From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
dev@opencontainers.org,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mount: universally disallow mounting over symlinks
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 14:48:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200115144831.GJ8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115143459.l4wurqyetkmptsdm@yavin>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:34:59AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2020-01-16, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> wrote:
> > On 2020-01-15, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:01:50AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, there were two patches I sent a while ago[1]. I can re-send them if
> > > > you like. The second patch switches open_how->mode to a u64, but I'm
> > > > still on the fence about whether that makes sense to do...
> > >
> > > IMO plain __u64 is better than games with __aligned_u64 - all sizes are
> > > fixed, so...
> > >
> > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191219105533.12508-1-cyphar@cyphar.com/
> > >
> > > Do you want that series folded into "open: introduce openat2(2) syscall"
> > > and "selftests: add openat2(2) selftests" or would you rather have them
> > > appended at the end of the series. Personally I'd go for "fold them in"
> > > if it had been about my code, but it's really up to you.
> >
> > "fold them in" would probably be better to avoid making the mainline
> > history confusing afterwards. Thanks.
>
> Also (if you prefer) I can send a v3 which uses u64s rather than
> aligned_u64s.
<mode "lazy bastard">
Could you fold and resend the results of folding (i.e. replacements
for two commits in question)?
</mode>
The hard part is, of course, in updating commit messages ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-30 5:20 [PATCH RFC 0/1] mount: universally disallow mounting over symlinks Aleksa Sarai
2019-12-30 5:20 ` [PATCH RFC 1/1] " Aleksa Sarai
2019-12-30 7:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-30 8:28 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-08 4:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-30 5:44 ` [PATCH RFC 0/1] " Al Viro
2019-12-30 5:49 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-12-30 7:29 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-12-30 7:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-30 8:32 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-02 8:58 ` David Laight
2020-01-02 9:09 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-01 0:43 ` Al Viro
2020-01-01 0:54 ` Al Viro
2020-01-01 3:08 ` Al Viro
2020-01-01 14:44 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-01 23:40 ` Al Viro
2020-01-02 3:59 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-03 1:49 ` Al Viro
2020-01-04 4:46 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-08 3:13 ` Al Viro
2020-01-08 3:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-01-08 21:34 ` Al Viro
2020-01-10 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-01-10 4:15 ` Al Viro
2020-01-10 5:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-01-10 6:20 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-12 21:33 ` Al Viro
2020-01-13 2:59 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-14 0:25 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-14 4:39 ` Al Viro
2020-01-14 5:01 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-14 5:59 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-10 21:07 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-14 4:57 ` Al Viro
2020-01-14 5:12 ` Al Viro
2020-01-14 20:01 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-15 14:25 ` Al Viro
2020-01-15 14:29 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-15 14:34 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-15 14:48 ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-01-15 13:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-01-19 3:14 ` [RFC][PATCHSET][CFT] pathwalk cleanups and fixes Al Viro
2020-01-19 14:33 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-10 23:19 ` [PATCH RFC 0/1] mount: universally disallow mounting over symlinks Al Viro
2020-01-13 1:48 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-13 3:54 ` Al Viro
2020-01-13 6:00 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-13 6:03 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-13 13:30 ` Al Viro
2020-01-14 7:25 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-14 12:17 ` Ian Kent
2020-01-04 5:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200115144831.GJ8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=dev@opencontainers.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).