From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Initialize MDSS irq domain at probe time
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:43:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21fe6cf4-3cef-91e1-7bf7-b94ac223e7c5@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211201202023.2313971-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Il 01/12/21 21:20, Dmitry Baryshkov ha scritto:
> Since commit 8f59ee9a570c ("drm/msm/dsi: Adjust probe order"), the
> DSI host gets initialized earlier, but this caused unability to probe
> the entire stack of components because they all depend on interrupts
> coming from the main `mdss` node (mdp5, or dpu1).
>
> To fix this issue, move mdss device initialization (which include irq
> domain setup) to msm_mdev_probe() time, as to make sure that the
> interrupt controller is available before dsi and/or other components try
> to initialize, finally satisfying the dependency.
>
> Fixes: 8f59ee9a570c ("drm/msm/dsi: Adjust probe order")
> Co-Developed-By: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> When checking your patch, I noticed that IRQ domain is created before
> respective MDSS clocks are enabled. This does not look like causing any
> issues at this time, but it did not look good. So I started moving
> clocks parsing to early_init() callbacks. And at some point it looked
> like we can drop the init()/destroy() callbacks in favour of
> early_init() and remove(). Which promted me to move init()/destroy() in
> place of early_init()/remove() with few minor fixes here and there.
>
Hey Dmitry,
I wanted to make the least amount of changes to Rob's logic... I know that
the clocks aren't up before registering the domain, but my logic was implying
that if the handlers aren't registered, then there's no interrupt coming, hence
no risk of getting issues. Same if the hardware is down, you can't get any
interrupt, because it can't generate any (but if bootloader leaves it up.. eh.)
I recognize that such approach is "fragile enough", lastly, I agree with this
patch which is, in the end, something that is in the middle between my first
and last approach.
I've tested this one on trogdor-lazor-limozeen and seems to be working in an
analogous way to my v2/v3, so on my side it's validated.
Let's go for this one!
How do we proceeed now? Are you sending a new series with the new patches, or
should I?
Also, I don't think this is relevant, since I'm in co-dev, but in case it is:
Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
P.S.: Sorry for the 1-day delay, got busy with other tasks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Initialize MDSS irq domain at probe time
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:43:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21fe6cf4-3cef-91e1-7bf7-b94ac223e7c5@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211201202023.2313971-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Il 01/12/21 21:20, Dmitry Baryshkov ha scritto:
> Since commit 8f59ee9a570c ("drm/msm/dsi: Adjust probe order"), the
> DSI host gets initialized earlier, but this caused unability to probe
> the entire stack of components because they all depend on interrupts
> coming from the main `mdss` node (mdp5, or dpu1).
>
> To fix this issue, move mdss device initialization (which include irq
> domain setup) to msm_mdev_probe() time, as to make sure that the
> interrupt controller is available before dsi and/or other components try
> to initialize, finally satisfying the dependency.
>
> Fixes: 8f59ee9a570c ("drm/msm/dsi: Adjust probe order")
> Co-Developed-By: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> When checking your patch, I noticed that IRQ domain is created before
> respective MDSS clocks are enabled. This does not look like causing any
> issues at this time, but it did not look good. So I started moving
> clocks parsing to early_init() callbacks. And at some point it looked
> like we can drop the init()/destroy() callbacks in favour of
> early_init() and remove(). Which promted me to move init()/destroy() in
> place of early_init()/remove() with few minor fixes here and there.
>
Hey Dmitry,
I wanted to make the least amount of changes to Rob's logic... I know that
the clocks aren't up before registering the domain, but my logic was implying
that if the handlers aren't registered, then there's no interrupt coming, hence
no risk of getting issues. Same if the hardware is down, you can't get any
interrupt, because it can't generate any (but if bootloader leaves it up.. eh.)
I recognize that such approach is "fragile enough", lastly, I agree with this
patch which is, in the end, something that is in the middle between my first
and last approach.
I've tested this one on trogdor-lazor-limozeen and seems to be working in an
analogous way to my v2/v3, so on my side it's validated.
Let's go for this one!
How do we proceeed now? Are you sending a new series with the new patches, or
should I?
Also, I don't think this is relevant, since I'm in co-dev, but in case it is:
Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
P.S.: Sorry for the 1-day delay, got busy with other tasks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-01 10:52 [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/msm: Fix dsi/bridge probe AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-12-01 10:52 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-12-01 10:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/msm: Allocate msm_drm_private early and pass it as driver data AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-12-01 10:52 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-12-01 10:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/msm: Initialize MDSS irq domain at probe time AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-12-01 10:52 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-12-01 20:20 ` [PATCH] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-01 20:20 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-03 10:43 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
2021-12-03 10:43 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-12-03 13:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-03 13:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-03 13:17 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-12-03 13:17 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-25 15:09 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-11-25 15:09 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-11-25 15:23 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-25 15:23 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-25 22:39 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-25 22:39 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-26 0:06 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-26 0:06 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-26 9:26 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-11-26 9:26 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-11-26 21:12 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-26 21:12 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-26 16:08 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-11-26 16:08 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-11-29 2:20 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-29 2:20 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-29 14:14 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-11-29 14:14 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-11-29 14:53 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-29 14:53 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-11-29 14:56 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2021-11-29 14:56 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21fe6cf4-3cef-91e1-7bf7-b94ac223e7c5@collabora.com \
--to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=abhinavk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.