selinux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
	Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] selinux: Add support for new key permissions
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:52:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <103187.1582905135@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhQ+pNTJjb=ipG_gsTSpv6-rEtWTL2sybrOnjyBJ+==2hw@mail.gmail.com>

Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:

> Yes, you really need to revert this patch David, I mentioned this some
> time ago when the linux-next conflict appeared.

It is reverted.

> Also, future patches like this *really* need to go in via the SELinux tree,
> not the keys tree, as they affect the SELinux kernel ABI and if they aren't
> merged via the same tree lots of bad things can happen if we aren't careful.

Are you're willing to take the matching keyring changes with it?  The SELinux
patch won't build without them - but they have to go in at the same time
otherwise the keyrings part will malfunction.

David


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-28 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20 18:10 [RFC PATCH 0/1] selinux: Add support for new key permissions Richard Haines
2020-02-20 18:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Richard Haines
     [not found]   ` <c5d6ae72-4f5d-fe41-c025-0eaa4616b7eb@tycho.nsa.gov>
2020-02-21  0:03     ` Paul Moore
2020-02-21 10:55     ` Richard Haines
2020-02-28 15:52     ` David Howells [this message]
2020-02-28 16:08       ` Paul Moore
2020-02-28 15:55   ` David Howells
2020-02-28 17:22     ` Stephen Smalley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=103187.1582905135@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=richard_c_haines@btinternet.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).