From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgaluk@gmail.com>,
Pavel Dovgalyuk <dovgaluk@ispras.ru>,
wrampazz@redhat.com, crosa@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for x86_64
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 13:32:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cbf625d-258c-9419-e1d3-13b0d5a25bb2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k10w48t9.fsf@linaro.org>
On 5/28/20 1:07 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 5/28/20 9:12 AM, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27.05.2020 17:53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> On 5/27/20 12:31 PM, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
>>>>> This patch adds a test for record/replay an execution of x86_64 machine.
>>>>> Execution scenario includes simple kernel boot, which allows testing
>>>>> basic hardware interaction in RR mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgaluk@ispras.ru>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> 0 files changed
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
>>>>> b/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
>>>>> index b8b277ad2f..c7526f1aba 100644
>>>>> --- a/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
>>>>> +++ b/tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py
>>>>> @@ -55,3 +55,19 @@ class ReplayKernel(LinuxKernelUtils):
>>>>> True, shift, args)
>>>>> self.run_vm(kernel_path, kernel_command_line, console_pattern,
>>>>> False, shift, args)
>>>>> +
>>>>> + def test_x86_64_pc(self):
>>>>> + """
>>>>> + :avocado: tags=arch:x86_64
>>>>> + :avocado: tags=machine:pc
>>>>> + """
>>>>> + kernel_url =
>>>>> ('https://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora'
>>>>> +
>>>>> '/linux/releases/29/Everything/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot'
>>>>> + '/vmlinuz')
>>>>> + kernel_hash = '23bebd2680757891cf7adedb033532163a792495'
>>>>> + kernel_path = self.fetch_asset(kernel_url,
>>>>> asset_hash=kernel_hash)
>>>>> +
>>>>> + kernel_command_line = self.KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE +
>>>>> 'console=ttyS0'
>>>>> + console_pattern = 'Kernel command line: %s' %
>>>>> kernel_command_line
>>>>> +
>>>>> + self.run_rr(kernel_path, kernel_command_line, console_pattern)
>>>>>
>>>> This one timeouted (I build with --enable-debug):
>>>
>>> I've got the strange behavior for the couple of times.
>>>
>>> Console output was correct (I saw 'Kernel command line' in logs), but
>>> _console_interation function didn't notice it.
>>>
>>> Therefore the test finished with timeout.
>>>
>>> How this could be possible?
>>
>> IIRC there is a problem in how Avocado consume the chardev output.
>
> Is this the same problem Robert has tried to work around in tests/vm?
>
> From: Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org>
> Subject: [PATCH v7 12/12] tests/vm: Add workaround to consume console
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 09:22:59 -0400
> Message-Id: <20200519132259.405-13-robert.foley@linaro.org>
Exactly! I guess Marc-André or Eduardo suggested the same fix (use a
dedicated polling thread).
>
>>
>> Cleber has been working on some PoC / kludge.
>>
>> Cleber/Eduardo do you remember the problem?
>>
>>>
>>>> (1/1) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernel.test_x86_64_pc:
>>>> replay: recording...
>>>> replay: replaying...
>>>> INTERRUPTED: Test interrupted by SIGTERM\nRunner error occurred: Timeout
>>>> reached\nOriginal status: ERROR\n{'name':
>>>> '1-tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernel.test_x86_64_pc',
>>>> 'logdir':
>>>> 'avocado/job-results/job-2020-05-27T16.48-71d7bf4/test-results/1-tes...
>>>> (90.68 s)
>>>>
>>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 10:30 [PATCH v2 00/11] Record/replay acceptance tests Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] tests/acceptance: allow console interaction with specific VMs Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:20 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-27 14:42 ` Willian Rampazzo
2020-05-27 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] tests/acceptance: refactor boot_linux_console test to allow code reuse Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:31 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-27 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] tests/acceptance: add base class record/replay kernel tests Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-27 15:20 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 7:19 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-28 8:28 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-29 5:58 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for x86_64 Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-28 7:12 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-28 8:38 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-28 11:07 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 11:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2020-05-27 15:40 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-27 16:20 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 7:26 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 15:41 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 6:12 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-28 13:26 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-29 5:56 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-29 9:20 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for aarch64 Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:44 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for arm Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for ppc64 Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for m68k Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] tests/acceptance: record/replay tests with advcal images Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] tests/acceptance: refactor boot_linux to allow code reuse Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] tests/acceptance: Linux boot test for record/replay Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 16:44 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 6:17 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Record/replay acceptance tests no-reply
2020-05-27 14:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9cbf625d-258c-9419-e1d3-13b0d5a25bb2@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=Pavel.Dovgaluk@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=robert.foley@linaro.org \
--cc=wrampazz@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).