG(fp_regs.fpsr);
- ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®);
- if (ret) {
- return ret;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * SVE registers are encoded in KVM's memory in an endianness-invariant format.
+ * The byte at offset i from the start of the in-memory representation contains
+ * the bits [(7 + 8 * i) : (8 * i)] of the register value. As this means the
+ * lowest offsets are stored in the lowest memory addresses, then that nearly
+ * matches QEMU's representation, which is to use an array of host-endian
+ * uint64_t's, where the lower offsets are at the lower indices. To complete
+ * the translation we just need to byte swap the uint64_t's on big-endian hosts.
+ */
+static uint64_t *sve_bswap64(uint64_t *dst, uint64_t *src, int nr)
+{
+#ifdef HOST_WORDS_BIGENDIAN
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr; ++i) {
+ dst[i] = bswap64(src[i]);
}
- reg.addr = (uintptr_t)(&fpr);
- fpr = vfp_get_fpcr(env);
- reg.id = AARCH64_SIMD_CTRL_REG(fp_regs.fpcr);
+ return dst;
+#else
+ return src;
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
+ * KVM SVE registers come in slices where ZREGs have a slice size of 2048 bits
+ * and PREGS and the FFR have a slice size of 256 bits. However we simply hard
+ * code the slice index to zero for now as it's unlikely we'll need more than
+ * one slice for quite some time.
+ */
+static int kvm_arch_put_sve(CPUState *cs)
+{
+ ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
+ CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
+ uint64_t tmp[ARM_MAX_VQ * 2];
+ uint64_t *r;
+ struct kvm_one_reg reg;
+ int n, ret;
+
+ for (n = 0; n < KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_ZREGS; ++n) {
+ r = sve_bswap64(tmp, &env->vfp.zregs[n].d[0], cpu->sve_max_vq * 2);
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)r;
+ reg.id = KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(n, 0);
+ ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (n = 0; n < KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_PREGS; ++n) {
+ r = sve_bswap64(tmp, r = &env->vfp.pregs[n].p[0],
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(cpu->sve_max_vq * 2, 8));
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)r;
+ reg.id = KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(n, 0);
+ ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ r = sve_bswap64(tmp, &env->vfp.pregs[FFR_PRED_NUM].p[0],
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(cpu->sve_max_vq * 2, 8));
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)r;
+ reg.id = KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR(0);
ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
@@ -765,6 +820,7 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
{
struct kvm_one_reg reg;
uint64_t val;
+ uint32_t fpr;
int i, ret;
unsigned int el;
@@ -855,7 +911,27 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
}
}
- ret = kvm_arch_put_fpsimd(cs);
+ if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
+ ret = kvm_arch_put_sve(cs);
+ } else {
+ ret = kvm_arch_put_fpsimd(cs);
+ }
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)(&fpr);
+ fpr = vfp_get_fpsr(env);
+ reg.id = AARCH64_SIMD_CTRL_REG(fp_regs.fpsr);
+ ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)(&fpr);
+ fpr = vfp_get_fpcr(env);
+ reg.id = AARCH64_SIMD_CTRL_REG(fp_regs.fpcr);
+ ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
@@ -878,10 +954,8 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
static int kvm_arch_get_fpsimd(CPUState *cs)
{
- ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
- CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
+ CPUARMState *env = &ARM_CPU(cs)->env;
struct kvm_one_reg reg;
- uint32_t fpr;
int i, ret;
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
@@ -899,21 +973,53 @@ static int kvm_arch_get_fpsimd(CPUState *cs)
}
}
- reg.addr = (uintptr_t)(&fpr);
- reg.id = AARCH64_SIMD_CTRL_REG(fp_regs.fpsr);
- ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
- if (ret) {
- return ret;
- }
- vfp_set_fpsr(env, fpr);
+ return 0;
+}
- reg.addr = (uintptr_t)(&fpr);
- reg.id = AARCH64_SIMD_CTRL_REG(fp_regs.fpcr);
+/*
+ * KVM SVE registers come in slices where ZREGs have a slice size of 2048 bits
+ * and PREGS and the FFR have a slice size of 256 bits. However we simply hard
+ * code the slice index to zero for now as it's unlikely we'll need more than
+ * one slice for quite some time.
+ */
+static int kvm_arch_get_sve(CPUState *cs)
+{
+ ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
+ CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
+ struct kvm_one_reg reg;
+ uint64_t *r;
+ int n, ret;
+
+ for (n = 0; n < KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_ZREGS; ++n) {
+ r = &env->vfp.zregs[n].d[0];
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)r;
+ reg.id = KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(n, 0);
+ ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+ sve_bswap64(r, r, cpu->sve_max_vq * 2);
+ }
+
+ for (n = 0; n < KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_PREGS; ++n) {
+ r = &env->vfp.pregs[n].p[0];
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)r;
+ reg.id = KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(n, 0);
+ ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+ sve_bswap64(r, r, DIV_ROUND_UP(cpu->sve_max_vq * 2, 8));
+ }
+
+ r = &env->vfp.pregs[FFR_PRED_NUM].p[0];
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)r;
+ reg.id = KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR(0);
ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
- vfp_set_fpcr(env, fpr);
+ sve_bswap64(r, r, DIV_ROUND_UP(cpu->sve_max_vq * 2, 8));
return 0;
}
@@ -923,6 +1029,7 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
struct kvm_one_reg reg;
uint64_t val;
unsigned int el;
+ uint32_t fpr;
int i, ret;
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
@@ -1012,11 +1119,31 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
env->spsr = env->banked_spsr[i];
}
- ret = kvm_arch_get_fpsimd(cs);
+ if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
+ ret = kvm_arch_get_sve(cs);
+ } else {
+ ret = kvm_arch_get_fpsimd(cs);
+ }
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)(&fpr);
+ reg.id = AARCH64_SIMD_CTRL_REG(fp_regs.fpsr);
+ ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+ vfp_set_fpsr(env, fpr);
+
+ reg.addr = (uintptr_t)(&fpr);
+ reg.id = AARCH64_SIMD_CTRL_REG(fp_regs.fpcr);
+ ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+ vfp_set_fpcr(env, fpr);
+
ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu);
if (ret) {
return ret;
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* [PULL 06/11] target/arm/kvm64: max cpu: Enable SVE when available
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 05/11] target/arm/kvm64: Add kvm_arch_get/put_sve Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 07/11] target/arm/kvm: scratch vcpu: Preserve input kvm_vcpu_init features Peter Maydell
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Enable SVE in the KVM guest when the 'max' cpu type is configured
and KVM supports it. KVM SVE requires use of the new finalize
vcpu ioctl, so we add that now too. For starters SVE can only be
turned on or off, getting all vector lengths the host CPU supports
when on. We'll add the other SVE CPU properties in later patches.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20191031142734.8590-7-drjones@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/kvm_arm.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target/arm/cpu64.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
target/arm/kvm.c | 5 +++++
target/arm/kvm64.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
tests/arm-cpu-features.c | 4 ++++
5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
index b4e19457a09..7c12f1501a8 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -27,6 +27,20 @@
*/
int kvm_arm_vcpu_init(CPUState *cs);
+/**
+ * kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize
+ * @cs: CPUState
+ * @feature: int
+ *
+ * Finalizes the configuration of the specified VCPU feature by
+ * invoking the KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE ioctl. Features requiring
+ * this are documented in the "KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE" section of
+ * KVM's API documentation.
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 if success else < 0 error code
+ */
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize(CPUState *cs, int feature);
+
/**
* kvm_arm_register_device:
* @mr: memory region for this device
@@ -225,6 +239,14 @@ bool kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(CPUState *cs);
*/
bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(CPUState *cs);
+/**
+ * bool kvm_arm_sve_supported:
+ * @cs: CPUState
+ *
+ * Returns true if the KVM VCPU can enable SVE and false otherwise.
+ */
+bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPUState *cs);
+
/**
* kvm_arm_get_max_vm_ipa_size - Returns the number of bits in the
* IPA address space supported by KVM
@@ -276,6 +298,11 @@ static inline bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(CPUState *cs)
return false;
}
+static inline bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPUState *cs)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline int kvm_arm_get_max_vm_ipa_size(MachineState *ms)
{
return -ENOENT;
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index 34b0ba2cf6f..a771a28daa5 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -493,6 +493,11 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
return;
}
+ if (value && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
+ error_setg(errp, "'sve' feature not supported by KVM on this host");
+ return;
+ }
+
t = cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0;
t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE, value);
cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = t;
@@ -507,11 +512,16 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
uint32_t vq;
+ uint64_t t;
if (kvm_enabled()) {
kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
+ if (kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
+ t = cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0;
+ t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE, 1);
+ cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = t;
+ }
} else {
- uint64_t t;
uint32_t u;
aarch64_a57_initfn(obj);
@@ -612,8 +622,6 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
- object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
- cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
char name[8];
@@ -622,6 +630,9 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
cpu_arm_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
}
}
+
+ object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
+ cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
}
struct ARMCPUInfo {
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c
index b473c63edb1..f07332bbda3 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm.c
@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_init(CPUState *cs)
return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, &init);
}
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize(CPUState *cs, int feature)
+{
+ return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE, &feature);
+}
+
void kvm_arm_init_serror_injection(CPUState *cs)
{
cap_has_inject_serror_esr = kvm_check_extension(cs->kvm_state,
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
index 4c0b11d105a..850da1b5e6a 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
@@ -602,6 +602,13 @@ bool kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(CPUState *cpu)
return kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ARM_EL1_32BIT);
}
+bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPUState *cpu)
+{
+ KVMState *s = KVM_STATE(current_machine->accelerator);
+
+ return kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE);
+}
+
#define ARM_CPU_ID_MPIDR 3, 0, 0, 0, 5
int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
@@ -630,13 +637,17 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
cpu->kvm_init_features[0] |= 1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT;
}
if (!kvm_check_extension(cs->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3)) {
- cpu->has_pmu = false;
+ cpu->has_pmu = false;
}
if (cpu->has_pmu) {
cpu->kvm_init_features[0] |= 1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3;
} else {
unset_feature(&env->features, ARM_FEATURE_PMU);
}
+ if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
+ assert(kvm_arm_sve_supported(cs));
+ cpu->kvm_init_features[0] |= 1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE;
+ }
/* Do KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT ioctl */
ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_init(cs);
@@ -644,6 +655,13 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
return ret;
}
+ if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
+ ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize(cs, KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
/*
* When KVM is in use, PSCI is emulated in-kernel and not by qemu.
* Currently KVM has its own idea about MPIDR assignment, so we
diff --git a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
index 7fd01f0ea3f..015b511c87e 100644
--- a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
+++ b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -417,12 +417,16 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "aarch64");
assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "pmu");
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "sve");
+
assert_error(qts, "cortex-a15",
"We cannot guarantee the CPU type 'cortex-a15' works "
"with KVM on this host", NULL);
} else {
assert_has_not_feature(qts, "host", "aarch64");
assert_has_not_feature(qts, "host", "pmu");
+
+ assert_has_not_feature(qts, "max", "sve");
}
qtest_quit(qts);
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* [PULL 07/11] target/arm/kvm: scratch vcpu: Preserve input kvm_vcpu_init features
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 06/11] target/arm/kvm64: max cpu: Enable SVE when available Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 08/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Support sve properties with KVM Peter Maydell
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu() takes a struct kvm_vcpu_init
parameter. Rather than just using it as an output parameter to
pass back the preferred target, use it also as an input parameter,
allowing a caller to pass a selected target if they wish and to
also pass cpu features. If the caller doesn't want to select a
target they can pass -1 for the target which indicates they want
to use the preferred target and have it passed back like before.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20191031142734.8590-8-drjones@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/kvm.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
target/arm/kvm32.c | 6 +++++-
target/arm/kvm64.c | 6 +++++-
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c
index f07332bbda3..5b82cefef60 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(const uint32_t *cpus_to_try,
int *fdarray,
struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
{
- int ret, kvmfd = -1, vmfd = -1, cpufd = -1;
+ int ret = 0, kvmfd = -1, vmfd = -1, cpufd = -1;
kvmfd = qemu_open("/dev/kvm", O_RDWR);
if (kvmfd < 0) {
@@ -86,7 +86,14 @@ bool kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(const uint32_t *cpus_to_try,
goto finish;
}
- ret = ioctl(vmfd, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, init);
+ if (init->target == -1) {
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init preferred;
+
+ ret = ioctl(vmfd, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &preferred);
+ if (!ret) {
+ init->target = preferred.target;
+ }
+ }
if (ret >= 0) {
ret = ioctl(cpufd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, init);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -98,10 +105,12 @@ bool kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(const uint32_t *cpus_to_try,
* creating one kind of guest CPU which is its preferred
* CPU type.
*/
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init try;
+
while (*cpus_to_try != QEMU_KVM_ARM_TARGET_NONE) {
- init->target = *cpus_to_try++;
- memset(init->features, 0, sizeof(init->features));
- ret = ioctl(cpufd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, init);
+ try.target = *cpus_to_try++;
+ memcpy(try.features, init->features, sizeof(init->features));
+ ret = ioctl(cpufd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, &try);
if (ret >= 0) {
break;
}
@@ -109,6 +118,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(const uint32_t *cpus_to_try,
if (ret < 0) {
goto err;
}
+ init->target = try.target;
} else {
/* Treat a NULL cpus_to_try argument the same as an empty
* list, which means we will fail the call since this must
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm32.c b/target/arm/kvm32.c
index 2451a2d4bbe..32bf8d6757c 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm32.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm32.c
@@ -53,7 +53,11 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
QEMU_KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A15,
QEMU_KVM_ARM_TARGET_NONE
};
- struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
+ /*
+ * target = -1 informs kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu()
+ * to use the preferred target
+ */
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, };
if (!kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(cpus_to_try, fdarray, &init)) {
return false;
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
index 850da1b5e6a..c7ecefbed72 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
@@ -502,7 +502,11 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57,
QEMU_KVM_ARM_TARGET_NONE
};
- struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
+ /*
+ * target = -1 informs kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu()
+ * to use the preferred target
+ */
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, };
if (!kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(cpus_to_try, fdarray, &init)) {
return false;
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* [PULL 08/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Support sve properties with KVM
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 07/11] target/arm/kvm: scratch vcpu: Preserve input kvm_vcpu_init features Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 09/11] target/arm/kvm: host cpu: Add support for sve<N> properties Peter Maydell
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Extend the SVE vq map initialization and validation with KVM's
supported vector lengths when KVM is enabled. In order to determine
and select supported lengths we add two new KVM functions for getting
and setting the KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS pseudo-register.
This patch has been co-authored with Richard Henderson, who reworked
the target/arm/cpu64.c changes in order to push all the validation and
auto-enabling/disabling steps into the finalizer, resulting in a nice
LOC reduction.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Message-id: 20191031142734.8590-9-drjones@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/kvm_arm.h | 12 +++
target/arm/cpu64.c | 176 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
target/arm/kvm64.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++-
tests/arm-cpu-features.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++-
docs/arm-cpu-features.rst | 45 +++++++---
5 files changed, 379 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
index 7c12f1501a8..8e14d400e8a 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -212,6 +212,17 @@ typedef struct ARMHostCPUFeatures {
*/
bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf);
+/**
+ * kvm_arm_sve_get_vls:
+ * @cs: CPUState
+ * @map: bitmap to fill in
+ *
+ * Get all the SVE vector lengths supported by the KVM host, setting
+ * the bits corresponding to their length in quadwords minus one
+ * (vq - 1) in @map up to ARM_MAX_VQ.
+ */
+void kvm_arm_sve_get_vls(CPUState *cs, unsigned long *map);
+
/**
* kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host:
* @cpu: ARMCPU to set the features for
@@ -316,6 +327,7 @@ static inline int kvm_arm_vgic_probe(void)
static inline void kvm_arm_pmu_set_irq(CPUState *cs, int irq) {}
static inline void kvm_arm_pmu_init(CPUState *cs) {}
+static inline void kvm_arm_sve_get_vls(CPUState *cs, unsigned long *map) {}
#endif
static inline const char *gic_class_name(void)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index a771a28daa5..c161a146ff0 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -273,9 +273,18 @@ void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
* any of the above. Finally, if SVE is not disabled, then at least one
* vector length must be enabled.
*/
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(kvm_supported, ARM_MAX_VQ);
DECLARE_BITMAP(tmp, ARM_MAX_VQ);
uint32_t vq, max_vq = 0;
+ /* Collect the set of vector lengths supported by KVM. */
+ bitmap_zero(kvm_supported, ARM_MAX_VQ);
+ if (kvm_enabled() && kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
+ kvm_arm_sve_get_vls(CPU(cpu), kvm_supported);
+ } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
+ assert(!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu));
+ }
+
/*
* Process explicit sve<N> properties.
* From the properties, sve_vq_map<N> implies sve_vq_init<N>.
@@ -293,10 +302,19 @@ void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
return;
}
- /* Propagate enabled bits down through required powers-of-two. */
- for (vq = pow2floor(max_vq); vq >= 1; vq >>= 1) {
- if (!test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
- set_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map);
+ if (kvm_enabled()) {
+ /*
+ * For KVM we have to automatically enable all supported unitialized
+ * lengths, even when the smaller lengths are not all powers-of-two.
+ */
+ bitmap_andnot(tmp, kvm_supported, cpu->sve_vq_init, max_vq);
+ bitmap_or(cpu->sve_vq_map, cpu->sve_vq_map, tmp, max_vq);
+ } else {
+ /* Propagate enabled bits down through required powers-of-two. */
+ for (vq = pow2floor(max_vq); vq >= 1; vq >>= 1) {
+ if (!test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
+ set_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map);
+ }
}
}
} else if (cpu->sve_max_vq == 0) {
@@ -308,23 +326,45 @@ void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
return;
}
- /* Disabling a power-of-two disables all larger lengths. */
- if (test_bit(0, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
- error_setg(errp, "cannot disable sve128");
- error_append_hint(errp, "Disabling sve128 results in all vector "
- "lengths being disabled.\n");
- error_append_hint(errp, "With SVE enabled, at least one vector "
- "length must be enabled.\n");
- return;
- }
- for (vq = 2; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; vq <<= 1) {
- if (test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
- break;
+ if (kvm_enabled()) {
+ /* Disabling a supported length disables all larger lengths. */
+ for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
+ if (test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init) &&
+ test_bit(vq - 1, kvm_supported)) {
+ break;
+ }
}
+ max_vq = vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ ? vq - 1 : ARM_MAX_VQ;
+ bitmap_andnot(cpu->sve_vq_map, kvm_supported,
+ cpu->sve_vq_init, max_vq);
+ if (max_vq == 0 || bitmap_empty(cpu->sve_vq_map, max_vq)) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot disable sve%d", vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "Disabling sve%d results in all "
+ "vector lengths being disabled.\n",
+ vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "With SVE enabled, at least one "
+ "vector length must be enabled.\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ } else {
+ /* Disabling a power-of-two disables all larger lengths. */
+ if (test_bit(0, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot disable sve128");
+ error_append_hint(errp, "Disabling sve128 results in all "
+ "vector lengths being disabled.\n");
+ error_append_hint(errp, "With SVE enabled, at least one "
+ "vector length must be enabled.\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ for (vq = 2; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; vq <<= 1) {
+ if (test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init)) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ max_vq = vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ ? vq - 1 : ARM_MAX_VQ;
+ bitmap_complement(cpu->sve_vq_map, cpu->sve_vq_init, max_vq);
}
- max_vq = vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ ? vq - 1 : ARM_MAX_VQ;
- bitmap_complement(cpu->sve_vq_map, cpu->sve_vq_init, max_vq);
max_vq = find_last_bit(cpu->sve_vq_map, max_vq) + 1;
}
@@ -358,16 +398,48 @@ void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
assert(max_vq != 0);
bitmap_clear(cpu->sve_vq_map, max_vq, ARM_MAX_VQ - max_vq);
- /* Ensure all required powers-of-two are enabled. */
- for (vq = pow2floor(max_vq); vq >= 1; vq >>= 1) {
- if (!test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map)) {
- error_setg(errp, "cannot disable sve%d", vq * 128);
- error_append_hint(errp, "sve%d is required as it "
- "is a power-of-two length smaller than "
- "the maximum, sve%d\n",
- vq * 128, max_vq * 128);
+ if (kvm_enabled()) {
+ /* Ensure the set of lengths matches what KVM supports. */
+ bitmap_xor(tmp, cpu->sve_vq_map, kvm_supported, max_vq);
+ if (!bitmap_empty(tmp, max_vq)) {
+ vq = find_last_bit(tmp, max_vq) + 1;
+ if (test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map)) {
+ if (cpu->sve_max_vq) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot set sve-max-vq=%d",
+ cpu->sve_max_vq);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "This KVM host does not support "
+ "the vector length %d-bits.\n",
+ vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "It may not be possible to use "
+ "sve-max-vq with this KVM host. Try "
+ "using only sve<N> properties.\n");
+ } else {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot enable sve%d", vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "This KVM host does not support "
+ "the vector length %d-bits.\n",
+ vq * 128);
+ }
+ } else {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot disable sve%d", vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "The KVM host requires all "
+ "supported vector lengths smaller "
+ "than %d bits to also be enabled.\n",
+ max_vq * 128);
+ }
return;
}
+ } else {
+ /* Ensure all required powers-of-two are enabled. */
+ for (vq = pow2floor(max_vq); vq >= 1; vq >>= 1) {
+ if (!test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map)) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot disable sve%d", vq * 128);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "sve%d is required as it "
+ "is a power-of-two length smaller than "
+ "the maximum, sve%d\n",
+ vq * 128, max_vq * 128);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
}
/*
@@ -421,15 +493,28 @@ static void cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
Error *err = NULL;
+ uint32_t max_vq;
- visit_type_uint32(v, name, &cpu->sve_max_vq, &err);
-
- if (!err && (cpu->sve_max_vq == 0 || cpu->sve_max_vq > ARM_MAX_VQ)) {
- error_setg(&err, "unsupported SVE vector length");
- error_append_hint(&err, "Valid sve-max-vq in range [1-%d]\n",
- ARM_MAX_VQ);
+ visit_type_uint32(v, name, &max_vq, &err);
+ if (err) {
+ error_propagate(errp, err);
+ return;
}
- error_propagate(errp, err);
+
+ if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot set sve-max-vq");
+ error_append_hint(errp, "SVE not supported by KVM on this host\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (max_vq == 0 || max_vq > ARM_MAX_VQ) {
+ error_setg(errp, "unsupported SVE vector length");
+ error_append_hint(errp, "Valid sve-max-vq in range [1-%d]\n",
+ ARM_MAX_VQ);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ cpu->sve_max_vq = max_vq;
}
static void cpu_arm_get_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
@@ -462,6 +547,12 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
return;
}
+ if (value && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot enable %s", name);
+ error_append_hint(errp, "SVE not supported by KVM on this host\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
if (value) {
set_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map);
} else {
@@ -619,20 +710,19 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
cpu->ctr = 0x80038003; /* 32 byte I and D cacheline size, VIPT icache */
cpu->dcz_blocksize = 7; /* 512 bytes */
#endif
-
- object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
- cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
-
- for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
- char name[8];
- sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
- object_property_add(obj, name, "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve_vq,
- cpu_arm_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
- }
}
object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+ object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
+ cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+
+ for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
+ char name[8];
+ sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
+ object_property_add(obj, name, "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve_vq,
+ cpu_arm_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+ }
}
struct ARMCPUInfo {
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
index c7ecefbed72..c93bbee425a 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
@@ -613,6 +613,100 @@ bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPUState *cpu)
return kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE);
}
+QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_ARM64_SVE_VQ_MIN != 1);
+
+void kvm_arm_sve_get_vls(CPUState *cs, unsigned long *map)
+{
+ /* Only call this function if kvm_arm_sve_supported() returns true. */
+ static uint64_t vls[KVM_ARM64_SVE_VLS_WORDS];
+ static bool probed;
+ uint32_t vq = 0;
+ int i, j;
+
+ bitmap_clear(map, 0, ARM_MAX_VQ);
+
+ /*
+ * KVM ensures all host CPUs support the same set of vector lengths.
+ * So we only need to create the scratch VCPUs once and then cache
+ * the results.
+ */
+ if (!probed) {
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init init = {
+ .target = -1,
+ .features[0] = (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE),
+ };
+ struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
+ .id = KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS,
+ .addr = (uint64_t)&vls[0],
+ };
+ int fdarray[3], ret;
+
+ probed = true;
+
+ if (!kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(NULL, fdarray, &init)) {
+ error_report("failed to create scratch VCPU with SVE enabled");
+ abort();
+ }
+ ret = ioctl(fdarray[2], KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
+ kvm_arm_destroy_scratch_host_vcpu(fdarray);
+ if (ret) {
+ error_report("failed to get KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS: %s",
+ strerror(errno));
+ abort();
+ }
+
+ for (i = KVM_ARM64_SVE_VLS_WORDS - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
+ if (vls[i]) {
+ vq = 64 - clz64(vls[i]) + i * 64;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (vq > ARM_MAX_VQ) {
+ warn_report("KVM supports vector lengths larger than "
+ "QEMU can enable");
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < KVM_ARM64_SVE_VLS_WORDS; ++i) {
+ if (!vls[i]) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ for (j = 1; j <= 64; ++j) {
+ vq = j + i * 64;
+ if (vq > ARM_MAX_VQ) {
+ return;
+ }
+ if (vls[i] & (1UL << (j - 1))) {
+ set_bit(vq - 1, map);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static int kvm_arm_sve_set_vls(CPUState *cs)
+{
+ uint64_t vls[KVM_ARM64_SVE_VLS_WORDS] = {0};
+ struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
+ .id = KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS,
+ .addr = (uint64_t)&vls[0],
+ };
+ ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
+ uint32_t vq;
+ int i, j;
+
+ assert(cpu->sve_max_vq <= KVM_ARM64_SVE_VQ_MAX);
+
+ for (vq = 1; vq <= cpu->sve_max_vq; ++vq) {
+ if (test_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_map)) {
+ i = (vq - 1) / 64;
+ j = (vq - 1) % 64;
+ vls[i] |= 1UL << j;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®);
+}
+
#define ARM_CPU_ID_MPIDR 3, 0, 0, 0, 5
int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
@@ -624,7 +718,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
if (cpu->kvm_target == QEMU_KVM_ARM_TARGET_NONE ||
!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(cpu), TYPE_AARCH64_CPU)) {
- fprintf(stderr, "KVM is not supported for this guest CPU type\n");
+ error_report("KVM is not supported for this guest CPU type");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -660,6 +754,10 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
}
if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
+ ret = kvm_arm_sve_set_vls(cs);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize(cs, KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE);
if (ret) {
return ret;
diff --git a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
index 015b511c87e..40d8395b7f7 100644
--- a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
+++ b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -130,6 +130,17 @@ static QDict *resp_get_props(QDict *resp)
return qdict;
}
+static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char *feature)
+{
+ QDict *props;
+
+ g_assert(resp);
+ g_assert(resp_has_props(resp));
+ props = resp_get_props(resp);
+ g_assert(qdict_get(props, feature));
+ return qdict_get_bool(props, feature);
+}
+
#define assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature) \
({ \
QDict *_resp = do_query_no_props(qts, cpu_type); \
@@ -359,6 +370,25 @@ static void sve_tests_sve_off(const void *data)
qtest_quit(qts);
}
+static void sve_tests_sve_off_kvm(const void *data)
+{
+ QTestState *qts;
+
+ qts = qtest_init(MACHINE_KVM "-cpu max,sve=off");
+
+ /*
+ * We don't know if this host supports SVE so we don't
+ * attempt to test enabling anything. We only test that
+ * everything is disabled (as it should be with sve=off)
+ * and that using sve<N>=off to explicitly disable vector
+ * lengths is OK too.
+ */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0, NULL);
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", 0, "{ 'sve128': false }");
+
+ qtest_quit(qts);
+}
+
static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
{
QTestState *qts;
@@ -414,14 +444,82 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
}
if (g_str_equal(qtest_get_arch(), "aarch64")) {
+ bool kvm_supports_sve;
+ char max_name[8], name[8];
+ uint32_t max_vq, vq;
+ uint64_t vls;
+ QDict *resp;
+ char *error;
+
assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "aarch64");
assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "pmu");
- assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "sve");
-
assert_error(qts, "cortex-a15",
"We cannot guarantee the CPU type 'cortex-a15' works "
"with KVM on this host", NULL);
+
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "sve");
+ resp = do_query_no_props(qts, "max");
+ kvm_supports_sve = resp_get_feature(resp, "sve");
+ vls = resp_get_sve_vls(resp);
+ qobject_unref(resp);
+
+ if (kvm_supports_sve) {
+ g_assert(vls != 0);
+ max_vq = 64 - __builtin_clzll(vls);
+ sprintf(max_name, "sve%d", max_vq * 128);
+
+ /* Enabling a supported length is of course fine. */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", vls, "{ %s: true }", max_name);
+
+ /* Get the next supported length smaller than max-vq. */
+ vq = 64 - __builtin_clzll(vls & ~BIT_ULL(max_vq - 1));
+ if (vq) {
+ /*
+ * We have at least one length smaller than max-vq,
+ * so we can disable max-vq.
+ */
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", (vls & ~BIT_ULL(max_vq - 1)),
+ "{ %s: false }", max_name);
+
+ /*
+ * Smaller, supported vector lengths cannot be disabled
+ * unless all larger, supported vector lengths are also
+ * disabled.
+ */
+ sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
+ error = g_strdup_printf("cannot disable %s", name);
+ assert_error(qts, "max", error,
+ "{ %s: true, %s: false }",
+ max_name, name);
+ g_free(error);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The smallest, supported vector length is required, because
+ * we need at least one vector length enabled.
+ */
+ vq = __builtin_ffsll(vls);
+ sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
+ error = g_strdup_printf("cannot disable %s", name);
+ assert_error(qts, "max", error, "{ %s: false }", name);
+ g_free(error);
+
+ /* Get an unsupported length. */
+ for (vq = 1; vq <= max_vq; ++vq) {
+ if (!(vls & BIT_ULL(vq - 1))) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (vq <= SVE_MAX_VQ) {
+ sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
+ error = g_strdup_printf("cannot enable %s", name);
+ assert_error(qts, "max", error, "{ %s: true }", name);
+ g_free(error);
+ }
+ } else {
+ g_assert(vls == 0);
+ }
} else {
assert_has_not_feature(qts, "host", "aarch64");
assert_has_not_feature(qts, "host", "pmu");
@@ -446,6 +544,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
NULL, sve_tests_sve_max_vq_8);
qtest_add_data_func("/arm/max/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-off",
NULL, sve_tests_sve_off);
+ qtest_add_data_func("/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-off",
+ NULL, sve_tests_sve_off_kvm);
}
return g_test_run();
diff --git a/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst b/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
index 2ea4d6e90c0..bed218d4461 100644
--- a/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
+++ b/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
@@ -191,10 +191,18 @@ SVE CPU Property Dependencies and Constraints
1) At least one vector length must be enabled when `sve` is enabled.
- 2) If a vector length `N` is enabled, then all power-of-two vector
- lengths smaller than `N` must also be enabled. E.g. if `sve512`
- is enabled, then the 128-bit and 256-bit vector lengths must also
- be enabled.
+ 2) If a vector length `N` is enabled, then, when KVM is enabled, all
+ smaller, host supported vector lengths must also be enabled. If
+ KVM is not enabled, then only all the smaller, power-of-two vector
+ lengths must be enabled. E.g. with KVM if the host supports all
+ vector lengths up to 512-bits (128, 256, 384, 512), then if `sve512`
+ is enabled, the 128-bit vector length, 256-bit vector length, and
+ 384-bit vector length must also be enabled. Without KVM, the 384-bit
+ vector length would not be required.
+
+ 3) If KVM is enabled then only vector lengths that the host CPU type
+ support may be enabled. If SVE is not supported by the host, then
+ no `sve*` properties may be enabled.
SVE CPU Property Parsing Semantics
----------------------------------
@@ -209,8 +217,10 @@ SVE CPU Property Parsing Semantics
an error is generated.
2) If SVE is enabled (`sve=on`), but no `sve<N>` CPU properties are
- provided, then all supported vector lengths are enabled, including
- the non-power-of-two lengths.
+ provided, then all supported vector lengths are enabled, which when
+ KVM is not in use means including the non-power-of-two lengths, and,
+ when KVM is in use, it means all vector lengths supported by the host
+ processor.
3) If SVE is enabled, then an error is generated when attempting to
disable the last enabled vector length (see constraint (1) of "SVE
@@ -221,20 +231,31 @@ SVE CPU Property Parsing Semantics
has been explicitly disabled, then an error is generated (see
constraint (2) of "SVE CPU Property Dependencies and Constraints").
- 5) If one or more `sve<N>` CPU properties are set `off`, but no `sve<N>`,
+ 5) When KVM is enabled, if the host does not support SVE, then an error
+ is generated when attempting to enable any `sve*` properties (see
+ constraint (3) of "SVE CPU Property Dependencies and Constraints").
+
+ 6) When KVM is enabled, if the host does support SVE, then an error is
+ generated when attempting to enable any vector lengths not supported
+ by the host (see constraint (3) of "SVE CPU Property Dependencies and
+ Constraints").
+
+ 7) If one or more `sve<N>` CPU properties are set `off`, but no `sve<N>`,
CPU properties are set `on`, then the specified vector lengths are
disabled but the default for any unspecified lengths remains enabled.
- Disabling a power-of-two vector length also disables all vector
- lengths larger than the power-of-two length (see constraint (2) of
- "SVE CPU Property Dependencies and Constraints").
+ When KVM is not enabled, disabling a power-of-two vector length also
+ disables all vector lengths larger than the power-of-two length.
+ When KVM is enabled, then disabling any supported vector length also
+ disables all larger vector lengths (see constraint (2) of "SVE CPU
+ Property Dependencies and Constraints").
- 6) If one or more `sve<N>` CPU properties are set to `on`, then they
+ 8) If one or more `sve<N>` CPU properties are set to `on`, then they
are enabled and all unspecified lengths default to disabled, except
for the required lengths per constraint (2) of "SVE CPU Property
Dependencies and Constraints", which will even be auto-enabled if
they were not explicitly enabled.
- 7) If SVE was disabled (`sve=off`), allowing all vector lengths to be
+ 9) If SVE was disabled (`sve=off`), allowing all vector lengths to be
explicitly disabled (i.e. avoiding the error specified in (3) of
"SVE CPU Property Parsing Semantics"), then if later an `sve=on` is
provided an error will be generated. To avoid this error, one must
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* [PULL 09/11] target/arm/kvm: host cpu: Add support for sve<N> properties
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 08/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Support sve properties with KVM Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2022-02-03 16:46 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 10/11] hw/arm/boot: Rebuild hflags when modifying CPUState at boot Peter Maydell
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Allow cpu 'host' to enable SVE when it's available, unless the
user chooses to disable it with the added 'sve=off' cpu property.
Also give the user the ability to select vector lengths with the
sve<N> properties. We don't adopt 'max' cpu's other sve property,
sve-max-vq, because that property is difficult to use with KVM.
That property assumes all vector lengths in the range from 1 up
to and including the specified maximum length are supported, but
there may be optional lengths not supported by the host in that
range. With KVM one must be more specific when enabling vector
lengths.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Message-id: 20191031142734.8590-10-drjones@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 2 ++
target/arm/cpu.c | 3 +++
target/arm/cpu64.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
target/arm/kvm64.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
tests/arm-cpu-features.c | 17 ++++++++---------
docs/arm-cpu-features.rst | 19 ++++++++++++-------
6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index a044d6028b6..e1a66a2d1cc 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -977,11 +977,13 @@ int aarch64_cpu_gdb_write_register(CPUState *cpu, uint8_t *buf, int reg);
void aarch64_sve_narrow_vq(CPUARMState *env, unsigned vq);
void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int old_el,
int new_el, bool el0_a64);
+void aarch64_add_sve_properties(Object *obj);
#else
static inline void aarch64_sve_narrow_vq(CPUARMState *env, unsigned vq) { }
static inline void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int o,
int n, bool a)
{ }
+static inline void aarch64_add_sve_properties(Object *obj) { }
#endif
#if !defined(CONFIG_TCG)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index 17d1f2b2894..7a4ac9339bf 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -2670,6 +2670,9 @@ static void arm_host_initfn(Object *obj)
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
+ if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
+ aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj);
+ }
arm_cpu_post_init(obj);
}
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index c161a146ff0..68baf0482ff 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -594,6 +594,21 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = t;
}
+void aarch64_add_sve_properties(Object *obj)
+{
+ uint32_t vq;
+
+ object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
+ cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+
+ for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
+ char name[8];
+ sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
+ object_property_add(obj, name, "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve_vq,
+ cpu_arm_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+ }
+}
+
/* -cpu max: if KVM is enabled, like -cpu host (best possible with this host);
* otherwise, a CPU with as many features enabled as our emulation supports.
* The version of '-cpu max' for qemu-system-arm is defined in cpu.c;
@@ -602,17 +617,11 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
- uint32_t vq;
- uint64_t t;
if (kvm_enabled()) {
kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
- if (kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
- t = cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0;
- t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE, 1);
- cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = t;
- }
} else {
+ uint64_t t;
uint32_t u;
aarch64_a57_initfn(obj);
@@ -712,17 +721,9 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
#endif
}
- object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
- cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
+ aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj);
object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
-
- for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
- char name[8];
- sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
- object_property_add(obj, name, "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve_vq,
- cpu_arm_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
- }
}
struct ARMCPUInfo {
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
index c93bbee425a..876184b8fe4 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
@@ -488,7 +488,9 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
* and then query that CPU for the relevant ID registers.
*/
int fdarray[3];
+ bool sve_supported;
uint64_t features = 0;
+ uint64_t t;
int err;
/* Old kernels may not know about the PREFERRED_TARGET ioctl: however
@@ -578,13 +580,23 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 3, 2));
}
+ sve_supported = ioctl(fdarray[0], KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION, KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE) > 0;
+
kvm_arm_destroy_scratch_host_vcpu(fdarray);
if (err < 0) {
return false;
}
- /* We can assume any KVM supporting CPU is at least a v8
+ /* Add feature bits that can't appear until after VCPU init. */
+ if (sve_supported) {
+ t = ahcf->isar.id_aa64pfr0;
+ t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE, 1);
+ ahcf->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = t;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We can assume any KVM supporting CPU is at least a v8
* with VFPv4+Neon; this in turn implies most of the other
* feature bits.
*/
diff --git a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
index 40d8395b7f7..b132ed09806 100644
--- a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
+++ b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -458,8 +458,8 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
"We cannot guarantee the CPU type 'cortex-a15' works "
"with KVM on this host", NULL);
- assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "sve");
- resp = do_query_no_props(qts, "max");
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "sve");
+ resp = do_query_no_props(qts, "host");
kvm_supports_sve = resp_get_feature(resp, "sve");
vls = resp_get_sve_vls(resp);
qobject_unref(resp);
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
sprintf(max_name, "sve%d", max_vq * 128);
/* Enabling a supported length is of course fine. */
- assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", vls, "{ %s: true }", max_name);
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "host", vls, "{ %s: true }", max_name);
/* Get the next supported length smaller than max-vq. */
vq = 64 - __builtin_clzll(vls & ~BIT_ULL(max_vq - 1));
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
* We have at least one length smaller than max-vq,
* so we can disable max-vq.
*/
- assert_sve_vls(qts, "max", (vls & ~BIT_ULL(max_vq - 1)),
+ assert_sve_vls(qts, "host", (vls & ~BIT_ULL(max_vq - 1)),
"{ %s: false }", max_name);
/*
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
*/
sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
error = g_strdup_printf("cannot disable %s", name);
- assert_error(qts, "max", error,
+ assert_error(qts, "host", error,
"{ %s: true, %s: false }",
max_name, name);
g_free(error);
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
vq = __builtin_ffsll(vls);
sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
error = g_strdup_printf("cannot disable %s", name);
- assert_error(qts, "max", error, "{ %s: false }", name);
+ assert_error(qts, "host", error, "{ %s: false }", name);
g_free(error);
/* Get an unsupported length. */
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
if (vq <= SVE_MAX_VQ) {
sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
error = g_strdup_printf("cannot enable %s", name);
- assert_error(qts, "max", error, "{ %s: true }", name);
+ assert_error(qts, "host", error, "{ %s: true }", name);
g_free(error);
}
} else {
@@ -523,8 +523,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
} else {
assert_has_not_feature(qts, "host", "aarch64");
assert_has_not_feature(qts, "host", "pmu");
-
- assert_has_not_feature(qts, "max", "sve");
+ assert_has_not_feature(qts, "host", "sve");
}
qtest_quit(qts);
diff --git a/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst b/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
index bed218d4461..1b367e22e16 100644
--- a/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
+++ b/docs/arm-cpu-features.rst
@@ -272,31 +272,36 @@ SVE CPU Property Examples
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max
- 3) Only enable the 128-bit vector length::
+ 3) When KVM is enabled, implicitly enable all host CPU supported vector
+ lengths with the `host` CPU type::
+
+ $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt,accel=kvm -cpu host
+
+ 4) Only enable the 128-bit vector length::
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve128=on
- 4) Disable the 512-bit vector length and all larger vector lengths,
+ 5) Disable the 512-bit vector length and all larger vector lengths,
since 512 is a power-of-two. This results in all the smaller,
uninitialized lengths (128, 256, and 384) defaulting to enabled::
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve512=off
- 5) Enable the 128-bit, 256-bit, and 512-bit vector lengths::
+ 6) Enable the 128-bit, 256-bit, and 512-bit vector lengths::
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve128=on,sve256=on,sve512=on
- 6) The same as (5), but since the 128-bit and 256-bit vector
+ 7) The same as (6), but since the 128-bit and 256-bit vector
lengths are required for the 512-bit vector length to be enabled,
then allow them to be auto-enabled::
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve512=on
- 7) Do the same as (6), but by first disabling SVE and then re-enabling it::
+ 8) Do the same as (7), but by first disabling SVE and then re-enabling it::
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve=off,sve512=on,sve=on
- 8) Force errors regarding the last vector length::
+ 9) Force errors regarding the last vector length::
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve128=off
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu max,sve=off,sve128=off,sve=on
@@ -308,5 +313,5 @@ The examples in "SVE CPU Property Examples" exhibit many ways to select
vector lengths which developers may find useful in order to avoid overly
verbose command lines. However, the recommended way to select vector
lengths is to explicitly enable each desired length. Therefore only
-example's (1), (3), and (5) exhibit recommended uses of the properties.
+example's (1), (4), and (6) exhibit recommended uses of the properties.
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 09/11] target/arm/kvm: host cpu: Add support for sve<N> properties
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 09/11] target/arm/kvm: host cpu: Add support for sve<N> properties Peter Maydell
@ 2022-02-03 16:46 ` Peter Maydell
2022-02-03 17:36 ` Andrew Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2022-02-03 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel, Andrew Jones, Richard Henderson
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 08:51, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>
> Allow cpu 'host' to enable SVE when it's available, unless the
> user chooses to disable it with the added 'sve=off' cpu property.
> Also give the user the ability to select vector lengths with the
> sve<N> properties. We don't adopt 'max' cpu's other sve property,
> sve-max-vq, because that property is difficult to use with KVM.
> That property assumes all vector lengths in the range from 1 up
> to and including the specified maximum length are supported, but
> there may be optional lengths not supported by the host in that
> range. With KVM one must be more specific when enabling vector
> lengths.
Hi; I've been looking at the '-cpu max' vs '-cpu host' code
as part of trying to sort out the 'hvf' accelerator doing
oddly different things with them. I noticed an oddity
introduced in this patch. In the commit message you say that
we deliberately leave the 'sve-max-vq' property out of the
new aarch64_add_sve_properties(), because it is difficult to
use with KVM. But in the code for handling '-cpu max' in
aarch64_max_initfn():
> @@ -602,17 +617,11 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
> static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
> {
> ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> - uint32_t vq;
> - uint64_t t;
>
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
> - if (kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
> - t = cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0;
> - t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE, 1);
> - cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = t;
> - }
because this 'if' doesn't exit the function early...
> } else {
> + uint64_t t;
> uint32_t u;
> aarch64_a57_initfn(obj);
>
> @@ -712,17 +721,9 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
> #endif
> }
...all this code at the tail of the function runs for both KVM
and TCG, and it still sets the sve-max-vq property, even for
using '-cpu max' with KVM.
> - object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
> - cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
> + aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj);
> object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
> cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
> -
> - for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
> - char name[8];
> - sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
> - object_property_add(obj, name, "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve_vq,
> - cpu_arm_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
> - }
> }
Was this intentional?
I'd like to fix up the weird divergence between -cpu host and
-cpu max, either by moving sve-max-vq into aarch64_add_sve_properties()
so it's present on both, or by changing the aarch64_max_initfn() so
it only adds the property when using TCG.
(I think also this code may get the '-cpu max,aarch64=off' case wrong,
as it doesn't guard the calls to add the sve and pauth properties
with the "if aarch64" feature check.)
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 09/11] target/arm/kvm: host cpu: Add support for sve<N> properties
2022-02-03 16:46 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2022-02-03 17:36 ` Andrew Jones
2022-02-03 17:40 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2022-02-03 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: Richard Henderson, qemu-devel
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:46:21PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 08:51, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> >
> > Allow cpu 'host' to enable SVE when it's available, unless the
> > user chooses to disable it with the added 'sve=off' cpu property.
> > Also give the user the ability to select vector lengths with the
> > sve<N> properties. We don't adopt 'max' cpu's other sve property,
> > sve-max-vq, because that property is difficult to use with KVM.
> > That property assumes all vector lengths in the range from 1 up
> > to and including the specified maximum length are supported, but
> > there may be optional lengths not supported by the host in that
> > range. With KVM one must be more specific when enabling vector
> > lengths.
>
> Hi; I've been looking at the '-cpu max' vs '-cpu host' code
> as part of trying to sort out the 'hvf' accelerator doing
> oddly different things with them. I noticed an oddity
> introduced in this patch. In the commit message you say that
> we deliberately leave the 'sve-max-vq' property out of the
> new aarch64_add_sve_properties(), because it is difficult to
> use with KVM. But in the code for handling '-cpu max' in
> aarch64_max_initfn():
>
> > @@ -602,17 +617,11 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
> > static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
> > {
> > ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> > - uint32_t vq;
> > - uint64_t t;
> >
> > if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(cpu);
> > - if (kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
> > - t = cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0;
> > - t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE, 1);
> > - cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = t;
> > - }
>
> because this 'if' doesn't exit the function early...
>
> > } else {
> > + uint64_t t;
> > uint32_t u;
> > aarch64_a57_initfn(obj);
> >
> > @@ -712,17 +721,9 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
> > #endif
> > }
>
> ...all this code at the tail of the function runs for both KVM
> and TCG, and it still sets the sve-max-vq property, even for
> using '-cpu max' with KVM.
>
> > - object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
> > - cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
> > + aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj);
> > object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
> > cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
> > -
> > - for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
> > - char name[8];
> > - sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
> > - object_property_add(obj, name, "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve_vq,
> > - cpu_arm_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL, &error_fatal);
> > - }
> > }
>
> Was this intentional?
No, darn. I don't know how many times I rebased that series and was always
careful to ensure sve-max-vq was left in the non-kvm part of the above
condition. I guess the final rebase finally got me...
>
> I'd like to fix up the weird divergence between -cpu host and
> -cpu max, either by moving sve-max-vq into aarch64_add_sve_properties()
> so it's present on both, or by changing the aarch64_max_initfn() so
> it only adds the property when using TCG.
The later, please. sve-max-vq won't work for any of the machines that
support SVE that I know of, so I think it's a bad idea for KVM.
>
> (I think also this code may get the '-cpu max,aarch64=off' case wrong,
> as it doesn't guard the calls to add the sve and pauth properties
> with the "if aarch64" feature check.)
Yes, but these property dependencies may need to be checked at property
finalize time. That means that the properties may get added, but then
they will error out if the user tried to enable them. Otherwise, they'll
be disabled and the QMP query will inform the user that they cannot be
enabled.
Thanks,
drew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 09/11] target/arm/kvm: host cpu: Add support for sve<N> properties
2022-02-03 17:36 ` Andrew Jones
@ 2022-02-03 17:40 ` Peter Maydell
2022-02-04 11:26 ` Andrew Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2022-02-03 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Jones; +Cc: Richard Henderson, qemu-devel
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 17:36, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:46:21PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Was this intentional?
>
> No, darn. I don't know how many times I rebased that series and was always
> careful to ensure sve-max-vq was left in the non-kvm part of the above
> condition. I guess the final rebase finally got me...
>
> >
> > I'd like to fix up the weird divergence between -cpu host and
> > -cpu max, either by moving sve-max-vq into aarch64_add_sve_properties()
> > so it's present on both, or by changing the aarch64_max_initfn() so
> > it only adds the property when using TCG.
>
> The later, please. sve-max-vq won't work for any of the machines that
> support SVE that I know of, so I think it's a bad idea for KVM.
>
> >
> > (I think also this code may get the '-cpu max,aarch64=off' case wrong,
> > as it doesn't guard the calls to add the sve and pauth properties
> > with the "if aarch64" feature check.)
>
> Yes, but these property dependencies may need to be checked at property
> finalize time. That means that the properties may get added, but then
> they will error out if the user tried to enable them. Otherwise, they'll
> be disabled and the QMP query will inform the user that they cannot be
> enabled.
Does 'max' need to do anything different from what we're doing
already in arm_host_initfn() for 'host' ? (My proposal for
fixing this stuff is basically to make aarch64_max_initfn()
start with "if (kvm or hvf) { call arm_host_initfn(); return }".)
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 09/11] target/arm/kvm: host cpu: Add support for sve<N> properties
2022-02-03 17:40 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2022-02-04 11:26 ` Andrew Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2022-02-04 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: Richard Henderson, qemu-devel
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 05:40:20PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 17:36, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:46:21PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > Was this intentional?
> >
> > No, darn. I don't know how many times I rebased that series and was always
> > careful to ensure sve-max-vq was left in the non-kvm part of the above
> > condition. I guess the final rebase finally got me...
> >
> > >
> > > I'd like to fix up the weird divergence between -cpu host and
> > > -cpu max, either by moving sve-max-vq into aarch64_add_sve_properties()
> > > so it's present on both, or by changing the aarch64_max_initfn() so
> > > it only adds the property when using TCG.
> >
> > The later, please. sve-max-vq won't work for any of the machines that
> > support SVE that I know of, so I think it's a bad idea for KVM.
> >
> > >
> > > (I think also this code may get the '-cpu max,aarch64=off' case wrong,
> > > as it doesn't guard the calls to add the sve and pauth properties
> > > with the "if aarch64" feature check.)
> >
> > Yes, but these property dependencies may need to be checked at property
> > finalize time. That means that the properties may get added, but then
> > they will error out if the user tried to enable them. Otherwise, they'll
> > be disabled and the QMP query will inform the user that they cannot be
> > enabled.
>
> Does 'max' need to do anything different from what we're doing
> already in arm_host_initfn() for 'host' ?
>
I don't think so. I think we want max+kvm == host and max+kvm to support
a strict subset of the properties that max+tcg supports. We could try to
provide all of max+tcg's properties to max+kvm, and then let them error
out when they bump into KVM limitations, but when we know they will likely
never work (e.g. sve-max-vq), then I think I still prefer just removing
them.
> (My proposal for
> fixing this stuff is basically to make aarch64_max_initfn()
> start with "if (kvm or hvf) { call arm_host_initfn(); return }".)
That sounds good to me. We'll get max+kvm == host that way for sure,
and I hope that host supports a strict subset of max's properties
already.
Thanks,
drew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [PULL 10/11] hw/arm/boot: Rebuild hflags when modifying CPUState at boot
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 09/11] target/arm/kvm: host cpu: Add support for sve<N> properties Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 11/11] target/arm: Allow reading flags from FPSCR for M-profile Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 9:30 ` [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
11 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Rebuild hflags when modifying CPUState at boot.
Fixes: e979972a6a
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 20191031040830.18800-2-edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
hw/arm/boot.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c
index c264864c11d..ef6724960c0 100644
--- a/hw/arm/boot.c
+++ b/hw/arm/boot.c
@@ -786,6 +786,7 @@ static void do_cpu_reset(void *opaque)
info->secondary_cpu_reset_hook(cpu, info);
}
}
+ arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
}
}
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* [PULL 11/11] target/arm: Allow reading flags from FPSCR for M-profile
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 10/11] hw/arm/boot: Rebuild hflags when modifying CPUState at boot Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 8:51 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 9:30 ` [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
11 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
rt==15 is a special case when reading the flags: it means the
destination is APSR. This patch avoids rejecting
vmrs apsr_nzcv, fpscr
as illegal instruction.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20191025095711.10853-1-christophe.lyon@linaro.org
[PMM: updated the comment]
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/translate-vfp.inc.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/translate-vfp.inc.c b/target/arm/translate-vfp.inc.c
index 9ae980bef63..85c5ef897be 100644
--- a/target/arm/translate-vfp.inc.c
+++ b/target/arm/translate-vfp.inc.c
@@ -703,9 +703,10 @@ static bool trans_VMSR_VMRS(DisasContext *s, arg_VMSR_VMRS *a)
if (arm_dc_feature(s, ARM_FEATURE_M)) {
/*
* The only M-profile VFP vmrs/vmsr sysreg is FPSCR.
- * Writes to R15 are UNPREDICTABLE; we choose to undef.
+ * Accesses to R15 are UNPREDICTABLE; we choose to undef.
+ * (FPSCR -> r15 is a special case which writes to the PSR flags.)
*/
- if (a->rt == 15 || a->reg != ARM_VFP_FPSCR) {
+ if (a->rt == 15 && (!a->l || a->reg != ARM_VFP_FPSCR)) {
return false;
}
}
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue
2019-11-01 8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2019-11-01 8:51 ` [PULL 11/11] target/arm: Allow reading flags from FPSCR for M-profile Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 9:30 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 9:54 ` Andrew Jones
11 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: QEMU Developers, Andrew Jones
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 08:51, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> target-arm queue: two bug fixes, plus the KVM/SVE patchset,
> which is a new feature but one which was in my pre-softfreeze
> pullreq (it just had to be dropped due to an unexpected test failure.)
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
> The following changes since commit b7c9a7f353c0e260519bf735ff0d4aa01e72784b:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/jnsnow/tags/ide-pull-request' into staging (2019-10-31 15:57:30 +0000)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> https://git.linaro.org/people/pmaydell/qemu-arm.git tags/pull-target-arm-20191101-1
>
> for you to fetch changes up to d9ae7624b659362cb2bb2b04fee53bf50829ca56:
>
> target/arm: Allow reading flags from FPSCR for M-profile (2019-11-01 08:49:10 +0000)
Drew, this is still failing 'make check' on the aarch32-chroot-on-aarch64 :-(
(armhf)pmaydell@mustang-maydell:~/qemu/build/all-a32$
QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm ./tests/arm-cpu-features
/arm/arm/query-cpu-model-expansion: OK
/arm/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion: qemu-system-arm: Failed to
retrieve host CPU features
Broken pipe
/home/peter.maydell/qemu/tests/libqtest.c:140: kill_qemu() tried to
terminate QEMU process but encountered exit status 1 (expected 0)
Aborted
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue
2019-11-01 9:30 ` [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 9:54 ` Andrew Jones
2019-11-01 10:34 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2019-11-01 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: QEMU Developers
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:30:21AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 08:51, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > target-arm queue: two bug fixes, plus the KVM/SVE patchset,
> > which is a new feature but one which was in my pre-softfreeze
> > pullreq (it just had to be dropped due to an unexpected test failure.)
> >
> > thanks
> > -- PMM
> >
> > The following changes since commit b7c9a7f353c0e260519bf735ff0d4aa01e72784b:
> >
> > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/jnsnow/tags/ide-pull-request' into staging (2019-10-31 15:57:30 +0000)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> > https://git.linaro.org/people/pmaydell/qemu-arm.git tags/pull-target-arm-20191101-1
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to d9ae7624b659362cb2bb2b04fee53bf50829ca56:
> >
> > target/arm: Allow reading flags from FPSCR for M-profile (2019-11-01 08:49:10 +0000)
>
> Drew, this is still failing 'make check' on the aarch32-chroot-on-aarch64 :-(
>
> (armhf)pmaydell@mustang-maydell:~/qemu/build/all-a32$
> QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm ./tests/arm-cpu-features
> /arm/arm/query-cpu-model-expansion: OK
> /arm/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion: qemu-system-arm: Failed to
> retrieve host CPU features
> Broken pipe
> /home/peter.maydell/qemu/tests/libqtest.c:140: kill_qemu() tried to
> terminate QEMU process but encountered exit status 1 (expected 0)
> Aborted
>
Darn it. Sorry about that, but if it's still failing then I think QEMU
must believe KVM is enabled, i.e. kvm_enabled() in QEMU must be true.
I can try to confirm that and fix it, but I'll need to set up this
environment first.
Thanks,
drew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue
2019-11-01 9:54 ` Andrew Jones
@ 2019-11-01 10:34 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 12:53 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Jones; +Cc: QEMU Developers
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 09:54, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> Darn it. Sorry about that, but if it's still failing then I think QEMU
> must believe KVM is enabled, i.e. kvm_enabled() in QEMU must be true.
> I can try to confirm that and fix it, but I'll need to set up this
> environment first.
Yeah, it looks like trying to run with KVM in an aarch32 chroot
doesn't work but we don't notice it -- in qemu kvm_init() succeeds
but then we fail when we try to actually create CPUs, so:
$ ./arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -M virt -M accel=kvm:tcg
qemu-system-arm: kvm_init_vcpu failed: Invalid argument
we barf rather than falling back to tcg the way we ought to.
Does i386-on-x86_64 KVM handle this case?
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue
2019-11-01 10:34 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 12:53 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 14:25 ` Andrew Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-01 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Jones; +Cc: QEMU Developers
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 10:34, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 09:54, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Darn it. Sorry about that, but if it's still failing then I think QEMU
> > must believe KVM is enabled, i.e. kvm_enabled() in QEMU must be true.
> > I can try to confirm that and fix it, but I'll need to set up this
> > environment first.
>
> Yeah, it looks like trying to run with KVM in an aarch32 chroot
> doesn't work but we don't notice it -- in qemu kvm_init() succeeds
> but then we fail when we try to actually create CPUs, so:
> $ ./arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -M virt -M accel=kvm:tcg
> qemu-system-arm: kvm_init_vcpu failed: Invalid argument
>
> we barf rather than falling back to tcg the way we ought to.
I spoke to Christoffer and Marc about this, and they reckoned
this was basically a kernel bug (and ideally a 64-bit kernel
should just refuse to open /dev/kvm for an aarch32-compat
userspace process, because it doesn't provide the aarch32 KVM
interface, only the aarch64 one).
In the meantime, we should just bodge whatever we need to
in this test to cause us not to bother to try to run the test,
in whatever is the most expedient way.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue
2019-11-01 12:53 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2019-11-01 14:25 ` Andrew Jones
2019-11-02 17:57 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2019-11-01 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: QEMU Developers
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 12:53:42PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 10:34, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 09:54, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Darn it. Sorry about that, but if it's still failing then I think QEMU
> > > must believe KVM is enabled, i.e. kvm_enabled() in QEMU must be true.
> > > I can try to confirm that and fix it, but I'll need to set up this
> > > environment first.
> >
> > Yeah, it looks like trying to run with KVM in an aarch32 chroot
> > doesn't work but we don't notice it -- in qemu kvm_init() succeeds
> > but then we fail when we try to actually create CPUs, so:
> > $ ./arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -M virt -M accel=kvm:tcg
> > qemu-system-arm: kvm_init_vcpu failed: Invalid argument
> >
> > we barf rather than falling back to tcg the way we ought to.
>
> I spoke to Christoffer and Marc about this, and they reckoned
> this was basically a kernel bug (and ideally a 64-bit kernel
> should just refuse to open /dev/kvm for an aarch32-compat
> userspace process, because it doesn't provide the aarch32 KVM
> interface, only the aarch64 one).
>
> In the meantime, we should just bodge whatever we need to
> in this test to cause us not to bother to try to run the test,
> in whatever is the most expedient way.
How about just doing this (which can be cleanly applied to 2/9
without conflicts on rebase)
Thanks,
drew
From 9c5358d03528ea8a46731dcc4cfafb160ff66b5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 15:18:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v8 10/9] fixup! tests: arm: Introduce cpu feature tests
---
tests/arm-cpu-features.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
index b132ed09806d..ec33d58e1367 100644
--- a/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
+++ b/tests/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -535,8 +535,16 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
qtest_add_data_func("/arm/query-cpu-model-expansion",
NULL, test_query_cpu_model_expansion);
- qtest_add_data_func("/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion",
- NULL, test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm);
+
+ /*
+ * For now we only run KVM specific tests with AArch64 QEMU in
+ * order avoid attempting to run an AArch32 QEMU with KVM on
+ * AArch64 hosts. That won't work and isn't easy to detect.
+ */
+ if (g_str_equal(qtest_get_arch(), "aarch64")) {
+ qtest_add_data_func("/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion",
+ NULL, test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm);
+ }
if (g_str_equal(qtest_get_arch(), "aarch64")) {
qtest_add_data_func("/arm/max/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-max-vq-8",
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue
2019-11-01 14:25 ` Andrew Jones
@ 2019-11-02 17:57 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2019-11-02 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Jones; +Cc: QEMU Developers
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 14:25, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 12:53:42PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 10:34, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 09:54, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > Darn it. Sorry about that, but if it's still failing then I think QEMU
> > > > must believe KVM is enabled, i.e. kvm_enabled() in QEMU must be true.
> > > > I can try to confirm that and fix it, but I'll need to set up this
> > > > environment first.
> > >
> > > Yeah, it looks like trying to run with KVM in an aarch32 chroot
> > > doesn't work but we don't notice it -- in qemu kvm_init() succeeds
> > > but then we fail when we try to actually create CPUs, so:
> > > $ ./arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -M virt -M accel=kvm:tcg
> > > qemu-system-arm: kvm_init_vcpu failed: Invalid argument
> > >
> > > we barf rather than falling back to tcg the way we ought to.
> >
> > I spoke to Christoffer and Marc about this, and they reckoned
> > this was basically a kernel bug (and ideally a 64-bit kernel
> > should just refuse to open /dev/kvm for an aarch32-compat
> > userspace process, because it doesn't provide the aarch32 KVM
> > interface, only the aarch64 one).
> >
> > In the meantime, we should just bodge whatever we need to
> > in this test to cause us not to bother to try to run the test,
> > in whatever is the most expedient way.
>
> How about just doing this (which can be cleanly applied to 2/9
> without conflicts on rebase)
Yep, that works. I squashed it in and have applied the
updated pullreq.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread