From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> To: "A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>, "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org> Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "mturquette@baylibre.com" <mturquette@baylibre.com>, "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>, "kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>, "A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/11] clk: imx: scu: add scu clock divider Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:26:23 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <153972518358.5275.8551722631185725008@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1539504194-28289-4-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Quoting A.s. Dong (2018-10-14 01:07:49) > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/scu/clk-divider-scu.c b/drivers/clk/imx/scu/clk-divider-scu.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..51cb816 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/scu/clk-divider-scu.c > @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2016 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. > + * Copyright 2017~2018 NXP > + * Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> > + * > + */ > +#include <linux/clk.h> > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h> > +#include <linux/err.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/jiffies.h> Is this used? > +#include <linux/slab.h> > + > +#include "clk-scu.h" > + > +struct clk_divider_scu { > + struct clk_hw hw; Nitpick: No idea why this is spaced out from clk_hw. > + u32 rsrc_id; > + u8 clk_type; > +}; > + > +/* SCU Clock Protocol definitions */ > +struct imx_sc_msg_req_set_clock_rate { > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr; > + u32 rate; > + u16 resource; > + u8 clk; > +} __packed; > + > +struct imx_sc_msg_req_get_clock_rate { > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr; > + u16 resource; > + u8 clk; > +} __packed; > + > +struct imx_sc_msg_resp_get_clock_rate { > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr; > + u32 rate; > +} __packed; > + > + > +static inline struct clk_divider_scu *to_clk_divider_scu(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + return container_of(hw, struct clk_divider_scu, hw); > +} > + > +/* > + * clk_divider_scu_recalc_rate - Get clock rate for a SCU clock > + * @hw: clock to get rate for > + * @parent_rate: parent rate provided by common clock framework, not used > + * > + * Gets the current clock rate of a SCU clock. Returns the current > + * clock rate, or zero in failure. > + */ > +static unsigned long clk_divider_scu_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > + unsigned long parent_rate) > +{ > + struct clk_divider_scu *div = to_clk_divider_scu(hw); > + struct imx_sc_msg_req_get_clock_rate msg; > + struct imx_sc_msg_resp_get_clock_rate *resp; > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr = &msg.hdr; > + int ret; > + > + hdr->ver = IMX_SC_RPC_VERSION; > + hdr->svc = (uint8_t)IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_PM; > + hdr->func = (uint8_t)IMX_SC_PM_FUNC_GET_CLOCK_RATE; > + hdr->size = 2; > + > + msg.resource = div->rsrc_id; > + msg.clk = div->clk_type; > + > + ret = imx_scu_call_rpc(ccm_ipc_handle, &msg, true); > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("%s: failed to get clock rate %d\n", > + clk_hw_get_name(hw), ret); > + return 0; > + } > + > + resp = (struct imx_sc_msg_resp_get_clock_rate *)&msg; Does the response get written to the same place that the message is written? If so, it would be better to combine the different structs into a union that's always large enough to handle this? For example, it looks like there are only 16 + 8 bytes for the get_clock_rate structure, but then the response is returning the rate in 32 bytes. When we cast that here we're now getting an extra 8 bytes of stack, aren't we? Combining the different structures into one bigger structure would alleviate this and avoid the need for casting. > + > + return resp->rate; > +} > + > +/* > + * clk_divider_scu_round_rate - Round clock rate for a SCU clock > + * @hw: clock to round rate for > + * @rate: rate to round > + * @parent_rate: parent rate provided by common clock framework, not used > + * > + * Gets the current clock rate of a SCU clock. Returns the current > + * clock rate, or zero in failure. > + */ > +static long clk_divider_scu_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > + unsigned long *parent_rate) > +{ > + /* > + * Assume we support all the requested rate and let the SCU firmware > + * to handle the left work > + */ > + return rate; > +} > + > +/* > + * clk_divider_scu_set_rate - Set rate for a SCU clock > + * @hw: clock to change rate for > + * @rate: target rate for the clock > + * @parent_rate: rate of the clock parent, not used for SCU clocks > + * > + * Sets a clock frequency for a SCU clock. Returns the SCU > + * protocol status. > + */ > +static int clk_divider_scu_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > + unsigned long parent_rate) > +{ > + struct clk_divider_scu *div = to_clk_divider_scu(hw); > + struct imx_sc_msg_req_set_clock_rate msg; > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr = &msg.hdr; > + int ret; > + > + hdr->ver = IMX_SC_RPC_VERSION; > + hdr->svc = (uint8_t)IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_PM; > + hdr->func = (uint8_t)IMX_SC_PM_FUNC_SET_CLOCK_RATE; Are these casts necessary? > + hdr->size = 3; > + > + msg.rate = rate; > + msg.resource = div->rsrc_id; > + msg.clk = div->clk_type; > + > + ret = imx_scu_call_rpc(ccm_ipc_handle, &msg, true); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: failed to set clock rate %ld : ret %d\n", > + clk_hw_get_name(hw), rate, ret); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct clk_ops clk_divider_scu_ops = { > + .recalc_rate = clk_divider_scu_recalc_rate, > + .round_rate = clk_divider_scu_round_rate, > + .set_rate = clk_divider_scu_set_rate, > +}; > + > +struct clk_hw *imx_clk_register_divider_scu(const char *name, > + const char *parent_name, > + u32 rsrc_id, > + u8 clk_type) > +{ > + struct clk_divider_scu *div; > + struct clk_init_data init; > + struct clk_hw *hw; > + int ret; > + > + div = kzalloc(sizeof(*div), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!div) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + > + div->rsrc_id = rsrc_id; > + div->clk_type = clk_type; > + > + init.name = name; > + init.ops = &clk_divider_scu_ops; > + init.flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE; Why nocache? Please have a good reason and add a comment indicating why. > + init.parent_names = parent_name ? &parent_name : NULL; > + init.num_parents = parent_name ? 1 : 0; > + div->hw.init = &init; > + > + hw = &div->hw; > + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, hw); > + if (ret) { > + kfree(div); > + hw = ERR_PTR(ret); > + } > + > + return hw; > +}
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@kernel.org (Stephen Boyd) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH V4 03/11] clk: imx: scu: add scu clock divider Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:26:23 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <153972518358.5275.8551722631185725008@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1539504194-28289-4-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Quoting A.s. Dong (2018-10-14 01:07:49) > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/scu/clk-divider-scu.c b/drivers/clk/imx/scu/clk-divider-scu.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..51cb816 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/scu/clk-divider-scu.c > @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2016 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. > + * Copyright 2017~2018 NXP > + * Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> > + * > + */ > +#include <linux/clk.h> > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h> > +#include <linux/err.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/jiffies.h> Is this used? > +#include <linux/slab.h> > + > +#include "clk-scu.h" > + > +struct clk_divider_scu { > + struct clk_hw hw; Nitpick: No idea why this is spaced out from clk_hw. > + u32 rsrc_id; > + u8 clk_type; > +}; > + > +/* SCU Clock Protocol definitions */ > +struct imx_sc_msg_req_set_clock_rate { > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr; > + u32 rate; > + u16 resource; > + u8 clk; > +} __packed; > + > +struct imx_sc_msg_req_get_clock_rate { > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr; > + u16 resource; > + u8 clk; > +} __packed; > + > +struct imx_sc_msg_resp_get_clock_rate { > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr; > + u32 rate; > +} __packed; > + > + > +static inline struct clk_divider_scu *to_clk_divider_scu(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + return container_of(hw, struct clk_divider_scu, hw); > +} > + > +/* > + * clk_divider_scu_recalc_rate - Get clock rate for a SCU clock > + * @hw: clock to get rate for > + * @parent_rate: parent rate provided by common clock framework, not used > + * > + * Gets the current clock rate of a SCU clock. Returns the current > + * clock rate, or zero in failure. > + */ > +static unsigned long clk_divider_scu_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > + unsigned long parent_rate) > +{ > + struct clk_divider_scu *div = to_clk_divider_scu(hw); > + struct imx_sc_msg_req_get_clock_rate msg; > + struct imx_sc_msg_resp_get_clock_rate *resp; > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr = &msg.hdr; > + int ret; > + > + hdr->ver = IMX_SC_RPC_VERSION; > + hdr->svc = (uint8_t)IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_PM; > + hdr->func = (uint8_t)IMX_SC_PM_FUNC_GET_CLOCK_RATE; > + hdr->size = 2; > + > + msg.resource = div->rsrc_id; > + msg.clk = div->clk_type; > + > + ret = imx_scu_call_rpc(ccm_ipc_handle, &msg, true); > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("%s: failed to get clock rate %d\n", > + clk_hw_get_name(hw), ret); > + return 0; > + } > + > + resp = (struct imx_sc_msg_resp_get_clock_rate *)&msg; Does the response get written to the same place that the message is written? If so, it would be better to combine the different structs into a union that's always large enough to handle this? For example, it looks like there are only 16 + 8 bytes for the get_clock_rate structure, but then the response is returning the rate in 32 bytes. When we cast that here we're now getting an extra 8 bytes of stack, aren't we? Combining the different structures into one bigger structure would alleviate this and avoid the need for casting. > + > + return resp->rate; > +} > + > +/* > + * clk_divider_scu_round_rate - Round clock rate for a SCU clock > + * @hw: clock to round rate for > + * @rate: rate to round > + * @parent_rate: parent rate provided by common clock framework, not used > + * > + * Gets the current clock rate of a SCU clock. Returns the current > + * clock rate, or zero in failure. > + */ > +static long clk_divider_scu_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > + unsigned long *parent_rate) > +{ > + /* > + * Assume we support all the requested rate and let the SCU firmware > + * to handle the left work > + */ > + return rate; > +} > + > +/* > + * clk_divider_scu_set_rate - Set rate for a SCU clock > + * @hw: clock to change rate for > + * @rate: target rate for the clock > + * @parent_rate: rate of the clock parent, not used for SCU clocks > + * > + * Sets a clock frequency for a SCU clock. Returns the SCU > + * protocol status. > + */ > +static int clk_divider_scu_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > + unsigned long parent_rate) > +{ > + struct clk_divider_scu *div = to_clk_divider_scu(hw); > + struct imx_sc_msg_req_set_clock_rate msg; > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr = &msg.hdr; > + int ret; > + > + hdr->ver = IMX_SC_RPC_VERSION; > + hdr->svc = (uint8_t)IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_PM; > + hdr->func = (uint8_t)IMX_SC_PM_FUNC_SET_CLOCK_RATE; Are these casts necessary? > + hdr->size = 3; > + > + msg.rate = rate; > + msg.resource = div->rsrc_id; > + msg.clk = div->clk_type; > + > + ret = imx_scu_call_rpc(ccm_ipc_handle, &msg, true); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: failed to set clock rate %ld : ret %d\n", > + clk_hw_get_name(hw), rate, ret); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct clk_ops clk_divider_scu_ops = { > + .recalc_rate = clk_divider_scu_recalc_rate, > + .round_rate = clk_divider_scu_round_rate, > + .set_rate = clk_divider_scu_set_rate, > +}; > + > +struct clk_hw *imx_clk_register_divider_scu(const char *name, > + const char *parent_name, > + u32 rsrc_id, > + u8 clk_type) > +{ > + struct clk_divider_scu *div; > + struct clk_init_data init; > + struct clk_hw *hw; > + int ret; > + > + div = kzalloc(sizeof(*div), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!div) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + > + div->rsrc_id = rsrc_id; > + div->clk_type = clk_type; > + > + init.name = name; > + init.ops = &clk_divider_scu_ops; > + init.flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE; Why nocache? Please have a good reason and add a comment indicating why. > + init.parent_names = parent_name ? &parent_name : NULL; > + init.num_parents = parent_name ? 1 : 0; > + div->hw.init = &init; > + > + hw = &div->hw; > + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, hw); > + if (ret) { > + kfree(div); > + hw = ERR_PTR(ret); > + } > + > + return hw; > +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-16 21:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-10-14 8:07 [PATCH V4 00/11] clk: imx: add imx8qxp clock support A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` [PATCH V4 01/11] clk: imx: add configuration option for mmio clks A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` [PATCH V4 02/11] clk: imx: scu: add scu clock common part A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-16 21:31 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-16 21:31 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 9:11 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 9:11 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 15:07 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 15:07 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 15:27 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 15:27 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` [PATCH V4 03/11] clk: imx: scu: add scu clock divider A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-16 21:26 ` Stephen Boyd [this message] 2018-10-16 21:26 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 8:56 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 8:56 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 15:17 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 15:17 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 15:45 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 15:45 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 16:05 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 16:05 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-18 2:35 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-18 2:35 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` [PATCH V4 04/11] clk: imx: scu: add scu clock gpr divider A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-16 21:27 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-16 21:27 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 9:03 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 9:03 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 15:17 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 15:17 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-14 8:07 ` [PATCH V4 05/11] clk: imx: scu: add scu clock gate A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-15 7:32 ` Sascha Hauer 2018-10-15 7:32 ` Sascha Hauer 2018-10-15 9:17 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-15 9:17 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-15 9:53 ` Sascha Hauer 2018-10-15 9:53 ` Sascha Hauer 2018-10-15 15:30 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-15 15:30 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-16 21:18 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-16 21:18 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 7:28 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 7:28 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` [PATCH V4 06/11] clk: imx: scu: add scu clock gpr gate A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:07 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V4 07/11] clk: imx: scu: add scu clock mux A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:08 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V4 08/11] clk: imx: scu: add scu clock gpr mux A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:08 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-16 21:30 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-16 21:30 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 9:07 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 9:07 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 15:18 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 15:18 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V4 09/11] clk: imx: add common imx_clk_hw_fixed functions A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:08 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-16 21:32 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-16 21:32 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 9:21 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 9:21 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 15:18 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 15:18 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V4 10/11] clk: imx: add imx_check_clk_hws helper function A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:08 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-16 21:34 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-16 21:34 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 9:24 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 9:24 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V4 11/11] clk: imx: add imx8qxp clk driver A.s. Dong 2018-10-14 8:08 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-16 21:38 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-16 21:38 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 9:43 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 9:43 ` A.s. Dong 2018-10-17 15:20 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-10-17 15:20 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=153972518358.5275.8551722631185725008@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \ --to=sboyd@kernel.org \ --cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \ --cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \ --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \ --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \ --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.