From: Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@gmail.com>
To: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
Cc: "Kumar, Anil" <anilkumar.v@ti.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:06:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKDJKT5xE9WWOC0pM8h1UWrF=OOtSr1D2WKPww9F6bhcO7VM_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51134907.1050803@linaro.org>
Hi Tushar
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>>> and added on top of the below patch:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>>> spi_2: spi@12d40000 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + gpio_keys {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>> anyone is using here.
>>
>
> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
Correct me if I am wrong here?
Thanks
Manish Badarkhe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: badarkhe.manish@gmail.com (Manish Badarkhe)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:06:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKDJKT5xE9WWOC0pM8h1UWrF=OOtSr1D2WKPww9F6bhcO7VM_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51134907.1050803@linaro.org>
Hi Tushar
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>>> and added on top of the below patch:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>>> spi_2: spi at 12d40000 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + gpio_keys {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>> anyone is using here.
>>
>
> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
Correct me if I am wrong here?
Thanks
Manish Badarkhe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-07 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-07 5:15 [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:49 ` Kumar, Anil
2013-02-07 5:49 ` Kumar, Anil
2013-02-07 5:56 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:56 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-11 0:38 ` amit daniel kachhap
2013-02-11 0:38 ` amit daniel kachhap
2013-03-11 2:05 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-03-11 2:05 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add vmmc regulator support Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add MFC codec support Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add HDMI HPD and regulator node Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 6:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons Kumar, Anil
2013-02-07 6:17 ` Kumar, Anil
2013-02-07 6:26 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 6:26 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 6:36 ` Manish Badarkhe [this message]
2013-02-07 6:36 ` Manish Badarkhe
2013-02-07 6:56 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 6:56 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 7:43 ` Girish KS
2013-02-07 7:43 ` Girish KS
2013-02-07 9:40 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 9:40 ` Tushar Behera
2013-02-07 11:25 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-02-07 11:25 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-02-07 10:30 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-02-07 10:30 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-03-11 2:05 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-03-11 2:05 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-03-11 9:44 ` Tushar Behera
2013-03-11 9:44 ` Tushar Behera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKDJKT5xE9WWOC0pM8h1UWrF=OOtSr1D2WKPww9F6bhcO7VM_w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=badarkhe.manish@gmail.com \
--cc=anilkumar.v@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=tushar.behera@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.