All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev, tfiga@chromium.org,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, mchehab@kernel.org, ming.qian@nxp.com,
	shijie.qin@nxp.com, eagle.zhou@nxp.com, bin.liu@mediatek.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
	tiffany.lin@mediatek.com, andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com,
	yunfei.dong@mediatek.com, stanimir.k.varbanov@gmail.com,
	quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com, agross@kernel.org,
	andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
	daniel.almeida@collabora.com, lkp@intel.com,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] media: videobuf2: Make bufs array dynamic allocated
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:52:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4b6ad10-1889-0a63-5a14-cb1320e2dc09@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324084830.GA18895@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

On 24/03/2023 09:48, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:31:35AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 24/03/2023 09:11, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 24/03/2023 à 06:01, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
>>>> Hi Benjamin,
>>>>
>>>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>>>>
>>>> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Benjamin-Gaignard/media-videobuf2-Access-vb2_queue-bufs-array-through-helper-functions/20230321-183154
>>>> base:   git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git master
>>>> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321102855.346732-3-benjamin.gaignard%40collabora.com
>>>> patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] media: videobuf2: Make bufs array dynamic allocated
>>>> config: arm64-randconfig-m041-20230319 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230324/202303240148.lKRnUqW9-lkp@intel.com/config)
>>>> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
>>>>
>>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
>>>> | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303240148.lKRnUqW9-lkp@intel.com/
>>>>
>>>> smatch warnings:
>>>> include/media/videobuf2-core.h:1272 vb2_queue_add_buffer() warn: sleeping in atomic context
>>>> drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:2456 vb2_core_queue_init() warn: Please consider using kcalloc instead of kmalloc_array
>>>>
>>>> vim +1272 include/media/videobuf2-core.h
>>>>
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1263  static inline bool vb2_queue_add_buffer(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1264  {
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1265      bool ret = false;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1266
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1267      spin_lock(&q->bufs_lock);
>>>>                                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> Holding a spin lock.
>>>>
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1268
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1269      if (vb->index >= q->max_num_bufs) {
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1270          struct vb2_buffer **tmp;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1271
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 @1272          tmp = krealloc_array(q->bufs, q->max_num_bufs * 2, sizeof(*q->bufs), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>                                                                                                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> Sleeping allocation.  GFP_ATOMIC?  Or is there a way to move the
>>>> allocation outside the lock?
>>>
>>> I will add GFP_ATOMIC flag in next version.
>>
>> No need. Instead, don't use realloc here, just allocate a new array, copy over all
>> the data from the old, and then switch q->bufs with the spinlock held. Then you
>> can free the old one.
>>
>> It's only when you update q->bufs that you need the lock.
> 
> The copy also needs to be protected by the lock.

I suspect that that is not needed, since you shouldn't be able to add buffers here
since a mutex should be held at this time.

That said, it's something that Benjamin needs to analyze.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1273          if (!tmp)
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1274              goto realloc_failed;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1275
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1276          q->max_num_bufs *= 2;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1277          q->bufs = tmp;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1278      }
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1279
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1280      if (vb->index < q->max_num_bufs) {
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1281          q->bufs[vb->index] = vb;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1282          ret = true;
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1283      }
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1284
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1285  realloc_failed:
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1286      spin_unlock(&q->bufs_lock);
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1287
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1288      return ret;
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1289  }
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev, tfiga@chromium.org,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, mchehab@kernel.org, ming.qian@nxp.com,
	shijie.qin@nxp.com, eagle.zhou@nxp.com, bin.liu@mediatek.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
	tiffany.lin@mediatek.com, andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com,
	yunfei.dong@mediatek.com, stanimir.k.varbanov@gmail.com,
	quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com, agross@kernel.org,
	andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
	daniel.almeida@collabora.com, lkp@intel.com,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] media: videobuf2: Make bufs array dynamic allocated
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:52:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4b6ad10-1889-0a63-5a14-cb1320e2dc09@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324084830.GA18895@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

On 24/03/2023 09:48, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:31:35AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 24/03/2023 09:11, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 24/03/2023 à 06:01, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
>>>> Hi Benjamin,
>>>>
>>>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>>>>
>>>> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Benjamin-Gaignard/media-videobuf2-Access-vb2_queue-bufs-array-through-helper-functions/20230321-183154
>>>> base:   git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git master
>>>> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321102855.346732-3-benjamin.gaignard%40collabora.com
>>>> patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] media: videobuf2: Make bufs array dynamic allocated
>>>> config: arm64-randconfig-m041-20230319 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230324/202303240148.lKRnUqW9-lkp@intel.com/config)
>>>> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
>>>>
>>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
>>>> | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303240148.lKRnUqW9-lkp@intel.com/
>>>>
>>>> smatch warnings:
>>>> include/media/videobuf2-core.h:1272 vb2_queue_add_buffer() warn: sleeping in atomic context
>>>> drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:2456 vb2_core_queue_init() warn: Please consider using kcalloc instead of kmalloc_array
>>>>
>>>> vim +1272 include/media/videobuf2-core.h
>>>>
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1263  static inline bool vb2_queue_add_buffer(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1264  {
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1265      bool ret = false;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1266
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1267      spin_lock(&q->bufs_lock);
>>>>                                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> Holding a spin lock.
>>>>
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1268
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1269      if (vb->index >= q->max_num_bufs) {
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1270          struct vb2_buffer **tmp;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1271
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 @1272          tmp = krealloc_array(q->bufs, q->max_num_bufs * 2, sizeof(*q->bufs), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>                                                                                                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> Sleeping allocation.  GFP_ATOMIC?  Or is there a way to move the
>>>> allocation outside the lock?
>>>
>>> I will add GFP_ATOMIC flag in next version.
>>
>> No need. Instead, don't use realloc here, just allocate a new array, copy over all
>> the data from the old, and then switch q->bufs with the spinlock held. Then you
>> can free the old one.
>>
>> It's only when you update q->bufs that you need the lock.
> 
> The copy also needs to be protected by the lock.

I suspect that that is not needed, since you shouldn't be able to add buffers here
since a mutex should be held at this time.

That said, it's something that Benjamin needs to analyze.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1273          if (!tmp)
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1274              goto realloc_failed;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1275
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1276          q->max_num_bufs *= 2;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1277          q->bufs = tmp;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1278      }
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1279
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1280      if (vb->index < q->max_num_bufs) {
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1281          q->bufs[vb->index] = vb;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1282          ret = true;
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1283      }
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1284
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1285  realloc_failed:
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1286      spin_unlock(&q->bufs_lock);
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1287
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1288      return ret;
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1289  }
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev, tfiga@chromium.org,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, mchehab@kernel.org, ming.qian@nxp.com,
	shijie.qin@nxp.com, eagle.zhou@nxp.com, bin.liu@mediatek.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
	tiffany.lin@mediatek.com, andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com,
	yunfei.dong@mediatek.com, stanimir.k.varbanov@gmail.com,
	quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com, agross@kernel.org,
	andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
	daniel.almeida@collabora.com, lkp@intel.com,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] media: videobuf2: Make bufs array dynamic allocated
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:52:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4b6ad10-1889-0a63-5a14-cb1320e2dc09@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324084830.GA18895@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

On 24/03/2023 09:48, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:31:35AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 24/03/2023 09:11, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 24/03/2023 à 06:01, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
>>>> Hi Benjamin,
>>>>
>>>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>>>>
>>>> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Benjamin-Gaignard/media-videobuf2-Access-vb2_queue-bufs-array-through-helper-functions/20230321-183154
>>>> base:   git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git master
>>>> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321102855.346732-3-benjamin.gaignard%40collabora.com
>>>> patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] media: videobuf2: Make bufs array dynamic allocated
>>>> config: arm64-randconfig-m041-20230319 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230324/202303240148.lKRnUqW9-lkp@intel.com/config)
>>>> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
>>>>
>>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
>>>> | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303240148.lKRnUqW9-lkp@intel.com/
>>>>
>>>> smatch warnings:
>>>> include/media/videobuf2-core.h:1272 vb2_queue_add_buffer() warn: sleeping in atomic context
>>>> drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:2456 vb2_core_queue_init() warn: Please consider using kcalloc instead of kmalloc_array
>>>>
>>>> vim +1272 include/media/videobuf2-core.h
>>>>
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1263  static inline bool vb2_queue_add_buffer(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1264  {
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1265      bool ret = false;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1266
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1267      spin_lock(&q->bufs_lock);
>>>>                                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> Holding a spin lock.
>>>>
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1268
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1269      if (vb->index >= q->max_num_bufs) {
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1270          struct vb2_buffer **tmp;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1271
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 @1272          tmp = krealloc_array(q->bufs, q->max_num_bufs * 2, sizeof(*q->bufs), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>                                                                                                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> Sleeping allocation.  GFP_ATOMIC?  Or is there a way to move the
>>>> allocation outside the lock?
>>>
>>> I will add GFP_ATOMIC flag in next version.
>>
>> No need. Instead, don't use realloc here, just allocate a new array, copy over all
>> the data from the old, and then switch q->bufs with the spinlock held. Then you
>> can free the old one.
>>
>> It's only when you update q->bufs that you need the lock.
> 
> The copy also needs to be protected by the lock.

I suspect that that is not needed, since you shouldn't be able to add buffers here
since a mutex should be held at this time.

That said, it's something that Benjamin needs to analyze.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1273          if (!tmp)
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1274              goto realloc_failed;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1275
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1276          q->max_num_bufs *= 2;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1277          q->bufs = tmp;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1278      }
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1279
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1280      if (vb->index < q->max_num_bufs) {
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1281          q->bufs[vb->index] = vb;
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1282          ret = true;
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1283      }
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1284
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1285  realloc_failed:
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1286      spin_unlock(&q->bufs_lock);
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1287
>>>> 487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1288      return ret;
>>>> 625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21  1289  }
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-21 10:28 [PATCH v2 0/8] Add DELETE_BUF ioctl Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] media: videobuf2: Access vb2_queue bufs array through helper functions Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 17:42   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-21 17:42     ` kernel test robot
2023-03-21 17:42     ` kernel test robot
2023-05-18 10:37   ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-18 10:37     ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-18 10:37     ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-22 11:19     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] media: videobuf2: Make bufs array dynamic allocated Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 18:16   ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-03-21 18:16     ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-03-21 18:16     ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-03-22  8:10     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-05-19 10:04     ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-19 10:04       ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-19 10:04       ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-22 12:27       ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-24  5:01   ` Dan Carpenter
2023-03-24  5:01     ` Dan Carpenter
2023-03-24  5:01     ` Dan Carpenter
2023-03-24  8:11     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-24  8:11       ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-24  8:11       ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-24  8:31       ` Hans Verkuil
2023-03-24  8:31         ` Hans Verkuil
2023-03-24  8:31         ` Hans Verkuil
2023-03-24  8:48         ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-03-24  8:48           ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-03-24  8:48           ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-03-24  8:52           ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2023-03-24  8:52             ` Hans Verkuil
2023-03-24  8:52             ` Hans Verkuil
2023-03-24  8:56             ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-24  8:56               ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-24  8:56               ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-05-19 10:00               ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-19 10:00                 ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-19 10:00                 ` Tomasz Figa
2023-03-24 13:02   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2023-03-24 13:02     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2023-03-24 13:02     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2023-03-21 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] media: videobuf2: Add a module param to limit vb2 queue buffer storage Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 17:01   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-21 17:01     ` kernel test robot
2023-03-21 17:01     ` kernel test robot
2023-03-21 19:15   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-21 19:15     ` kernel test robot
2023-03-21 19:15     ` kernel test robot
2023-03-22  6:22   ` [EXT] " Ming Qian
2023-03-22  6:22     ` Ming Qian
2023-03-22  6:22     ` Ming Qian
2023-03-22  9:23     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-05-19 10:19   ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-19 10:19     ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-19 10:19     ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-30 17:38     ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-30 17:38       ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-30 17:38       ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31  6:36   ` Hans Verkuil
2023-05-31  6:36     ` Hans Verkuil
2023-05-31  6:36     ` Hans Verkuil
2023-05-31  8:03     ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31  8:03       ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31  8:03       ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31  8:30       ` Hans Verkuil
2023-05-31  8:30         ` Hans Verkuil
2023-05-31  8:30         ` Hans Verkuil
2023-05-31 12:39         ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31 12:39           ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31 12:39           ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-01  8:03           ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-06-01  8:03             ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-06-01  8:03             ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-06-01  8:34             ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-01  8:34               ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-01  8:34               ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-08 10:24           ` Tomasz Figa
2023-06-08 10:24             ` Tomasz Figa
2023-06-08 10:24             ` Tomasz Figa
2023-06-08 10:42             ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-08 10:42               ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-08 10:42               ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-03-21 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] media: videobuf2: Stop define VB2_MAX_FRAME as global Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-05-23  7:14   ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-23  7:14     ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-23  7:14     ` Tomasz Figa
2023-03-21 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] media: v4l2: Add DELETE_BUF ioctl Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 20:06   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-21 20:06     ` kernel test robot
2023-03-21 20:06     ` kernel test robot
2023-05-23  8:23   ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-23  8:23     ` Tomasz Figa
2023-05-23  8:23     ` Tomasz Figa
2023-03-21 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] media: v4l2: Add mem2mem helpers for " Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] media: vim2m: Use v4l2-mem2mem helpers for VIDIOC_DELETE_BUF ioctl Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] media: verisilicon: " Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-21 10:28   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2023-03-23 17:52 [PATCH v2 2/8] media: videobuf2: Make bufs array dynamic allocated kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4b6ad10-1889-0a63-5a14-cb1320e2dc09@xs4all.nl \
    --to=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=bin.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=eagle.zhou@nxp.com \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.qian@nxp.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com \
    --cc=shijie.qin@nxp.com \
    --cc=stanimir.k.varbanov@gmail.com \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=tiffany.lin@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yunfei.dong@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.