wireguard.lists.zx2c4.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Centos 7.6 wg-quick not working properly
       [not found] <1429556426.5086611.1568572361543.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
@ 2019-09-15 18:32 ` George Lucan
  2019-09-16 18:47   ` George Lucan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: George Lucan @ 2019-09-15 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wireguard


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2187 bytes --]

Hello,
I have been trying for several days to setup a wireguard vpn and send all the traffic from a VM to another site (redirect gateway scenario).
Site AOS is Centos 7.6 installed with docker and wireguard installed
Site BOS is a Opensense 19.7.4 with wireguard installed from the plugin and a bunch of other things on it
I believe the issue is within Ip route on Centos 7.6 but I am reaching out for maybe different opinions.On the Centos VM I am using wireguard installed from the repos on the website and using systemd to bring up the tunnel. Everything seem to be brought up correctly except that the traffic does not go through the tunnel.
Further investigating I noticed something unusual (in my opinion).
Before the tunnel is up:#ip rule show
0:      from all lookup local 
32766:  from all lookup main 
32767:  from all lookup default After the tunnel is up:#ip rule show
0:      from all lookup local 
32764:  from all lookup main 
32765:  not from all fwmark 0xca6c lookup 51820 
32766:  from all lookup main 
32767:  from all lookup default To me is seems like somehow there are 2 tables named "main" one after the new table created by wg-quick (looking at the priority it seems it is the same one that was present previously) and another one that gets create out of thin air before the wireguard created one named 51820.Ping works through the tunnel for IP to the other end of the tunnel#wg
interface: wg0
  public key: 8JXLXfl1W2xZd1T+zaCKSNB+FhUbb1IquIHvHhY7/iY=
  private key: (hidden)
  listening port: 34559
  fwmark: 0xca6c

peer: 04kTPSrh08X5uOCmL5aM1iCm8UqFHGtJDsrsPReafS8=
  endpoint: 188.27.172.68:1300
  allowed ips: 0.0.0.0/0
  latest handshake: 1 minute, 41 seconds ago
  transfer: 87.85 KiB received, 415.61 KiB sent
  persistent keepalive: every 15 seconds# ping 192.168.249.1
PING 192.168.249.1 (192.168.249.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.249.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=89.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.249.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=89.5 msIs there any step that I might have missed or any kernel feature that would explain the behaviour?Worth mentioning it is a home env so I can test whatever is needed to get to the bottom of it.
Thanks
George

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5755 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Centos 7.6 wg-quick not working properly
  2019-09-15 18:32 ` Centos 7.6 wg-quick not working properly George Lucan
@ 2019-09-16 18:47   ` George Lucan
  2019-09-24 15:29     ` Eddie
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: George Lucan @ 2019-09-16 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wireguard


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2543 bytes --]

 Hello,
Some further investigations have revealed that actually the "second main" table gets created by the last command executed by wg-quick "ip -4 rule add table main suppress_prefixlength 0". Will try to figure out what is happening further.
George
    On Sunday, 15 September 2019, 9:32:41 pm GMT+3, George Lucan <boss_geo2005@yahoo.com> wrote:  
 
 Hello,
I have been trying for several days to setup a wireguard vpn and send all the traffic from a VM to another site (redirect gateway scenario).
Site AOS is Centos 7.6 installed with docker and wireguard installed
Site BOS is a Opensense 19.7.4 with wireguard installed from the plugin and a bunch of other things on it
I believe the issue is within Ip route on Centos 7.6 but I am reaching out for maybe different opinions.On the Centos VM I am using wireguard installed from the repos on the website and using systemd to bring up the tunnel. Everything seem to be brought up correctly except that the traffic does not go through the tunnel.
Further investigating I noticed something unusual (in my opinion).
Before the tunnel is up:#ip rule show
0:      from all lookup local 
32766:  from all lookup main 
32767:  from all lookup default After the tunnel is up:#ip rule show
0:      from all lookup local 
32764:  from all lookup main 
32765:  not from all fwmark 0xca6c lookup 51820 
32766:  from all lookup main 
32767:  from all lookup default To me is seems like somehow there are 2 tables named "main" one after the new table created by wg-quick (looking at the priority it seems it is the same one that was present previously) and another one that gets create out of thin air before the wireguard created one named 51820.Ping works through the tunnel for IP to the other end of the tunnel#wg
interface: wg0
  public key: 8JXLXfl1W2xZd1T+zaCKSNB+FhUbb1IquIHvHhY7/iY=
  private key: (hidden)
  listening port: 34559
  fwmark: 0xca6c

peer: 04kTPSrh08X5uOCmL5aM1iCm8UqFHGtJDsrsPReafS8=
  endpoint: 188.27.172.68:1300
  allowed ips: 0.0.0.0/0
  latest handshake: 1 minute, 41 seconds ago
  transfer: 87.85 KiB received, 415.61 KiB sent
  persistent keepalive: every 15 seconds# ping 192.168.249.1
PING 192.168.249.1 (192.168.249.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.249.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=89.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.249.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=89.5 msIs there any step that I might have missed or any kernel feature that would explain the behaviour?Worth mentioning it is a home env so I can test whatever is needed to get to the bottom of it.
Thanks
George  

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6504 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Centos 7.6 wg-quick not working properly
  2019-09-16 18:47   ` George Lucan
@ 2019-09-24 15:29     ` Eddie
  2019-09-24 19:23       ` George Lucan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eddie @ 2019-09-24 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: George Lucan, WireGuard mailing list


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3453 bytes --]

I'll just repeat verbatim the response I got from Silvan (thank you) 
when I reported the same issue previously:

The main problem is that the current standard kernel of CentOS simple 
does not support the handling of "suppress_prefixlength".
Iproute2 supports it since it does not return any error while adding so 
it had to be the kernel causing problems.
In essence Red Hats official answer was "It isn't a bug, RHEL7 simple 
does not support it".
If you sill want to fix your problem just upgrade your kernel to 
long-term or mainline.

Cheers.

On 9/16/2019 11:47 AM, George Lucan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some further investigations have revealed that actually the "second 
> main" table gets created by the last command executed by wg-quick "ip 
> -4 rule add table main suppress_prefixlength 0". Will try to figure 
> out what is happening further.
>
> George
>
> On Sunday, 15 September 2019, 9:32:41 pm GMT+3, George Lucan 
> <boss_geo2005@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been trying for several days to setup a wireguard vpn and send 
> all the traffic from a VM to another site (redirect gateway scenario).
>
> Site A
> OS is Centos 7.6 installed with docker and wireguard installed
>
> Site B
> OS is a Opensense 19.7.4 with wireguard installed from the plugin and 
> a bunch of other things on it
>
> I believe the issue is within Ip route on Centos 7.6 but I am reaching 
> out for maybe different opinions.
> On the Centos VM I am using wireguard installed from the repos on the 
> website and using systemd to bring up the tunnel. Everything seem to 
> be brought up correctly except that the traffic does not go through 
> the tunnel.
>
> Further investigating I noticed something unusual (in my opinion).
>
> Before the tunnel is up:
> #ip rule show
> 0:      from all lookup local
> 32766:  from all lookup main
> 32767:  from all lookup default
> After the tunnel is up:
> #ip rule show
> 0:      from all lookup local
> 32764:  from all lookup main
> 32765:  not from all fwmark 0xca6c lookup 51820
> 32766:  from all lookup main
> 32767:  from all lookup default
> To me is seems like somehow there are 2 tables named "main" one after 
> the new table created by wg-quick (looking at the priority it seems it 
> is the same one that was present previously) and another one that gets 
> create out of thin air before the wireguard created one named 51820.
> Ping works through the tunnel for IP to the other end of the tunnel
> #wg
> interface: wg0
>    public key: 8JXLXfl1W2xZd1T+zaCKSNB+FhUbb1IquIHvHhY7/iY=
>    private key: (hidden)
>    listening port: 34559
>    fwmark: 0xca6c
>
> peer: 04kTPSrh08X5uOCmL5aM1iCm8UqFHGtJDsrsPReafS8=
>    endpoint: 188.27.172.68:1300
>    allowed ips: 0.0.0.0/0
>    latest handshake: 1 minute, 41 seconds ago
>    transfer: 87.85 KiB received, 415.61 KiB sent
>    persistent keepalive: every 15 seconds
> # ping 192.168.249.1
> PING 192.168.249.1 (192.168.249.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.249.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=89.2 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.249.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=89.5 ms
> Is there any step that I might have missed or any kernel feature that would explain the behaviour?
> Worth mentioning it is a home env so I can test whatever is needed to get to the bottom of it.
> Thanks
> George
>
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9816 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Centos 7.6 wg-quick not working properly
  2019-09-24 15:29     ` Eddie
@ 2019-09-24 19:23       ` George Lucan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: George Lucan @ 2019-09-24 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: WireGuard mailing list, Eddie


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4441 bytes --]

 Hi Eddie,
Thanks for the response, I figured is was something with either the kernel or iproute and I guess either the kernel does not support it or the iproute2 version does not "completely support it" or has a bug.
On your note about updating the kernel, the funny thing is initially I tried this on Oracle Linux (that comes with 4.14.35-1902.3.1.el7uek.x86_64) by default and when I was ending up in kernel panics, so I though it might be because the kernel is too new or something.
For the moment I resolved my problem installing a Ubuntu that works without any issue.
I still have the Oracle Linux machine (4.14.35-1902.3.1.el7uek.x86_64) so if anyone want to me to do any debug and provide the response, I am happy to do it.
Although it might or not be relevant all are Virtual Machine in Hyper-v, both the ubuntu one(working) and the Centos(failing one) and the Oracle Linux(kernel panics one)
Thanks
George
    On Tuesday, 24 September 2019, 06:29:07 pm GMT+3, Eddie <stunnel@attglobal.net> wrote:  
 
  I'll just repeat verbatim the response I got from Silvan (thank you) when I reported the same issue previously:
 
 The main problem is that the current standard kernel of CentOS simple does not support the handling of "suppress_prefixlength". 
 Iproute2 supports it since it does not return any error while adding so it had to be the kernel causing problems. 
 In essence Red Hats official answer was "It isn't a bug, RHEL7 simple does not support it". 
 If you sill want to fix your problem just upgrade your kernel to long-term or mainline. 
 
 Cheers.
 
 On 9/16/2019 11:47 AM, George Lucan wrote:
  
 
 Hello, 
  Some further investigations have revealed that actually the "second main" table gets created by the last command executed by wg-quick "ip -4 rule add table main suppress_prefixlength 0". Will try to figure out what is happening further. 
  George 
      On Sunday, 15 September 2019, 9:32:41 pm GMT+3, George Lucan <boss_geo2005@yahoo.com> wrote:  
  
      Hello, 
  I have been trying for several days to setup a wireguard vpn and send all the traffic from a VM to another site (redirect  gateway scenario). 
  Site A OS is Centos 7.6 installed with docker and wireguard installed 
  Site B OS is a Opensense 19.7.4 with wireguard installed from the plugin and a bunch of other things on it 
  I believe the issue is within Ip route on Centos 7.6 but I am reaching out for maybe different opinions. On the Centos VM I am using wireguard installed from the repos on the website and using systemd to bring up the tunnel. Everything seem to be brought up correctly except that the traffic does not go through the tunnel. 
  Further investigating I noticed something unusual (in my opinion). 
  Before the tunnel is up:   #ip rule show
0:      from all lookup local 
32766:  from all lookup main 
32767:  from all lookup default    After the tunnel is up:   #ip rule show
0:      from all lookup local 
32764:  from all lookup main 
32765:  not from all fwmark 0xca6c lookup 51820 
32766:  from all lookup main 
32767:  from all lookup default  To me is seems like somehow there are 2 tables named "main" one after the new table created by wg-quick (looking at the priority it seems it is the same one that was present previously) and another one that gets create out of thin air before the wireguard created one named 51820. Ping works through the tunnel for IP to the other end of the tunnel #wg
interface: wg0
  public key: 8JXLXfl1W2xZd1T+zaCKSNB+FhUbb1IquIHvHhY7/iY=
  private key: (hidden)
  listening port: 34559
  fwmark: 0xca6c

peer: 04kTPSrh08X5uOCmL5aM1iCm8UqFHGtJDsrsPReafS8=
  endpoint: 188.27.172.68:1300
  allowed ips: 0.0.0.0/0
  latest handshake: 1 minute, 41 seconds ago
  transfer: 87.85 KiB received, 415.61 KiB sent
  persistent keepalive: every 15 seconds# ping 192.168.249.1
PING 192.168.249.1 (192.168.249.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.249.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=89.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.249.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=89.5 ms    Is there any step that I might have missed or any kernel feature that would explain the behaviour? Worth mentioning it is a home env so I can test whatever is needed to get to the bottom of it.  Thanks  George        
  _______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard 
   

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 13381 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-25  8:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <1429556426.5086611.1568572361543.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2019-09-15 18:32 ` Centos 7.6 wg-quick not working properly George Lucan
2019-09-16 18:47   ` George Lucan
2019-09-24 15:29     ` Eddie
2019-09-24 19:23       ` George Lucan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).