qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoheyi <guoheyi@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm/virt/acpi: remove _ADR from devices identified by _HID
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:25:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cbaf4c3-ed40-c386-fd6c-332cc831890f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200113152623.dlkxsrs7nr6uriyn@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>


在 2020/1/13 23:26, Andrew Jones 写道:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 09:57:55PM +0800, Guoheyi wrote:
>> 在 2020/1/13 20:08, Igor Mammedov 写道:
>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:47:59 +0800
>>> Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> According to ACPI spec, _ADR should be used for device which is on a
>>>> bus that has a standard enumeration algorithm. It does not make sense
>>>> to have a _ADR object for devices which already have _HID and will be
>>>> enumerated by OSPM.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
>>> Are you sure it's does not make sense?
>>> Have you checked commit f264d51d8, that added _ADR?
>> I searched in SPCR spec and ACPI spec, but didn't find such requirement for
>> serial port device description.
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Could you help to explain the reason?
> tl;dr: It was a mistake and I agree with removing _ADR from SPCR.
>
> The long version is that ACPI support for ARM took a long time to get
> merged upstream. In the meantime Linaro and Red Hat had ACPI support
> in their downstream trees. The initial, never upstreamed implementation
> of Linux SPCR support used _ADR to find the console UART (probably
> because some vendor hacked their ACPI tables that way). I made the
> mistake of using the out-of-tree Linux kernel code as my "specification".
>
> Upstream kernels never had this problem and I don't think we need to
> worry about any of those downstream kernels which did. They'd be five
> years old by now anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> drew

Thanks for your confirmation, Andrew.

Hi Igor,

On arm64 physical machine, we didn't have _ADR for SPCR serial port 
device attached to system bus either, and we never saw any problem.

Thanks,

Heyi

>> Thanks,
>>
>> Heyi
>>
>>
>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Cc: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>>>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
>>>> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>>>> ---
>>>>    hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c          |   8 --------
>>>>    tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT         | Bin 18449 -> 18426 bytes
>>>>    tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.memhp   | Bin 19786 -> 19763 bytes
>>>>    tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.numamem | Bin 18449 -> 18426 bytes
>>>>    4 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
>>>> index 9f4c7d1889..be752c0ad8 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
>>>> @@ -78,11 +78,6 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_uart(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *uart_memmap,
>>>>                                 AML_EXCLUSIVE, &uart_irq, 1));
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
>>>> -    /* The _ADR entry is used to link this device to the UART described
>>>> -     * in the SPCR table, i.e. SPCR.base_address.address == _ADR.
>>>> -     */
>>>> -    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(uart_memmap->base)));
>>>> -
>>>>        aml_append(scope, dev);
>>>>    }
>>>> @@ -170,7 +165,6 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_pci(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *memmap,
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CID", aml_string("PNP0A03")));
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_SEG", aml_int(0)));
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_BBN", aml_int(0)));
>>>> -    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(0)));
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_string("PCI0")));
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STR", aml_unicode("PCIe 0 Device")));
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CCA", aml_int(1)));
>>>> @@ -334,7 +328,6 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_gpio(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *gpio_memmap,
>>>>    {
>>>>        Aml *dev = aml_device("GPO0");
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("ARMH0061")));
>>>> -    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(0)));
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0)));
>>>>        Aml *crs = aml_resource_template();
>>>> @@ -364,7 +357,6 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)
>>>>    {
>>>>        Aml *dev = aml_device(ACPI_POWER_BUTTON_DEVICE);
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("PNP0C0C")));
>>>> -    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(0)));
>>>>        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0)));
>>>>        aml_append(scope, dev);
>>>>    }
>>>> diff --git a/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT b/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT
>>>> index b5895cb22446860a0b9be3d32ec856feb388be4c..a759ff739a071d5fbf50519a6aea296e5e0f1e0c 100644
>>>> GIT binary patch
>>>> delta 72
>>>> zcmbO@f$>*ABbQ6COUN&G1_q{66S<_BT5Bh&t1wzk^tIeLL4lL8ZSqD=gU!!5x$Pt+
>>>> c1HyxxIO07#U3dfh0t}oDoEbRcLp@y>07w882mk;8
>>>>
>>>> delta 94
>>>> zcmey>&p2@cBbQ6CONgKc0|V26iCof5J#`b+RhV2^Ci+-%al|{i1o1F1FmP^cRp4ao
>>>> tnY@hCfEg&X`7$S;oxFTNc#soEyoaX?Z-8HbfwO@#16Tu)4E1zj005fm7mWY_
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.memhp b/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.memhp
>>>> index 69ad844f65d047973a3e55198beecd45a35b8fce..6e5cc61977e4cd24f765fec0693f75a528c144c1 100644
>>>> GIT binary patch
>>>> delta 72
>>>> zcmX>#i*fTTMlP3Nmk?uL1_q|eiCof5eHSLGt1wzk^tIeLL4lL8ZSqD=gU!!5U7RH)
>>>> c1HyxxIO07#U3dfh0t}oDoEbRcLp@y>03)CjmjD0&
>>>>
>>>> delta 94
>>>> zcmdlyi}BPfMlP3Nmk=*s1_q}3iCof5t(PXMt1!8;O!Tqj;)r*23F2X3VBp-?s=&$E
>>>> tGkF=O0W(l&^JPwVXL<R6@E|9Scn?n(-T=P<17`zg2CxPo8S3f6006qZ7#siq
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.numamem b/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.numamem
>>>> index b5895cb22446860a0b9be3d32ec856feb388be4c..a759ff739a071d5fbf50519a6aea296e5e0f1e0c 100644
>>>> GIT binary patch
>>>> delta 72
>>>> zcmbO@f$>*ABbQ6COUN&G1_q{66S<_BT5Bh&t1wzk^tIeLL4lL8ZSqD=gU!!5x$Pt+
>>>> c1HyxxIO07#U3dfh0t}oDoEbRcLp@y>07w882mk;8
>>>>
>>>> delta 94
>>>> zcmey>&p2@cBbQ6CONgKc0|V26iCof5J#`b+RhV2^Ci+-%al|{i1o1F1FmP^cRp4ao
>>>> tnY@hCfEg&X`7$S;oxFTNc#soEyoaX?Z-8HbfwO@#16Tu)4E1zj005fm7mWY_
>>>>
>>> .
>>
>
> .



  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-15  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-19  6:47 [PATCH 0/2] Some cleanup in arm/virt/acpi Heyi Guo
2019-12-19  6:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm/virt/acpi: remove meaningless sub device "PR0" from PCI0 Heyi Guo
2020-01-13 12:37   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-16 12:36     ` Guoheyi
2020-01-21  3:48     ` Guoheyi
2020-01-21  6:35     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-22  5:39   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-22  6:38     ` Guoheyi
2019-12-19  6:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm/virt/acpi: remove _ADR from devices identified by _HID Heyi Guo
2020-01-05 12:33   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-05 12:53     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-06  2:10       ` Guoheyi
2020-01-13  8:46         ` Guoheyi
2020-01-16 11:56       ` Guoheyi
2020-01-16 13:25         ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-17  1:54           ` Guoheyi
2020-01-05 22:54     ` Corey Minyard
2020-01-06  9:39       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-06 13:07         ` Corey Minyard
2020-01-06 15:51     ` Peter Maydell
2020-01-15  2:03       ` Guoheyi
2020-01-15  6:30         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-15  9:25           ` Guoheyi
2020-01-15 10:53             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-15 10:55             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-16 12:24               ` Peter Maydell
2020-01-17  2:08                 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-13 12:08   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-13 13:57     ` Guoheyi
2020-01-13 15:26       ` Andrew Jones
2020-01-15  1:25         ` Guoheyi [this message]
2020-01-15 12:08   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-12-19 12:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] Some cleanup in arm/virt/acpi Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8cbaf4c3-ed40-c386-fd6c-332cc831890f@huawei.com \
    --to=guoheyi@huawei.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).