* [v4 01/17] VT-d Posted-intterrupt (PI) design
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 02/17] Add helper macro for X86_FEATURE_CX16 feature detection Feng Wu
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Cc: Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper,
Jan Beulich, Yang Zhang, Feng Wu
Add the design doc for VT-d PI.
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
CC: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt | 333 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 333 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt
diff --git a/docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt b/docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..98a77ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+Authors: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
+
+VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) design for XEN
+
+Background
+==========
+With the development of virtualization, there are more and more device
+assignment requirements. However, today when a VM is running with
+assigned devices (such as, NIC), external interrupt handling for the assigned
+devices always needs VMM intervention.
+
+VT-d Posted-interrupt is a more enhanced method to handle interrupts
+in the virtualization environment. Interrupt posting is the process by
+which an interrupt request is recorded in a memory-resident
+posted-interrupt-descriptor structure by the root-complex, followed by
+an optional notification event issued to the CPU complex.
+
+With VT-d Posted-interrupt we can get the following advantages:
+- Direct delivery of external interrupts to running vCPUs without VMM
+intervention
+- Decrease the interrupt migration complexity. On vCPU migration, software
+can atomically co-migrate all interrupts targeting the migrating vCPU. For
+virtual machines with assigned devices, migrating a vCPU across pCPUs
+either incur the overhead of forwarding interrupts in software (e.g. via VMM
+generated IPIS), or complexity to independently migrate each interrupt targeting
+the vCPU to the new pCPU. However, after enabling VT-d PI, the destination vCPU
+of an external interrupt from assigned devices is stored in the IRTE (i.e.
+Posted-interrupt Descriptor Address), when vCPU is migrated to another pCPU,
+we will set this new pCPU in the 'NDST' filed of Posted-interrupt descriptor, this
+make the interrupt migration automatic.
+
+Here is what Xen currently does for external interrupts from assigned devices:
+
+When a VM is running and an external interrupt from an assigned device occurs
+for it. VM-EXIT happens, then:
+
+vmx_do_extint() --> do_IRQ() --> __do_IRQ_guest() --> hvm_do_IRQ_dpci() -->
+raise_softirq_for(pirq_dpci) --> raise_softirq(HVM_DPCI_SOFTIRQ)
+
+softirq HVM_DPCI_SOFTIRQ is bound to dpci_softirq()
+
+dpci_softirq() --> hvm_dirq_assist() --> vmsi_deliver_pirq() --> vmsi_deliver() -->
+vmsi_inj_irq() --> vlapic_set_irq()
+
+vlapic_set_irq() does the following things:
+1. If CPU-side posted-interrupt is supported, call vmx_deliver_posted_intr() to deliver
+the virtual interrupt via posted-interrupt infrastructure.
+2. Else if CPU-side posted-interrupt is not supported, set the related vIRR in vLAPIC
+page and call vcpu_kick() to kick the related vCPU. Before VM-Entry, vmx_intr_assist()
+will help to inject the interrupt to guests.
+
+However, after VT-d PI is supported, when a guest is running in non-root and an
+external interrupt from an assigned device occurs for it. No VM-Exit is needed,
+the guest can handle this totally in non-root mode, thus avoiding all the above
+code flow.
+
+Posted-interrupt Introduction
+========================
+There are two components to the Posted-interrupt architecture:
+Processor Support and Root-Complex Support
+
+- Processor Support
+Posted-interrupt processing is a feature by which a processor processes
+the virtual interrupts by recording them as pending on the virtual-APIC
+page.
+
+Posted-interrupt processing is enabled by setting the process posted
+interrupts VM-execution control. The processing is performed in response
+to the arrival of an interrupt with the posted-interrupt notification vector.
+In response to such an interrupt, the processor processes virtual interrupts
+recorded in a data structure called a posted-interrupt descriptor.
+
+More information about APICv and CPU-side Posted-interrupt, please refer
+to Chapter 29, and Section 29.6 in the Intel SDM:
+http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/manuals/64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-manual-325462.pdf
+
+- Root-Complex Support
+Interrupt posting is the process by which an interrupt request (from IOAPIC
+or MSI/MSIx capable sources) is recorded in a memory-resident
+posted-interrupt-descriptor structure by the root-complex, followed by
+an optional notification event issued to the CPU complex. The interrupt
+request arriving at the root-complex carry the identity of the interrupt
+request source and a 'remapping-index'. The remapping-index is used to
+look-up an entry from the memory-resident interrupt-remap-table. Unlike
+with interrupt-remapping, the interrupt-remap-table-entry for a posted-
+interrupt, specifies a virtual-vector and a pointer to the posted-interrupt
+descriptor. The virtual-vector specifies the vector of the interrupt to be
+recorded in the posted-interrupt descriptor. The posted-interrupt descriptor
+hosts storage for the virtual-vectors and contains the attributes of the
+notification event (interrupt) to be issued to the CPU complex to inform
+CPU/software about pending interrupts recorded in the posted-interrupt
+descriptor.
+
+More information about VT-d PI, please refer to
+http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-technology/vt-directed-io-spec.html
+
+Important Definitions
+==================
+There are some changes to IRTE and posted-interrupt descriptor after
+VT-d PI is introduced:
+IRTE: Interrupt Remapping Table Entry
+Posted-interrupt Descriptor Address: the address of the posted-interrupt descriptor
+Virtual Vector: the guest vector of the interrupt
+URG: indicates if the interrupt is urgent
+
+Posted-interrupt descriptor:
+The Posted Interrupt Descriptor hosts the following fields:
+Posted Interrupt Request (PIR): Provide storage for posting (recording) interrupts (one bit
+per vector, for up to 256 vectors).
+
+Outstanding Notification (ON): Indicate if there is a notification event outstanding (not
+processed by processor or software) for this Posted Interrupt Descriptor. When this field is 0,
+hardware modifies it from 0 to 1 when generating a notification event, and the entity receiving
+the notification event (processor or software) resets it as part of posted interrupt processing.
+
+Suppress Notification (SN): Indicate if a notification event is to be suppressed (not
+generated) for non-urgent interrupt requests (interrupts processed through an IRTE with
+URG=0).
+
+Notification Vector (NV): Specify the vector for notification event (interrupt).
+
+Notification Destination (NDST): Specify the physical APIC-ID of the destination logical
+processor for the notification event.
+
+Design Overview
+==============
+In this design, we will cover the following items:
+1. Add a variable to control whether enable VT-d posted-interrupt or not.
+2. VT-d PI feature detection.
+3. Extend posted-interrupt descriptor structure to cover VT-d PI specific stuff.
+4. Extend IRTE structure to support VT-d PI.
+5. Introduce a new global vector which is used for waking up the blocked vCPU.
+6. Update IRTE when guest modifies the interrupt configuration (MSI/MSIx configuration).
+7. Update posted-interrupt descriptor during vCPU scheduling (when the state
+of the vCPU is transmitted among RUNSTATE_running / RUNSTATE_blocked/
+RUNSTATE_runnable / RUNSTATE_offline).
+8. How to wakeup blocked vCPU when an interrupt is posted for it (wakeup notification handler).
+9. New boot command line for Xen, which controls VT-d PI feature by user.
+10. Multicast/broadcast and lowest priority interrupts consideration.
+
+
+Implementation details
+===================
+- New variable to control VT-d PI
+
+Like variable 'iommu_intremap' for interrupt remapping, it is very straightforward
+to add a new one 'iommu_intpost' for posted-interrupt. 'iommu_intpost' is set
+only when interrupt remapping and VT-d posted-interrupt are both enabled.
+
+- VT-d PI feature detection.
+Bit 59 in VT-d Capability Register is used to report VT-d Posted-interrupt support.
+
+- Extend posted-interrupt descriptor structure to cover VT-d PI specific stuff.
+Here is the new structure for posted-interrupt descriptor:
+
+struct pi_desc {
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(pir, NR_VECTORS);
+ union {
+ struct
+ {
+ u16 on : 1, /* bit 256 - Outstanding Notification */
+ sn : 1, /* bit 257 - Suppress Notification */
+ rsvd_1 : 14; /* bit 271:258 - Reserved */
+ u8 nv; /* bit 279:272 - Notification Vector */
+ u8 rsvd_2; /* bit 287:280 - Reserved */
+ u32 ndst; /* bit 319:288 - Notification Destination */
+ };
+ u64 control;
+ };
+ u32 rsvd[6];
+} __attribute__ ((aligned (64)));
+
+- Extend IRTE structure to support VT-d PI.
+
+Here is the new structure for IRTE:
+/* interrupt remap entry */
+struct iremap_entry {
+ union {
+ struct { u64 lo, hi; };
+ struct {
+ u16 p : 1,
+ fpd : 1,
+ dm : 1,
+ rh : 1,
+ tm : 1,
+ dlm : 3,
+ avail : 4,
+ res_1 : 4;
+ u8 vector;
+ u8 res_2;
+ u32 dst;
+ u16 sid;
+ u16 sq : 2,
+ svt : 2,
+ res_3 : 12;
+ u32 res_4 : 32;
+ } remap;
+ struct {
+ u16 p : 1,
+ fpd : 1,
+ res_1 : 6,
+ avail : 4,
+ res_2 : 2,
+ urg : 1,
+ im : 1;
+ u8 vector;
+ u8 res_3;
+ u32 res_4 : 6,
+ pda_l : 26;
+ u16 sid;
+ u16 sq : 2,
+ svt : 2,
+ res_5 : 12;
+ u32 pda_h;
+ } post;
+ };
+};
+
+- Introduce a new global vector which is used to wake up the blocked vCPU.
+
+Currently, there is a global vector 'posted_intr_vector', which is used as the
+global notification vector for all vCPUs in the system. This vector is stored in
+VMCS and CPU considers it as a _special_ vector, uses it to notify the related
+pCPU when an interrupt is recorded in the posted-interrupt descriptor.
+
+This existing global vector is a _special_ vector to CPU, CPU handle it in a
+_special_ way compared to normal vectors, please refer to 29.6 in Intel SDM
+http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/manuals/64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-manual-325462.pdf
+for more information about how CPU handles it.
+
+After having VT-d PI, VT-d engine can issue notification event when the
+assigned devices issue interrupts. We need add a new global vector to
+wakeup the blocked vCPU, please refer to later section in this design for
+how to use this new global vector.
+
+- Update IRTE when guest modifies the interrupt configuration (MSI/MSIx configuration).
+After VT-d PI is introduced, the format of IRTE is changed as follows:
+ Descriptor Address: the address of the posted-interrupt descriptor
+ Virtual Vector: the guest vector of the interrupt
+ URG: indicates if the interrupt is urgent
+ Other fields continue to have the same meaning
+
+'Descriptor Address' tells the destination vCPU of this interrupt, since
+each vCPU has a dedicated posted-interrupt descriptor.
+
+'Virtual Vector' tells the guest vector of the interrupt.
+
+When guest changes the configuration of the interrupts, such as, the
+cpu affinity, or the vector, we need to update the associated IRTE accordingly.
+
+- Update posted-interrupt descriptor during vCPU scheduling
+
+The basic idea here is:
+1. When vCPU's state is RUNSTATE_running,
+ - Set 'NV' to 'posted_intr_vector'.
+ - Clear 'SN' to accept posted-interrupts.
+ - Set 'NDST' to the pCPU on which the vCPU will be running.
+2. When vCPU's state is RUNSTATE_blocked,
+ - Set 'NV' to ' pi_wakeup_vector ', so we can wake up the
+ related vCPU when posted-interrupt happens for it.
+ Please refer to the above section about the new global vector.
+ - Clear 'SN' to accept posted-interrupts
+3. When vCPU's state is RUNSTATE_runnable/RUNSTATE_offline,
+ - Set 'SN' to suppress non-urgent interrupts
+ (Current, we only support non-urgent interrupts)
+ When vCPU is in RUNSTATE_runnable or RUNSTATE_offline,
+ It is not needed to accept posted-interrupt notification event,
+ since we don't change the behavior of scheduler when the interrupt
+ occurs, we still need wait the next scheduling of the vCPU.
+ When external interrupts from assigned devices occur, the interrupts
+ are recorded in PIR, and will be synced to IRR before VM-Entry.
+ - Set 'NV' to 'posted_intr_vector'.
+
+- How to wakeup blocked vCPU when an interrupt is posted for it (wakeup notification handler).
+
+Here is the scenario for the usage of the new global vector:
+
+1. vCPU0 is running on pCPU0
+2. vCPU0 is blocked and vCPU1 is currently running on pCPU0
+3. An external interrupt from an assigned device occurs for vCPU0, if we
+still use 'posted_intr_vector' as the notification vector for vCPU0, the
+notification event for vCPU0 (the event will go to pCPU1) will be consumed
+by vCPU1 incorrectly (remember this is a special vector to CPU). The worst
+case is that vCPU0 will never be woken up again since the wakeup event
+for it is always consumed by other vCPUs incorrectly. So we need introduce
+another global vector, naming 'pi_wakeup_vector' to wake up the blocked vCPU.
+
+After using 'pi_wakeup_vector' for vCPU0, VT-d engine will issue notification
+event using this new vector. Since this new vector is not a SPECIAL one to CPU,
+it is just a normal vector. To cpu, it just receives an normal external interrupt,
+then we can get control in the handler of this new vector. In this case, hypervisor
+can do something in it, such as wakeup the blocked vCPU.
+
+Here are what we do for the blocked vCPU:
+1. Define a per-cpu list 'pi_blocked_vcpu', which stored the blocked
+vCPU on the pCPU.
+2. When the vCPU's state is changed to RUNSTATE_blocked, insert the vCPU
+to the per-cpu list belonging to the pCPU it was running.
+3. When the vCPU is unblocked, remove the vCPU from the related pCPU list.
+
+In the handler of 'pi_wakeup_vector', we do:
+1. Get the physical CPU.
+2. Iterate the list 'pi_blocked_vcpu' of the current pCPU, if 'ON' is set,
+we unblock the associated vCPU.
+
+- New boot command line for Xen, which controls VT-d PI feature by user.
+
+Like 'intremap' for interrupt remapping, we add a new boot command line
+'intpost' for posted-interrupts.
+
+- Multicast/broadcast and lowest priority interrupts consideration.
+
+With VT-d PI, the destination vCPU information of an external interrupt
+from assigned devices is stored in IRTE, this makes the following
+consideration of the design:
+1. Multicast/broadcast interrupts cannot be posted.
+2. For lowest-priority interrupts, new Intel CPU/Chipset/root-complex
+(starting from Nehalem) ignore TPR value, and instead supported two other
+ways (configurable by BIOS) on how the handle lowest priority interrupts:
+ A) Round robin: In this method, the chipset simply delivers lowest priority
+interrupts in a round-robin manner across all the available logical CPUs. While
+this provides good load balancing, this was not the best thing to do always as
+interrupts from the same device (like NIC) will start running on all the CPUs
+thrashing caches and taking locks. This led to the next scheme.
+ B) Vector hashing: In this method, hardware would apply a hash function
+on the vector value in the interrupt request, and use that hash to pick a logical
+CPU to route the lowest priority interrupt. This way, a given vector always goes
+to the same logical CPU, avoiding the thrashing problem above.
+
+So, gist of above is that, lowest priority interrupts has never been delivered as
+"lowest priority" in physical hardware.
+
+Vector hashing is used in this design.
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* [v4 02/17] Add helper macro for X86_FEATURE_CX16 feature detection
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 01/17] VT-d Posted-intterrupt (PI) design Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 03/17] Add cmpxchg16b support for x86-64 Feng Wu
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, Jan Beulich, Andrew Cooper
Add macro cpu_has_cx16 to detect X86_FEATURE_CX16 feature.
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
v4:
- no changes
v3:
- Newly added. We need to atomically update the IRTE in PI format
via CMPXCHG16B which is only available with this feature.
xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
index 7963a3a..63c1fe8 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@
#define cpu_has_cpuid_faulting boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULTING)
+#define cpu_has_cx16 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX16)
+
enum _cache_type {
CACHE_TYPE_NULL = 0,
CACHE_TYPE_DATA = 1,
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* [v4 03/17] Add cmpxchg16b support for x86-64
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 01/17] VT-d Posted-intterrupt (PI) design Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 02/17] Add helper macro for X86_FEATURE_CX16 feature detection Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-24 15:03 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 04/17] iommu: Add iommu_intpost to control VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature Feng Wu
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Feng Wu, Jan Beulich, Andrew Cooper
This patch adds cmpxchg16b support for x86-64, so software
can perform 128-bit atomic write/read.
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Use pointer as the parameter of __cmpxchg16b().
- Use gcc's __uint128_t built-in type
- Make the parameters of __cmpxchg16b() void *
v3:
- Newly added.
xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/system.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/system.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/system.h
index 662813a..0267797 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/system.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/system.h
@@ -6,6 +6,38 @@
(unsigned long)(n),sizeof(*(ptr))))
/*
+ * Atomic 16 bytes compare and exchange. Compare OLD with MEM, if
+ * identical, store NEW in MEM. Return the initial value in MEM.
+ * Success is indicated by comparing RETURN with OLD.
+ *
+ * This function can only be called when cpu_has_cx16 is ture.
+ */
+
+static always_inline __uint128_t __cmpxchg16b(
+ volatile void *ptr, void *old, void *new)
+{
+ uint64_t prev_high, prev_low;
+ uint64_t new_high = (*(__uint128_t *)new) >> 64;
+ uint64_t new_low = (uint64_t)(*(__uint128_t *)new);
+ uint64_t old_high = (*(__uint128_t *)old) >> 64;
+ uint64_t old_low = (uint64_t)(*(__uint128_t *)old);
+
+ ASSERT(cpu_has_cx16);
+
+ asm volatile ( "lock; cmpxchg16b %4"
+ : "=d" (prev_high), "=a" (prev_low)
+ : "c" (new_high), "b" (new_low),
+ "m" (*__xg((volatile void *)ptr)),
+ "0" (old_high), "1" (old_low)
+ : "memory" );
+
+ return ( ((__uint128_t)prev_high) << 64 | prev_low );
+}
+
+#define cmpxchg16b(ptr,o,n) \
+ __cmpxchg16b((ptr), (__uint128_t *)(o), (__uint128_t *)(n))
+
+/*
* This function causes value _o to be changed to _n at location _p.
* If this access causes a fault then we return 1, otherwise we return 0.
* If no fault occurs then _o is updated to the value we saw at _p. If this
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 03/17] Add cmpxchg16b support for x86-64
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 03/17] Add cmpxchg16b support for x86-64 Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-24 15:03 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-24 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu; +Cc: Andrew Cooper, Keir Fraser, xen-devel
>>> On 23.07.15 at 13:35, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> This patch adds cmpxchg16b support for x86-64, so software
> can perform 128-bit atomic write/read.
>
> CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - Use pointer as the parameter of __cmpxchg16b().
> - Use gcc's __uint128_t built-in type
> - Make the parameters of __cmpxchg16b() void *
I haven't been able to spot who asked you when to do this.
Looking at the code ...
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/system.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/system.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,38 @@
> (unsigned long)(n),sizeof(*(ptr))))
>
> /*
> + * Atomic 16 bytes compare and exchange. Compare OLD with MEM, if
> + * identical, store NEW in MEM. Return the initial value in MEM.
> + * Success is indicated by comparing RETURN with OLD.
> + *
> + * This function can only be called when cpu_has_cx16 is ture.
> + */
> +
> +static always_inline __uint128_t __cmpxchg16b(
> + volatile void *ptr, void *old, void *new)
> +{
> + uint64_t prev_high, prev_low;
> + uint64_t new_high = (*(__uint128_t *)new) >> 64;
> + uint64_t new_low = (uint64_t)(*(__uint128_t *)new);
> + uint64_t old_high = (*(__uint128_t *)old) >> 64;
> + uint64_t old_low = (uint64_t)(*(__uint128_t *)old);
... I certainly think this goes too far - way too many casts.
> + ASSERT(cpu_has_cx16);
> +
> + asm volatile ( "lock; cmpxchg16b %4"
> + : "=d" (prev_high), "=a" (prev_low)
Is there a reason not to use the A constraint here?
> + : "c" (new_high), "b" (new_low),
> + "m" (*__xg((volatile void *)ptr)),
Regardless of the memory clobber this should be an output. And
once an output (ideally properly typed - right now the cast is
pointless), I'm not sure the memory clobber has to stay.
> + "0" (old_high), "1" (old_low)
> + : "memory" );
> +
> + return ( ((__uint128_t)prev_high) << 64 | prev_low );
Badly chose parentheses placement:
return ((__uint128_t)prev_high << 64) | prev_low;
> +}
> +
> +#define cmpxchg16b(ptr,o,n) \
> + __cmpxchg16b((ptr), (__uint128_t *)(o), (__uint128_t *)(n))
This makes the use of void * pointers above even more
questionable.
But I think now I recall that it may have been me asking for using
void pointers here: That way one can pass pointers to other types.
But then you would better cast to void * here, and have the inline
function have properly typed pointers. And it should go without
saying that if you cast (or implicitly convert to void), you should
validate that what your caller handed you is at least the size of a
__uint128_t (and for "ptr" perhaps also, as I think Andrew already
pointed out, that it is suitably aligned).
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* [v4 04/17] iommu: Add iommu_intpost to control VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 03/17] Add cmpxchg16b support for x86-64 Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 14:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 05/17] vt-d: VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature detection Feng Wu
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, Jan Beulich
VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-Interrupt.
With VT-d Posted-Interrupts enabled, external interrupts from
direct-assigned devices can be delivered to guests without VMM
intervention when guest is running in non-root mode.
This patch adds variable 'iommu_intpost' to control whether enable VT-d
posted-interrupt or not in the generic IOMMU code.
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
v4:
- No changes
v3:
- Remove pointless initializer for 'iommu_intpost'.
- Some adjustment for "if no intremap then no intpost" logic.
* For parse_iommu_param(), move it to the end of the function,
so we don't need to add the some logic when introduing the
new kernel parameter 'intpost' in later patch.
* Add this logic in iommu_setup() after iommu_hardware_setup()
is called.
xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
index 06cb38f..536b69f 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static void iommu_dump_p2m_table(unsigned char key);
* no-snoop Disable VT-d Snoop Control
* no-qinval Disable VT-d Queued Invalidation
* no-intremap Disable VT-d Interrupt Remapping
+ * no-intpost Disable VT-d Interrupt posting
*/
custom_param("iommu", parse_iommu_param);
bool_t __initdata iommu_enable = 1;
@@ -51,6 +52,14 @@ bool_t __read_mostly iommu_passthrough;
bool_t __read_mostly iommu_snoop = 1;
bool_t __read_mostly iommu_qinval = 1;
bool_t __read_mostly iommu_intremap = 1;
+
+/*
+ * In the current implementation of VT-d posted interrupts, in some extreme
+ * cases, the per cpu list which saves the blocked vCPU will be very long,
+ * and this will affect the interrupt latency, so let this feature off by
+ * default until we find a good solution to resolve it.
+ */
+bool_t __read_mostly iommu_intpost;
bool_t __read_mostly iommu_hap_pt_share = 1;
bool_t __read_mostly iommu_debug;
bool_t __read_mostly amd_iommu_perdev_intremap = 1;
@@ -112,6 +121,9 @@ static void __init parse_iommu_param(char *s)
s = ss + 1;
} while ( ss );
+
+ if ( !iommu_intremap )
+ iommu_intpost = 0;
}
int iommu_domain_init(struct domain *d)
@@ -305,6 +317,9 @@ int __init iommu_setup(void)
panic("Couldn't enable %s and iommu=required/force",
!iommu_enabled ? "IOMMU" : "Interrupt Remapping");
+ if ( !iommu_intremap )
+ iommu_intpost = 0;
+
if ( !iommu_enabled )
{
iommu_snoop = 0;
@@ -372,7 +387,7 @@ void iommu_crash_shutdown(void)
const struct iommu_ops *ops = iommu_get_ops();
if ( iommu_enabled )
ops->crash_shutdown();
- iommu_enabled = iommu_intremap = 0;
+ iommu_enabled = iommu_intremap = iommu_intpost = 0;
}
bool_t iommu_has_feature(struct domain *d, enum iommu_feature feature)
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
index b30bf41..a123cce 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
extern bool_t iommu_enable, iommu_enabled;
extern bool_t force_iommu, iommu_verbose;
extern bool_t iommu_workaround_bios_bug, iommu_passthrough;
-extern bool_t iommu_snoop, iommu_qinval, iommu_intremap;
+extern bool_t iommu_snoop, iommu_qinval, iommu_intremap, iommu_intpost;
extern bool_t iommu_hap_pt_share;
extern bool_t iommu_debug;
extern bool_t amd_iommu_perdev_intremap;
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 04/17] iommu: Add iommu_intpost to control VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 04/17] iommu: Add iommu_intpost to control VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 14:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-23 14:05 ` Andrew Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2015-07-23 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu, xen-devel; +Cc: Kevin Tian, Jan Beulich
On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
> VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-Interrupt.
> With VT-d Posted-Interrupts enabled, external interrupts from
> direct-assigned devices can be delivered to guests without VMM
> intervention when guest is running in non-root mode.
>
> This patch adds variable 'iommu_intpost' to control whether enable VT-d
> posted-interrupt or not in the generic IOMMU code.
>
> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Please patch docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown as you are
> ---
> v4:
> - No changes
>
> v3:
> - Remove pointless initializer for 'iommu_intpost'.
> - Some adjustment for "if no intremap then no intpost" logic.
> * For parse_iommu_param(), move it to the end of the function,
> so we don't need to add the some logic when introduing the
> new kernel parameter 'intpost' in later patch.
> * Add this logic in iommu_setup() after iommu_hardware_setup()
> is called.
>
> xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> index 06cb38f..536b69f 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static void iommu_dump_p2m_table(unsigned char key);
> * no-snoop Disable VT-d Snoop Control
> * no-qinval Disable VT-d Queued Invalidation
> * no-intremap Disable VT-d Interrupt Remapping
> + * no-intpost Disable VT-d Interrupt posting
> */
> custom_param("iommu", parse_iommu_param);
> bool_t __initdata iommu_enable = 1;
> @@ -51,6 +52,14 @@ bool_t __read_mostly iommu_passthrough;
> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_snoop = 1;
> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_qinval = 1;
> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_intremap = 1;
> +
> +/*
> + * In the current implementation of VT-d posted interrupts, in some extreme
> + * cases, the per cpu list which saves the blocked vCPU will be very long,
> + * and this will affect the interrupt latency, so let this feature off by
> + * default until we find a good solution to resolve it.
> + */
> +bool_t __read_mostly iommu_intpost;
> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_hap_pt_share = 1;
> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_debug;
> bool_t __read_mostly amd_iommu_perdev_intremap = 1;
> @@ -112,6 +121,9 @@ static void __init parse_iommu_param(char *s)
>
> s = ss + 1;
> } while ( ss );
> +
> + if ( !iommu_intremap )
> + iommu_intpost = 0;
This hunk is still wrong, as I said in v3.
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 04/17] iommu: Add iommu_intpost to control VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature
2015-07-23 14:01 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2015-07-23 14:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-24 0:47 ` Wu, Feng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2015-07-23 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu, xen-devel; +Cc: Kevin Tian, Jan Beulich
On 23/07/15 15:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
>> VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-Interrupt.
>> With VT-d Posted-Interrupts enabled, external interrupts from
>> direct-assigned devices can be delivered to guests without VMM
>> intervention when guest is running in non-root mode.
>>
>> This patch adds variable 'iommu_intpost' to control whether enable VT-d
>> posted-interrupt or not in the generic IOMMU code.
>>
>> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Please patch docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown as you are
>
>> ---
>> v4:
>> - No changes
>>
>> v3:
>> - Remove pointless initializer for 'iommu_intpost'.
>> - Some adjustment for "if no intremap then no intpost" logic.
>> * For parse_iommu_param(), move it to the end of the function,
>> so we don't need to add the some logic when introduing the
>> new kernel parameter 'intpost' in later patch.
>> * Add this logic in iommu_setup() after iommu_hardware_setup()
>> is called.
>>
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
>> index 06cb38f..536b69f 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static void iommu_dump_p2m_table(unsigned char key);
>> * no-snoop Disable VT-d Snoop Control
>> * no-qinval Disable VT-d Queued Invalidation
>> * no-intremap Disable VT-d Interrupt Remapping
>> + * no-intpost Disable VT-d Interrupt posting
>> */
>> custom_param("iommu", parse_iommu_param);
>> bool_t __initdata iommu_enable = 1;
>> @@ -51,6 +52,14 @@ bool_t __read_mostly iommu_passthrough;
>> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_snoop = 1;
>> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_qinval = 1;
>> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_intremap = 1;
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * In the current implementation of VT-d posted interrupts, in some extreme
>> + * cases, the per cpu list which saves the blocked vCPU will be very long,
>> + * and this will affect the interrupt latency, so let this feature off by
>> + * default until we find a good solution to resolve it.
>> + */
>> +bool_t __read_mostly iommu_intpost;
>> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_hap_pt_share = 1;
>> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_debug;
>> bool_t __read_mostly amd_iommu_perdev_intremap = 1;
>> @@ -112,6 +121,9 @@ static void __init parse_iommu_param(char *s)
>>
>> s = ss + 1;
>> } while ( ss );
>> +
>> + if ( !iommu_intremap )
>> + iommu_intpost = 0;
> This hunk is still wrong, as I said in v3.
Furthermore, you appear to have no way in v4 to enable intpost on the
Xen command line.
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 04/17] iommu: Add iommu_intpost to control VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature
2015-07-23 14:05 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2015-07-24 0:47 ` Wu, Feng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Wu, Feng @ 2015-07-24 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, xen-devel; +Cc: Tian, Kevin, Wu, Feng, Jan Beulich
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.cooper3@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:05 PM
> To: Wu, Feng; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Tian, Kevin; Jan Beulich
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [v4 04/17] iommu: Add iommu_intpost to control VT-d
> Posted-Interrupts feature
>
> On 23/07/15 15:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
> >> VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-Interrupt.
> >> With VT-d Posted-Interrupts enabled, external interrupts from
> >> direct-assigned devices can be delivered to guests without VMM
> >> intervention when guest is running in non-root mode.
> >>
> >> This patch adds variable 'iommu_intpost' to control whether enable VT-d
> >> posted-interrupt or not in the generic IOMMU code.
> >>
> >> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> >> CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > Please patch docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown as you are
> >
> >> ---
> >> v4:
> >> - No changes
> >>
> >> v3:
> >> - Remove pointless initializer for 'iommu_intpost'.
> >> - Some adjustment for "if no intremap then no intpost" logic.
> >> * For parse_iommu_param(), move it to the end of the function,
> >> so we don't need to add the some logic when introduing the
> >> new kernel parameter 'intpost' in later patch.
> >> * Add this logic in iommu_setup() after iommu_hardware_setup()
> >> is called.
> >>
> >> xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> >> xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> >> index 06cb38f..536b69f 100644
> >> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> >> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> >> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static void iommu_dump_p2m_table(unsigned char
> key);
> >> * no-snoop Disable VT-d Snoop Control
> >> * no-qinval Disable VT-d Queued Invalidation
> >> * no-intremap Disable VT-d Interrupt Remapping
> >> + * no-intpost Disable VT-d Interrupt posting
> >> */
> >> custom_param("iommu", parse_iommu_param);
> >> bool_t __initdata iommu_enable = 1;
> >> @@ -51,6 +52,14 @@ bool_t __read_mostly iommu_passthrough;
> >> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_snoop = 1;
> >> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_qinval = 1;
> >> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_intremap = 1;
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * In the current implementation of VT-d posted interrupts, in some
> extreme
> >> + * cases, the per cpu list which saves the blocked vCPU will be very long,
> >> + * and this will affect the interrupt latency, so let this feature off by
> >> + * default until we find a good solution to resolve it.
> >> + */
> >> +bool_t __read_mostly iommu_intpost;
> >> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_hap_pt_share = 1;
> >> bool_t __read_mostly iommu_debug;
> >> bool_t __read_mostly amd_iommu_perdev_intremap = 1;
> >> @@ -112,6 +121,9 @@ static void __init parse_iommu_param(char *s)
> >>
> >> s = ss + 1;
> >> } while ( ss );
> >> +
> >> + if ( !iommu_intremap )
> >> + iommu_intpost = 0;
> > This hunk is still wrong, as I said in v3.
>
> Furthermore, you appear to have no way in v4 to enable intpost on the
> Xen command line.
Oh, sorry, since this feature is required default off, I forget to send out the last
patch, which add the Xen command line. I will re-add it in the next version.
Thanks,
Feng
>
> ~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* [v4 05/17] vt-d: VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature detection
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 04/17] iommu: Add iommu_intpost to control VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-24 15:05 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 06/17] vmx: Extend struct pi_desc to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu
VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-Interrupt.
With VT-d Posted-Interrupts enabled, external interrupts from
direct-assigned devices can be delivered to guests without VMM
intervention when guest is running in non-root mode.
CC: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Correct a logic error when setting iommu_intpost to 0
v3:
- Remove the "if no intremap then no intpost" logic in
intel_vtd_setup(), it is covered in the iommu_setup().
- Add "if no intremap then no intpost" logic in the end
of init_vtd_hw() which is called by vtd_resume().
So the logic exists in the following three places:
- parse_iommu_param()
- iommu_setup()
- init_vtd_hw()
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
index 9053a1f..4564a00 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
@@ -2071,6 +2071,9 @@ static int init_vtd_hw(void)
disable_intremap(drhd->iommu);
}
+ if ( !iommu_intremap )
+ iommu_intpost = 0;
+
/*
* Set root entries for each VT-d engine. After set root entry,
* must globally invalidate context cache, and then globally
@@ -2133,8 +2136,8 @@ int __init intel_vtd_setup(void)
}
/* We enable the following features only if they are supported by all VT-d
- * engines: Snoop Control, DMA passthrough, Queued Invalidation and
- * Interrupt Remapping.
+ * engines: Snoop Control, DMA passthrough, Queued Invalidation, Interrupt
+ * Remapping, and Posted Interrupt
*/
for_each_drhd_unit ( drhd )
{
@@ -2162,6 +2165,15 @@ int __init intel_vtd_setup(void)
if ( iommu_intremap && !ecap_intr_remap(iommu->ecap) )
iommu_intremap = 0;
+ /*
+ * We cannot use posted interrupt if X86_FEATURE_CX16 is
+ * not supported, since we count on this feature to
+ * atomically update 16-byte IRTE in posted format.
+ */
+ if ( !iommu_intremap || !cap_intr_post(iommu->cap) || !cpu_has_cx16 )
+ iommu_intpost = 0;
+
+
if ( !vtd_ept_page_compatible(iommu) )
iommu_hap_pt_share = 0;
@@ -2187,6 +2199,7 @@ int __init intel_vtd_setup(void)
P(iommu_passthrough, "Dom0 DMA Passthrough");
P(iommu_qinval, "Queued Invalidation");
P(iommu_intremap, "Interrupt Remapping");
+ P(iommu_intpost, "Posted Interrupt");
P(iommu_hap_pt_share, "Shared EPT tables");
#undef P
@@ -2206,6 +2219,7 @@ int __init intel_vtd_setup(void)
iommu_passthrough = 0;
iommu_qinval = 0;
iommu_intremap = 0;
+ iommu_intpost = 0;
return ret;
}
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h
index 80f8830..e807253 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
/*
* Decoding Capability Register
*/
+#define cap_intr_post(c) (((c) >> 59) & 1)
#define cap_read_drain(c) (((c) >> 55) & 1)
#define cap_write_drain(c) (((c) >> 54) & 1)
#define cap_max_amask_val(c) (((c) >> 48) & 0x3f)
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* [v4 06/17] vmx: Extend struct pi_desc to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 05/17] vt-d: VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature detection Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 07/17] vmx: Add some helper functions for Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, Jan Beulich, Andrew Cooper
Extend struct pi_desc according to VT-d Posted-Interrupts Spec.
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
v4:
- No changes
v3:
- Use u32 instead of u64 for the bitfield in 'struct pi_desc'
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
index 1104bda..dedfaef 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
@@ -81,8 +81,19 @@ struct vmx_domain {
struct pi_desc {
DECLARE_BITMAP(pir, NR_VECTORS);
- u32 control;
- u32 rsvd[7];
+ union {
+ struct
+ {
+ u16 on : 1, /* bit 256 - Outstanding Notification */
+ sn : 1, /* bit 257 - Suppress Notification */
+ rsvd_1 : 14; /* bit 271:258 - Reserved */
+ u8 nv; /* bit 279:272 - Notification Vector */
+ u8 rsvd_2; /* bit 287:280 - Reserved */
+ u32 ndst; /* bit 319:288 - Notification Destination */
+ };
+ u64 control;
+ };
+ u32 rsvd[6];
} __attribute__ ((aligned (64)));
#define ept_get_wl(ept) ((ept)->ept_wl)
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* [v4 07/17] vmx: Add some helper functions for Posted-Interrupts
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 06/17] vmx: Extend struct pi_desc to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 08/17] vmx: Initialize VT-d Posted-Interrupts Descriptor Feng Wu
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, Jan Beulich, Andrew Cooper
This patch adds some helper functions to manipulate the
Posted-Interrupts Descriptor.
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Newly added
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 35f804a..2eb7cbd 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ void vmx_update_cpu_exec_control(struct vcpu *v);
void vmx_update_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu *v);
#define POSTED_INTR_ON 0
+#define POSTED_INTR_SN 1
static inline int pi_test_and_set_pir(int vector, struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
{
return test_and_set_bit(vector, pi_desc->pir);
@@ -121,11 +122,31 @@ static inline int pi_test_and_clear_on(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
return test_and_clear_bit(POSTED_INTR_ON, &pi_desc->control);
}
+static inline int pi_test_on(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
+{
+ return test_bit(POSTED_INTR_ON, &pi_desc->control);
+}
+
static inline unsigned long pi_get_pir(struct pi_desc *pi_desc, int group)
{
return xchg(&pi_desc->pir[group], 0);
}
+static inline int pi_test_sn(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
+{
+ return test_bit(POSTED_INTR_SN, &pi_desc->control);
+}
+
+static inline void pi_set_sn(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
+{
+ set_bit(POSTED_INTR_SN, &pi_desc->control);
+}
+
+static inline void pi_clear_sn(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
+{
+ clear_bit(POSTED_INTR_SN, &pi_desc->control);
+}
+
/*
* Exit Reasons
*/
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* [v4 08/17] vmx: Initialize VT-d Posted-Interrupts Descriptor
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 07/17] vmx: Add some helper functions for Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 09/17] vmx: Suppress posting interrupts when 'SN' is set Feng Wu
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, Jan Beulich, Andrew Cooper
This patch initializes the VT-d Posted-interrupt Descriptor.
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
v4:
- No changes
v3:
- Move pi_desc_init() to xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
- Remove the 'inline' flag of pi_desc_init()
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
index 3aff365..11dc1b5 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include <asm/flushtlb.h>
#include <asm/shadow.h>
#include <asm/tboot.h>
+#include <asm/apic.h>
static bool_t __read_mostly opt_vpid_enabled = 1;
boolean_param("vpid", opt_vpid_enabled);
@@ -921,6 +922,20 @@ void virtual_vmcs_vmwrite(void *vvmcs, u32 vmcs_encoding, u64 val)
virtual_vmcs_exit(vvmcs);
}
+static void pi_desc_init(struct vcpu *v)
+{
+ uint32_t dest;
+
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc.nv = posted_intr_vector;
+
+ dest = cpu_physical_id(v->processor);
+
+ if ( x2apic_enabled )
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc.ndst = dest;
+ else
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc.ndst = MASK_INSR(dest, PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK);
+}
+
static int construct_vmcs(struct vcpu *v)
{
struct domain *d = v->domain;
@@ -1054,6 +1069,9 @@ static int construct_vmcs(struct vcpu *v)
if ( cpu_has_vmx_posted_intr_processing )
{
+ if ( iommu_intpost )
+ pi_desc_init(v);
+
__vmwrite(PI_DESC_ADDR, virt_to_maddr(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc));
__vmwrite(POSTED_INTR_NOTIFICATION_VECTOR, posted_intr_vector);
}
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 2eb7cbd..b53973e 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ typedef enum {
#define EPT_EMT_WB 6
#define EPT_EMT_RSV2 7
+#define PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK 0xFF00
+
void vmx_asm_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs);
void vmx_asm_do_vmentry(void);
void vmx_intr_assist(void);
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* [v4 09/17] vmx: Suppress posting interrupts when 'SN' is set
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 08/17] vmx: Initialize VT-d Posted-Interrupts Descriptor Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-24 15:11 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 10/17] vt-d: Extend struct iremap_entry to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, Jan Beulich, Andrew Cooper
Currently, we don't support urgent interrupt, all interrupts
are recognized as non-urgent interrupt, so we cannot send
posted-interrupt when 'SN' is set.
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Coding style.
- V3 removes a vcpu_kick() from the eoi_exitmap_changed path
incorrectly, fix it.
v3:
- use cmpxchg to test SN/ON and set ON
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 0837627..cd5bfab 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1697,14 +1697,39 @@ static void vmx_deliver_posted_intr(struct vcpu *v, u8 vector)
* VMEntry as it used to be.
*/
pi_set_on(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc);
+ vcpu_kick(v);
}
- else if ( !pi_test_and_set_on(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc) )
+ else
{
+ struct pi_desc old, new, prev;
+
+ prev.control = 0;
+
+ do {
+ /*
+ * Currently, we don't support urgent interrupt, all
+ * interrupts are recognized as non-urgent interrupt,
+ * so we cannot send posted-interrupt when 'SN' is set.
+ * Besides that, if 'ON' is already set, we cannot set
+ * posted-interrupts as well.
+ */
+ if ( pi_test_sn(&prev) || pi_test_on(&prev) )
+ {
+ vcpu_kick(v);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ old.control = v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc.control &
+ ~( 1 << POSTED_INTR_ON | 1 << POSTED_INTR_SN );
+ new.control = v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc.control |
+ 1 << POSTED_INTR_ON;
+
+ prev.control = cmpxchg(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc.control,
+ old.control, new.control);
+ } while ( prev.control != old.control );
+
__vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(v);
- return;
}
-
- vcpu_kick(v);
}
static void vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct vcpu *v)
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 09/17] vmx: Suppress posting interrupts when 'SN' is set
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 09/17] vmx: Suppress posting interrupts when 'SN' is set Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-24 15:11 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-24 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu; +Cc: Andrew Cooper, Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, xen-devel
>>> On 23.07.15 at 13:35, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -1697,14 +1697,39 @@ static void vmx_deliver_posted_intr(struct vcpu *v, u8 vector)
> * VMEntry as it used to be.
> */
> pi_set_on(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc);
> + vcpu_kick(v);
Why can't this be left at the end of the function? You only need to ...
> }
> - else if ( !pi_test_and_set_on(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc) )
> + else
> {
> + struct pi_desc old, new, prev;
> +
> + prev.control = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + /*
> + * Currently, we don't support urgent interrupt, all
> + * interrupts are recognized as non-urgent interrupt,
> + * so we cannot send posted-interrupt when 'SN' is set.
> + * Besides that, if 'ON' is already set, we cannot set
> + * posted-interrupts as well.
> + */
> + if ( pi_test_sn(&prev) || pi_test_on(&prev) )
> + {
> + vcpu_kick(v);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + old.control = v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc.control &
> + ~( 1 << POSTED_INTR_ON | 1 << POSTED_INTR_SN );
> + new.control = v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc.control |
> + 1 << POSTED_INTR_ON;
> +
> + prev.control = cmpxchg(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc.control,
> + old.control, new.control);
> + } while ( prev.control != old.control );
> +
> __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(v);
> - return;
... keep the return here.
> }
> -
> - vcpu_kick(v);
> }
Makes for a smaller and hence more obviously correct change. Or am
I overlooking something?
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* [v4 10/17] vt-d: Extend struct iremap_entry to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 09/17] vmx: Suppress posting interrupts when 'SN' is set Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-24 15:13 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used Feng Wu
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu
Extend struct iremap_entry according to VT-d Posted-Interrupts Spec.
CC: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
v4:
- res_4 is not a bitfiled, correct it.
- Expose 'im' to remapped irte as well.
v3:
- Use u32 instead of u64 to define the bitfields in 'struct iremap_entry'
- Limit using bitfield if possible
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h | 43 ++++++++++------
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c | 10 ++--
3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
index 0333686..b7a42f6 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
@@ -123,9 +123,9 @@ static u16 hpetid_to_bdf(unsigned int hpet_id)
static void set_ire_sid(struct iremap_entry *ire,
unsigned int svt, unsigned int sq, unsigned int sid)
{
- ire->hi.svt = svt;
- ire->hi.sq = sq;
- ire->hi.sid = sid;
+ ire->remap.svt = svt;
+ ire->remap.sq = sq;
+ ire->remap.sid = sid;
}
static void set_ioapic_source_id(int apic_id, struct iremap_entry *ire)
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static unsigned int alloc_remap_entry(struct iommu *iommu, unsigned int nr)
else
p = &iremap_entries[i % (1 << IREMAP_ENTRY_ORDER)];
- if ( p->lo_val || p->hi_val ) /* not a free entry */
+ if ( p->lo || p->hi ) /* not a free entry */
found = 0;
else if ( ++found == nr )
break;
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static int remap_entry_to_ioapic_rte(
GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, index,
iremap_entries, iremap_entry);
- if ( iremap_entry->hi_val == 0 && iremap_entry->lo_val == 0 )
+ if ( iremap_entry->hi == 0 && iremap_entry->lo == 0 )
{
dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX,
"%s: index (%d) get an empty entry!\n",
@@ -264,13 +264,13 @@ static int remap_entry_to_ioapic_rte(
return -EFAULT;
}
- old_rte->vector = iremap_entry->lo.vector;
- old_rte->delivery_mode = iremap_entry->lo.dlm;
- old_rte->dest_mode = iremap_entry->lo.dm;
- old_rte->trigger = iremap_entry->lo.tm;
+ old_rte->vector = iremap_entry->remap.vector;
+ old_rte->delivery_mode = iremap_entry->remap.dlm;
+ old_rte->dest_mode = iremap_entry->remap.dm;
+ old_rte->trigger = iremap_entry->remap.tm;
old_rte->__reserved_2 = 0;
old_rte->dest.logical.__reserved_1 = 0;
- old_rte->dest.logical.logical_dest = iremap_entry->lo.dst >> 8;
+ old_rte->dest.logical.logical_dest = iremap_entry->remap.dst >> 8;
unmap_vtd_domain_page(iremap_entries);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ir_ctrl->iremap_lock, flags);
@@ -318,27 +318,28 @@ static int ioapic_rte_to_remap_entry(struct iommu *iommu,
if ( rte_upper )
{
if ( x2apic_enabled )
- new_ire.lo.dst = value;
+ new_ire.remap.dst = value;
else
- new_ire.lo.dst = (value >> 24) << 8;
+ new_ire.remap.dst = (value >> 24) << 8;
}
else
{
*(((u32 *)&new_rte) + 0) = value;
- new_ire.lo.fpd = 0;
- new_ire.lo.dm = new_rte.dest_mode;
- new_ire.lo.tm = new_rte.trigger;
- new_ire.lo.dlm = new_rte.delivery_mode;
+ new_ire.remap.fpd = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.dm = new_rte.dest_mode;
+ new_ire.remap.tm = new_rte.trigger;
+ new_ire.remap.dlm = new_rte.delivery_mode;
/* Hardware require RH = 1 for LPR delivery mode */
- new_ire.lo.rh = (new_ire.lo.dlm == dest_LowestPrio);
- new_ire.lo.avail = 0;
- new_ire.lo.res_1 = 0;
- new_ire.lo.vector = new_rte.vector;
- new_ire.lo.res_2 = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.rh = (new_ire.remap.dlm == dest_LowestPrio);
+ new_ire.remap.avail = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.res_1 = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.vector = new_rte.vector;
+ new_ire.remap.res_2 = 0;
set_ioapic_source_id(IO_APIC_ID(apic), &new_ire);
- new_ire.hi.res_1 = 0;
- new_ire.lo.p = 1; /* finally, set present bit */
+ new_ire.remap.res_3 = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.res_4 = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.p = 1; /* finally, set present bit */
/* now construct new ioapic rte entry */
remap_rte->vector = new_rte.vector;
@@ -511,7 +512,7 @@ static int remap_entry_to_msi_msg(
GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, index,
iremap_entries, iremap_entry);
- if ( iremap_entry->hi_val == 0 && iremap_entry->lo_val == 0 )
+ if ( iremap_entry->hi == 0 && iremap_entry->lo == 0 )
{
dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX,
"%s: index (%d) get an empty entry!\n",
@@ -524,25 +525,25 @@ static int remap_entry_to_msi_msg(
msg->address_hi = MSI_ADDR_BASE_HI;
msg->address_lo =
MSI_ADDR_BASE_LO |
- ((iremap_entry->lo.dm == 0) ?
+ ((iremap_entry->remap.dm == 0) ?
MSI_ADDR_DESTMODE_PHYS:
MSI_ADDR_DESTMODE_LOGIC) |
- ((iremap_entry->lo.dlm != dest_LowestPrio) ?
+ ((iremap_entry->remap.dlm != dest_LowestPrio) ?
MSI_ADDR_REDIRECTION_CPU:
MSI_ADDR_REDIRECTION_LOWPRI);
if ( x2apic_enabled )
- msg->dest32 = iremap_entry->lo.dst;
+ msg->dest32 = iremap_entry->remap.dst;
else
- msg->dest32 = (iremap_entry->lo.dst >> 8) & 0xff;
+ msg->dest32 = (iremap_entry->remap.dst >> 8) & 0xff;
msg->address_lo |= MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID(msg->dest32);
msg->data =
MSI_DATA_TRIGGER_EDGE |
MSI_DATA_LEVEL_ASSERT |
- ((iremap_entry->lo.dlm != dest_LowestPrio) ?
+ ((iremap_entry->remap.dlm != dest_LowestPrio) ?
MSI_DATA_DELIVERY_FIXED:
MSI_DATA_DELIVERY_LOWPRI) |
- iremap_entry->lo.vector;
+ iremap_entry->remap.vector;
unmap_vtd_domain_page(iremap_entries);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ir_ctrl->iremap_lock, flags);
@@ -601,29 +602,30 @@ static int msi_msg_to_remap_entry(
memcpy(&new_ire, iremap_entry, sizeof(struct iremap_entry));
/* Set interrupt remapping table entry */
- new_ire.lo.fpd = 0;
- new_ire.lo.dm = (msg->address_lo >> MSI_ADDR_DESTMODE_SHIFT) & 0x1;
- new_ire.lo.tm = (msg->data >> MSI_DATA_TRIGGER_SHIFT) & 0x1;
- new_ire.lo.dlm = (msg->data >> MSI_DATA_DELIVERY_MODE_SHIFT) & 0x1;
+ new_ire.remap.fpd = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.dm = (msg->address_lo >> MSI_ADDR_DESTMODE_SHIFT) & 0x1;
+ new_ire.remap.tm = (msg->data >> MSI_DATA_TRIGGER_SHIFT) & 0x1;
+ new_ire.remap.dlm = (msg->data >> MSI_DATA_DELIVERY_MODE_SHIFT) & 0x1;
/* Hardware require RH = 1 for LPR delivery mode */
- new_ire.lo.rh = (new_ire.lo.dlm == dest_LowestPrio);
- new_ire.lo.avail = 0;
- new_ire.lo.res_1 = 0;
- new_ire.lo.vector = (msg->data >> MSI_DATA_VECTOR_SHIFT) &
- MSI_DATA_VECTOR_MASK;
- new_ire.lo.res_2 = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.rh = (new_ire.remap.dlm == dest_LowestPrio);
+ new_ire.remap.avail = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.res_1 = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.vector = (msg->data >> MSI_DATA_VECTOR_SHIFT) &
+ MSI_DATA_VECTOR_MASK;
+ new_ire.remap.res_2 = 0;
if ( x2apic_enabled )
- new_ire.lo.dst = msg->dest32;
+ new_ire.remap.dst = msg->dest32;
else
- new_ire.lo.dst = ((msg->address_lo >> MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_SHIFT)
- & 0xff) << 8;
+ new_ire.remap.dst = ((msg->address_lo >> MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_SHIFT)
+ & 0xff) << 8;
if ( pdev )
set_msi_source_id(pdev, &new_ire);
else
set_hpet_source_id(msi_desc->hpet_id, &new_ire);
- new_ire.hi.res_1 = 0;
- new_ire.lo.p = 1; /* finally, set present bit */
+ new_ire.remap.res_3 = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.res_4 = 0;
+ new_ire.remap.p = 1; /* finally, set present bit */
/* now construct new MSI/MSI-X rte entry */
remap_rte = (struct msi_msg_remap_entry *)msg;
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h
index e807253..0be6c2e 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h
@@ -289,29 +289,44 @@ struct dma_pte {
/* interrupt remap entry */
struct iremap_entry {
union {
- u64 lo_val;
+ struct { u64 lo, hi; };
struct {
- u64 p : 1,
+ u16 p : 1,
fpd : 1,
dm : 1,
rh : 1,
tm : 1,
dlm : 3,
avail : 4,
- res_1 : 4,
- vector : 8,
- res_2 : 8,
- dst : 32;
- }lo;
- };
- union {
- u64 hi_val;
+ res_1 : 3,
+ im : 1;
+ u8 vector;
+ u8 res_2;
+ u32 dst;
+ u16 sid;
+ u16 sq : 2,
+ svt : 2,
+ res_3 : 12;
+ u32 res_4;
+ } remap;
struct {
- u64 sid : 16,
- sq : 2,
+ u16 p : 1,
+ fpd : 1,
+ res_1 : 6,
+ avail : 4,
+ res_2 : 2,
+ urg : 1,
+ im : 1;
+ u8 vector;
+ u8 res_3;
+ u32 res_4 : 6,
+ pda_l : 26;
+ u16 sid;
+ u16 sq : 2,
svt : 2,
- res_1 : 44;
- }hi;
+ res_5 : 12;
+ u32 pda_h;
+ } post;
};
};
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c
index bd14c02..a5fe237 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c
@@ -238,14 +238,14 @@ static void dump_iommu_info(unsigned char key)
else
p = &iremap_entries[i % (1 << IREMAP_ENTRY_ORDER)];
- if ( !p->lo.p )
+ if ( !p->remap.p )
continue;
printk(" %04x: %x %x %04x %08x %02x %x %x %x %x %x"
" %x %x\n", i,
- (u32)p->hi.svt, (u32)p->hi.sq, (u32)p->hi.sid,
- (u32)p->lo.dst, (u32)p->lo.vector, (u32)p->lo.avail,
- (u32)p->lo.dlm, (u32)p->lo.tm, (u32)p->lo.rh,
- (u32)p->lo.dm, (u32)p->lo.fpd, (u32)p->lo.p);
+ (u32)p->remap.svt, (u32)p->remap.sq, (u32)p->remap.sid,
+ (u32)p->remap.dst, (u32)p->remap.vector, (u32)p->remap.avail,
+ (u32)p->remap.dlm, (u32)p->remap.tm, (u32)p->remap.rh,
+ (u32)p->remap.dm, (u32)p->remap.fpd, (u32)p->remap.p);
print_cnt++;
}
if ( iremap_entries )
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 10/17] vt-d: Extend struct iremap_entry to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 10/17] vt-d: Extend struct iremap_entry to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-24 15:13 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-24 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Kevin Tian, xen-devel
>>> On 23.07.15 at 13:35, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c
> @@ -238,14 +238,14 @@ static void dump_iommu_info(unsigned char key)
> else
> p = &iremap_entries[i % (1 << IREMAP_ENTRY_ORDER)];
>
> - if ( !p->lo.p )
> + if ( !p->remap.p )
> continue;
> printk(" %04x: %x %x %04x %08x %02x %x %x %x %x %x"
> " %x %x\n", i,
> - (u32)p->hi.svt, (u32)p->hi.sq, (u32)p->hi.sid,
> - (u32)p->lo.dst, (u32)p->lo.vector, (u32)p->lo.avail,
> - (u32)p->lo.dlm, (u32)p->lo.tm, (u32)p->lo.rh,
> - (u32)p->lo.dm, (u32)p->lo.fpd, (u32)p->lo.p);
> + (u32)p->remap.svt, (u32)p->remap.sq, (u32)p->remap.sid,
> + (u32)p->remap.dst, (u32)p->remap.vector, (u32)p->remap.avail,
> + (u32)p->remap.dlm, (u32)p->remap.tm, (u32)p->remap.rh,
> + (u32)p->remap.dm, (u32)p->remap.fpd, (u32)p->remap.p);
While touching this code anyway, can you please at once drop as
many of these bogus casts as possible?
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 10/17] vt-d: Extend struct iremap_entry to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 13:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-24 15:27 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 12/17] Update IRTE according to guest interrupt config changes Feng Wu
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 2 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Cc: Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich, Yang Zhang, Feng Wu
This patch adds an API which is used to update the IRTE
for posted-interrupt when guest changes MSI/MSI-X information.
CC: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Don't inline setup_posted_irte()
- const struct pi_desc *pi_desc for setup_posted_irte()
- return -EINVAL when pirq_spin_lock_irq_desc() fails.
- Make some variables const
- Release irq desc lock earlier in pi_update_irte()
- Remove the pointless do-while() loop when doing cmpxchg16b()
v3:
- Remove "adding PDA_MASK()" when updating 'pda_l' and 'pda_h' for IRTE.
- Change the return type of pi_update_irte() to int.
- Remove some pointless printk message in pi_update_irte().
- Use structure assignment instead of memcpy() for irte copy.
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h | 2 +
xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h | 2 +
3 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
index b7a42f6..724ba83 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
@@ -900,3 +900,110 @@ void iommu_disable_x2apic_IR(void)
for_each_drhd_unit ( drhd )
disable_qinval(drhd->iommu);
}
+
+static void setup_posted_irte(
+ struct iremap_entry *new_ire, const struct pi_desc *pi_desc, uint8_t gvec)
+{
+ new_ire->post.urg = 0;
+ new_ire->post.vector = gvec;
+ new_ire->post.pda_l = virt_to_maddr(pi_desc) >> (32 - PDA_LOW_BIT);
+ new_ire->post.pda_h = virt_to_maddr(pi_desc) >> 32;
+
+ new_ire->post.res_1 = 0;
+ new_ire->post.res_2 = 0;
+ new_ire->post.res_3 = 0;
+ new_ire->post.res_4 = 0;
+ new_ire->post.res_5 = 0;
+
+ new_ire->post.im = 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function is used to update the IRTE for posted-interrupt
+ * when guest changes MSI/MSI-X information.
+ */
+int pi_update_irte(struct vcpu *v, struct pirq *pirq, uint8_t gvec)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ const struct msi_desc *msi_desc;
+ int remap_index;
+ int rc = 0;
+ const struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
+ const struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd;
+ struct iommu *iommu;
+ struct ir_ctrl *ir_ctrl;
+ struct iremap_entry *iremap_entries = NULL, *p = NULL;
+ struct iremap_entry new_ire, old_ire;
+ const struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ __uint128_t ret;
+
+ desc = pirq_spin_lock_irq_desc(pirq, NULL);
+ if ( !desc )
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ msi_desc = desc->msi_desc;
+ if ( !msi_desc )
+ {
+ rc = -EBADSLT;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
+
+ pci_dev = msi_desc->dev;
+ if ( !pci_dev )
+ {
+ rc = -ENODEV;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
+
+ remap_index = msi_desc->remap_index;
+
+ /*
+ * For performance concern, we will store the 'iommu' pointer in
+ * 'struct msi_desc' in some other place, so we don't need to waste
+ * time searching it here. I will fix this soon.
+ */
+ drhd = acpi_find_matched_drhd_unit(pci_dev);
+ if ( !drhd )
+ {
+ rc = -ENODEV;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
+
+ iommu = drhd->iommu;
+ ir_ctrl = iommu_ir_ctrl(iommu);
+ if ( !ir_ctrl )
+ {
+ rc = -ENODEV;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ir_ctrl->iremap_lock, flags);
+
+ GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index, iremap_entries, p);
+
+ old_ire = new_ire = *p;
+
+ /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
+ setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
+ ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
+
+ ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
+
+ iommu_flush_cache_entry(p, sizeof(struct iremap_entry));
+ iommu_flush_iec_index(iommu, 0, remap_index);
+
+ if ( iremap_entries )
+ unmap_vtd_domain_page(iremap_entries);
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ir_ctrl->iremap_lock, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+
+ unlock_out:
+ spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
+
+ return rc;
+}
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h
index 0be6c2e..692473f 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h
@@ -330,6 +330,8 @@ struct iremap_entry {
};
};
+#define PDA_LOW_BIT 26
+
/* Max intr remapping table page order is 8, as max number of IRTEs is 64K */
#define IREMAP_PAGE_ORDER 8
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h
index e7a65da..2a1523e 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ int iommu_supports_eim(void);
int iommu_enable_x2apic_IR(void);
void iommu_disable_x2apic_IR(void);
+int pi_update_irte(struct vcpu *v, struct pirq *pirq, uint8_t gvec);
+
#endif /* !__ARCH_X86_IOMMU_H__ */
/*
* Local variables:
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 13:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-23 15:52 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-24 0:39 ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-24 15:27 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 2 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2015-07-23 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu, xen-devel; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, Jan Beulich
On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
> + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index, iremap_entries, p);
> +
> + old_ire = new_ire = *p;
> +
> + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
> + setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
> + ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
> +
> + ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
This cannot be correct. Either the cmpxchg() is required and you must
cope with it failing, or the cmpxchg() is not required and this should
be a plain write.
It looks as if the cmpxchg() is required.
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-23 13:51 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2015-07-23 15:52 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-23 15:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-24 0:39 ` Wu, Feng
1 sibling, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-23 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, Feng Wu, xen-devel; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser
>>> On 23.07.15 at 15:51, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
>> + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index, iremap_entries, p);
>> +
>> + old_ire = new_ire = *p;
>> +
>> + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
>> + setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
>> + ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
>> +
>> + ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
>
> This cannot be correct. Either the cmpxchg() is required and you must
> cope with it failing, or the cmpxchg() is not required and this should
> be a plain write.
Not exactly: The cmpxchg() is required for this to be an atomic
128-bit write. And hence I would view the ASSERT() as
appropriate - it validates that the entry didn't change behind our
back.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-23 15:52 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2015-07-23 15:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-23 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2015-07-23 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, Feng Wu, xen-devel; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser
On 23/07/15 16:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 23.07.15 at 15:51, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
>>> + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index, iremap_entries, p);
>>> +
>>> + old_ire = new_ire = *p;
>>> +
>>> + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
>>> + setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
>>> + ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
>>> +
>>> + ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
>> This cannot be correct. Either the cmpxchg() is required and you must
>> cope with it failing, or the cmpxchg() is not required and this should
>> be a plain write.
> Not exactly: The cmpxchg() is required for this to be an atomic
> 128-bit write. And hence I would view the ASSERT() as
> appropriate - it validates that the entry didn't change behind our
> back.
But p is an active descriptor, which means hardware is liable to change
it behind our back.
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-23 15:55 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2015-07-23 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-23 16:11 ` Andrew Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-23 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Keir Fraser, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, xen-devel
>>> On 23.07.15 at 17:55, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 23/07/15 16:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 23.07.15 at 15:51, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
>>>> + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index, iremap_entries, p);
>>>> +
>>>> + old_ire = new_ire = *p;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
>>>> + setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
>>>> + ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
>>>> +
>>>> + ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
>>> This cannot be correct. Either the cmpxchg() is required and you must
>>> cope with it failing, or the cmpxchg() is not required and this should
>>> be a plain write.
>> Not exactly: The cmpxchg() is required for this to be an atomic
>> 128-bit write. And hence I would view the ASSERT() as
>> appropriate - it validates that the entry didn't change behind our
>> back.
>
> But p is an active descriptor, which means hardware is liable to change
> it behind our back.
I inquired about this on the previous round and was told
hardware doesn't alter the descriptor. Comparing this with
the spec, I couldn't spot any fields that I would suspect
getting written. Which fields do you have in mind?
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-23 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2015-07-23 16:11 ` Andrew Cooper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2015-07-23 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Keir Fraser, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, xen-devel
On 23/07/15 17:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 23.07.15 at 17:55, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 23/07/15 16:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 23.07.15 at 15:51, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
>>>>> + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index, iremap_entries, p);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + old_ire = new_ire = *p;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
>>>>> + setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
>>>>> + ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
>>>> This cannot be correct. Either the cmpxchg() is required and you must
>>>> cope with it failing, or the cmpxchg() is not required and this should
>>>> be a plain write.
>>> Not exactly: The cmpxchg() is required for this to be an atomic
>>> 128-bit write. And hence I would view the ASSERT() as
>>> appropriate - it validates that the entry didn't change behind our
>>> back.
>> But p is an active descriptor, which means hardware is liable to change
>> it behind our back.
> I inquired about this on the previous round and was told
> hardware doesn't alter the descriptor.
Ah - apologies for not noticing this.
> Comparing this with
> the spec, I couldn't spot any fields that I would suspect
> getting written. Which fields do you have in mind?
None in particular.
I called it out because ASSERT(cmpxchg(...) == old) reads as if it is buggy.
If hardware will genuinely never update the descriptor, then a comment
should be put in here explaining why the assert is safe in this instance.
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-23 13:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-23 15:52 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2015-07-24 0:39 ` Wu, Feng
1 sibling, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Wu, Feng @ 2015-07-24 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, xen-devel
Cc: Zhang, Yang Z, Wu, Feng, Tian, Kevin, Keir Fraser, Jan Beulich
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.cooper3@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:52 PM
> To: Wu, Feng; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Zhang, Yang Z; Tian, Kevin; Keir Fraser; Jan Beulich
> Subject: Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
>
> On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
> > + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index,
> iremap_entries, p);
> > +
> > + old_ire = new_ire = *p;
> > +
> > + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
> > + setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
> > + ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
> > +
> > + ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
>
> This cannot be correct. Either the cmpxchg() is required and you must
> cope with it failing, or the cmpxchg() is not required and this should
> be a plain write.
In fact, Jan gave some comments about this before. The only thing here we
need to do is to atomically update the 128-bit IRTE, so we need use cmpxchg16b,
and there is no race condition here, which means the IRTE cannot be changed
behind us, so the return value should be the same as the old one, right?
Thanks,
Feng
>
> It looks as if the cmpxchg() is required.
>
> ~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used Feng Wu
2015-07-23 13:51 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2015-07-24 15:27 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-28 7:34 ` Wu, Feng
1 sibling, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-24 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Andrew Cooper, Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, xen-devel
>>> On 23.07.15 at 13:35, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> +int pi_update_irte(struct vcpu *v, struct pirq *pirq, uint8_t gvec)
More constification is possible here.
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> + const struct msi_desc *msi_desc;
> + int remap_index;
> + int rc = 0;
> + const struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
> + const struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd;
> + struct iommu *iommu;
> + struct ir_ctrl *ir_ctrl;
> + struct iremap_entry *iremap_entries = NULL, *p = NULL;
> + struct iremap_entry new_ire, old_ire;
> + const struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + __uint128_t ret;
> +
> + desc = pirq_spin_lock_irq_desc(pirq, NULL);
> + if ( !desc )
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + msi_desc = desc->msi_desc;
> + if ( !msi_desc )
> + {
> + rc = -EBADSLT;
> + goto unlock_out;
> + }
> +
> + pci_dev = msi_desc->dev;
> + if ( !pci_dev )
> + {
> + rc = -ENODEV;
> + goto unlock_out;
> + }
> +
> + remap_index = msi_desc->remap_index;
> +
> + /*
> + * For performance concern, we will store the 'iommu' pointer in
> + * 'struct msi_desc' in some other place, so we don't need to waste
> + * time searching it here. I will fix this soon.
> + */
> + drhd = acpi_find_matched_drhd_unit(pci_dev);
> + if ( !drhd )
> + {
> + rc = -ENODEV;
> + goto unlock_out;
> + }
> +
> + iommu = drhd->iommu;
> + ir_ctrl = iommu_ir_ctrl(iommu);
> + if ( !ir_ctrl )
> + {
> + rc = -ENODEV;
> + goto unlock_out;
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ir_ctrl->iremap_lock, flags);
So dropping the lock like this eliminates the lock nesting, but doesn't
address my concern of namely acpi_find_matched_drhd_unit() being
(apparently pointlessly) being called with the lock held. As I think I
said before - perhaps what you really want here is to hold
pcidevs_lock (and maybe your caller(s) already do so, in which case
you'd just want to add a respective [documenting] ASSERT()).
Furthermore, having used spin_unlock_irq() right before, I can't see
the point in then using spin_lock_irqsave() instead of just
spin_lock_irq().
> + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index, iremap_entries, p);
> +
> + old_ire = new_ire = *p;
> +
> + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
> + setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
> + ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
> +
> + ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
> +
> + iommu_flush_cache_entry(p, sizeof(struct iremap_entry));
sizeof(*p) please.
> + iommu_flush_iec_index(iommu, 0, remap_index);
> +
> + if ( iremap_entries )
> + unmap_vtd_domain_page(iremap_entries);
The conditional comes way too late: Either GET_IREMAP_ENTRY()
can produce NULL, in which case you're hosed above. Or it can't,
in which case the check here is pointless.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-24 15:27 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2015-07-28 7:34 ` Wu, Feng
2015-08-11 10:18 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Wu, Feng @ 2015-07-28 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich
Cc: Tian, Kevin, Keir Fraser, Andrew Cooper, xen-devel, Zhang,
Yang Z, Wu, Feng
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:28 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Tian, Kevin; Zhang, Yang Z; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir
> Fraser
> Subject: Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
>
> >>> On 23.07.15 at 13:35, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > +int pi_update_irte(struct vcpu *v, struct pirq *pirq, uint8_t gvec)
>
> More constification is possible here.
>
> > +{
> > + struct irq_desc *desc;
> > + const struct msi_desc *msi_desc;
> > + int remap_index;
> > + int rc = 0;
> > + const struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
> > + const struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd;
> > + struct iommu *iommu;
> > + struct ir_ctrl *ir_ctrl;
> > + struct iremap_entry *iremap_entries = NULL, *p = NULL;
> > + struct iremap_entry new_ire, old_ire;
> > + const struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + __uint128_t ret;
> > +
> > + desc = pirq_spin_lock_irq_desc(pirq, NULL);
> > + if ( !desc )
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + msi_desc = desc->msi_desc;
> > + if ( !msi_desc )
> > + {
> > + rc = -EBADSLT;
> > + goto unlock_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pci_dev = msi_desc->dev;
> > + if ( !pci_dev )
> > + {
> > + rc = -ENODEV;
> > + goto unlock_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + remap_index = msi_desc->remap_index;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * For performance concern, we will store the 'iommu' pointer in
> > + * 'struct msi_desc' in some other place, so we don't need to waste
> > + * time searching it here. I will fix this soon.
> > + */
> > + drhd = acpi_find_matched_drhd_unit(pci_dev);
> > + if ( !drhd )
> > + {
> > + rc = -ENODEV;
> > + goto unlock_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + iommu = drhd->iommu;
> > + ir_ctrl = iommu_ir_ctrl(iommu);
> > + if ( !ir_ctrl )
> > + {
> > + rc = -ENODEV;
> > + goto unlock_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ir_ctrl->iremap_lock, flags);
>
> So dropping the lock like this eliminates the lock nesting, but doesn't
> address my concern of namely acpi_find_matched_drhd_unit() being
> (apparently pointlessly) being called with the lock held. As I think I
> said before - perhaps what you really want here is to hold
> pcidevs_lock (and maybe your caller(s) already do so, in which case
> you'd just want to add a respective [documenting] ASSERT()).
>
> Furthermore, having used spin_unlock_irq() right before, I can't see
> the point in then using spin_lock_irqsave() instead of just
> spin_lock_irq().
>
> > + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index,
> iremap_entries, p);
> > +
> > + old_ire = new_ire = *p;
> > +
> > + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
> > + setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
> > + ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
> > +
> > + ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
> > +
> > + iommu_flush_cache_entry(p, sizeof(struct iremap_entry));
>
> sizeof(*p) please.
>
> > + iommu_flush_iec_index(iommu, 0, remap_index);
> > +
> > + if ( iremap_entries )
> > + unmap_vtd_domain_page(iremap_entries);
>
> The conditional comes way too late: Either GET_IREMAP_ENTRY()
> can produce NULL, in which case you're hosed above. Or it can't,
> in which case the check here is pointless.
I cannot find the case GET_IREMAP_ENTRY() produce NULL for
"iremap_entries", if it is, GET_IREMAP_ENTRY() itself will get
a big problem, right? So this check is not needed, maybe I can
add an ASSERT() after GET_IREMAP_ENTRY().
Thanks,
Feng
>
> Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used
2015-07-28 7:34 ` Wu, Feng
@ 2015-08-11 10:18 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-08-11 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu; +Cc: Yang Z Zhang, Andrew Cooper, Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, xen-devel
>>> On 28.07.15 at 09:34, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:28 PM
>> >>> On 23.07.15 at 13:35, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> > + GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(ir_ctrl->iremap_maddr, remap_index,
>> iremap_entries, p);
>> > +
>> > + old_ire = new_ire = *p;
>> > +
>> > + /* Setup/Update interrupt remapping table entry. */
>> > + setup_posted_irte(&new_ire, pi_desc, gvec);
>> > + ret = cmpxchg16b(p, &old_ire, &new_ire);
>> > +
>> > + ASSERT(ret == *(__uint128_t *)&old_ire);
>> > +
>> > + iommu_flush_cache_entry(p, sizeof(struct iremap_entry));
>>
>> sizeof(*p) please.
>>
>> > + iommu_flush_iec_index(iommu, 0, remap_index);
>> > +
>> > + if ( iremap_entries )
>> > + unmap_vtd_domain_page(iremap_entries);
>>
>> The conditional comes way too late: Either GET_IREMAP_ENTRY()
>> can produce NULL, in which case you're hosed above. Or it can't,
>> in which case the check here is pointless.
>
> I cannot find the case GET_IREMAP_ENTRY() produce NULL for
> "iremap_entries",
And I didn't say it would - I simply listed both possibilities and their
respective consequences for your code.
> if it is, GET_IREMAP_ENTRY() itself will get
> a big problem, right? So this check is not needed, maybe I can
> add an ASSERT() after GET_IREMAP_ENTRY().
You might, but iirc no other uses do so, so you could as well omit
any such checks.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* [v4 12/17] Update IRTE according to guest interrupt config changes
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 13/17] vmx: posted-interrupt handling when vCPU is blocked Feng Wu
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Feng Wu, Jan Beulich
When guest changes its interrupt configuration (such as, vector, etc.)
for direct-assigned devices, we need to update the associated IRTE
with the new guest vector, so external interrupts from the assigned
devices can be injected to guests without VM-Exit.
For lowest-priority interrupts, we use vector-hashing mechamisn to find
the destination vCPU. This follows the hardware behavior, since modern
Intel CPUs use vector hashing to handle the lowest-priority interrupt.
For multicast/broadcast vCPU, we cannot handle it via interrupt posting,
still use interrupt remapping.
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Make some 'int' variables 'unsigned int' in pi_find_dest_vcpu()
- Make 'dest_id' uint32_t
- Rename 'size' to 'bitmap_array_size'
- find_next_bit() and find_first_bit() always return unsigned int,
so no need to check whether the return value is less than 0.
- Message error level XENLOG_G_WARNING -> XENLOG_G_INFO
- Remove useless warning message
- Create a seperate function vector_hashing_dest() to find the
- destination of lowest-priority interrupts.
- Change some comments
v3:
- Use bitmap to store the all the possible destination vCPUs of an
interrupt, then trying to find the right destination from the bitmap
- Typo and some small changes
xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c
index 9b77334..546b962 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <asm/hvm/iommu.h>
#include <asm/hvm/support.h>
#include <xen/hvm/irq.h>
+#include <asm/io_apic.h>
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, dpci_list);
@@ -199,6 +200,108 @@ void free_hvm_irq_dpci(struct hvm_irq_dpci *dpci)
xfree(dpci);
}
+/*
+ * This routine handles lowest-priority interrupts using vector-hashing
+ * mechanism. As an example, modern Intel CPUs use this method to handle
+ * lowest-priority interrupts.
+ *
+ * Here is the details about the vector-hashing mechanism:
+ * 1. For lowest-priority interrupts, store all the possible destination
+ * vCPUs in an array.
+ * 2. Use "gvec % max number of destination vCPUs" to find the right
+ * destination vCPU in the array for the lowest-priority interrupt.
+ */
+static struct vcpu *vector_hashing_dest(const struct domain *d,
+ uint32_t dest_id,
+ bool_t dest_mode,
+ uint8_t gvec)
+
+{
+ unsigned long *dest_vcpu_bitmap;
+ unsigned int dest_vcpu_num = 0, idx;
+ unsigned int bitmap_array_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(d->max_vcpus);
+ struct vcpu *v, *dest = NULL;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ dest_vcpu_bitmap = xzalloc_array(unsigned long, bitmap_array_size);
+ if ( !dest_vcpu_bitmap )
+ {
+ dprintk(XENLOG_G_INFO,
+ "dom%d: failed to allocate memory\n", d->domain_id);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ for_each_vcpu ( d, v )
+ {
+ if ( !vlapic_match_dest(vcpu_vlapic(v), NULL, 0,
+ dest_id, dest_mode) )
+ continue;
+
+ __set_bit(v->vcpu_id, dest_vcpu_bitmap);
+ dest_vcpu_num++;
+ }
+
+ if ( dest_vcpu_num != 0 )
+ {
+ idx = 0;
+
+ for ( i = gvec % dest_vcpu_num; i >= 0; i--)
+ {
+ idx = find_next_bit(dest_vcpu_bitmap, d->max_vcpus, idx) + 1;
+ BUG_ON(idx >= d->max_vcpus);
+ }
+ idx--;
+
+ dest = d->vcpu[idx];
+ }
+
+ xfree(dest_vcpu_bitmap);
+
+ return dest;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The purpose of this routine is to find the right destination vCPU for
+ * an interrupt which will be delivered by VT-d posted-interrupt. There
+ * are several cases as below:
+ *
+ * - For lowest-priority interrupts, use vector-hashing mechanism to find
+ * the destination.
+ * - Otherwise, for single destination interrupt, it is straightforward to
+ * find the destination vCPU and return true.
+ * - For multicast/broadcast vCPU, we cannot handle it via interrupt posting,
+ * so return NULL.
+ */
+static struct vcpu *pi_find_dest_vcpu(const struct domain *d, uint32_t dest_id,
+ bool_t dest_mode, uint8_t delivery_mode,
+ uint8_t gvec)
+{
+ unsigned int dest_vcpu_num = 0;
+ struct vcpu *v, *dest = NULL;
+
+ if ( delivery_mode == dest_LowestPrio )
+ return vector_hashing_dest(d, dest_id, dest_mode, gvec);
+
+ for_each_vcpu ( d, v )
+ {
+ if ( !vlapic_match_dest(vcpu_vlapic(v), NULL, 0,
+ dest_id, dest_mode) )
+ continue;
+
+ dest_vcpu_num++;
+ dest = v;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * For fixed destination, we only handle single-destination
+ * interrupts.
+ */
+ if ( dest_vcpu_num == 1 )
+ return dest;
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
int pt_irq_create_bind(
struct domain *d, xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq_t *pt_irq_bind)
{
@@ -257,7 +360,7 @@ int pt_irq_create_bind(
{
case PT_IRQ_TYPE_MSI:
{
- uint8_t dest, dest_mode;
+ uint8_t dest, dest_mode, delivery_mode;
int dest_vcpu_id;
if ( !(pirq_dpci->flags & HVM_IRQ_DPCI_MAPPED) )
@@ -330,11 +433,30 @@ int pt_irq_create_bind(
/* Calculate dest_vcpu_id for MSI-type pirq migration. */
dest = pirq_dpci->gmsi.gflags & VMSI_DEST_ID_MASK;
dest_mode = !!(pirq_dpci->gmsi.gflags & VMSI_DM_MASK);
+ delivery_mode = (pirq_dpci->gmsi.gflags >> GFLAGS_SHIFT_DELIV_MODE) &
+ VMSI_DELIV_MASK;
dest_vcpu_id = hvm_girq_dest_2_vcpu_id(d, dest, dest_mode);
pirq_dpci->gmsi.dest_vcpu_id = dest_vcpu_id;
spin_unlock(&d->event_lock);
if ( dest_vcpu_id >= 0 )
hvm_migrate_pirqs(d->vcpu[dest_vcpu_id]);
+
+ /* Use interrupt posting if it is supported */
+ if ( iommu_intpost )
+ {
+ struct vcpu *vcpu = pi_find_dest_vcpu(d, dest, dest_mode,
+ delivery_mode, pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec);
+
+ if ( vcpu )
+ {
+ rc = pi_update_irte( vcpu, info, pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec );
+ if ( unlikely(rc) )
+ dprintk(XENLOG_G_INFO,
+ "%pv: failed to update PI IRTE, gvec:%02x\n",
+ vcpu, pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec);
+ }
+ }
+
break;
}
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* [v4 13/17] vmx: posted-interrupt handling when vCPU is blocked
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 12/17] Update IRTE according to guest interrupt config changes Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 14/17] vmx: Properly handle notification event when vCPU is running Feng Wu
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, Jan Beulich, Andrew Cooper
This patch includes the following aspects:
- Add a global vector to wake up the blocked vCPU
when an interrupt is being posted to it (This
part was sugguested by Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>).
- Adds a new per-vCPU tasklet to wakeup the blocked
vCPU. It can be used in the case vcpu_unblock
cannot be called directly.
- Define two per-cpu variables:
* pi_blocked_vcpu:
A list storing the vCPUs which were blocked on this pCPU.
* pi_blocked_vcpu_lock:
The spinlock to protect pi_blocked_vcpu.
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Use local variables in pi_wakeup_interrupt()
- Remove vcpu from the blocked list when pi_desc.on==1, this
- avoid kick vcpu multiple times.
- Remove tasklet
v3:
- This patch is generated by merging the following three patches in v2:
[RFC v2 09/15] Add a new per-vCPU tasklet to wakeup the blocked vCPU
[RFC v2 10/15] vmx: Define two per-cpu variables
[RFC v2 11/15] vmx: Add a global wake-up vector for VT-d Posted-Interrupts
- rename 'vcpu_wakeup_tasklet' to 'pi_vcpu_wakeup_tasklet'
- Move the definition of 'pi_vcpu_wakeup_tasklet' to 'struct arch_vmx_struct'
- rename 'vcpu_wakeup_tasklet_handler' to 'pi_vcpu_wakeup_tasklet_handler'
- Make pi_wakeup_interrupt() static
- Rename 'blocked_vcpu_list' to 'pi_blocked_vcpu_list'
- move 'pi_blocked_vcpu_list' to 'struct arch_vmx_struct'
- Rename 'blocked_vcpu' to 'pi_blocked_vcpu'
- Rename 'blocked_vcpu_lock' to 'pi_blocked_vcpu_lock'
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c | 3 ++
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h | 3 ++
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h | 5 +++
4 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
index 11dc1b5..0c5ce3f 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
@@ -631,6 +631,9 @@ int vmx_cpu_up(void)
if ( cpu_has_vmx_vpid )
vpid_sync_all();
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu, cpu));
+ spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock, cpu));
+
return 0;
}
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index cd5bfab..d137ea0 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -82,7 +82,15 @@ static int vmx_msr_read_intercept(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *msr_content);
static int vmx_msr_write_intercept(unsigned int msr, uint64_t msr_content);
static void vmx_invlpg_intercept(unsigned long vaddr);
+/*
+ * We maintian a per-CPU linked-list of vCPU, so in PI wakeup handler we
+ * can find which vCPU should be waken up.
+ */
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, pi_blocked_vcpu);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, pi_blocked_vcpu_lock);
+
uint8_t __read_mostly posted_intr_vector;
+uint8_t __read_mostly pi_wakeup_vector;
static int vmx_domain_initialise(struct domain *d)
{
@@ -105,6 +113,9 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
spin_lock_init(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.vmcs_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocked_vcpu_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_vcpu_on_set_list);
+
v->arch.schedule_tail = vmx_do_resume;
v->arch.ctxt_switch_from = vmx_ctxt_switch_from;
v->arch.ctxt_switch_to = vmx_ctxt_switch_to;
@@ -1849,6 +1860,53 @@ static struct hvm_function_table __initdata vmx_function_table = {
.enable_msr_exit_interception = vmx_enable_msr_exit_interception,
};
+/*
+ * Handle VT-d posted-interrupt when VCPU is blocked.
+ */
+static void pi_wakeup_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+{
+ struct arch_vmx_struct *vmx, *tmp;
+ struct vcpu *v;
+ spinlock_t *lock = &this_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock);
+ struct list_head *blocked_vcpus = &this_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu);
+ LIST_HEAD(list);
+
+ spin_lock(lock);
+
+ /*
+ * XXX: The length of the list depends on how many vCPU is current
+ * blocked on this specific pCPU. This may hurt the interrupt latency
+ * if the list grows to too many entries.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(vmx, tmp, blocked_vcpus, pi_blocked_vcpu_list)
+ {
+ if ( pi_test_on(&vmx->pi_desc) )
+ {
+ list_del_init(&vmx->pi_blocked_vcpu_list);
+
+ /*
+ * We cannot call vcpu_unblock here, since it also needs
+ * 'pi_blocked_vcpu_lock', we store the vCPUs with ON
+ * set in another list and unblock them after we release
+ * 'pi_blocked_vcpu_lock'.
+ */
+ list_add_tail(&vmx->pi_vcpu_on_set_list, &list);
+ }
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock(lock);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(vmx, tmp, &list, pi_vcpu_on_set_list)
+ {
+ v = container_of(vmx, struct vcpu, arch.hvm_vmx);
+ list_del_init(&vmx->pi_vcpu_on_set_list);
+ vcpu_unblock(v);
+ }
+
+ ack_APIC_irq();
+ this_cpu(irq_count)++;
+}
+
const struct hvm_function_table * __init start_vmx(void)
{
set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_VMXE);
@@ -1885,7 +1943,12 @@ const struct hvm_function_table * __init start_vmx(void)
}
if ( cpu_has_vmx_posted_intr_processing )
+ {
alloc_direct_apic_vector(&posted_intr_vector, event_check_interrupt);
+
+ if ( iommu_intpost )
+ alloc_direct_apic_vector(&pi_wakeup_vector, pi_wakeup_interrupt);
+ }
else
{
vmx_function_table.deliver_posted_intr = NULL;
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
index dedfaef..fdaf6fb 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
@@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ struct arch_vmx_struct {
struct page_info *vmwrite_bitmap;
struct page_info *pml_pg;
+
+ struct list_head pi_blocked_vcpu_list;
+ struct list_head pi_vcpu_on_set_list;
};
int vmx_create_vmcs(struct vcpu *v);
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
index b53973e..ca950dc 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
#include <asm/hvm/trace.h>
#include <asm/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h>
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, pi_blocked_vcpu);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, pi_blocked_vcpu_lock);
+
+extern uint8_t pi_wakeup_vector;
+
typedef union {
struct {
u64 r : 1, /* bit 0 - Read permission */
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* [v4 14/17] vmx: Properly handle notification event when vCPU is running
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 13/17] vmx: posted-interrupt handling when vCPU is blocked Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 15/17] arm: add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler Feng Wu
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu, Jan Beulich, Andrew Cooper
When a vCPU is running in Root mode and a notification event
has been injected to it. we need to set VCPU_KICK_SOFTIRQ for
the current cpu, so the pending interrupt in PIRR will be
synced to vIRR before VM-Exit in time.
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Coding style.
v3:
- Make pi_notification_interrupt() static
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index d137ea0..f2b7fe0 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1907,6 +1907,51 @@ static void pi_wakeup_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
this_cpu(irq_count)++;
}
+/* Handle VT-d posted-interrupt when VCPU is running. */
+static void pi_notification_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+{
+ /*
+ * We get here when a vCPU is running in root-mode (such as via hypercall,
+ * or any other reasons which can result in VM-Exit), and before vCPU is
+ * back to non-root, external interrupts from an assigned device happen
+ * and a notification event is delivered to this logical CPU.
+ *
+ * we need to set VCPU_KICK_SOFTIRQ for the current cpu, just like
+ * __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(). So the pending interrupt in PIRR will
+ * be synced to vIRR before VM-Exit in time.
+ *
+ * Please refer to the following code fragments from
+ * xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/entry.S:
+ *
+ * .Lvmx_do_vmentry
+ *
+ * ......
+ * point 1
+ *
+ * cmp %ecx,(%rdx,%rax,1)
+ * jnz .Lvmx_process_softirqs
+ *
+ * ......
+ *
+ * je .Lvmx_launch
+ *
+ * ......
+ *
+ * .Lvmx_process_softirqs:
+ * sti
+ * call do_softirq
+ * jmp .Lvmx_do_vmentry
+ *
+ * If VT-d engine issues a notification event at point 1 above, it cannot
+ * be delivered to the guest during this VM-entry without raising the
+ * softirq in this notification handler.
+ */
+ raise_softirq(VCPU_KICK_SOFTIRQ);
+
+ ack_APIC_irq();
+ this_cpu(irq_count)++;
+}
+
const struct hvm_function_table * __init start_vmx(void)
{
set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_VMXE);
@@ -1944,7 +1989,7 @@ const struct hvm_function_table * __init start_vmx(void)
if ( cpu_has_vmx_posted_intr_processing )
{
- alloc_direct_apic_vector(&posted_intr_vector, event_check_interrupt);
+ alloc_direct_apic_vector(&posted_intr_vector, pi_notification_interrupt);
if ( iommu_intpost )
alloc_direct_apic_vector(&pi_wakeup_vector, pi_wakeup_interrupt);
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* [v4 15/17] arm: add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 14/17] vmx: Properly handle notification event when vCPU is running Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:54 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-23 11:58 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 17/17] VT-d: Dump the posted format IRTE Feng Wu
16 siblings, 2 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Stefano Stabellini, Feng Wu, Ian Campbell, Tim Deegan
Add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler to make the build successful
in ARM.
CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Newly added
xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
index f1a087e..7f25fd5 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static inline unsigned int domain_max_vcpus(const struct domain *d)
return MAX_VIRT_CPUS;
}
+static void arch_vcpu_wake(struct vcpu *v) {}
+
#endif /* __ASM_DOMAIN_H__ */
/*
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 15/17] arm: add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 15/17] arm: add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:54 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-24 0:39 ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-23 11:58 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Julien Grall @ 2015-07-23 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu, xen-devel; +Cc: Tim Deegan, Stefano Stabellini, Ian Campbell
Hi,
On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
> Add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler to make the build successful
> in ARM.
I would make more sense if you introduce the dummy hooks in the patch
where you effectively use it (i.e #16).
Actually you also introduce arch_vcpu_wake for x86 there too.
> CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
> CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - Newly added
>
> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
> index f1a087e..7f25fd5 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
> @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static inline unsigned int domain_max_vcpus(const struct domain *d)
> return MAX_VIRT_CPUS;
> }
>
> +static void arch_vcpu_wake(struct vcpu *v) {}
> +
Please use static inline here.
> #endif /* __ASM_DOMAIN_H__ */
>
> /*
>
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 15/17] arm: add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler
2015-07-23 11:54 ` Julien Grall
@ 2015-07-24 0:39 ` Wu, Feng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Wu, Feng @ 2015-07-24 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julien Grall, xen-devel
Cc: Tim Deegan, Stefano Stabellini, Ian Campbell, Wu, Feng
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.grall@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:54 PM
> To: Wu, Feng; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Ian Campbell; Tim Deegan
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [v4 15/17] arm: add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler
>
> Hi,
>
> On 23/07/15 12:35, Feng Wu wrote:
> > Add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler to make the build successful
> > in ARM.
>
> I would make more sense if you introduce the dummy hooks in the patch
> where you effectively use it (i.e #16).
>
> Actually you also introduce arch_vcpu_wake for x86 there too.
I split it just because this is the only changes to ARM. I will make them
one patch any way.
Thanks,
Feng
>
> > CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
> > CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v4:
> > - Newly added
> >
> > xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
> > index f1a087e..7f25fd5 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
> > @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static inline unsigned int domain_max_vcpus(const
> struct domain *d)
> > return MAX_VIRT_CPUS;
> > }
> >
> > +static void arch_vcpu_wake(struct vcpu *v) {}
> > +
>
> Please use static inline here.
>
> > #endif /* __ASM_DOMAIN_H__ */
> >
> > /*
> >
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Julien Grall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* Re: [v4 15/17] arm: add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 15/17] arm: add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler Feng Wu
2015-07-23 11:54 ` Julien Grall
@ 2015-07-23 11:58 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-23 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu; +Cc: Tim Deegan, Stefano Stabellini, Ian Campbell, xen-devel
>>> On 23.07.15 at 13:35, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> Add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler to make the build successful
> in ARM.
This imo should go in the same patch adding the hook for x86.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 15/17] arm: add a dummy arch hooks for scheduler Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
2015-07-23 12:50 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-07-28 14:15 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 17/17] VT-d: Dump the posted format IRTE Feng Wu
16 siblings, 2 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Cc: Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper,
Dario Faggioli, Jan Beulich, Feng Wu
This patch adds the following arch hooks in scheduler:
- vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi():
It is called before context switch, we update the posted
interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is preempted, go to sleep,
or is blocked.
- vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi()
It is called after context switch, we update the posted
interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is going to run.
- arch_vcpu_wake()
It will be called when waking up the vCPU, we update
the posted interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is unblocked.
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
CC: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Sugguested-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Newly added
xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 10 +++
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/common/schedule.c | 2 +
xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h | 3 +
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h | 2 +
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h | 8 ++
6 files changed, 170 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
index db073a6..36fd2d5 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
@@ -1550,9 +1550,19 @@ void context_switch(struct vcpu *prev, struct vcpu *next)
set_current(next);
+ /*
+ * We need to update posted interrupt descriptor for each context switch,
+ * hence cannot use the lazy context switch for this.
+ */
+ if ( !is_idle_vcpu(prev) && prev->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from )
+ prev->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from(prev);
+
if ( (per_cpu(curr_vcpu, cpu) == next) ||
(is_idle_vcpu(next) && cpu_online(cpu)) )
{
+ if ( !is_idle_vcpu(next) && next->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to )
+ next->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to(next);
+
local_irq_enable();
}
else
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index f2b7fe0..f8b3601 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ enum handler_return { HNDL_done, HNDL_unhandled, HNDL_exception_raised };
static void vmx_ctxt_switch_from(struct vcpu *v);
static void vmx_ctxt_switch_to(struct vcpu *v);
+static void vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi(struct vcpu *v);
+static void vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi(struct vcpu *v);
static int vmx_alloc_vlapic_mapping(struct domain *d);
static void vmx_free_vlapic_mapping(struct domain *d);
@@ -116,10 +118,17 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocked_vcpu_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_vcpu_on_set_list);
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu = -1;
+
+ spin_lock_init(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock);
+
v->arch.schedule_tail = vmx_do_resume;
v->arch.ctxt_switch_from = vmx_ctxt_switch_from;
v->arch.ctxt_switch_to = vmx_ctxt_switch_to;
+ v->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from = vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi;
+ v->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to = vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi;
+
if ( (rc = vmx_create_vmcs(v)) != 0 )
{
dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,
@@ -715,6 +724,141 @@ static void vmx_fpu_leave(struct vcpu *v)
}
}
+void arch_vcpu_wake(struct vcpu *v)
+{
+ unsigned long gflags;
+
+ if ( !iommu_intpost || !is_hvm_vcpu(v) || !has_arch_pdevs(v->domain) )
+ return;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock, gflags);
+
+ if ( likely(vcpu_runnable(v)) ||
+ !test_bit(_VPF_blocked, &v->pause_flags) )
+ {
+ struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /*
+ * We don't need to send notification event to a non-running
+ * vcpu, the interrupt information will be delivered to it before
+ * VM-ENTRY when the vcpu is scheduled to run next time.
+ */
+ pi_set_sn(pi_desc);
+
+ /*
+ * Set 'NV' feild back to posted_intr_vector, so the
+ * Posted-Interrupts can be delivered to the vCPU by
+ * VT-d HW after it is scheduled to run.
+ */
+ write_atomic((uint8_t*)&pi_desc->nv, posted_intr_vector);
+
+ /*
+ * Delete the vCPU from the related block list
+ * if we are resuming from blocked state
+ */
+ if ( v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu != -1 )
+ {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock,
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu), flags);
+ list_del_init(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocked_vcpu_list);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock,
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu), flags);
+ }
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock, gflags);
+}
+
+static void vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi(struct vcpu *v)
+{
+ struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
+ struct pi_desc old, new;
+ unsigned long flags, gflags;
+
+ if ( !iommu_intpost || !is_hvm_vcpu(v) || !has_arch_pdevs(v->domain) )
+ return;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock, gflags);
+
+ if ( vcpu_runnable(v) || !test_bit(_VPF_blocked, &v->pause_flags) )
+ {
+ /*
+ * The vCPU has been preempted or went to sleep. We don't need to send
+ * notification event to a non-running vcpu, the interrupt information
+ * will be delivered to it before VM-ENTRY when the vcpu is scheduled
+ * to run next time.
+ */
+ pi_set_sn(pi_desc);
+
+ }
+ else if ( test_bit(_VPF_blocked, &v->pause_flags) )
+ {
+ /*
+ * The vCPU is blocking, we need to add it to one of the per pCPU lists.
+ * We save v->processor to v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu and use it for
+ * the per-CPU list, we also save it to posted-interrupt descriptor and
+ * make it as the destination of the wake-up notification event.
+ */
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu = v->processor;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock,
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu), flags);
+ list_add_tail(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocked_vcpu_list,
+ &per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu, v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu));
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock,
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu), flags);
+
+ do {
+ old.control = new.control = pi_desc->control;
+
+ /* Should not block the vCPU if an interrupt was posted for it */
+
+ if ( pi_test_on(&old) )
+ {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock, gflags);
+ vcpu_unblock(v);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Change the 'NDST' field to v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu,
+ * so when external interrupts from assigned deivces happen,
+ * wakeup notifiction event will go to
+ * v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu, then in pi_wakeup_interrupt()
+ * we can find the vCPU in the right list to wake up.
+ */
+ if ( x2apic_enabled )
+ new.ndst = cpu_physical_id(v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu);
+ else
+ new.ndst = MASK_INSR(cpu_physical_id(
+ v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu),
+ PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK);
+ pi_clear_sn(&new);
+ new.nv = pi_wakeup_vector;
+ } while ( cmpxchg(&pi_desc->control, old.control, new.control)
+ != old.control );
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock, gflags);
+}
+
+static void vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi(struct vcpu *v)
+{
+ struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
+
+ if ( !iommu_intpost || !is_hvm_vcpu(v) || !has_arch_pdevs(v->domain) )
+ return;
+
+ if ( x2apic_enabled )
+ write_atomic(&pi_desc->ndst, cpu_physical_id(v->processor));
+ else
+ write_atomic(&pi_desc->ndst,
+ MASK_INSR(cpu_physical_id(v->processor),
+ PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK));
+
+ pi_clear_sn(pi_desc);
+}
+
static void vmx_ctxt_switch_from(struct vcpu *v)
{
/*
@@ -753,6 +897,7 @@ static void vmx_ctxt_switch_to(struct vcpu *v)
vmx_restore_guest_msrs(v);
vmx_restore_dr(v);
+ vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi(v);
}
diff --git a/xen/common/schedule.c b/xen/common/schedule.c
index 6b02f98..90616c4 100644
--- a/xen/common/schedule.c
+++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
@@ -381,6 +381,8 @@ void vcpu_wake(struct vcpu *v)
unsigned long flags;
spinlock_t *lock = vcpu_schedule_lock_irqsave(v, &flags);
+ arch_vcpu_wake(v);
+
if ( likely(vcpu_runnable(v)) )
{
if ( v->runstate.state >= RUNSTATE_blocked )
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
index a3c117f..ff7a995 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
@@ -446,6 +446,9 @@ struct arch_vcpu
void (*ctxt_switch_from) (struct vcpu *);
void (*ctxt_switch_to) (struct vcpu *);
+ void (*pi_ctxt_switch_from) (struct vcpu *);
+ void (*pi_ctxt_switch_to) (struct vcpu *);
+
/* Virtual Machine Extensions */
union {
struct pv_vcpu pv_vcpu;
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
index 77eeac5..eeabb32 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
@@ -509,6 +509,8 @@ bool_t nhvm_vmcx_hap_enabled(struct vcpu *v);
/* interrupt */
enum hvm_intblk nhvm_interrupt_blocked(struct vcpu *v);
+void arch_vcpu_wake(struct vcpu *v);
+
#ifndef NDEBUG
/* Permit use of the Forced Emulation Prefix in HVM guests */
extern bool_t opt_hvm_fep;
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
index fdaf6fb..6ed2081 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
@@ -165,6 +165,14 @@ struct arch_vmx_struct {
struct list_head pi_blocked_vcpu_list;
struct list_head pi_vcpu_on_set_list;
+
+ /*
+ * Before vCPU is blocked, it is added to the global per-cpu list
+ * of 'pi_block_cpu', then VT-d engine can send wakeup notification
+ * event to 'pi_block_cpu' and wakeup the related vCPU.
+ */
+ int pi_block_cpu;
+ spinlock_t pi_lock;
};
int vmx_create_vmcs(struct vcpu *v);
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 12:50 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-07-24 0:49 ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-28 14:15 ` Dario Faggioli
1 sibling, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Dario Faggioli @ 2015-07-23 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu
Cc: Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper, xen-devel,
Jan Beulich
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1221 bytes --]
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 19:35 +0800, Feng Wu wrote:
> This patch adds the following arch hooks in scheduler:
>
So, preliminary question: does this mean that you have identified (and
fixed) the differences in behavior wrt the runstate based model, which
was causing performance issue?
I've been sidetracked a bit in looking at your previous patch, but did
found a couple of differences, which I was about to report... But I
guess that's no longer necessary, I guess, is it?
Dario
> - vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi():
> It is called before context switch, we update the posted
> interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is preempted, go to sleep,
> or is blocked.
>
> - vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi()
> It is called after context switch, we update the posted
> interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is going to run.
>
> - arch_vcpu_wake()
> It will be called when waking up the vCPU, we update
> the posted interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is unblocked.
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* Re: [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts
2015-07-23 12:50 ` Dario Faggioli
@ 2015-07-24 0:49 ` Wu, Feng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Wu, Feng @ 2015-07-24 0:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dario Faggioli
Cc: Tian, Kevin, Keir Fraser, George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper,
xen-devel, Jan Beulich, Wu, Feng
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggioli@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:50 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Tian, Kevin; Keir Fraser; George Dunlap; Andrew
> Cooper; Jan Beulich
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d
> posted interrupts
>
> On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 19:35 +0800, Feng Wu wrote:
> > This patch adds the following arch hooks in scheduler:
> >
> So, preliminary question: does this mean that you have identified (and
> fixed) the differences in behavior wrt the runstate based model, which
> was causing performance issue?
Yes, the issue has been fixed in this version.
>
> I've been sidetracked a bit in looking at your previous patch, but did
> found a couple of differences, which I was about to report... But I
> guess that's no longer necessary, I guess, is it?
Thanks for your effort, Dario! Maybe you can give a review about this
new version, if you have time.
Thanks,
Feng
>
> Dario
>
> > - vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi():
> > It is called before context switch, we update the posted
> > interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is preempted, go to sleep,
> > or is blocked.
> >
> > - vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi()
> > It is called after context switch, we update the posted
> > interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is going to run.
> >
> > - arch_vcpu_wake()
> > It will be called when waking up the vCPU, we update
> > the posted interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is unblocked.
>
> --
> <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
> Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* Re: [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts Feng Wu
2015-07-23 12:50 ` Dario Faggioli
@ 2015-07-28 14:15 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-07-30 2:04 ` Wu, Feng
1 sibling, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Dario Faggioli @ 2015-07-28 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu
Cc: Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper, xen-devel,
Jan Beulich
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7080 bytes --]
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 19:35 +0800, Feng Wu wrote:
> This patch adds the following arch hooks in scheduler:
> - vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi():
> It is called before context switch, we update the posted
> interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is preempted, go to sleep,
> or is blocked.
>
> - vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi()
> It is called after context switch, we update the posted
> interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is going to run.
>
> - arch_vcpu_wake()
> It will be called when waking up the vCPU, we update
> the posted interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is unblocked.
>
Thanks again for doing this. I'll never get tired to say how much better
I like this, wrt the previous RUNSTATE_* based approach. :-)
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -1550,9 +1550,19 @@ void context_switch(struct vcpu *prev, struct vcpu *next)
>
> set_current(next);
>
> + /*
> + * We need to update posted interrupt descriptor for each context switch,
> + * hence cannot use the lazy context switch for this.
> + */
>
Perhaps it's me, but I don't get the comment. Why do you mention "the
lazy context switch"? We can't use it "for this", as opposed to what
other circumstance where we can use it?
> + if ( !is_idle_vcpu(prev) && prev->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from )
> + prev->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from(prev);
> +
Flip the order in the conditions, maybe? So that guests with
pi_ctxt_switch_from==NULL suffers the least possible overhead?
> if ( (per_cpu(curr_vcpu, cpu) == next) ||
> (is_idle_vcpu(next) && cpu_online(cpu)) )
> {
> + if ( !is_idle_vcpu(next) && next->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to )
>
Same as above.
> + next->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to(next);
> +
> local_irq_enable();
>
Another thing: if prev == next --and let's call such vcpu pp-- you go
through both:
pp->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from(pp);
pp->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to(pp);
Is this really necessary? AFAICT, it reduces to:
pi_set_sn(&pp->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc);
if ( x2apic_enabled )
write_atomic(&pp->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc->ndst,
cpu_physical_id(v->processor));
else
write_atomic(&pp->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc->ndst,
MASK_INSR(cpu_physical_id(v->processor),
PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK));
pi_clear_sn(pi_desc);
In fact, if the scheduler picked prev again, as the next vcpu to be run,
I expect
( cpu_runnable(v) || !test_bit(_VPF_blocked, &v->pause_flags) )
to be true, and hence vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi() reducing to just a call to
pi_set_sn().
So, either it is the write_atomic() that you absolutely need, which I
don't think, or you really can check whether such situation is
occurring, and avoid going through _pre_ and _post_ back to back.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -116,10 +118,17 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocked_vcpu_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_vcpu_on_set_list);
>
> + v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu = -1;
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock);
> +
> v->arch.schedule_tail = vmx_do_resume;
> v->arch.ctxt_switch_from = vmx_ctxt_switch_from;
> v->arch.ctxt_switch_to = vmx_ctxt_switch_to;
>
> + v->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from = vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi;
> + v->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to = vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi;
> +
Would it make sense to get the two initialization above with:
if ( iommu_intpost && is_hvm_vcpu(v) )
and leave them NULL if that is false? I think it works, and it looks
worthwhile to me.
In fact, this would make the operands flip suggested above actually
effective at cutting the overhead for non-PI enabled guests/hosts.
> +static void vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi(struct vcpu *v)
> +{
> + struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
> + struct pi_desc old, new;
> + unsigned long flags, gflags;
> +
> + if ( !iommu_intpost || !is_hvm_vcpu(v) || !has_arch_pdevs(v->domain) )
> + return;
> +
And, if you do as I suggest in context_switch() and
vmx_vcpu_initialise(), this will reduce to:
if ( !has_arch_pdevs(v->domain) )
return;
> + else if ( test_bit(_VPF_blocked, &v->pause_flags) )
> + {
> + /*
> + * The vCPU is blocking, we need to add it to one of the per pCPU lists.
> + * We save v->processor to v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu and use it for
> + * the per-CPU list, we also save it to posted-interrupt descriptor and
> + * make it as the destination of the wake-up notification event.
> + */
> + v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu = v->processor;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock,
> + v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu), flags);
> + list_add_tail(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocked_vcpu_list,
> + &per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu, v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu));
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock,
> + v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu), flags);
> +
> + do {
> + old.control = new.control = pi_desc->control;
> +
> + /* Should not block the vCPU if an interrupt was posted for it */
> +
There's no need for the blank line, and I'd say kill it.
> + if ( pi_test_on(&old) )
> + {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock, gflags);
> + vcpu_unblock(v);
> + return;
> + }
> --- a/xen/common/schedule.c
> +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
> @@ -381,6 +381,8 @@ void vcpu_wake(struct vcpu *v)
> unsigned long flags;
> spinlock_t *lock = vcpu_schedule_lock_irqsave(v, &flags);
>
> + arch_vcpu_wake(v);
> +
So, in the draft you sent a few days back, this was called at the end of
vcpu_wake(), right before releasing the lock. Now it's at the beginning,
before the scheduler's wakeup routine has a chance to run.
IMO, it feels more natural for it to be at the bottom (i.e., generic
stuff first, arch specific stuff afterwards), and, after a quick
inspection, I don't think I see nothing preventing things to be that
way.
However, I recall you mentioning having issues with such draft, which
are now resolved with this version. Since this is one of the differences
between the two, was it the cause of the issues you were seeing? If yes,
can you elaborate on how and why?
In the end, I'm not too opposed to the hook being at the beginning
rather than at the end, but there has to be a reason, which may well end
up better be stated in a comment...
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts
2015-07-28 14:15 ` Dario Faggioli
@ 2015-07-30 2:04 ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-30 18:26 ` Dario Faggioli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Wu, Feng @ 2015-07-30 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dario Faggioli
Cc: Tian, Kevin, Keir Fraser, George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper,
xen-devel, Jan Beulich, Wu, Feng
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggioli@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:16 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir Fraser; Jan Beulich; Andrew Cooper; Tian,
> Kevin; George Dunlap
> Subject: Re: [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted
> interrupts
>
> On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 19:35 +0800, Feng Wu wrote:
> > This patch adds the following arch hooks in scheduler:
> > - vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi():
> > It is called before context switch, we update the posted
> > interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is preempted, go to sleep,
> > or is blocked.
> >
> > - vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi()
> > It is called after context switch, we update the posted
> > interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is going to run.
> >
> > - arch_vcpu_wake()
> > It will be called when waking up the vCPU, we update
> > the posted interrupt descriptor when the vCPU is unblocked.
> >
> Thanks again for doing this. I'll never get tired to say how much better
> I like this, wrt the previous RUNSTATE_* based approach. :-)
I should say thanks to you, it is you that suggested this method! :)
>
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> > @@ -1550,9 +1550,19 @@ void context_switch(struct vcpu *prev, struct
> vcpu *next)
> >
> > set_current(next);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * We need to update posted interrupt descriptor for each context
> switch,
> > + * hence cannot use the lazy context switch for this.
> > + */
> >
> Perhaps it's me, but I don't get the comment. Why do you mention "the
> lazy context switch"? We can't use it "for this", as opposed to what
> other circumstance where we can use it?
Oh, maybe I shouldn't use the word here, what I want to say here is
__context_switch() isn't called in each context switch, such as,
non-idle vcpu -> idle vcpu, so we need to call prev->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from
explicitly instead of in __context_switch().
>
> > + if ( !is_idle_vcpu(prev) && prev->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from )
> > + prev->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from(prev);
> > +
> Flip the order in the conditions, maybe? So that guests with
> pi_ctxt_switch_from==NULL suffers the least possible overhead?
>
Sounds good!
>
> > if ( (per_cpu(curr_vcpu, cpu) == next) ||
> > (is_idle_vcpu(next) && cpu_online(cpu)) )
> > {
> > + if ( !is_idle_vcpu(next) && next->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to )
> >
> Same as above.
>
> > + next->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to(next);
> > +
> > local_irq_enable();
> >
> Another thing: if prev == next --and let's call such vcpu pp-- you go
> through both:
>
> pp->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from(pp);
> pp->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to(pp);
In my understanding, if the scheduler chooses the same vcpu to run, it
will return early in schedule() as below:
static void schedule(void)
{
....
/* get policy-specific decision on scheduling... */
sched = this_cpu(scheduler);
next_slice = sched->do_schedule(sched, now, tasklet_work_scheduled);
next = next_slice.task;
sd->curr = next;
if ( next_slice.time >= 0 ) /* -ve means no limit */
set_timer(&sd->s_timer, now + next_slice.time);
if ( unlikely(prev == next) )
{
pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(lock, cpu);
trace_continue_running(next);
return continue_running(prev);
}
....
}
If this is that case, when we get context_switch(), the prev and next are
different. Do I miss something?
>
> Is this really necessary? AFAICT, it reduces to:
>
> pi_set_sn(&pp->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc);
> if ( x2apic_enabled )
> write_atomic(&pp->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc->ndst,
> cpu_physical_id(v->processor));
> else
> write_atomic(&pp->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc->ndst,
> MASK_INSR(cpu_physical_id(v->processor),
> PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK));
> pi_clear_sn(pi_desc);
>
> In fact, if the scheduler picked prev again, as the next vcpu to be run,
> I expect
>
> ( cpu_runnable(v) || !test_bit(_VPF_blocked, &v->pause_flags) )
>
> to be true, and hence vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi() reducing to just a call to
> pi_set_sn().
>
> So, either it is the write_atomic() that you absolutely need, which I
> don't think, or you really can check whether such situation is
> occurring, and avoid going through _pre_ and _post_ back to back.
>
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>
> > @@ -116,10 +118,17 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocked_vcpu_list);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_vcpu_on_set_list);
> >
> > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu = -1;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_init(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock);
> > +
> > v->arch.schedule_tail = vmx_do_resume;
> > v->arch.ctxt_switch_from = vmx_ctxt_switch_from;
> > v->arch.ctxt_switch_to = vmx_ctxt_switch_to;
> >
> > + v->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from = vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi;
> > + v->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to = vmx_post_ctx_switch_pi;
> > +
> Would it make sense to get the two initialization above with:
>
> if ( iommu_intpost && is_hvm_vcpu(v) )
>
> and leave them NULL if that is false? I think it works, and it looks
> worthwhile to me.
>
> In fact, this would make the operands flip suggested above actually
> effective at cutting the overhead for non-PI enabled guests/hosts.
>
> > +static void vmx_pre_ctx_switch_pi(struct vcpu *v)
> > +{
> > + struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
> > + struct pi_desc old, new;
> > + unsigned long flags, gflags;
> > +
> > + if ( !iommu_intpost || !is_hvm_vcpu(v)
> || !has_arch_pdevs(v->domain) )
> > + return;
> > +
> And, if you do as I suggest in context_switch() and
> vmx_vcpu_initialise(), this will reduce to:
>
> if ( !has_arch_pdevs(v->domain) )
> return;
>
> > + else if ( test_bit(_VPF_blocked, &v->pause_flags) )
> > + {
> > + /*
> > + * The vCPU is blocking, we need to add it to one of the per pCPU
> lists.
> > + * We save v->processor to v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu and
> use it for
> > + * the per-CPU list, we also save it to posted-interrupt descriptor
> and
> > + * make it as the destination of the wake-up notification event.
> > + */
> > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu = v->processor;
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock,
> > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu), flags);
> > + list_add_tail(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocked_vcpu_list,
> > + &per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu,
> v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu));
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&per_cpu(pi_blocked_vcpu_lock,
> > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_block_cpu), flags);
> > +
> > + do {
> > + old.control = new.control = pi_desc->control;
> > +
> > + /* Should not block the vCPU if an interrupt was posted for it
> */
> > +
> There's no need for the blank line, and I'd say kill it.
>
> > + if ( pi_test_on(&old) )
> > + {
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_lock,
> gflags);
> > + vcpu_unblock(v);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> > --- a/xen/common/schedule.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
> > @@ -381,6 +381,8 @@ void vcpu_wake(struct vcpu *v)
> > unsigned long flags;
> > spinlock_t *lock = vcpu_schedule_lock_irqsave(v, &flags);
> >
> > + arch_vcpu_wake(v);
> > +
> So, in the draft you sent a few days back, this was called at the end of
> vcpu_wake(), right before releasing the lock. Now it's at the beginning,
> before the scheduler's wakeup routine has a chance to run.
>
> IMO, it feels more natural for it to be at the bottom (i.e., generic
> stuff first, arch specific stuff afterwards), and, after a quick
> inspection, I don't think I see nothing preventing things to be that
> way.
>
> However, I recall you mentioning having issues with such draft, which
> are now resolved with this version.
The long latency issue mentioned previously is caused by another reason.
Originally I called the ' pi_ctxt_switch_from ' and ' pi_ctxt_switch_to ' in
__context_switch(), however, this function is not called for each context
switch, as I described above, after fixing this, the performance issue
disappeared.
> Since this is one of the differences
> between the two, was it the cause of the issues you were seeing? If yes,
> can you elaborate on how and why?
>
> In the end, I'm not too opposed to the hook being at the beginning
> rather than at the end, but there has to be a reason, which may well end
> up better be stated in a comment...
Here is the reason I put arch_vcpu_wake() ahead of vcpu_wake():
arch_vcpu_wake() does some prerequisites for a vCPU which is about
to run, such as, setting SN again, changing NV filed back to
' posted_intr_vector ', which should be finished before the vCPU is
actually scheduled to run. However, if we put arch_vcpu_wake() later
in vcpu_wake() right before ' vcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore', after
the 'wake' hook get finished, the vcpu can run at any time (maybe in
another pCPU since the current pCPU is protected by the lock), if
this can happen, it is incorrect. Does my understanding make sense?
Thanks,
Feng
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Dario
> --
> <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
> Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts
2015-07-30 2:04 ` Wu, Feng
@ 2015-07-30 18:26 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-08-11 10:23 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 46+ messages in thread
From: Dario Faggioli @ 2015-07-30 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu, Feng
Cc: Tian, Kevin, Keir Fraser, George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper,
xen-devel, Jan Beulich
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7571 bytes --]
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 02:04 +0000, Wu, Feng wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggioli@citrix.com]
> > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> > > @@ -1550,9 +1550,19 @@ void context_switch(struct vcpu *prev, struct
> > vcpu *next)
> > >
> > > set_current(next);
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * We need to update posted interrupt descriptor for each context
> > switch,
> > > + * hence cannot use the lazy context switch for this.
> > > + */
> > >
> > Perhaps it's me, but I don't get the comment. Why do you mention "the
> > lazy context switch"? We can't use it "for this", as opposed to what
> > other circumstance where we can use it?
>
> Oh, maybe I shouldn't use the word here, what I want to say here is
> __context_switch() isn't called in each context switch, such as,
> non-idle vcpu -> idle vcpu, so we need to call prev->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from
> explicitly instead of in __context_switch().
>
Ok, I see what you mean now, and it's probably correct, as 'lazy context
switch' is, in this context, exactly that (i.e., not actually context
switching if next is the idle vcpu).
It's just that such term is used, in literature, in different places to
mean (slightly) different thing, and there is no close reference to it
(like in the function), so I still see a bit of room for potential
confusion.
In the end, as you which. If it were me, I'd add a few word to specify
things better, something very similar to what you've put in this email,
e.g.:
"When switching from non-idle to idle, we only do a lazy context switch.
However, in order for posted interrupt (if available and enabled) to
work properly, we at least need to update the descriptors"
Or some better English form of it. :-)
But that's certainly something not critical, and I'll be ok with
everything other maintainers agree on.
> > > if ( (per_cpu(curr_vcpu, cpu) == next) ||
> > > (is_idle_vcpu(next) && cpu_online(cpu)) )
> > > {
> > > + if ( !is_idle_vcpu(next) && next->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to )
> > >
> > Same as above.
> >
> > > + next->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to(next);
> > > +
> > > local_irq_enable();
> > >
> > Another thing: if prev == next --and let's call such vcpu pp-- you go
> > through both:
> >
> > pp->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_from(pp);
> > pp->arch.pi_ctxt_switch_to(pp);
>
> In my understanding, if the scheduler chooses the same vcpu to run, it
> will return early in schedule() as below:
>
> static void schedule(void)
> {
> ....
>
> /* get policy-specific decision on scheduling... */
> sched = this_cpu(scheduler);
> next_slice = sched->do_schedule(sched, now, tasklet_work_scheduled);
>
> next = next_slice.task;
>
> sd->curr = next;
>
> if ( next_slice.time >= 0 ) /* -ve means no limit */
> set_timer(&sd->s_timer, now + next_slice.time);
>
> if ( unlikely(prev == next) )
> {
> pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(lock, cpu);
> trace_continue_running(next);
> return continue_running(prev);
> }
>
> ....
>
> }
>
> If this is that case, when we get context_switch(), the prev and next are
> different. Do I miss something?
>
That looks correct. Still, there are checks like '(prev!=next)' around
in context_switch(), for both x86 and ARM... weird. I shall have a
deeper look...
In any case, as far as this hunk is concerned, the
'(per_cpu(curr_vcpu,cpu)==next)' is there to deal with the case where we
went from vcpu v to idle, and we're now going from idle to v again,
which is something you want to intercept.
So, at least for now, ignore my comments about it. I'll let you know if
I find something interesting that you should take into account.
> > > --- a/xen/common/schedule.c
> > > +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
> > > @@ -381,6 +381,8 @@ void vcpu_wake(struct vcpu *v)
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > > spinlock_t *lock = vcpu_schedule_lock_irqsave(v, &flags);
> > >
> > > + arch_vcpu_wake(v);
> > > +
> > So, in the draft you sent a few days back, this was called at the end of
> > vcpu_wake(), right before releasing the lock. Now it's at the beginning,
> > before the scheduler's wakeup routine has a chance to run.
> >
> > IMO, it feels more natural for it to be at the bottom (i.e., generic
> > stuff first, arch specific stuff afterwards), and, after a quick
> > inspection, I don't think I see nothing preventing things to be that
> > way.
> >
> > However, I recall you mentioning having issues with such draft, which
> > are now resolved with this version.
>
> The long latency issue mentioned previously is caused by another reason.
> Originally I called the ' pi_ctxt_switch_from ' and ' pi_ctxt_switch_to ' in
> __context_switch(), however, this function is not called for each context
> switch, as I described above, after fixing this, the performance issue
> disappeared.
>
I see, thanks for explaining this.
> > Since this is one of the differences
> > between the two, was it the cause of the issues you were seeing? If yes,
> > can you elaborate on how and why?
> >
> > In the end, I'm not too opposed to the hook being at the beginning
> > rather than at the end, but there has to be a reason, which may well end
> > up better be stated in a comment...
>
> Here is the reason I put arch_vcpu_wake() ahead of vcpu_wake():
> arch_vcpu_wake() does some prerequisites for a vCPU which is about
> to run, such as, setting SN again, changing NV filed back to
> ' posted_intr_vector ', which should be finished before the vCPU is
> actually scheduled to run. However, if we put arch_vcpu_wake() later
> in vcpu_wake() right before ' vcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore', after
> the 'wake' hook get finished, the vcpu can run at any time (maybe in
> another pCPU since the current pCPU is protected by the lock), if
> this can happen, it is incorrect. Does my understanding make sense?
>
It's safe in any case. In fact, the spinlock will prevent both the
vcpu's processor to schedule, as well as any other processors to steal
the waking vcpu from the runqueue to run it.
That's actually why I wanted to double check you changing the position
of the hook (wrt the draft), as it felt weird that the issue were in
there. :-)
So, now that we know that safety is not an issue, where should we put
the hook?
Having it before SCHED_OP(wake) may make people think that arch specific
code is (or can, at some point) somehow influencing the scheduler
specific wakeup code, which is not (and should not become, if possible)
the case.
However, I kind of like the fact that the spinlock is released as soon
as possible, after the call to SCHED_OP(wake). That will make it more
likely, for the processors we may have sent IPIs to, during the
scheduler specific wakeup code, to find the spinlock free. So, looking
at things from this angle, it would be better to avoid putting stuff in
between SCHED_OP(wake) and vcpu_schedule_unlock().
So, all in all, I'd say leave it on top, where it is in this patch. Of
course, if others have opinions, I'm all ears. :-)
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread* Re: [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts
2015-07-30 18:26 ` Dario Faggioli
@ 2015-08-11 10:23 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-08-11 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dario Faggioli, Feng Wu
Cc: GeorgeDunlap, Andrew Cooper, Kevin Tian, Keir Fraser, xen-devel
>>> On 30.07.15 at 20:26, <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 02:04 +0000, Wu, Feng wrote:
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggioli@citrix.com]
>> > Since this is one of the differences
>> > between the two, was it the cause of the issues you were seeing? If yes,
>> > can you elaborate on how and why?
>> >
>> > In the end, I'm not too opposed to the hook being at the beginning
>> > rather than at the end, but there has to be a reason, which may well end
>> > up better be stated in a comment...
>>
>> Here is the reason I put arch_vcpu_wake() ahead of vcpu_wake():
>> arch_vcpu_wake() does some prerequisites for a vCPU which is about
>> to run, such as, setting SN again, changing NV filed back to
>> ' posted_intr_vector ', which should be finished before the vCPU is
>> actually scheduled to run. However, if we put arch_vcpu_wake() later
>> in vcpu_wake() right before ' vcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore', after
>> the 'wake' hook get finished, the vcpu can run at any time (maybe in
>> another pCPU since the current pCPU is protected by the lock), if
>> this can happen, it is incorrect. Does my understanding make sense?
>>
> It's safe in any case. In fact, the spinlock will prevent both the
> vcpu's processor to schedule, as well as any other processors to steal
> the waking vcpu from the runqueue to run it.
>
> That's actually why I wanted to double check you changing the position
> of the hook (wrt the draft), as it felt weird that the issue were in
> there. :-)
>
> So, now that we know that safety is not an issue, where should we put
> the hook?
>
> Having it before SCHED_OP(wake) may make people think that arch specific
> code is (or can, at some point) somehow influencing the scheduler
> specific wakeup code, which is not (and should not become, if possible)
> the case.
>
> However, I kind of like the fact that the spinlock is released as soon
> as possible, after the call to SCHED_OP(wake). That will make it more
> likely, for the processors we may have sent IPIs to, during the
> scheduler specific wakeup code, to find the spinlock free. So, looking
> at things from this angle, it would be better to avoid putting stuff in
> between SCHED_OP(wake) and vcpu_schedule_unlock().
>
> So, all in all, I'd say leave it on top, where it is in this patch. Of
> course, if others have opinions, I'm all ears. :-)
If it is kept at the beginning, the hook should be renamed to
something like arch_vcpu_wake_prepare().
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread
* [v4 17/17] VT-d: Dump the posted format IRTE
2015-07-23 11:35 [v4 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-23 11:35 ` [v4 16/17] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks for VT-d posted interrupts Feng Wu
@ 2015-07-23 11:35 ` Feng Wu
16 siblings, 0 replies; 46+ messages in thread
From: Feng Wu @ 2015-07-23 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Yang Zhang, Kevin Tian, Feng Wu
Add the utility to dump the posted format IRTE.
CC: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
---
v4:
- Newly added
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c
index a5fe237..7f73a84 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/utils.c
@@ -211,6 +211,9 @@ static void dump_iommu_info(unsigned char key)
ecap_intr_remap(iommu->ecap) ? "" : "not ",
(status & DMA_GSTS_IRES) ? " and enabled" : "" );
+ printk(" Interrupt Posting: %ssupported.\n",
+ cap_intr_post(iommu->ecap) ? "" : "not ");
+
if ( status & DMA_GSTS_IRES )
{
/* Dump interrupt remapping table. */
@@ -221,6 +224,7 @@ static void dump_iommu_info(unsigned char key)
printk(" Interrupt remapping table (nr_entry=%#x. "
"Only dump P=1 entries here):\n", nr_entry);
+ printk ("Entries for remapped format:\n");
printk(" SVT SQ SID DST V AVL DLM TM RH DM "
"FPD P\n");
for ( i = 0; i < nr_entry; i++ )
@@ -238,7 +242,7 @@ static void dump_iommu_info(unsigned char key)
else
p = &iremap_entries[i % (1 << IREMAP_ENTRY_ORDER)];
- if ( !p->remap.p )
+ if ( !p->remap.p || p->remap.im )
continue;
printk(" %04x: %x %x %04x %08x %02x %x %x %x %x %x"
" %x %x\n", i,
@@ -248,6 +252,41 @@ static void dump_iommu_info(unsigned char key)
(u32)p->remap.dm, (u32)p->remap.fpd, (u32)p->remap.p);
print_cnt++;
}
+
+ if ( iremap_entries )
+ unmap_vtd_domain_page(iremap_entries);
+
+ iremap_entries = NULL;
+ printk ("\nEntries for posted format:\n");
+ printk(" SVT SQ SID PDA V URG AVL FPD P\n");
+ for ( i = 0; i < nr_entry; i++ )
+ {
+ struct iremap_entry *p;
+ if ( i % (1 << IREMAP_ENTRY_ORDER) == 0 )
+ {
+ /* This entry across page boundry */
+ if ( iremap_entries )
+ unmap_vtd_domain_page(iremap_entries);
+
+ GET_IREMAP_ENTRY(iremap_maddr, i,
+ iremap_entries, p);
+ }
+ else
+ p = &iremap_entries[i % (1 << IREMAP_ENTRY_ORDER)];
+
+ if ( !p->post.p || !p->post.im )
+ continue;
+
+ printk(" %04x: %x %x %04x %16lx %02x %x %x %x %x\n",
+ i,
+ (u32)p->post.svt, (u32)p->post.sq, (u32)p->post.sid,
+ (((u64)p->post.pda_h << 32) | (p->post.pda_l << 6)),
+ (u32)p->post.vector, (u32)p->post.urg,
+ (u32)p->post.avail, (u32)p->post.fpd, (u32)p->post.p);
+
+ print_cnt++;
+ }
+
if ( iremap_entries )
unmap_vtd_domain_page(iremap_entries);
if ( iommu_ir_ctrl(iommu)->iremap_num != print_cnt )
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 46+ messages in thread