From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: fix xen-detect to correctly identify domU type
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:52:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F2756A.3010202@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F270A7.6030808@citrix.com>
On 23/03/16 11:32, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 23/03/16 10:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 23.03.16 at 11:14, <JGross@suse.com> wrote:
>>> 7. Report type according to features found (this is a little bit
>>> ugly: we have to rely on the current hypervisor implementation
>>> regarding the bits set for the different guest types).
>>
>> Well, in some of the cases feature flags only make sense for one
>> kind of guest, so if such a flag is set it could be used as positive
>> indication (while it being clear may then still mean nothing).
>>
>>> Would it make sense to add another file to /sys/hypervisor/properties?
>>> Something like guest_type, containing "pv", "hvm" or "pvh"? If existing
>>> this could be used to report the guest type.
>>
>> That would seem a good idea to me. What do others, namely
>> Linux maintainers, think?
>
> What's the use case for user space knowing if it's in a PV or HVM domain?
The first thing coming to my mind would be diagnostic tools.
juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-23 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-23 7:50 [PATCH] tools: fix xen-detect to correctly identify domU type Juergen Gross
2016-03-23 9:10 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <56F26B7C02000078000DF896@suse.com>
2016-03-23 9:19 ` Juergen Gross
2016-03-23 9:29 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <56F26FF602000078000DF8C8@suse.com>
2016-03-23 10:14 ` Juergen Gross
2016-03-23 10:25 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-23 10:32 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-23 10:52 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2016-03-23 10:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-23 10:59 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-23 11:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-23 11:18 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-23 11:25 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-23 19:03 ` Juergen Gross
2016-03-24 10:22 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-24 10:58 ` Juergen Gross
2016-03-24 11:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-24 11:38 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-25 8:54 ` Juergen Gross
2016-03-29 6:49 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-29 13:54 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-29 14:00 ` Juergen Gross
2016-03-29 14:05 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-23 11:33 ` Juergen Gross
2016-03-23 12:50 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-03-23 10:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-23 10:48 ` Juergen Gross
2016-03-23 10:29 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F2756A.3010202@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).