qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Alvise Rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>
Cc: mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com, claudio.fontana@huawei.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	jani.kokkonen@huawei.com, tech@virtualopensystems.com,
	rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 16/16] target-arm: aarch64: add atomic instructions
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:34:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vb5lc4sg.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454059965-23402-17-git-send-email-a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>


Alvise Rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com> writes:

> Use the new LL/SC runtime helpers to handle the aarch64 atomic instructions
> in softmmu_llsc_template.h.
>
> The STXP emulation required a dedicated helper to handle the paired
> doubleword case.
>
> Suggested-by: Jani Kokkonen <jani.kokkonen@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>
> ---
>  configure                  |   6 +-
>  target-arm/helper-a64.c    |  55 +++++++++++++++++++
>  target-arm/helper-a64.h    |   4 ++
>  target-arm/op_helper.c     |   8 +++
>  target-arm/translate-a64.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 915efcc..38121ff 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -5873,9 +5873,11 @@ echo "QEMU_CFLAGS+=$cflags" >> $config_target_mak
>  # Use tcg LL/SC tcg backend for exclusive instruction is arm/aarch64
>  # softmmus targets
>  if test "$arm_tcg_use_llsc" = "yes" ; then
> -  if test "$target" = "arm-softmmu" ; then
> +  case "$target" in
> +    arm-softmmu | aarch64-softmmu)
>      echo "CONFIG_ARM_USE_LDST_EXCL=y" >> $config_target_mak
> -  fi
> +    ;;
> +  esac
>  fi

See previous comments about configure code.

>  done # for target in $targets
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.c b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> index c7bfb4d..dcee66f 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include "qemu/bitops.h"
>  #include "internals.h"
>  #include "qemu/crc32c.h"
> +#include "tcg/tcg.h"
>  #include <zlib.h> /* For crc32 */
>
>  /* C2.4.7 Multiply and divide */
> @@ -443,3 +444,57 @@ uint64_t HELPER(crc32c_64)(uint64_t acc, uint64_t val, uint32_t bytes)
>      /* Linux crc32c converts the output to one's complement.  */
>      return crc32c(acc, buf, bytes) ^ 0xffffffff;
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_USE_LDST_EXCL
> +/* STXP emulation for two 64 bit doublewords. We can't use directly two
> + * stcond_i64 accesses, otherwise the first will conclude the LL/SC pair.
> + * Instead, two normal 64-bit accesses are used and the CPUState is
> + * updated accordingly. */
> +target_ulong HELPER(stxp_i128)(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr,
> +                               uint64_t vall, uint64_t valh,
> +                               uint32_t mmu_idx)
> +{
> +    CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
> +    TCGMemOpIdx op;
> +    target_ulong ret = 0;
> +
> +    if (!cpu->ll_sc_context) {
> +        cpu->excl_succeeded = false;
> +        ret = 1;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    op = make_memop_idx(MO_BEQ, mmu_idx);
> +
> +    /* According to section C6.6.191 of ARM ARM DDI 0487A.h, the access has to
> +     * be quadword aligned.  For the time being, we do not support paired STXPs
> +     * to MMIO memory, this will become trivial when the softmmu will support
> +     * 128bit memory accesses. */
> +    if (addr & 0xf) {
> +        /* TODO: Do unaligned access */

This should probably log UNIMP if you don't implement it now.

> +    }
> +
> +    /* Setting excl_succeeded to true will make the store exclusive. */
> +    cpu->excl_succeeded = true;
> +    helper_ret_stq_mmu(env, addr, vall, op, GETRA());
> +
> +    if (!cpu->excl_succeeded) {
> +        ret = 1;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    helper_ret_stq_mmu(env, addr + 8, valh, op, GETRA());
> +    if (!cpu->excl_succeeded) {
> +        ret = 1;
> +    } else {
> +        cpu->excl_succeeded = false;
> +    }
> +
> +out:
> +    /* Unset LL/SC context */
> +    cpu->ll_sc_context = false;
> +    cpu->excl_protected_range.begin = EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR;
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.h b/target-arm/helper-a64.h
> index 1d3d10f..c416a83 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper-a64.h
> +++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.h
> @@ -46,3 +46,7 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_2(frecpx_f32, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, f32, f32, ptr)
>  DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_2(fcvtx_f64_to_f32, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, f32, f64, env)
>  DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_3(crc32_64, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG_SE, i64, i64, i64, i32)
>  DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_3(crc32c_64, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG_SE, i64, i64, i64, i32)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_USE_LDST_EXCL
> +/* STXP helper */
> +DEF_HELPER_5(stxp_i128, i64, env, i64, i64, i64, i32)
> +#endif
> diff --git a/target-arm/op_helper.c b/target-arm/op_helper.c
> index 404c13b..146fc9a 100644
> --- a/target-arm/op_helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/op_helper.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,14 @@ static void raise_exception(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t excp,
>      cs->exception_index = excp;
>      env->exception.syndrome = syndrome;
>      env->exception.target_el = target_el;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_USE_LDST_EXCL
> +    HELPER(atomic_clear)(env);
> +    /* If the exception happens in the middle of a LL/SC, we need to clear
> +     * excl_succeeded to avoid that the normal store following the exception is
> +     * wrongly interpreted as exclusive.
> +     * */
> +    cs->excl_succeeded = 0;
> +#endif
>      cpu_loop_exit(cs);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/translate-a64.c b/target-arm/translate-a64.c
> index 80f6c20..f34e957 100644
> --- a/target-arm/translate-a64.c
> +++ b/target-arm/translate-a64.c
> @@ -37,8 +37,10 @@
>  static TCGv_i64 cpu_X[32];
>  static TCGv_i64 cpu_pc;
>
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM_USE_LDST_EXCL)
>  /* Load/store exclusive handling */
>  static TCGv_i64 cpu_exclusive_high;
> +#endif
>
>  static const char *regnames[] = {
>      "x0", "x1", "x2", "x3", "x4", "x5", "x6", "x7",
> @@ -94,8 +96,10 @@ void a64_translate_init(void)
>                                            regnames[i]);
>      }
>
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM_USE_LDST_EXCL)
>      cpu_exclusive_high = tcg_global_mem_new_i64(TCG_AREG0,
>          offsetof(CPUARMState, exclusive_high), "exclusive_high");
> +#endif
>  }
>
>  static inline ARMMMUIdx get_a64_user_mem_index(DisasContext *s)
> @@ -1219,7 +1223,11 @@ static void handle_hint(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn,
>
>  static void gen_clrex(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
>  {
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_USE_LDST_EXCL
>      tcg_gen_movi_i64(cpu_exclusive_addr, -1);
> +#else
> +    gen_helper_atomic_clear(cpu_env);
> +#endif
>  }
>
>  /* CLREX, DSB, DMB, ISB */
> @@ -1685,7 +1693,11 @@ static void disas_b_exc_sys(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
>  }
>
>  /*
> - * Load/Store exclusive instructions are implemented by remembering
> + * If the softmmu is enabled, the translation of Load/Store exclusive
> + * instructions will rely on the gen_helper_{ldlink,stcond} helpers,
> + * offloading most of the work to the softmmu_llsc_template.h functions.
> + *
> + * Otherwise, instructions are implemented by remembering
>   * the value/address loaded, and seeing if these are the same
>   * when the store is performed. This is not actually the architecturally
>   * mandated semantics, but it works for typical guest code sequences
> @@ -1695,6 +1707,66 @@ static void disas_b_exc_sys(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
>   * this sequence is effectively atomic.  In user emulation mode we
>   * throw an exception and handle the atomic operation elsewhere.
>   */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_USE_LDST_EXCL
> +static void gen_load_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rt, int rt2,
> +                               TCGv_i64 addr, int size, bool is_pair)
> +{
> +    /* In case @is_pair is set, we have to guarantee that at least the 128 bits
> +     * accessed by a Load Exclusive Pair (64-bit variant) are protected. Since
> +     * we do not have 128-bit helpers, we split the access in two halves, the
> +     * first of them will set the exclusive region to cover at least 128 bits
> +     * (this is why aarch64 has a custom cc->cpu_set_excl_protected_range which
> +     * covers 128 bits).
> +     * */
> +    TCGv_i32 mem_idx = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> +
> +    tcg_gen_movi_i32(mem_idx, get_mem_index(s));
> +
> +    g_assert(size <= 3);
> +
> +    if (size < 3) {
> +        TCGv_i32 tmp = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> +
> +        switch (size) {
> +        case 0:
> +            gen_helper_ldlink_i8(tmp, cpu_env, addr, mem_idx);
> +            break;
> +        case 1:
> +            gen_helper_ldlink_i16(tmp, cpu_env, addr, mem_idx);
> +            break;
> +        case 2:
> +            gen_helper_ldlink_i32(tmp, cpu_env, addr, mem_idx);
> +            break;
> +        default:
> +            abort();
> +        }
> +
> +        TCGv_i64 tmp64 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> +        tcg_gen_ext_i32_i64(tmp64, tmp);
> +        tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt), tmp64);
> +
> +        tcg_temp_free_i32(tmp);
> +        tcg_temp_free_i64(tmp64);
> +    } else {
> +        gen_helper_ldlink_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt), cpu_env, addr, mem_idx);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (is_pair) {
> +        TCGMemOp memop = MO_TE + size;
> +        TCGv_i64 addr2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> +        TCGv_i64 hitmp = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> +
> +        g_assert(size >= 2);
> +        tcg_gen_addi_i64(addr2, addr, 1 << size);
> +        tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(hitmp, addr2, get_mem_index(s), memop);
> +        tcg_temp_free_i64(addr2);
> +        tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt2), hitmp);
> +        tcg_temp_free_i64(hitmp);
> +    }
> +
> +    tcg_temp_free_i32(mem_idx);
> +}
> +#else
>  static void gen_load_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rt, int rt2,
>                                 TCGv_i64 addr, int size, bool is_pair)
>  {
> @@ -1723,6 +1795,7 @@ static void gen_load_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rt, int rt2,
>      tcg_temp_free_i64(tmp);
>      tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_exclusive_addr, addr);
>  }
> +#endif
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  static void gen_store_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rd, int rt, int rt2,
> @@ -1733,6 +1806,65 @@ static void gen_store_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rd, int rt, int rt2,
>                       size | is_pair << 2 | (rd << 4) | (rt << 9) | (rt2 << 14));
>      gen_exception_internal_insn(s, 4, EXCP_STREX);
>  }
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM_USE_LDST_EXCL)
> +static void gen_store_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rd, int rt, int rt2,
> +                                TCGv_i64 addr, int size, int is_pair)
> +{
> +    /* Don't bother to check if we are actually in exclusive context since the
> +     * helpers keep care of it. */
> +    TCGv_i32 mem_idx = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> +
> +    tcg_gen_movi_i32(mem_idx, get_mem_index(s));
> +
> +    g_assert(size <= 3);
> +    if (is_pair) {
> +        if (size == 3) {
> +            gen_helper_stxp_i128(cpu_reg(s, rd), cpu_env, addr, cpu_reg(s, rt),
> +                                 cpu_reg(s, rt2), mem_idx);
> +        } else if (size == 2) {
> +            /* Paired single word case. After merging the two registers into
> +             * one, we use one stcond_i64 to store the value to memory. */
> +            TCGv_i64 val = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> +            TCGv_i64 valh = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> +            tcg_gen_shli_i64(valh, cpu_reg(s, rt2), 32);
> +            tcg_gen_and_i64(val, valh, cpu_reg(s, rt));
> +            gen_helper_stcond_i64(cpu_reg(s, rd), cpu_env, addr, val, mem_idx);
> +            tcg_temp_free_i64(valh);
> +            tcg_temp_free_i64(val);
> +        } else {
> +            abort();
> +        }
> +    } else {
> +        if (size < 3) {
> +            TCGv_i32 val = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> +
> +            tcg_gen_extrl_i64_i32(val, cpu_reg(s, rt));
> +
> +            switch (size) {
> +            case 0:
> +                gen_helper_stcond_i8(cpu_reg(s, rd), cpu_env, addr, val,
> +                                     mem_idx);
> +                break;
> +            case 1:
> +                gen_helper_stcond_i16(cpu_reg(s, rd), cpu_env, addr, val,
> +                                      mem_idx);
> +                break;
> +            case 2:
> +                gen_helper_stcond_i32(cpu_reg(s, rd), cpu_env, addr, val,
> +                                      mem_idx);
> +                break;
> +            default:
> +                abort();
> +            }
> +            tcg_temp_free_i32(val);
> +        } else {
> +            gen_helper_stcond_i64(cpu_reg(s, rd), cpu_env, addr, cpu_reg(s, rt),
> +                                  mem_idx);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    tcg_temp_free_i32(mem_idx);
> +}
>  #else
>  static void gen_store_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rd, int rt, int rt2,
>                                  TCGv_i64 inaddr, int size, int is_pair)


--
Alex Bennée

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-19 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-29  9:32 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 00/16] Slow-path for atomic instruction translation Alvise Rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 01/16] exec.c: Add new exclusive bitmap to ram_list Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:00   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-11 13:21     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 02/16] softmmu: Simplify helper_*_st_name, wrap unaligned code Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:07   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 03/16] softmmu: Simplify helper_*_st_name, wrap MMIO code Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:15   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 04/16] softmmu: Simplify helper_*_st_name, wrap RAM code Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:18   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 05/16] softmmu: Add new TLB_EXCL flag Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:18   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 06/16] qom: cpu: Add CPUClass hooks for exclusive range Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 13:22   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 13:53     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 07/16] softmmu: Add helpers for a new slowpath Alvise Rigo
2016-02-11 16:33   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 13:58     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 08/16] softmmu: Honor the new exclusive bitmap Alvise Rigo
2016-02-16 17:39   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 14:18     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 09/16] softmmu: Include MMIO/invalid exclusive accesses Alvise Rigo
2016-02-16 17:49   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 14:18     ` alvise rigo
2016-02-18 16:26       ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 10/16] softmmu: Protect MMIO exclusive range Alvise Rigo
2016-02-17 18:55   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 14:15     ` alvise rigo
2016-02-18 16:25       ` Alex Bennée
2016-03-07 18:13         ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 11/16] tcg: Create new runtime helpers for excl accesses Alvise Rigo
2016-02-18 16:16   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 12/16] configure: Use slow-path for atomic only when the softmmu is enabled Alvise Rigo
2016-02-18 16:40   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 16:43     ` Alex Bennée
2016-03-07 17:21     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 13/16] softmmu: Add history of excl accesses Alvise Rigo
2016-02-16 17:07   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-18 14:17     ` alvise rigo
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 14/16] target-arm: translate: Use ld/st excl for atomic insns Alvise Rigo
2016-02-18 17:02   ` Alex Bennée
2016-03-07 18:39     ` alvise rigo
2016-03-07 20:06       ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 15/16] target-arm: cpu64: use custom set_excl hook Alvise Rigo
2016-02-18 18:19   ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-29  9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 16/16] target-arm: aarch64: add atomic instructions Alvise Rigo
2016-02-19 11:34   ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2016-02-19 11:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 00/16] Slow-path for atomic instruction translation Alex Bennée
2016-02-19 12:01   ` alvise rigo
2016-02-19 12:19     ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vb5lc4sg.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com \
    --cc=claudio.fontana@huawei.com \
    --cc=jani.kokkonen@huawei.com \
    --cc=mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=tech@virtualopensystems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).