From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.k.lengyel@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <iwj@xenproject.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Tamas K Lengyel <lengyelt@ainfosec.com>,
Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU <ppircalabu@bitdefender.com>,
Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@bitdefender.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] evtchn: don't call Xen consumer callback with per-channel lock held
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:41:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b339f30-57db-caf6-fd7e-84199f98546f@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed5fc3e2-42b1-477a-c424-05ddf7fd3bf4@xen.org>
On 23.12.2020 14:33, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/12/2020 13:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> From the input by both of you I still can't
>> conclude whether this patch should remain as is in v4, or revert
>> back to its v2 version. Please can we get this settled so I can get
>> v4 out?
>
> I haven't had time to investigate the rest of the VM event code to find
> other cases where this may happen. I still think there is a bigger
> problem in the VM event code, but the maintainer disagrees here.
>
> At which point, I see limited reason to try to paper over in the common
> code. So I would rather ack/merge v2 rather than v3.
Since I expect Tamas and/or the Bitdefender folks to be of the
opposite opinion, there's still no way out, at least if "rather
ack" implies a nak for v3. Personally, if this expectation of
mine is correct, I'd prefer to keep the accounting but make it
optional (as suggested in a post-commit-message remark).
That'll eliminate the overhead you appear to be concerned of,
but of course it'll further complicate the logic (albeit just
slightly).
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-23 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 13:26 [PATCH v3 0/5] evtchn: (not so) recent XSAs follow-on Jan Beulich
2020-11-23 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] evtchn: drop acquiring of per-channel lock from send_guest_{global,vcpu}_virq() Jan Beulich
2020-12-02 19:03 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-03 9:46 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-09 9:53 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-09 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
2020-11-23 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] evtchn: avoid access tearing for ->virq_to_evtchn[] accesses Jan Beulich
2020-12-02 21:14 ` Julien Grall
2020-11-23 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] evtchn: convert vIRQ lock to an r/w one Jan Beulich
2020-12-09 11:16 ` Julien Grall
2020-11-23 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] evtchn: convert domain event " Jan Beulich
2020-12-09 11:54 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-11 10:32 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-11 10:57 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-14 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-21 17:45 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-22 9:46 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-23 11:22 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-23 12:57 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-23 13:19 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-23 13:36 ` Jan Beulich
2020-11-23 13:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] evtchn: don't call Xen consumer callback with per-channel lock held Jan Beulich
2020-11-30 10:39 ` Isaila Alexandru
2020-12-02 21:10 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-03 10:09 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-03 14:40 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-12-04 11:28 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-04 11:48 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-04 11:51 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-04 12:01 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-04 15:09 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-07 8:02 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-07 17:22 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-04 15:21 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-12-04 15:29 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-04 19:15 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-12-04 19:22 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-04 21:23 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-12-07 15:28 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-07 17:30 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-07 17:35 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-12-23 13:12 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-23 13:33 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-23 13:41 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2020-12-23 14:44 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-23 14:56 ` Jan Beulich
2020-12-23 15:08 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-23 15:15 ` Tamas K Lengyel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b339f30-57db-caf6-fd7e-84199f98546f@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=aisaila@bitdefender.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=lengyelt@ainfosec.com \
--cc=ppircalabu@bitdefender.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tamas.k.lengyel@gmail.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).