From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: andrii.anisov@gmail.com
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"andrii_anisov@epam.com" <andrii_anisov@epam.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: implement VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 06:02:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5CDAAE4F020000780022E941@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f71bdb25-ebd3-31fc-f5fc-b8d591c3cc28@gmail.com>
>>> On 14.05.19 at 13:45, <andrii.anisov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14.05.19 14:24, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>> I think there are an agreement that the two methods should not be used together.
>>>
>>> For a domain or for a particular VCPU?
>>> How should we response on the request to register paddr when we already have registered vaddr and vice versa?
>>
>> From the discussion with Jan, you would tear down the previous solution and then
>> register the new version. So this allows cases like a bootloader and a
> kernel using different version of the interface.
>
> I'm not sure Jan stated that, he rather questioned that.
>
> Jan, could you please confirm you agree that it should be dropped already
> registered runstate and (potentially) changed version in case of the new
> register request?
Well, I think Julian's implication was that we can't support in particular
the boot loader -> kernel handover case without extra measures (if
at all), and hence he added things together and said what results
from this. Of course ideally we'd reject mixed requests, but unless
someone can come up with a clever means of how to determine entity
boundaries I'm afraid this is not going to be possible without breaking
certain setups.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: <andrii.anisov@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"andrii_anisov@epam.com" <andrii_anisov@epam.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: implement VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 06:02:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5CDAAE4F020000780022E941@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190514120223.uQXowHlxkGE2sCBBEj5fvwhI5xzow62RC7VsdpeNCzM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f71bdb25-ebd3-31fc-f5fc-b8d591c3cc28@gmail.com>
>>> On 14.05.19 at 13:45, <andrii.anisov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14.05.19 14:24, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>> I think there are an agreement that the two methods should not be used together.
>>>
>>> For a domain or for a particular VCPU?
>>> How should we response on the request to register paddr when we already have registered vaddr and vice versa?
>>
>> From the discussion with Jan, you would tear down the previous solution and then
>> register the new version. So this allows cases like a bootloader and a
> kernel using different version of the interface.
>
> I'm not sure Jan stated that, he rather questioned that.
>
> Jan, could you please confirm you agree that it should be dropped already
> registered runstate and (potentially) changed version in case of the new
> register request?
Well, I think Julian's implication was that we can't support in particular
the boot loader -> kernel handover case without extra measures (if
at all), and hence he added things together and said what results
from this. Of course ideally we'd reject mixed requests, but unless
someone can come up with a clever means of how to determine entity
boundaries I'm afraid this is not going to be possible without breaking
certain setups.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-14 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-23 8:10 [PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce runstate area registration with phys address Andrii Anisov
2019-04-23 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] xen: introduce VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area hypercall Andrii Anisov
2019-04-23 8:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-08 10:10 ` George Dunlap
2019-05-08 10:10 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2019-04-23 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: implement VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area Andrii Anisov
2019-04-23 8:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-08 15:40 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-08 15:40 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-09 9:27 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-09 9:27 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-05-14 9:35 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-14 9:35 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-14 9:48 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-14 9:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-05-14 11:23 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-14 11:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-14 11:29 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-14 11:29 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-05-13 12:30 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-13 12:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-14 9:58 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-14 9:58 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-14 10:08 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-14 10:08 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-14 11:24 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-14 11:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-14 11:45 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-14 11:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-14 12:02 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-05-14 12:02 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-14 13:05 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-14 13:05 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-14 13:49 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-14 13:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-15 9:04 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-15 9:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-15 10:31 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-15 10:31 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-14 13:49 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-14 13:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-05-15 8:44 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-15 8:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-15 11:59 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-15 11:59 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-05-16 12:09 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-16 12:09 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-05-16 13:30 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-16 13:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-16 13:30 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-16 13:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-16 13:48 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-16 13:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-16 14:25 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-16 14:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-16 14:28 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-16 14:28 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-16 14:29 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-16 14:29 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
[not found] ` <fa126315-31af-854e-817a-8640b431c82b@arm.com>
[not found] ` <CAC1WxdiMzAq5hRC-mhRQuFDs7z_Hj5w7VAy52ec87SJQOGmp3w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <a28f95a1-d9da-2caf-f4b4-013100176b02@arm.com>
[not found] ` <090ce8cc-f329-fe54-4894-b7f12e3cd5a6@gmail.com>
2019-05-08 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce runstate area registration with phys address Julien Grall
2019-05-08 13:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-08 13:54 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-08 13:54 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-08 14:31 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-08 14:31 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-08 16:01 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-08 16:01 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-13 10:50 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-13 10:50 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-13 14:34 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-13 14:34 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-08 13:59 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-13 10:15 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-13 11:16 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-13 14:14 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-13 14:34 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-13 15:29 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-13 15:31 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-13 15:38 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-13 15:40 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-13 15:42 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-13 15:45 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-13 16:05 ` Andrii Anisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5CDAAE4F020000780022E941@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=andrii.anisov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii_anisov@epam.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).