All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <JBottomley@odin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/efi: Map EFI memmap entries in-order at runtime
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:16:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150928061646.GA21690@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150927180633.GA29466@srcf.ucam.org>


* Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:30:48AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Sep 26, 2015 1:19 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sadly a lot of firmware is known to fail in that configuration :(  That was very much our guest choice.
> > >
> > 
> > Why can't we map everything completely 1:1 (VA = PA) and call the
> > setVA thing but pass it literally the identity.
> 
> Last time I tried this I found that some firmware makes assumptions 
> about having high addresses.

So the question is, what does Windows do?

PC firmware is a hostile environment for Linux, to be compatible the best we can 
do is to mimic the environment that the firmware is tested under - i.e. try to use 
the firmware in the way Windows uses it.

Thanks,

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Leif Lindholm
	<leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	stable <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel
	<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Linus Torvalds
	<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Peter Jones <pjones-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Matt Fleming
	<matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>,
	Matt Fleming
	<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
	"Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	James Bottomley <JBottomley-wo1vFcy6AUs@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/efi: Map EFI memmap entries in-order at runtime
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:16:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150928061646.GA21690@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150927180633.GA29466-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>


* Matthew Garrett <mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:30:48AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Sep 26, 2015 1:19 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sadly a lot of firmware is known to fail in that configuration :(  That was very much our guest choice.
> > >
> > 
> > Why can't we map everything completely 1:1 (VA = PA) and call the
> > setVA thing but pass it literally the identity.
> 
> Last time I tried this I found that some firmware makes assumptions 
> about having high addresses.

So the question is, what does Windows do?

PC firmware is a hostile environment for Linux, to be compatible the best we can 
do is to mimic the environment that the firmware is tested under - i.e. try to use 
the firmware in the way Windows uses it.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-28  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-25 22:02 [GIT PULL 0/2] EFI urgent fixes Matt Fleming
2015-09-25 22:02 ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-25 22:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/efi: Map EFI memmap entries in-order at runtime Matt Fleming
2015-09-25 22:02   ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-26  5:56   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-26  5:56     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-26  6:44     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-26  6:44       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-26 13:43     ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-27  7:03       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-27  7:03         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-28  6:49         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-28  8:22           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-28  8:22             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-28  9:51             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-28  9:51               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-29  9:12               ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-29 10:41                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-29 14:18                   ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-29 14:18                     ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-29 13:52                 ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-29 13:52                   ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-26 17:01     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-26 17:01       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-26 17:20       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-26 18:15         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-26 18:15           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-26 19:49           ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-26 19:57             ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-26 20:09               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-26 20:09                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-26 20:19                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-27 16:30                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-27 18:06                     ` Matthew Garrett
2015-09-27 18:06                       ` Matthew Garrett
2015-09-28  6:16                       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-09-28  6:16                         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-28  6:41                         ` Matthew Garrett
2015-09-29 21:58                           ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-29 21:58                             ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-30  9:30                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-30 16:43                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-30 16:43                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-30 17:24                                 ` James Bottomley
2015-09-30 17:24                                   ` James Bottomley
2015-09-30 17:24                                   ` James Bottomley
2015-09-30  0:54                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-30  0:54                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-26 19:55         ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-26 19:55           ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-27  6:50       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-01 12:48   ` [tip:core/urgent] x86/efi: Fix boot crash by mapping EFI memmap entries bottom-up at runtime, instead of top-down tip-bot for Matt Fleming
2015-10-02  9:44     ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-25 22:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64/efi: Don't pad between EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME regions Matt Fleming
2015-09-25 22:02   ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-26  6:01   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-26  6:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-26  7:08     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-26  7:08       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-27  7:06       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-27  7:06         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-27 10:40         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-28  6:20           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-29  9:31           ` Dave Young
2015-09-29 10:24             ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-29 14:36           ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-29 14:36             ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-30  0:56             ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-30  0:56               ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-30  8:33               ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-30  8:33                 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-30  1:03         ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-30  1:16           ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-30  1:19             ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-30  4:24             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-30  4:24               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-01 10:44           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-01 12:49   ` [tip:core/urgent] arm64/efi: Fix boot crash by not padding " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150928061646.GA21690@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=JBottomley@odin.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.