[PATCH 0/2] target/m68k: MacOS supervisor/user mode switch fixes - part 2

[PATCH 0/2] target/m68k: MacOS supervisor/user mode switch fixes - part 2

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

Here are the two outstanding patches from
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-09/msg02340.html updated and
rebased onto git master.

Patch 1 is equivalent to patch 2 in the original series but using BIT_ULL() to
set and clear the feature bits, and updating m68k_feature() to return a bool
instead of int.

Patch 2 is the same as the previous patch 3 but with Richard's R-B tag added.

Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>


Mark Cave-Ayland (2):
  target/m68k: increase size of m68k CPU features from uint32_t to
    uint64_t
  target/m68k: use M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV feature for move_from_sr
    privilege check

 target/m68k/cpu.c       | 9 +++++++--
 target/m68k/cpu.h       | 8 +++++---
 target/m68k/translate.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH 1/2] target/m68k: increase size of m68k CPU features from uint32_t to uint64_t

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

There are already 32 feature bits in use, so change the size of the m68k
CPU features to uint64_t (along with the associated m68k_feature()
functions) to allow up to 64 feature bits to be used.

At the same time make use of the BIT_ULL() macro when reading/writing
the CPU feature bits to improve readability, and also update m68k_feature()
to return a bool rather than an int.

Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
---
 target/m68k/cpu.c | 4 ++--
 target/m68k/cpu.h | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/m68k/cpu.c b/target/m68k/cpu.c
index f681be3a2a..8d23c72056 100644
--- a/target/m68k/cpu.c
+++ b/target/m68k/cpu.c
@@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ static bool m68k_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
 
 static void m68k_set_feature(CPUM68KState *env, int feature)
 {
-    env->features |= (1u << feature);
+    env->features |= BIT_ULL(feature);
 }
 
 static void m68k_unset_feature(CPUM68KState *env, int feature)
 {
-    env->features &= (-1u - (1u << feature));
+    env->features &= ~BIT_ULL(feature);
 }
 
 static void m68k_cpu_reset(DeviceState *dev)
diff --git a/target/m68k/cpu.h b/target/m68k/cpu.h
index 67b6c12c28..f5c6e95cb4 100644
--- a/target/m68k/cpu.h
+++ b/target/m68k/cpu.h
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState {
     struct {} end_reset_fields;
 
     /* Fields from here on are preserved across CPU reset. */
-    uint32_t features;
+    uint64_t features;
 } CPUM68KState;
 
 /*
@@ -539,9 +539,9 @@ enum m68k_features {
     M68K_FEATURE_TRAPCC,
 };
 
-static inline int m68k_feature(CPUM68KState *env, int feature)
+static inline bool m68k_feature(CPUM68KState *env, int feature)
 {
-    return (env->features & (1u << feature)) != 0;
+    return (env->features & BIT_ULL(feature)) != 0;
 }
 
 void m68k_cpu_list(void);
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH 2/2] target/m68k: use M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV feature for move_from_sr privilege check

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

Now that M68K_FEATURE_M68000 has been renamed to M68K_FEATURE_M68K it is easier
to see that the privilege exception check is wrong: it is currently only generated
for ColdFire CPUs when in fact it should also be generated for Motorola CPUs from
the 68010 onwards.

Introduce a new M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV feature which is set for all non-
Motorola CPUs, and for all Motorola CPUs from the 68010 onwards and use it to
determine whether a privilege exception should be generated for the MOVE-from-SR
instruction.

Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 target/m68k/cpu.c       | 5 +++++
 target/m68k/cpu.h       | 2 ++
 target/m68k/translate.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/m68k/cpu.c b/target/m68k/cpu.c
index 8d23c72056..25d610db21 100644
--- a/target/m68k/cpu.c
+++ b/target/m68k/cpu.c
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static void m5206_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
     CPUM68KState *env = &cpu->env;
 
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_CF_ISA_A);
+    m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV);
 }
 
 /* Base feature set, including isns. for m68k family */
@@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ static void m68010_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_RTD);
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_BKPT);
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_MOVEC);
+    m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -241,6 +243,7 @@ static void m5208_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_BRAL);
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_CF_EMAC);
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_USP);
+    m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV);
 }
 
 static void cfv4e_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
@@ -254,6 +257,7 @@ static void cfv4e_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_CF_FPU);
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_CF_EMAC);
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_USP);
+    m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV);
 }
 
 static void any_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
@@ -275,6 +279,7 @@ static void any_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_USP);
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_EXT_FULL);
     m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_WORD_INDEX);
+    m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV);
 }
 
 static void m68k_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
diff --git a/target/m68k/cpu.h b/target/m68k/cpu.h
index f5c6e95cb4..3a9cfe2f33 100644
--- a/target/m68k/cpu.h
+++ b/target/m68k/cpu.h
@@ -537,6 +537,8 @@ enum m68k_features {
     M68K_FEATURE_UNALIGNED_DATA,
     /* TRAPcc insn. (680[2346]0, and CPU32) */
     M68K_FEATURE_TRAPCC,
+    /* MOVE from SR privileged (from 68010) */
+    M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV,
 };
 
 static inline bool m68k_feature(CPUM68KState *env, int feature)
diff --git a/target/m68k/translate.c b/target/m68k/translate.c
index 233b9d8e57..9df17aa4b2 100644
--- a/target/m68k/translate.c
+++ b/target/m68k/translate.c
@@ -4624,7 +4624,7 @@ DISAS_INSN(move_from_sr)
 {
     TCGv sr;
 
-    if (IS_USER(s) && !m68k_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_M68K)) {
+    if (IS_USER(s) && m68k_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV)) {
         gen_exception(s, s->base.pc_next, EXCP_PRIVILEGE);
         return;
     }
-- 
2.30.2

Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/m68k: increase size of m68k CPU features from uint32_t to uint64_t

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via]

On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 3:53 PM Mark Cave-Ayland
<mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote:
>
> There are already 32 feature bits in use, so change the size of the m68k
> CPU features to uint64_t (along with the associated m68k_feature()
> functions) to allow up to 64 feature bits to be used.
>
> At the same time make use of the BIT_ULL() macro when reading/writing
> the CPU feature bits to improve readability, and also update m68k_feature()
> to return a bool rather than an int.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
> ---
>  target/m68k/cpu.c | 4 ++--
>  target/m68k/cpu.h | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/m68k: increase size of m68k CPU features from uint32_t to uint64_t

[Laurent Vivier]

Le 25/09/2022 à 15:48, Mark Cave-Ayland a écrit :
> There are already 32 feature bits in use, so change the size of the m68k
> CPU features to uint64_t (along with the associated m68k_feature()
> functions) to allow up to 64 feature bits to be used.
> 
> At the same time make use of the BIT_ULL() macro when reading/writing
> the CPU feature bits to improve readability, and also update m68k_feature()
> to return a bool rather than an int.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
> ---
>   target/m68k/cpu.c | 4 ++--
>   target/m68k/cpu.h | 6 +++---
>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Applied to my m68k-for-7.2 branch

Thanks,
Laurent

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target/m68k: use M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV feature for move_from_sr privilege check

[Laurent Vivier]

Le 25/09/2022 à 15:48, Mark Cave-Ayland a écrit :
> Now that M68K_FEATURE_M68000 has been renamed to M68K_FEATURE_M68K it is easier
> to see that the privilege exception check is wrong: it is currently only generated
> for ColdFire CPUs when in fact it should also be generated for Motorola CPUs from
> the 68010 onwards.
> 
> Introduce a new M68K_FEATURE_MOVEFROMSR_PRIV feature which is set for all non-
> Motorola CPUs, and for all Motorola CPUs from the 68010 onwards and use it to
> determine whether a privilege exception should be generated for the MOVE-from-SR
> instruction.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>   target/m68k/cpu.c       | 5 +++++
>   target/m68k/cpu.h       | 2 ++
>   target/m68k/translate.c | 2 +-
>   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Applied to my m68k-for-7.2 branch

Thanks,
Laurent