From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>,
Fu Wei <wefu@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: GTDT: Don't corrupt interrupt mappings on watchdow probe failure
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:57:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sg3jsepd.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421172056.n2yoggo5epqwdhtc@bogus>
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:20:56 +0100,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> (with stable email fixed, but may need separate posting anyways)
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:43:16PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > When failing the driver probe because of invalid firmware properties,
> > the GTDT driver unmaps the interrupt that it mapped earlier.
> >
> > However, it never checks whether the mapping of the interrupt actially
> > succeeded. Even more, should the firmware report an illegal interrupt
> > number that overlaps with the GIC SGI range, this can result in an
> > IPI being unmapped, and subsequent fireworks (as reported by Dann
> > Frazier).
> >
> > Rework the driver to have a slightly saner behaviour and actually
> > check whether the interrupt has been mapped before unmapping things.
> >
> > Reported-by: dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>
> > Fixes: ca9ae5ec4ef0 ("acpi/arm64: Add SBSA Generic Watchdog support in GTDT driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YH87dtTfwYgavusz@xps13.dannf
> > Cc: stable@vgerlkernel.org
> ^^^
>
> I thought I messed up while replying with my fat fingers, but here is the
> culprit. I got mail delivery failure to my reply, thought I will let you
> know as it may be difficult to notice this when using git send-email.
I'm definitely the one with very fat fingers. I'll fix the patch in my
tree.
Thanks for the heads up,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-21 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210421164317.1718831-1-maz@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20210421164317.1718831-2-maz@kernel.org>
2021-04-21 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: GTDT: Don't corrupt interrupt mappings on watchdow probe failure Sudeep Holla
2021-04-21 17:57 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sg3jsepd.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=dann.frazier@canonical.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=wefu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).