dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:29:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yun4o2bj84s.fsf@aiko.keithp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107231847520.4843@tiger>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1008 bytes --]

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:55:48 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> wrote:

> I know I sound like a broken record but I really wish you i915 devs were 
> little more eager to revert broken patches early rather than late. I mean, 
> this particular breakage was already bisected but nobody said or 
> did anything - and it's not like it's the first time either!

We've switched processes starting with 2.6.39 and I think we're doing
better in this regard. For this particular issue, the regression came
with 2.6.38, and the revert was too large for me to consider merging
just before 3.0 shipped -- I knew reverting it *would* cause problems
for anyone using UMS on newer hardware.

> I suppose I need to bribe Linus somehow to be more strict with you
> folks.

He nicely delivered the message for you a few months ago in person.

In any case, I'm hoping that my smaller fix will resolve the problem and
also not cause regressions for other users.

-- 
keith.packard@intel.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-25  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20 17:06 Major 2.6.38 regression ignored? Luke-Jr
2011-05-20 18:08 ` Ray Lee
2011-05-20 20:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-20 21:11     ` Ray Lee
2011-05-21  8:41   ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 15:23     ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-21 15:40       ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 19:33         ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-28 13:19         ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 17:17           ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 18:07             ` Pekka Enberg
     [not found]               ` <CA+55aFxakA2U+oMJ1T7awTYa+p6xp9N0aCbfrUqgkF7BJ8gnQw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-22 11:08                 ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 14:12                   ` Herbert Xu
2011-07-22 18:00                   ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 20:23                     ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 20:50                       ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 21:08                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 21:31                           ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:10                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2011-07-23 18:19                               ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:55                         ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25  4:29                           ` Keith Packard [this message]
2011-07-26 13:48                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 12:08                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 14:00                           ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 14:47                             ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 15:09                               ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 15:34                                 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:02                                   ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 16:32                                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:56                                       ` Ray Lee
2011-08-09 17:40                                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 17:43                                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Ray Lee
2011-08-10  8:36                                             ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-10  9:41                                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Alan Cox
2011-08-10 11:37                                             ` Kirill Smelkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yun4o2bj84s.fsf@aiko.keithp.com \
    --to=keithp@keithp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kirr@mns.spb.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).