From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] pc-bios: s390x: Rename and use PSW_MASK_ZMODE constant
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 14:03:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db21e269-c4af-2ffd-f151-2c190a32478e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f7cd050-a3a5-452b-d596-e075dd213110@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1799 bytes --]
On 5/21/20 7:47 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/05/2020 07.44, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 14/05/2020 14.37, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> ZMODE has a lot of ambiguity with the ESAME architecture mode, but is
>>> actually 64 bit addressing.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c | 3 +--
>>> pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c
>>> index 0fc879bb8e..b932531e6f 100644
>>> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c
>>> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c
>>> @@ -229,7 +229,6 @@ void dasd_ipl(SubChannelId schid, uint16_t cutype)
>>> run_ipl2(schid, cutype, ipl2_addr);
>>>
>>> /* Transfer control to the guest operating system */
>>> - pswl->mask |= PSW_MASK_EAMODE; /* Force z-mode */
>>> - pswl->addr |= PSW_MASK_BAMODE; /* ... */
>>> + pswl->mask |= PSW_MASK_64; /* Force 64 bit addressing */
>>
>> This is not only a rename (as announced in the subject), but also a
>> change in behavior since you now do not change pswl->addr anymore. So
>> this is even a bug fix? Could you please mention this in the patch
>> description, too?
>
> Ah, wait, pswl is of type PSWLegacy, and ->mask and ->addr are of type
> uint32_t here! So it seems wrong to use a 64-bit value for mask here,
> doesn't it?
Absolutely, how did that even compile?
I'm tempted to just make it a unsigned long ptr instead. The legacy PSW
struct doesn't seem to be used correctly anyway, the lowcore one is in
fact never used and this is the only other occurrence.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-25 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-14 12:37 [PATCH v2 0/9] pc-bios: s390x: Cleanup part 1 Janosch Frank
2020-05-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] pc-bios: s390x: cio.c cleanup and compile fix Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 11:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-18 12:02 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-20 19:37 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] pc-bios: s390x: Consolidate timing functions into time.h Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 12:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-18 12:09 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 12:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-20 19:53 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-25 12:20 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] pc-bios: s390x: Get rid of magic offsets into the lowcore Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 12:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-20 19:57 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] pc-bios: s390x: Rename and use PSW_MASK_ZMODE constant Janosch Frank
2020-05-21 5:44 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-21 5:47 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-25 12:03 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-05-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] pc-bios: s390x: Use PSW masks where possible Janosch Frank
2020-05-21 5:50 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-25 12:08 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] pc-bios: s390x: Move panic() into header and add infinite loop Janosch Frank
2020-05-21 5:53 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] pc-bios: s390x: Use ebcdic2ascii table Janosch Frank
2020-05-21 5:56 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] pc-bios: s390x: Replace 0x00 with 0x0 or 0 Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 12:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-21 6:01 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] pc-bios: s390x: Make u32 ptr check explicit Janosch Frank
2020-05-21 6:03 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] pc-bios: s390x: Cleanup part 1 no-reply
2020-05-20 11:52 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db21e269-c4af-2ffd-f151-2c190a32478e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).