Upstream Submission v1

Upstream Submission v1

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

Hey list,

I submitted patchset v1 of WireGuard to LKML a few minutes ago:

[0/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429108040&w=2
[1/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429908043&w=2
[2/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306437408074&w=2
[3/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306440208084&w=2

I'm pretty elated, as getting v1 out the door marks a major milestone.

I expect for the first submission to be mercilessly criticized from
all sorts of interesting and useful angles. There will most certainly
be a v2, and it will be better because of whatever intense criticism
received from v1. So hold on tight: a wild process is about to begin.

Regards,
Jason

Re: Upstream Submission v1

[Joe Doss]

On 07/31/2018 02:26 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey list,
> 
> I submitted patchset v1 of WireGuard to LKML a few minutes ago:
> 
> [0/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429108040&w=2
> [1/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429908043&w=2
> [2/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306437408074&w=2
> [3/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306440208084&w=2
> 
> I'm pretty elated, as getting v1 out the door marks a major milestone.
> 
> I expect for the first submission to be mercilessly criticized from
> all sorts of interesting and useful angles. There will most certainly
> be a v2, and it will be better because of whatever intense criticism
> received from v1. So hold on tight: a wild process is about to begin.

Great job Jason and everyone that has contributed to this wonderful 
project! This is a wonderful achievement! Cheers to the next chapter of 
WireGuard! I look forward to killing off the wireguard-dkms RPM in the 
future. :)

Joe




-- 
Joe Doss
joe@solidadmin.com

Re: Upstream Submission v1

[Reuben Martin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 663 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 2:27 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:

>
> I'm pretty elated, as getting v1 out the door marks a major milestone.
>
> I expect for the first submission to be mercilessly criticized from
> all sorts of interesting and useful angles. There will most certainly
> be a v2, and it will be better because of whatever intense criticism
> received from v1. So hold on tight: a wild process is about to begin.
>

Congrats! You've put a lot of work into this, and put up with a lot of
grief for it as well. Critical review not withstanding, having a community
actively using it in prod lends a lot of weight to your submission.

-Reuben

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1269 bytes --]

Re: Upstream Submission v1

[Lee Yates]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1840 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Huge contrats, Jason et al.! A lot of work, but you got there *touch
wood*. This will open a lot of doors for the protocol, service providers
and end users.


- ------ Original Message ------
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: "WireGuard mailing list" <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Sent: 31/07/2018 20:26:53
Subject: Upstream Submission v1

>Hey list,
>
>I submitted patchset v1 of WireGuard to LKML a few minutes ago:
>
>[0/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429108040&w=2
>[1/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429908043&w=2
>[2/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306437408074&w=2
>[3/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306440208084&w=2
>
>I'm pretty elated, as getting v1 out the door marks a major milestone.
>
>I expect for the first submission to be mercilessly criticized from
>all sorts of interesting and useful angles. There will most certainly
>be a v2, and it will be better because of whatever intense criticism
>received from v1. So hold on tight: a wild process is about to begin.
>
>Regards,
>Jason
>_______________________________________________
>WireGuard mailing list
>WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
>https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: BCPG C# v1.8.1.0

iQFBBAEBCAArBQJbYNEMJBxMZWUgWWF0ZXMgPHJhaW5tYWtlcnJhd0BpY2xvdWQu
Y29tPgAKCRDvJcvMOyipkpUbB/4pd9bTas2l+Ftk7MPPMl0hP0+QK1Ox3UGxJmWv
khWfrZDrrV7syobjN+2FEtA54ePAGKZpK6ic4n9dryTS3MM/A3dFPeZLoyLWFgWi
69ALg8EYNdCZRqqK57te4f8ldQh3J1exb0d/QmiVDSAWxsgIJ1fNL8UW0bilntDh
G26azO6MYDRA6Jj5ACS848mMeNa4Os2EttxOR2bJph1itRouitLNEm52spBZks6F
zk3KgATpThhliUwG4O5IAB3U4OU+mnqkjoGkW4ABq0hQyuUbld/v1AKrC+HgY+5J
I9ApGdd/SSN4dsqk1WCG/TbwdFR8u6m8q1PQ7Yz4ym/5X94L
=Df9j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: rainmakerraw@icloud.com.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 1677 bytes --]

Re: Upstream Submission v1

[Eric Light]

Congratulations Jason!!  Thanks for all of your amazing work.

This feels like a great moment to visit https://www.wireguard.com/donations/

E

--------------------------------------------
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es

On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, at 07:26, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey list,
> 
> I submitted patchset v1 of WireGuard to LKML a few minutes ago:
> 
> [0/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429108040&w=2
> [1/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429908043&w=2
> [2/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306437408074&w=2
> [3/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306440208084&w=2
> 
> I'm pretty elated, as getting v1 out the door marks a major milestone.
> 
> I expect for the first submission to be mercilessly criticized from
> all sorts of interesting and useful angles. There will most certainly
> be a v2, and it will be better because of whatever intense criticism
> received from v1. So hold on tight: a wild process is about to begin.
> 
> Regards,
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

Re: Upstream Submission v1

[jugs]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1806 bytes --]

I don't have anything unique to say, but congratulations Jason!

Years of hard work coming together for this submission, thank you for everything and looking forward to seeing CONFIG_WIREGUARD=y :)


-jugs

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On July 31, 2018 10:28 PM, Eric Light <eric@ericlight.com> wrote:

> Congratulations Jason!! Thanks for all of your amazing work.
> 

> This feels like a great moment to visit https://www.wireguard.com/donations/
> 

> E
> 

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

> Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
> A: http://five.sentenc.es
> 

> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, at 07:26, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> 

> > Hey list,
> > I submitted patchset v1 of WireGuard to LKML a few minutes ago:
> > [0/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429108040&w=2
> > [1/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429908043&w=2
> > [2/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306437408074&w=2
> > [3/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306440208084&w=2
> > I'm pretty elated, as getting v1 out the door marks a major milestone.
> > I expect for the first submission to be mercilessly criticized from
> > all sorts of interesting and useful angles. There will most certainly
> > be a v2, and it will be better because of whatever intense criticism
> > received from v1. So hold on tight: a wild process is about to begin.
> > Regards,
> > Jason
> > 

> > WireGuard mailing list
> > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
> 

> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard


[-- Attachment #1.2: publickey - jugs@protonmail.ch - 0xFD2E0B45.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 1758 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 509 bytes --]

Re: Upstream Submission v1

[Fredrik Strömberg]

Congratulations, and thank you! Looking forward to following the
discussions that will be sparked by this.

Cheers,
Fredrik Stromberg

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:49 AM, jugs <jugs@protonmail.ch> wrote:
> I don't have anything unique to say, but congratulations Jason!
>
> Years of hard work coming together for this submission, thank you for eve=
rything and looking forward to seeing CONFIG_WIREGUARD=3Dy :)
>
>
> -jugs
>
> =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original =
Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
> On July 31, 2018 10:28 PM, Eric Light <eric@ericlight.com> wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Jason!! Thanks for all of your amazing work.
>>
>
>> This feels like a great moment to visit https://www.wireguard.com/donati=
ons/
>>
>
>> E
>>
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>> Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
>> A: http://five.sentenc.es
>>
>
>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, at 07:26, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>
>
>> > Hey list,
>> > I submitted patchset v1 of WireGuard to LKML a few minutes ago:
>> > [0/3] https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-netdev&m=3D153306429108040&w=3D2
>> > [1/3] https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-netdev&m=3D153306429908043&w=3D2
>> > [2/3] https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-netdev&m=3D153306437408074&w=3D2
>> > [3/3] https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-netdev&m=3D153306440208084&w=3D2
>> > I'm pretty elated, as getting v1 out the door marks a major milestone.
>> > I expect for the first submission to be mercilessly criticized from
>> > all sorts of interesting and useful angles. There will most certainly
>> > be a v2, and it will be better because of whatever intense criticism
>> > received from v1. So hold on tight: a wild process is about to begin.
>> > Regards,
>> > Jason
>> >
>
>> > WireGuard mailing list
>> > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
>> > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
>>
>
>> WireGuard mailing list
>> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
>> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
>

Re: Upstream Submission v1

[Roman Mamedov]

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:26:53 +0200
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:

> Hey list,
> 
> I submitted patchset v1 of WireGuard to LKML a few minutes ago:
> 
> [0/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429108040&w=2
> [1/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429908043&w=2
> [2/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306437408074&w=2
> [3/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306440208084&w=2
> 
> I'm pretty elated, as getting v1 out the door marks a major milestone.
> 
> I expect for the first submission to be mercilessly criticized from
> all sorts of interesting and useful angles. There will most certainly
> be a v2, and it will be better because of whatever intense criticism
> received from v1. So hold on tight: a wild process is about to begin.

Congratulations, and a minor thing, please don't forget to CC: the WireGuard
mailing list on such submissions, so all subscribers here could take a peek on
replies to WG patches even if they don't follow the high-volume netdev list
themselves.

-- 
With respect,
Roman

Re: Upstream Submission v1

[Martin Eskdale Moen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1071 bytes --]

Congrats Jason, I'm looking forward to seeing what they come up with but
also seeing Wireguard being in mainline.

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 8:27 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:

> Hey list,
>
> I submitted patchset v1 of WireGuard to LKML a few minutes ago:
>
> [0/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429108040&w=2
> [1/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306429908043&w=2
> [2/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306437408074&w=2
> [3/3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153306440208084&w=2
>
> I'm pretty elated, as getting v1 out the door marks a major milestone.
>
> I expect for the first submission to be mercilessly criticized from
> all sorts of interesting and useful angles. There will most certainly
> be a v2, and it will be better because of whatever intense criticism
> received from v1. So hold on tight: a wild process is about to begin.
>
> Regards,
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2026 bytes --]