qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, groug@kaod.org, philmd@redhat.com
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, lvivier@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] target/ppc: Correct handling of real mode accesses with vhyp on hash MMU
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:22:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6452c163-b2e4-ab9f-3117-4a19aad3e04e@kaod.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107044827.471355-4-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On 1/7/20 5:48 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On ppc we have the concept of virtual hypervisor ("vhyp") mode, where we
> only model the non-hypervisor-privileged parts of the cpu.  Essentially we
> model the hypervisor's behaviour from the point of view of a guest OS, but
> we don't model the hypervisor's execution.
> 
> In particular, in this mode, qemu's notion of target physical address is
> a guest physical address from the vcpu's point of view.  So accesses in
> guest real mode don't require translation.  If we were modelling the
> hypervisor mode, we'd need to translate the guest physical address into
> a host physical address.
> 
> Currently, we handle this sloppily: we rely on setting up the virtual LPCR
> and RMOR registers so that GPAs are simply HPAs plus an offset, which we
> set to zero.  This is already conceptually dubious, since the LPCR and RMOR
> registers don't exist in the non-hypervisor portion of the CPU.  It gets
> worse with POWER9, where RMOR and LPCR[VPM0] no longer exist at all.
> 
> Clean this up by explicitly handling the vhyp case.  While we're there,
> remove some unnecessary nesting of if statements that made the logic to
> select the correct real mode behaviour a bit less clear than it could be.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

I went through the changes and they look correct to me.

Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>

C.

> ---
>  target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index a881876647..5fabd93c92 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -789,27 +789,30 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
>           */
>          raddr = eaddr & 0x0FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL;
>  
> -        /* In HV mode, add HRMOR if top EA bit is clear */
> -        if (msr_hv || !env->has_hv_mode) {
> +        if (cpu->vhyp) {
> +            /*
> +             * In virtual hypervisor mode, there's nothing to do:
> +             *   EA == GPA == qemu guest address
> +             */
> +        } else if (msr_hv || !env->has_hv_mode) {
> +            /* In HV mode, add HRMOR if top EA bit is clear */
>              if (!(eaddr >> 63)) {
>                  raddr |= env->spr[SPR_HRMOR];
>              }
> -        } else {
> -            /* Otherwise, check VPM for RMA vs VRMA */
> -            if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0) {
> -                slb = &env->vrma_slb;
> -                if (slb->sps) {
> -                    goto skip_slb_search;
> -                }
> -                /* Not much else to do here */
> +        } else if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0) {
> +            /* Emulated VRMA mode */
> +            slb = &env->vrma_slb;
> +            if (!slb->sps) {
> +                /* Invalid VRMA setup, machine check */
>                  cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK;
>                  env->error_code = 0;
>                  return 1;
> -            } else if (raddr < env->rmls) {
> -                /* RMA. Check bounds in RMLS */
> -                raddr |= env->spr[SPR_RMOR];
> -            } else {
> -                /* The access failed, generate the approriate interrupt */
> +            }
> +
> +            goto skip_slb_search;
> +        } else {
> +            /* Emulated old-style RMO mode, bounds check against RMLS */
> +            if (raddr >= env->rmls) {
>                  if (rwx == 2) {
>                      ppc_hash64_set_isi(cs, SRR1_PROTFAULT);
>                  } else {
> @@ -821,6 +824,8 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
>                  }
>                  return 1;
>              }
> +
> +            raddr |= env->spr[SPR_RMOR];
>          }
>          tlb_set_page(cs, eaddr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK, raddr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK,
>                       PAGE_READ | PAGE_WRITE | PAGE_EXEC, mmu_idx,
> @@ -953,22 +958,27 @@ hwaddr ppc_hash64_get_phys_page_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong addr)
>          /* In real mode the top 4 effective address bits are ignored */
>          raddr = addr & 0x0FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL;
>  
> -        /* In HV mode, add HRMOR if top EA bit is clear */
> -        if ((msr_hv || !env->has_hv_mode) && !(addr >> 63)) {
> +        if (cpu->vhyp) {
> +            /*
> +             * In virtual hypervisor mode, there's nothing to do:
> +             *   EA == GPA == qemu guest address
> +             */
> +            return raddr;
> +        } else if ((msr_hv || !env->has_hv_mode) && !(addr >> 63)) {
> +            /* In HV mode, add HRMOR if top EA bit is clear */
>              return raddr | env->spr[SPR_HRMOR];
> -        }
> -
> -        /* Otherwise, check VPM for RMA vs VRMA */
> -        if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0) {
> +        } else if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0) {
> +            /* Emulated VRMA mode */
>              slb = &env->vrma_slb;
>              if (!slb->sps) {
>                  return -1;
>              }
> -        } else if (raddr < env->rmls) {
> -            /* RMA. Check bounds in RMLS */
> -            return raddr | env->spr[SPR_RMOR];
>          } else {
> -            return -1;
> +            /* Emulated old-style RMO mode, bounds check against RMLS */
> +            if (raddr >= env->rmls) {
> +                return -1;
> +            }
> +            return raddr | env->spr[SPR_RMOR];
>          }
>      } else {
>          slb = slb_lookup(cpu, addr);
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-14 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-07  4:48 [PATCH v2 00/10] target/ppc: Correct some errors with real mode handling David Gibson
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Drop PPC_EMULATE_32BITS_HYPV stub David Gibson
2020-01-07 12:52   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-07 17:05   ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] ppc: Remove stub of PPC970 HID4 implementation David Gibson
2020-01-07 12:51   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-07 17:32   ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-07 17:36     ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-07 18:05       ` BALATON Zoltan
2020-01-08  1:09         ` David Gibson
2020-01-08  8:29         ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-08  1:08       ` David Gibson
2020-01-08  8:11         ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-08  2:17       ` Paul Mackerras
2020-01-08 13:35   ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] target/ppc: Correct handling of real mode accesses with vhyp on hash MMU David Gibson
2020-01-14 10:22   ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper David Gibson
2020-01-07 13:24   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] spapr, ppc: Remove VPM0/RMLS hacks for POWER9 David Gibson
2020-01-07 14:35   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-09  7:33   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-01-13  3:38     ` David Gibson
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] target/ppc: Remove RMOR register from POWER9 & POWER10 David Gibson
2020-01-07 13:39   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] target/ppc: Use class fields to simplify LPCR masking David Gibson
2020-01-07 13:41   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] target/ppc: Streamline calculation of RMA limit from LPCR[RMLS] David Gibson
2020-01-07 13:43   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] target/ppc: Correct RMLS table David Gibson
2020-01-07 14:21   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-08  1:06     ` David Gibson
2020-01-08  8:29       ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-09  7:46       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-01-13  3:46         ` David Gibson
2020-01-08  8:28   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-07  4:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] target/ppc: Only calculate RMLS derived RMA limit on demand David Gibson
2020-01-08  8:31   ` Cédric Le Goater

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6452c163-b2e4-ab9f-3117-4a19aad3e04e@kaod.org \
    --to=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).