qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Alvise Rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>
Cc: mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com, claudio.fontana@huawei.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	jani.kokkonen@huawei.com, tech@virtualopensystems.com,
	rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 01/16] exec.c: Add new exclusive bitmap to ram_list
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:00:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bn7nbdvg.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454059965-23402-2-git-send-email-a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>


Alvise Rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com> writes:

> The purpose of this new bitmap is to flag the memory pages that are in
> the middle of LL/SC operations (after a LL, before a SC). For all these
> pages, the corresponding TLB entries will be generated in such a way to
> force the slow-path for all the VCPUs (see the following patches).
>
> When the system starts, the whole memory is set to dirty.
>
> Suggested-by: Jani Kokkonen <jani.kokkonen@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>
> ---
>  exec.c                  |  7 +++++--
>  include/exec/memory.h   |  3 ++-
>  include/exec/ram_addr.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index 7115403..51f366d 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -1575,11 +1575,14 @@ static ram_addr_t ram_block_add(RAMBlock *new_block, Error **errp)
>          int i;
>
>          /* ram_list.dirty_memory[] is protected by the iothread lock.  */
> -        for (i = 0; i < DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM; i++) {
> +        for (i = 0; i < DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE; i++) {
>              ram_list.dirty_memory[i] =
>                  bitmap_zero_extend(ram_list.dirty_memory[i],
>                                     old_ram_size, new_ram_size);
> -       }
> +        }
> +        ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE] =
> +            bitmap_zero_extend(ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE],
> +                               old_ram_size, new_ram_size);

In the previous patch you moved this out of the loop as
ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE] was a different size to
the other dirty bitmaps. This no longer seems to be the case so this
seems pointless.

>      }
>      cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(new_block->offset,
>                                          new_block->used_length,
> diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
> index c92734a..71e0480 100644
> --- a/include/exec/memory.h
> +++ b/include/exec/memory.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
>  #define DIRTY_MEMORY_VGA       0
>  #define DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE      1
>  #define DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION 2
> -#define DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM       3        /* num of dirty bits */
> +#define DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE 3
> +#define DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM       4        /* num of dirty bits */
>
>  #include <stdint.h>
>  #include <stdbool.h>
> diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
> index ef1489d..19789fc 100644
> --- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h
> +++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  #include "hw/xen/xen.h"
> +#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>
>  struct RAMBlock {
>      struct rcu_head rcu;
> @@ -172,6 +173,9 @@ static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start,
>      if (unlikely(mask & (1 << DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE))) {
>          bitmap_set_atomic(d[DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE], page, end - page);
>      }
> +    if (unlikely(mask & (1 << DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE))) {
> +        bitmap_set_atomic(d[DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE], page, end - page);
> +    }
>      xen_modified_memory(start, length);
>  }
>
> @@ -287,5 +291,32 @@ uint64_t cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(unsigned long *dest,
>  }
>
>  void migration_bitmap_extend(ram_addr_t old, ram_addr_t new);
> +
> +/* Exclusive bitmap support. */
> +#define EXCL_BITMAP_GET_OFFSET(addr) (addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS)
> +
> +/* Make the page of @addr not exclusive. */
> +static inline void cpu_physical_memory_unset_excl(ram_addr_t addr)
> +{
> +    set_bit_atomic(EXCL_BITMAP_GET_OFFSET(addr),
> +                   ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE]);
> +}
> +
> +/* Return true if the page of @addr is exclusive, i.e. the EXCL bit is set. */
> +static inline int cpu_physical_memory_is_excl(ram_addr_t addr)
> +{
> +    return !test_bit(EXCL_BITMAP_GET_OFFSET(addr),
> +                     ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE]);
> +}
> +
> +/* Set the page of @addr as exclusive clearing its EXCL bit and return the
> + * previous bit's state. */
> +static inline int cpu_physical_memory_set_excl(ram_addr_t addr)
> +{
> +    return bitmap_test_and_clear_atomic(
> +                                ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE],
> +                                EXCL_BITMAP_GET_OFFSET(addr), 1);
> +}
> +
>  #endif
>  #endif


--
Alex Bennée

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-11 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-29  9:32 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 00/16] Slow-path for atomic instruction translation Alvise Rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 01/16] exec.c: Add new exclusive bitmap to ram_list Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:00   ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2016-02-11 13:21     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 02/16] softmmu: Simplify helper_*_st_name, wrap unaligned code Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:07   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 03/16] softmmu: Simplify helper_*_st_name, wrap MMIO code Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:15   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 04/16] softmmu: Simplify helper_*_st_name, wrap RAM code Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:18   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 05/16] softmmu: Add new TLB_EXCL flag Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:18   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 06/16] qom: cpu: Add CPUClass hooks for exclusive range Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:22   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 13:53     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 07/16] softmmu: Add helpers for a new slowpath Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 16:33   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 13:58     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 08/16] softmmu: Honor the new exclusive bitmap Alvise Rigo
2016-02-16 17:39   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 14:18     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 09/16] softmmu: Include MMIO/invalid exclusive accesses Alvise Rigo
2016-02-16 17:49   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 14:18     ` alvise rigo
2016-02-18 16:26       ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 10/16] softmmu: Protect MMIO exclusive range Alvise Rigo
2016-02-17 18:55   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 14:15     ` alvise rigo
2016-02-18 16:25       ` Alex Bennée
2016-03-07 18:13         ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 11/16] tcg: Create new runtime helpers for excl accesses Alvise Rigo
2016-02-18 16:16   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 12/16] configure: Use slow-path for atomic only when the softmmu is enabled Alvise Rigo
2016-02-18 16:40   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 16:43     ` Alex Bennée
2016-03-07 17:21     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 13/16] softmmu: Add history of excl accesses Alvise Rigo
2016-02-16 17:07   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 14:17     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 14/16] target-arm: translate: Use ld/st excl for atomic insns Alvise Rigo
2016-02-18 17:02   ` Alex Bennée
2016-03-07 18:39     ` alvise rigo
2016-03-07 20:06       ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 15/16] target-arm: cpu64: use custom set_excl hook Alvise Rigo
2016-02-18 18:19   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 16/16] target-arm: aarch64: add atomic instructions Alvise Rigo
2016-02-19 11:34   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-19 11:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 00/16] Slow-path for atomic instruction translation Alex Bennée
2016-02-19 12:01   ` alvise rigo
2016-02-19 12:19     ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bn7nbdvg.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com \
    --cc=claudio.fontana@huawei.com \
    --cc=jani.kokkonen@huawei.com \
    --cc=mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=tech@virtualopensystems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).