qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Hou Weiying <weiying_hou@outlook.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Hongzheng-Li <Ethan.Lee.QNL@gmail.com>,
	Myriad-Dreamin <camiyoru@gmail.com>,
	Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
	Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL v3 24/42] target/riscv: Implementation of enhanced PMP (ePMP)
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 08:38:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKmqyKO7OMFA_pnie8NfbP3hb=Tp-70P-kOFJyefaJgxyzOYvw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_J739jGEGLTAo+JEqRDyWcuCMZicT1tpxPQY26N5h2SA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:51 PM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 11:21, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Hou Weiying <weiying_hou@outlook.com>
> >
> > This commit adds support for ePMP v0.9.1.
> >
> > The ePMP spec can be found in:
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Mh_aiHYxemL0umN3GTTw8vsbmzHZ_nxZXgjgOUzbvc8
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hongzheng-Li <Ethan.Lee.QNL@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hou Weiying <weiying_hou@outlook.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Myriad-Dreamin <camiyoru@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> > Message-id: fef23b885f9649a4d54e7c98b168bdec5d297bb1.1618812899.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
> > [ Changes by AF:
> >  - Rebase on master
> >  - Update to latest spec
> >  - Use a switch case to handle ePMP MML permissions
> >  - Fix a few bugs
> > ]
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
>
> Hi; this code confuses Coverity into thinking that the pmp_hart_has_privs()
> function might read the value pointed to by 'allowed_privs' when
> it is uninitialized (CID 1453108):
>
>
> > @@ -294,13 +351,94 @@ bool pmp_hart_has_privs(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong addr,
> >              pmp_get_a_field(env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg);
> >
> >          /*
> > -         * If the PMP entry is not off and the address is in range, do the priv
> > -         * check
> > +         * Convert the PMP permissions to match the truth table in the
> > +         * ePMP spec.
> >           */
> > +        const uint8_t epmp_operation =
> > +            ((env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg & PMP_LOCK) >> 4) |
> > +            ((env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg & PMP_READ) << 2) |
> > +            (env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg & PMP_WRITE) |
> > +            ((env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg & PMP_EXEC) >> 2);
>
> Here we construct a value which can only be in the range [0,15],
> but we do it in a way that Coverity isn't clever enough to figure out...
>
> > +
> >          if (((s + e) == 2) && (PMP_AMATCH_OFF != a_field)) {
> > -            *allowed_privs = PMP_READ | PMP_WRITE | PMP_EXEC;
> > -            if ((mode != PRV_M) || pmp_is_locked(env, i)) {
> > -                *allowed_privs &= env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg;
> > +            /*
> > +             * If the PMP entry is not off and the address is in range,
> > +             * do the priv check
> > +             */
> > +            if (!MSECCFG_MML_ISSET(env)) {
> > +                /*
> > +                 * If mseccfg.MML Bit is not set, do pmp priv check
> > +                 * This will always apply to regular PMP.
> > +                 */
> > +                *allowed_privs = PMP_READ | PMP_WRITE | PMP_EXEC;
> > +                if ((mode != PRV_M) || pmp_is_locked(env, i)) {
> > +                    *allowed_privs &= env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg;
> > +                }
> > +            } else {
> > +                /*
> > +                 * If mseccfg.MML Bit set, do the enhanced pmp priv check
> > +                 */
> > +                if (mode == PRV_M) {
> > +                    switch (epmp_operation) {
> > +                    case 0:
> > +                    case 1:
> > +                    case 4:
> > +                    case 5:
> > +                    case 6:
> > +                    case 7:
> > +                    case 8:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = 0;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    case 2:
> > +                    case 3:
> > +                    case 14:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = PMP_READ | PMP_WRITE;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    case 9:
> > +                    case 10:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = PMP_EXEC;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    case 11:
> > +                    case 13:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = PMP_READ | PMP_EXEC;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    case 12:
> > +                    case 15:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = PMP_READ;
> > +                        break;
>
> ...so coverity thinks that "via the 'default' case" is a valid flow
> of control in these switch() statements...
>
> > +                    }
> > +                } else {
> > +                    switch (epmp_operation) {
> > +                    case 0:
> > +                    case 8:
> > +                    case 9:
> > +                    case 12:
> > +                    case 13:
> > +                    case 14:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = 0;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    case 1:
> > +                    case 10:
> > +                    case 11:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = PMP_EXEC;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    case 2:
> > +                    case 4:
> > +                    case 15:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = PMP_READ;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    case 3:
> > +                    case 6:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = PMP_READ | PMP_WRITE;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    case 5:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = PMP_READ | PMP_EXEC;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    case 7:
> > +                        *allowed_privs = PMP_READ | PMP_WRITE | PMP_EXEC;
> > +                        break;
> > +                    }
> > +                }
> >              }
> >
> >              ret = ((privs & *allowed_privs) == privs);
>
> ...and that we can get to here without having ever set *allowed_privs.
>
>
> Adding
>    default:
>        g_assert_not_reached();
>
> to both switches should clarify to both Coverity and human readers that
> the cases in the switch are a complete enumeration of the possibilities.

Thanks Peter, I'll send a fix.

Alistair

>
> thanks
> -- PMM


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 10:19 [PULL v3 00/42] riscv-to-apply queue Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 01/42] target/riscv: Remove privilege v1.9 specific CSR related code Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 02/42] docs/system/generic-loader.rst: Fix style Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 03/42] target/riscv: Align the data type of reset vector address Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 04/42] hw/riscv: sifive_e: Add 'const' to sifive_e_memmap[] Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 05/42] target/riscv: Add Shakti C class CPU Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 06/42] riscv: Add initial support for Shakti C machine Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 07/42] hw/char: Add Shakti UART emulation Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 08/42] hw/riscv: Connect Shakti UART to Shakti platform Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 09/42] target/riscv: Convert the RISC-V exceptions to an enum Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 10/42] target/riscv: Use the RISCVException enum for CSR predicates Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 11/42] target/riscv: Fix 32-bit HS mode access permissions Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 12/42] target/riscv: Use the RISCVException enum for CSR operations Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 13/42] target/riscv: Use RISCVException enum for CSR access Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 14/42] MAINTAINERS: Update the RISC-V CPU Maintainers Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 15/42] hw/opentitan: Update the interrupt layout Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 16/42] hw/riscv: Enable VIRTIO_VGA for RISC-V virt machine Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 17/42] riscv: don't look at SUM when accessing memory from a debugger context Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 18/42] target/riscv: Fixup saturate subtract function Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 19/42] docs: Add documentation for shakti_c machine Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 20/42] target/riscv: Fix the PMP is locked check when using TOR Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 21/42] target/riscv: Define ePMP mseccfg Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 22/42] target/riscv: Add the ePMP feature Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 23/42] target/riscv: Add ePMP CSR access functions Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 24/42] target/riscv: Implementation of enhanced PMP (ePMP) Alistair Francis
2021-05-20 13:51   ` Peter Maydell
2021-05-20 22:38     ` Alistair Francis [this message]
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 25/42] target/riscv: Add a config option for ePMP Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 26/42] target/riscv/pmp: Remove outdated comment Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 27/42] target/riscv: Add ePMP support for the Ibex CPU Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 28/42] target/riscv: fix vrgather macro index variable type bug Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 29/42] target/riscv: fix exception index on instruction access fault Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 30/42] hw/riscv: Fix OT IBEX reset vector Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 31/42] fpu/softfloat: set invalid excp flag for RISC-V muladd instructions Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 32/42] target/riscv: fix a typo with interrupt names Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 33/42] target/riscv: Remove the hardcoded RVXLEN macro Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 34/42] target/riscv: Remove the hardcoded SSTATUS_SD macro Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 35/42] target/riscv: Remove the hardcoded HGATP_MODE macro Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 36/42] target/riscv: Remove the hardcoded MSTATUS_SD macro Alistair Francis
2021-05-20 13:55   ` Peter Maydell
2021-05-20 22:55     ` Alistair Francis
2021-05-21  2:07       ` LIU Zhiwei
2021-05-25 21:47         ` Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 37/42] target/riscv: Remove the hardcoded SATP_MODE macro Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 38/42] target/riscv: Remove the unused HSTATUS_WPRI macro Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 39/42] target/riscv: Remove an unused CASE_OP_32_64 macro Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 40/42] target/riscv: Consolidate RV32/64 32-bit instructions Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 41/42] target/riscv: Consolidate RV32/64 16-bit instructions Alistair Francis
2021-05-11 10:19 ` [PULL v3 42/42] target/riscv: Fix the RV64H decode comment Alistair Francis
2021-05-12 18:46 ` [PULL v3 00/42] riscv-to-apply queue Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKmqyKO7OMFA_pnie8NfbP3hb=Tp-70P-kOFJyefaJgxyzOYvw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alistair23@gmail.com \
    --cc=Ethan.Lee.QNL@gmail.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=camiyoru@gmail.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=weiying_hou@outlook.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).