All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	 madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev
Cc: wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	ast@kernel.org, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, android-mm@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com, elver@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/17] arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:37:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220726073750.3219117-5-kaleshsingh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220726073750.3219117-1-kaleshsingh@google.com>

The unwinder code is made reusable so that it can be used to
unwind various types of stacks. One usecase is unwinding the
nVHE hyp stack from the host (EL1) in non-protected mode. This
means that the unwinder must be able to translate HYP stack
addresses to kernel addresses.

Add a callback (stack_trace_translate_fp_fn) to allow specifying
the translation function.

Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
---

Changes in v6:
  - Fix typo in comment, per Fuad
  - Add Fuad’s Reviewed-by tag and Tested-by tags

Changes in v5:
  - Fix typo in commit text, per Fuad
  - Update unwind_next_common() to not have side effects on failure, per Fuad
  - Use regular comment instead of doc comments, per Fuad

 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c             |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
index 0c5cbfdb56b5..b241edba5c76 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
@@ -124,11 +124,25 @@ static inline void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
 }
 
+/*
+ * stack_trace_translate_fp_fn() - Translates a non-kernel frame pointer to
+ * a kernel address.
+ *
+ * @fp:   the frame pointer to be updated to its kernel address.
+ * @type: the stack type associated with frame pointer @fp
+ *
+ * Returns true and success and @fp is updated to the corresponding
+ * kernel virtual address; otherwise returns false.
+ */
+typedef bool (*stack_trace_translate_fp_fn)(unsigned long *fp,
+					    enum stack_type type);
+
 static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
-				     struct stack_info *info)
+				     struct stack_info *info,
+				     stack_trace_translate_fp_fn translate_fp)
 {
+	unsigned long fp = state->fp, kern_fp = fp;
 	struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
-	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
 
 	if (fp & 0x7)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -139,6 +153,13 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	if (test_bit(info->type, state->stacks_done))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/*
+	 * If fp is not from the current address space perform the necessary
+	 * translation before dereferencing it to get the next fp.
+	 */
+	if (translate_fp && !translate_fp(&kern_fp, info->type))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/*
 	 * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
 	 * at a strictly higher address than the prior record.
@@ -163,8 +184,8 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	 * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
 	 * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
 	 */
-	state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
-	state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
+	state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(kern_fp));
+	state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(kern_fp + 8));
 	state->prev_fp = fp;
 	state->prev_type = info->type;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 834851939364..eef3cf6bf2d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	err = unwind_next_common(state, &info);
+	err = unwind_next_common(state, &info, NULL);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-- 
2.37.1.359.gd136c6c3e2-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	 madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev
Cc: will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, kaleshsingh@google.com,
	 james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com,  catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	andreyknvl@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
	 mhiramat@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	 elver@google.com, keirf@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	ardb@kernel.org,  oupton@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 android-mm@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/17] arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:37:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220726073750.3219117-5-kaleshsingh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220726073750.3219117-1-kaleshsingh@google.com>

The unwinder code is made reusable so that it can be used to
unwind various types of stacks. One usecase is unwinding the
nVHE hyp stack from the host (EL1) in non-protected mode. This
means that the unwinder must be able to translate HYP stack
addresses to kernel addresses.

Add a callback (stack_trace_translate_fp_fn) to allow specifying
the translation function.

Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
---

Changes in v6:
  - Fix typo in comment, per Fuad
  - Add Fuad’s Reviewed-by tag and Tested-by tags

Changes in v5:
  - Fix typo in commit text, per Fuad
  - Update unwind_next_common() to not have side effects on failure, per Fuad
  - Use regular comment instead of doc comments, per Fuad

 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c             |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
index 0c5cbfdb56b5..b241edba5c76 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
@@ -124,11 +124,25 @@ static inline void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
 }
 
+/*
+ * stack_trace_translate_fp_fn() - Translates a non-kernel frame pointer to
+ * a kernel address.
+ *
+ * @fp:   the frame pointer to be updated to its kernel address.
+ * @type: the stack type associated with frame pointer @fp
+ *
+ * Returns true and success and @fp is updated to the corresponding
+ * kernel virtual address; otherwise returns false.
+ */
+typedef bool (*stack_trace_translate_fp_fn)(unsigned long *fp,
+					    enum stack_type type);
+
 static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
-				     struct stack_info *info)
+				     struct stack_info *info,
+				     stack_trace_translate_fp_fn translate_fp)
 {
+	unsigned long fp = state->fp, kern_fp = fp;
 	struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
-	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
 
 	if (fp & 0x7)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -139,6 +153,13 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	if (test_bit(info->type, state->stacks_done))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/*
+	 * If fp is not from the current address space perform the necessary
+	 * translation before dereferencing it to get the next fp.
+	 */
+	if (translate_fp && !translate_fp(&kern_fp, info->type))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/*
 	 * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
 	 * at a strictly higher address than the prior record.
@@ -163,8 +184,8 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	 * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
 	 * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
 	 */
-	state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
-	state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
+	state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(kern_fp));
+	state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(kern_fp + 8));
 	state->prev_fp = fp;
 	state->prev_type = info->type;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 834851939364..eef3cf6bf2d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	err = unwind_next_common(state, &info);
+	err = unwind_next_common(state, &info, NULL);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-- 
2.37.1.359.gd136c6c3e2-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev
Cc: will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, kaleshsingh@google.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	andreyknvl@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	elver@google.com, keirf@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, oupton@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	android-mm@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/17] arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:37:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220726073750.3219117-5-kaleshsingh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220726073750.3219117-1-kaleshsingh@google.com>

The unwinder code is made reusable so that it can be used to
unwind various types of stacks. One usecase is unwinding the
nVHE hyp stack from the host (EL1) in non-protected mode. This
means that the unwinder must be able to translate HYP stack
addresses to kernel addresses.

Add a callback (stack_trace_translate_fp_fn) to allow specifying
the translation function.

Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
---

Changes in v6:
  - Fix typo in comment, per Fuad
  - Add Fuad’s Reviewed-by tag and Tested-by tags

Changes in v5:
  - Fix typo in commit text, per Fuad
  - Update unwind_next_common() to not have side effects on failure, per Fuad
  - Use regular comment instead of doc comments, per Fuad

 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c             |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
index 0c5cbfdb56b5..b241edba5c76 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
@@ -124,11 +124,25 @@ static inline void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
 }
 
+/*
+ * stack_trace_translate_fp_fn() - Translates a non-kernel frame pointer to
+ * a kernel address.
+ *
+ * @fp:   the frame pointer to be updated to its kernel address.
+ * @type: the stack type associated with frame pointer @fp
+ *
+ * Returns true and success and @fp is updated to the corresponding
+ * kernel virtual address; otherwise returns false.
+ */
+typedef bool (*stack_trace_translate_fp_fn)(unsigned long *fp,
+					    enum stack_type type);
+
 static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
-				     struct stack_info *info)
+				     struct stack_info *info,
+				     stack_trace_translate_fp_fn translate_fp)
 {
+	unsigned long fp = state->fp, kern_fp = fp;
 	struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
-	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
 
 	if (fp & 0x7)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -139,6 +153,13 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	if (test_bit(info->type, state->stacks_done))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/*
+	 * If fp is not from the current address space perform the necessary
+	 * translation before dereferencing it to get the next fp.
+	 */
+	if (translate_fp && !translate_fp(&kern_fp, info->type))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/*
 	 * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
 	 * at a strictly higher address than the prior record.
@@ -163,8 +184,8 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	 * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
 	 * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
 	 */
-	state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
-	state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
+	state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(kern_fp));
+	state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(kern_fp + 8));
 	state->prev_fp = fp;
 	state->prev_type = info->type;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 834851939364..eef3cf6bf2d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	err = unwind_next_common(state, &info);
+	err = unwind_next_common(state, &info, NULL);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-- 
2.37.1.359.gd136c6c3e2-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-26  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-26  7:37 [PATCH v6 00/17] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 01/17] arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 02/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out on_accessible_stack_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 16:01   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 16:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 16:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 16:33     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 16:33       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 16:33       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 03/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` Kalesh Singh [this message]
2022-07-26  7:37   ` [PATCH v6 04/17] arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 14:34   ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 14:34     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 14:34     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 15:30     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 15:30       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 15:30       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 05/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out common unwind() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 06/17] arm64: stacktrace: Add description of stacktrace/common.h Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 14:49   ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 14:49     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 14:49     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 07/17] KVM: arm64: On stack overflow switch to hyp overflow_stack Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 08/17] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 09/17] KVM: arm64: Prepare non-protected nVHE hypervisor stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 16:26   ` kernel test robot
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 10/17] KVM: arm64: Implement non-protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 11/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 12/17] KVM: arm64: Add PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE Kconfig Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 10:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 10:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 10:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 15:33     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 15:33       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 15:33       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 13/17] KVM: arm64: Allocate shared pKVM hyp stacktrace buffers Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 14/17] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of pKVM HYP stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 15/17] KVM: arm64: Save protected-nVHE (pKVM) hyp stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 16/17] KVM: arm64: Implement protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 17/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce pkvm_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-27 14:29   ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: arm64: nVHE stack unwinder rework Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: arm64: Move PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE around Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Move nVHE stacktrace unwinding into its own compilation unit Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: arm64: Make unwind()/on_accessible_stack() per-unwinder functions Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:32       ` Mark Brown
2022-07-27 17:32         ` Mark Brown
2022-07-27 17:32         ` Mark Brown
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Move nVHE-only helpers into kvm/stacktrace.c Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: arm64: Don't open code ARRAY_SIZE() Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: Update 'unwinder howto' Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 15:56     ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: arm64: nVHE stack unwinder rework Kalesh Singh
2022-07-27 15:56       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-27 15:56       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-27 16:01     ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-27 16:01       ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-27 16:01       ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-27 17:45     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:44 ` [PATCH v6 00/17] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:44   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220726073750.3219117-5-kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --to=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=android-mm@google.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.