From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] x86: DMA support for memory encryption
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:36:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb3e6b91-44f7-ee01-6da1-82eb32243b85@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160912105815.3z5bvzbcfjcj4ku7@pd.tnic>
On 09/12/2016 05:58 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:38:07PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> Since DMA addresses will effectively look like 48-bit addresses when the
>> memory encryption mask is set, SWIOTLB is needed if the DMA mask of the
>> device performing the DMA does not support 48-bits. SWIOTLB will be
>> initialized to create un-encrypted bounce buffers for use by these devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 5 ++-
>> arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 6 +++
>> arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 11 ++++--
>> arch/x86/kernel/pci-nommu.c | 2 +
>> arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c | 8 +++--
>> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 22 ++++++++++++
>> include/linux/swiotlb.h | 1 +
>> init/main.c | 13 +++++++
>> lib/swiotlb.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 9 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -172,3 +174,23 @@ void __init sme_early_init(void)
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(protection_map); i++)
>> protection_map[i] = __pgprot(pgprot_val(protection_map[i]) | sme_me_mask);
>> }
>> +
>> +/* Architecture __weak replacement functions */
>> +void __init mem_encrypt_init(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!sme_me_mask)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /* Make SWIOTLB use an unencrypted DMA area */
>> + swiotlb_clear_encryption();
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned long swiotlb_get_me_mask(void)
>
> This could just as well be named to something more generic:
>
> swiotlb_get_clear_dma_mask() or so which basically means the mask of
> bits which get cleared before returning DMA addresses...
Ok.
>
>> +{
>> + return sme_me_mask;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void swiotlb_set_mem_dec(void *vaddr, unsigned long size)
>> +{
>> + sme_set_mem_dec(vaddr, size);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
>> index 5f81f8a..5c909fc 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ int swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose);
>> extern unsigned long swiotlb_nr_tbl(void);
>> unsigned long swiotlb_size_or_default(void);
>> extern int swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs);
>> +extern void __init swiotlb_clear_encryption(void);
>>
>> /*
>> * Enumeration for sync targets
>> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
>> index a8a58e2..82c7cd9 100644
>> --- a/init/main.c
>> +++ b/init/main.c
>> @@ -458,6 +458,10 @@ void __init __weak thread_stack_cache_init(void)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +void __init __weak mem_encrypt_init(void)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Set up kernel memory allocators
>> */
>> @@ -598,6 +602,15 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
>> */
>> locking_selftest();
>>
>> + /*
>> + * This needs to be called before any devices perform DMA
>> + * operations that might use the swiotlb bounce buffers.
>> + * This call will mark the bounce buffers as un-encrypted so
>> + * that the usage of them will not cause "plain-text" data
>
> ...that their usage will not cause ...
Ok.
>
>> + * to be decrypted when accessed.
>> + */
>> + mem_encrypt_init();
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
>> if (initrd_start && !initrd_below_start_ok &&
>> page_to_pfn(virt_to_page((void *)initrd_start)) < min_low_pfn) {
>> diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
>> index 22e13a0..15d5741 100644
>> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
>> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
>> @@ -131,6 +131,26 @@ unsigned long swiotlb_size_or_default(void)
>> return size ? size : (IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Support for memory encryption. If memory encryption is supported, then an
>> + * override to these functions will be provided.
>> + */
>
> No need for that comment.
Ok.
>
>> +unsigned long __weak swiotlb_get_me_mask(void)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __weak swiotlb_set_mem_dec(void *vaddr, unsigned long size)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* For swiotlb, clear memory encryption mask from dma addresses */
>> +static dma_addr_t swiotlb_phys_to_dma(struct device *hwdev,
>> + phys_addr_t address)
>> +{
>> + return phys_to_dma(hwdev, address) & ~swiotlb_get_me_mask();
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Note that this doesn't work with highmem page */
>> static dma_addr_t swiotlb_virt_to_bus(struct device *hwdev,
>> volatile void *address)
>> @@ -159,6 +179,30 @@ void swiotlb_print_info(void)
>> bytes >> 20, vstart, vend - 1);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * If memory encryption is active, the DMA address for an encrypted page may
>> + * be beyond the range of the device. If bounce buffers are required be sure
>> + * that they are not on an encrypted page. This should be called before the
>> + * iotlb area is used.
>> + */
>> +void __init swiotlb_clear_encryption(void)
>> +{
>> + void *vaddr;
>> + unsigned long bytes;
>> +
>> + if (no_iotlb_memory || !io_tlb_start || late_alloc)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + vaddr = phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start);
>> + bytes = PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
>> + swiotlb_set_mem_dec(vaddr, bytes);
>> + memset(vaddr, 0, bytes);
>
> io_tlb_start is cleared...
>
>> +
>> + vaddr = phys_to_virt(io_tlb_overflow_buffer);
>> + bytes = PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow);
>> + swiotlb_set_mem_dec(vaddr, bytes);
>
> ... but io_tlb_overflow_buffer isn't? I don't see the difference here.
Yup, I missed that one. Will memset this as well.
Thanks,
Tom
>
>> +}
>> +
>> int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
>> {
>> void *v_overflow_buffer;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-22 22:35 [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] x86: Documentation for AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 8:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:02 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 15:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] x86: Set the write-protect cache mode for full PAT support Tom Lendacky
2016-08-25 3:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) build enablement Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 11:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support Tom Lendacky
2016-08-25 13:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-30 13:19 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-30 14:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-31 13:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] x86: Add the Secure Memory Encryption cpu feature Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 14:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:07 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 18:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-05 8:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-05 15:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:19 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-06 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-08 13:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-08 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 13:43 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] x86: Extend the early_memmap support with additional attrs Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] x86: Add support for early encryption/decryption of memory Tom Lendacky
2016-09-06 16:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] x86: Insure that memory areas are encrypted when possible Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:05 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] mm: Access BOOT related data in the clear Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 16:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:14 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-14 14:20 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 9:57 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15 16:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 17:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] x86: Decrypt trampoline area if memory encryption is active Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 17:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:43 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] x86: DMA support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 10:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:36 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] iommu/amd: AMD IOMMU " Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 11:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:45 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-15 16:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-16 7:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] x86: Check for memory encryption on the APs Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 12:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:50 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] x86: Do not specify encrypted memory for VGA mapping Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] x86/kvm: Enable Secure Memory Encryption of nested page tables Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 14:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:02 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] x86: Access the setup data through debugfs un-encrypted Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-15 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-16 7:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] x86: Add support to make use of Secure Memory Encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 17:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:31 ` Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb3e6b91-44f7-ee01-6da1-82eb32243b85@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).