* Re: [PATCH] nfsd: fix race between cache_clean and cache_purge [not found] <5eed50660eb13326b0fbf537fb58481ea53c1acb.1585043174.git.wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com> @ 2020-03-25 1:01 ` Sasha Levin 2020-03-25 14:13 ` Chuck Lever 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2020-03-25 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sasha Levin, Yihao Wu, J . Bruce Fields; +Cc: linux-nfs, stable Hi [This is an automated email] The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.11, v5.4.27, v4.19.112, v4.14.174, v4.9.217, v4.4.217. v5.5.11: Build OK! v5.4.27: Build OK! v4.19.112: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock") v4.14.174: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock") v4.9.217: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock") 2b477c00f3bd ("svcrpc: free contexts immediately on PROC_DESTROY") 471a930ad7d1 ("SUNRPC: Drop all entries from cache_detail when cache_purge()") v4.4.217: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock") 2b477c00f3bd ("svcrpc: free contexts immediately on PROC_DESTROY") 471a930ad7d1 ("SUNRPC: Drop all entries from cache_detail when cache_purge()") d8d29138b17c ("sunrpc: remove 'inuse' flag from struct cache_detail.") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks Sasha ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nfsd: fix race between cache_clean and cache_purge 2020-03-25 1:01 ` [PATCH] nfsd: fix race between cache_clean and cache_purge Sasha Levin @ 2020-03-25 14:13 ` Chuck Lever 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Chuck Lever @ 2020-03-25 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sasha Levin; +Cc: Yihao Wu, Bruce Fields, Linux NFS Mailing List, stable > On Mar 24, 2020, at 9:01 PM, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hi > > [This is an automated email] > > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.11, v5.4.27, v4.19.112, v4.14.174, v4.9.217, v4.4.217. > > v5.5.11: Build OK! > v5.4.27: Build OK! > v4.19.112: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock") > > v4.14.174: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock") > > v4.9.217: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock") > 2b477c00f3bd ("svcrpc: free contexts immediately on PROC_DESTROY") > 471a930ad7d1 ("SUNRPC: Drop all entries from cache_detail when cache_purge()") > > v4.4.217: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock") > 2b477c00f3bd ("svcrpc: free contexts immediately on PROC_DESTROY") > 471a930ad7d1 ("SUNRPC: Drop all entries from cache_detail when cache_purge()") > d8d29138b17c ("sunrpc: remove 'inuse' flag from struct cache_detail.") > > > NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. > > How should we proceed with this patch? Please drop it. Thanks! -- Chuck Lever ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-25 14:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <5eed50660eb13326b0fbf537fb58481ea53c1acb.1585043174.git.wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com>
2020-03-25 1:01 ` [PATCH] nfsd: fix race between cache_clean and cache_purge Sasha Levin
2020-03-25 14:13 ` Chuck Lever
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).