From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 22:24:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105202224.56867.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimOqhNEsBEg6f=nMiMJqYGNyFJmeQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, May 20, 2011, Ray Lee wrote:
> [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki
> to the message ]
It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking
them any more now that 2.6.39 is out.
Thanks,
Rafael
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
>
> > I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago
> > against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being
> > addressed. This bug makes the system unusable... Some guys on IRC suggested
> > I
> > email, so here it is.
> >
>
> See the bugzilla entry for the bisection history.
>
> ~r.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-20 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-20 17:06 Major 2.6.38 regression ignored? Luke-Jr
2011-05-20 18:08 ` Ray Lee
2011-05-20 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-05-20 21:11 ` Ray Lee
2011-05-21 8:41 ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 15:23 ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-21 15:40 ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 19:33 ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-28 13:19 ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 17:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 18:07 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <CA+55aFxakA2U+oMJ1T7awTYa+p6xp9N0aCbfrUqgkF7BJ8gnQw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-22 11:08 ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 14:12 ` Herbert Xu
2011-07-22 18:00 ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 20:23 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 20:50 ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 21:08 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 21:31 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2011-07-23 18:19 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 4:29 ` Keith Packard
2011-07-26 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 12:08 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 14:00 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 14:47 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 15:09 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 15:34 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:02 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 16:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:56 ` Ray Lee
2011-08-09 17:40 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ray Lee
2011-08-10 8:36 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-10 9:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alan Cox
2011-08-10 11:37 ` Kirill Smelkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201105202224.56867.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luke@dashjr.org \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).