qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Greg Kurz" <groug@kaod.org>,
	"Halil Pasic" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.2 v2 02/11] machine: Make smp_parse generic enough for all arches
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:28:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210719162846.dcltg22pbdpnyjcl@gator> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719032043.25416-3-wangyanan55@huawei.com>

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:20:34AM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> Currently the only difference between smp_parse and pc_smp_parse
> is the support of multi-dies and the related error reporting code.
> With an arch compat variable "bool smp_dies_supported", we can
> easily make smp_parse generic enough for all arches and the PC
> specific one can be removed.
> 
> Making smp_parse() generic enough can reduce code duplication and
> ease the code maintenance, and also allows extending the topology
> with more arch specific members (e.g., clusters) in the future.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/core/machine.c   | 28 ++++++++++-------
>  hw/i386/pc.c        | 76 +--------------------------------------------
>  include/hw/boards.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index d73daa10f4..ed6712e964 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
>  
>  static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
>  {
> +    MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
>      unsigned cpus    = config->has_cpus ? config->cpus : 0;
>      unsigned sockets = config->has_sockets ? config->sockets : 0;
>      unsigned dies    = config->has_dies ? config->dies : 1;
> @@ -761,7 +762,7 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
>          return;
>      }
>  
> -    if (dies > 1) {
> +    if (!mc->smp_dies_supported && dies > 1) {

Won't this allow a user on an arch with !mc->smp_dies_supported to specify
dies=1? To not allow that, can we do

   if (!mc->smp_dies_supported && config->has_dies)

instead?

>          error_setg(errp, "dies not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
>          return;
>      }
> @@ -772,23 +773,25 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
>          threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
>          if (cpus == 0) {
>              sockets = sockets > 0 ? sockets : 1;
> -            cpus = cores * threads * sockets;
> +            cpus = sockets * dies * cores * threads;
>          } else {
>              maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : cpus;
> -            sockets = maxcpus / (cores * threads);
> +            sockets = maxcpus / (dies * cores * threads);
>          }
>      } else if (cores == 0) {
>          threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
> -        cores = cpus / (sockets * threads);
> +        cores = cpus / (sockets * dies * threads);
>          cores = cores > 0 ? cores : 1;
>      } else if (threads == 0) {
> -        threads = cpus / (cores * sockets);
> +        threads = cpus / (sockets * dies * cores);
>          threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
> -    } else if (sockets * cores * threads < cpus) {
> +    } else if (sockets * dies * cores * threads < cpus) {
> +        g_autofree char *dies_msg = g_strdup_printf(
> +            mc->smp_dies_supported ? " * dies (%u)" : "", dies);
>          error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: "
> -                   "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < "
> +                   "sockets (%u)%s * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < "
>                     "smp_cpus (%u)",
> -                   sockets, cores, threads, cpus);
> +                   sockets, dies_msg, cores, threads, cpus);
>          return;
>      }
>  
> @@ -799,17 +802,20 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
>          return;
>      }
>  
> -    if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) {
> +    if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) {
> +        g_autofree char *dies_msg = g_strdup_printf(
> +            mc->smp_dies_supported ? " * dies (%u)" : "", dies);
>          error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: "
> -                   "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
> +                   "sockets (%u)%s * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
>                     "!= maxcpus (%u)",
> -                   sockets, cores, threads,
> +                   sockets, dies_msg, cores, threads,
>                     maxcpus);
>          return;
>      }
>  
>      ms->smp.cpus = cpus;
>      ms->smp.sockets = sockets;
> +    ms->smp.dies = dies;
>      ms->smp.cores = cores;
>      ms->smp.threads = threads;
>      ms->smp.max_cpus = maxcpus;
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index c6b63c00a5..d94ef582b5 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -708,80 +708,6 @@ void pc_acpi_smi_interrupt(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * This function is very similar to smp_parse()
> - * in hw/core/machine.c but includes CPU die support.
> - */
> -static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
> -{
> -    unsigned cpus    = config->has_cpus ? config->cpus : 0;
> -    unsigned sockets = config->has_sockets ? config->sockets : 0;
> -    unsigned dies    = config->has_dies ? config->dies : 1;
> -    unsigned cores   = config->has_cores ? config->cores : 0;
> -    unsigned threads = config->has_threads ? config->threads : 0;
> -    unsigned maxcpus = config->has_maxcpus ? config->maxcpus : 0;
> -
> -    if ((config->has_cpus && config->cpus == 0) ||
> -        (config->has_sockets && config->sockets == 0) ||
> -        (config->has_dies && config->dies == 0) ||
> -        (config->has_cores && config->cores == 0) ||
> -        (config->has_threads && config->threads == 0) ||
> -        (config->has_maxcpus && config->maxcpus == 0)) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "parameters must be equal to or greater than one"
> -                   "if provided");
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* compute missing values, prefer sockets over cores over threads */
> -    if (cpus == 0 || sockets == 0) {
> -        cores = cores > 0 ? cores : 1;
> -        threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
> -        if (cpus == 0) {
> -            sockets = sockets > 0 ? sockets : 1;
> -            cpus = cores * threads * dies * sockets;
> -        } else {
> -            maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : cpus;
> -            sockets = maxcpus / (cores * threads * dies);
> -        }
> -    } else if (cores == 0) {
> -        threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
> -        cores = cpus / (sockets * dies * threads);
> -        cores = cores > 0 ? cores : 1;
> -    } else if (threads == 0) {
> -        threads = cpus / (cores * dies * sockets);
> -        threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
> -    } else if (sockets * dies * cores * threads < cpus) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: "
> -                   "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < "
> -                   "smp_cpus (%u)",
> -                   sockets, dies, cores, threads, cpus);
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
> -    maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : cpus;
> -
> -    if (maxcpus < cpus) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp");
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
> -    if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology deprecated: "
> -                   "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
> -                   "!= maxcpus (%u)",
> -                   sockets, dies, cores, threads,
> -                   maxcpus);
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
> -    ms->smp.cpus = cpus;
> -    ms->smp.sockets = sockets;
> -    ms->smp.dies = dies;
> -    ms->smp.cores = cores;
> -    ms->smp.threads = threads;
> -    ms->smp.max_cpus = maxcpus;
> -}
> -
>  static
>  void pc_machine_done(Notifier *notifier, void *data)
>  {
> @@ -1735,7 +1661,6 @@ static void pc_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>      mc->auto_enable_numa_with_memdev = true;
>      mc->has_hotpluggable_cpus = true;
>      mc->default_boot_order = "cad";
> -    mc->smp_parse = pc_smp_parse;

Can we also get rid of MachineClass::smp_parse now?

>      mc->block_default_type = IF_IDE;
>      mc->max_cpus = 255;
>      mc->reset = pc_machine_reset;
> @@ -1746,6 +1671,7 @@ static void pc_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>      hc->unplug = pc_machine_device_unplug_cb;
>      mc->default_cpu_type = TARGET_DEFAULT_CPU_TYPE;
>      mc->nvdimm_supported = true;
> +    mc->smp_dies_supported = true;
>      mc->default_ram_id = "pc.ram";
>  
>      object_class_property_add(oc, PC_MACHINE_MAX_RAM_BELOW_4G, "size",
> diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
> index accd6eff35..b6161cee88 100644
> --- a/include/hw/boards.h
> +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ struct MachineClass {
>      bool smbus_no_migration_support;
>      bool nvdimm_supported;
>      bool numa_mem_supported;
> +    bool smp_dies_supported;
>      bool auto_enable_numa;
>      const char *default_ram_id;
>  
> -- 
> 2.19.1
>

Thanks,
drew 



  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-19  3:20 [PATCH for-6.2 v2 00/11] machine: smp parsing fixes and improvement Yanan Wang
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 01/11] machine: Disallow specifying topology parameters as zero Yanan Wang
2021-07-19 16:11   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-21 12:34     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-19 16:46   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-21 12:35     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 02/11] machine: Make smp_parse generic enough for all arches Yanan Wang
2021-07-19 16:28   ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2021-07-19 16:36     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-19 16:48       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-19 16:50         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-19 16:53   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-22  7:18     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-20  6:57   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-22  7:12     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 03/11] machine: Uniformly use maxcpus to calculate the omitted parameters Yanan Wang
2021-07-19 16:36   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22  3:00     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 04/11] machine: Use the computed parameters to calculate omitted cpus Yanan Wang
2021-07-19 16:42   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22  4:42     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-22 12:27       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 14:59         ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-22 15:05           ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 15:45             ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 05/11] machine: Improve the error reporting of smp parsing Yanan Wang
2021-07-19 16:53   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22  8:10     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-22 12:47       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 06/11] hw: Add compat machines for 6.2 Yanan Wang
2021-07-19  3:38   ` David Gibson
2021-07-19 17:00   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-19 17:03   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 23:45   ` Pankaj Gupta
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 07/11] machine: Prefer cores over sockets in smp parsing since 6.2 Yanan Wang
2021-07-19  3:40   ` David Gibson
2021-07-22  5:22     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-19 17:13   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22  5:32     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 08/11] machine: Use ms instead of global current_machine in sanity-check Yanan Wang
2021-07-19 17:14   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 09/11] machine: Tweak the order of topology members in struct CpuTopology Yanan Wang
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 10/11] machine: Split out the smp parsing code Yanan Wang
2021-07-19 17:20   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22  6:24     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-22 13:07       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 14:29         ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-19  3:20 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 11/11] tests/unit: Add a unit test for smp parsing Yanan Wang
2021-07-19 18:57   ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22  6:15     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-22 13:12       ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 14:18         ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-19 16:57 ` [PATCH for-6.2 v2 00/11] machine: smp parsing fixes and improvement Cornelia Huck
2021-07-21 12:38   ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-21 13:52     ` Pankaj Gupta
2021-07-22  2:22       ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-22  7:51     ` Pierre Morel
2021-07-22  8:32       ` wangyanan (Y)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210719162846.dcltg22pbdpnyjcl@gator \
    --to=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).