From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> To: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: Cleanup DSSDBG with dynamic pr_debug function Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:24:51 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1348554291.2342.8.camel@deskari> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1348552998-6596-1-git-send-email-cmahapatra@ti.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5314 bytes --] On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 11:33 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote: > The printk in DSSDBG function definition is replaced with dynamic debug enabled > pr_debug(). The use of dynamic debugging provides more flexiblity as each debug > statement can be enabled or disabled dynamically on basis of source filename, > line number, module name etc. by writing to a control file in debugfs > filesystem. For better undertsanding please refer to > Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt. > > The DSSDBGF() differs from DSSDBG() by providing function name. However, > function name, line number, module name and thread ID can be printed through > dynamic debug by setting appropiate flags 'f','l','m' and 't' in the debugfs > control file. So, DSSDBGF instances are replaced with DSSDBG. Typos with: flexiblity, undertsanding, appropiate. > Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com> > --- > drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c | 12 ++++-------- > drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h | 34 ++++++++-------------------------- > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c > index 6354bb8..cb86d94 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c > +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c > @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void dss_ovl_write_regs(struct omap_overlay *ovl) > struct mgr_priv_data *mp; > int r; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", ovl->id); > + DSSDBG("%d", ovl->id); I don't think this is good. It's true that dyn-debug can print the function name, but that's optional. The debug message should be somehow sensible independently, but in this case only a number is printed which is totally meaningless. Either the messages should be modified to give a hint what's going on, or the DSSDBGF could be kept for now. In the above case the debug message could be something like "writing ovl %d regs". However, I think it'd be easier just to keep the DSSDBGF for now, and remove it gradually. > if (!op->enabled || !op->info_dirty) > return; > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static void dss_ovl_write_regs_extra(struct omap_overlay *ovl) > struct ovl_priv_data *op = get_ovl_priv(ovl); > struct mgr_priv_data *mp; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", ovl->id); > + DSSDBG("%d", ovl->id); > > if (!op->extra_info_dirty) > return; > @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static void dss_mgr_write_regs(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr) > struct mgr_priv_data *mp = get_mgr_priv(mgr); > struct omap_overlay *ovl; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", mgr->id); > + DSSDBG("%d", mgr->id); > > if (!mp->enabled) > return; > @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static void dss_mgr_write_regs_extra(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr) > { > struct mgr_priv_data *mp = get_mgr_priv(mgr); > > - DSSDBGF("%d", mgr->id); > + DSSDBG("%d", mgr->id); > > if (!mp->extra_info_dirty) > return; > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c > index 8d815e3..8304cc6b 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c > @@ -1525,8 +1525,6 @@ int dsi_pll_set_clock_div(struct platform_device *dsidev, > u8 regn_start, regn_end, regm_start, regm_end; > u8 regm_dispc_start, regm_dispc_end, regm_dsi_start, regm_dsi_end; > > - DSSDBGF(); > - > dsi->current_cinfo.clkin = cinfo->clkin; > dsi->current_cinfo.fint = cinfo->fint; > dsi->current_cinfo.clkin4ddr = cinfo->clkin4ddr; > @@ -2334,8 +2332,6 @@ static int dsi_cio_init(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev) > int r; > u32 l; > > - DSSDBGF(); > - > r = dss_dsi_enable_pads(dsi->module_id, dsi_get_lane_mask(dssdev)); > if (r) > return r; > @@ -2686,7 +2682,7 @@ static void dsi_vc_initial_config(struct platform_device *dsidev, int channel) > { > u32 r; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", channel); > + DSSDBG("%d", channel); > > r = dsi_read_reg(dsidev, DSI_VC_CTRL(channel)); > > @@ -2718,7 +2714,7 @@ static int dsi_vc_config_source(struct platform_device *dsidev, int channel, > if (dsi->vc[channel].source == source) > return 0; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", channel); > + DSSDBG("%d", channel); > > dsi_sync_vc(dsidev, channel); > > @@ -3475,7 +3471,7 @@ static int dsi_enter_ulps(struct platform_device *dsidev) > int r, i; > unsigned mask; > > - DSSDBGF(); > + DSSDBG(""); This debug message is even less meaningful than the overlay number =). Again, I think either keep the DSSDBGF, or print something sensible, like "entering ULPS". > > WARN_ON(!dsi_bus_is_locked(dsidev)); > > @@ -4184,7 +4180,7 @@ int omapdss_dsi_set_clocks(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev, > unsigned long pck; > int r; > > - DSSDBGF("ddr_clk %lu, lp_clk %lu", ddr_clk, lp_clk); > + DSSDBG("ddr_clk %lu, lp_clk %lu", ddr_clk, lp_clk); > > mutex_lock(&dsi->lock); > > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h > index 5e9fd769..3a2caab 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h > +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h > @@ -29,38 +29,20 @@ > > #ifdef DEBUG > extern bool dss_debug; You still left the dss_debug option here, even if it's not used by the DSSDBG anymore. What's your plan about this? Tomi [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> To: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: Cleanup DSSDBG with dynamic pr_debug function Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:24:51 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1348554291.2342.8.camel@deskari> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1348552998-6596-1-git-send-email-cmahapatra@ti.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5314 bytes --] On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 11:33 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote: > The printk in DSSDBG function definition is replaced with dynamic debug enabled > pr_debug(). The use of dynamic debugging provides more flexiblity as each debug > statement can be enabled or disabled dynamically on basis of source filename, > line number, module name etc. by writing to a control file in debugfs > filesystem. For better undertsanding please refer to > Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt. > > The DSSDBGF() differs from DSSDBG() by providing function name. However, > function name, line number, module name and thread ID can be printed through > dynamic debug by setting appropiate flags 'f','l','m' and 't' in the debugfs > control file. So, DSSDBGF instances are replaced with DSSDBG. Typos with: flexiblity, undertsanding, appropiate. > Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com> > --- > drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c | 12 ++++-------- > drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h | 34 ++++++++-------------------------- > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c > index 6354bb8..cb86d94 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c > +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c > @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void dss_ovl_write_regs(struct omap_overlay *ovl) > struct mgr_priv_data *mp; > int r; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", ovl->id); > + DSSDBG("%d", ovl->id); I don't think this is good. It's true that dyn-debug can print the function name, but that's optional. The debug message should be somehow sensible independently, but in this case only a number is printed which is totally meaningless. Either the messages should be modified to give a hint what's going on, or the DSSDBGF could be kept for now. In the above case the debug message could be something like "writing ovl %d regs". However, I think it'd be easier just to keep the DSSDBGF for now, and remove it gradually. > if (!op->enabled || !op->info_dirty) > return; > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static void dss_ovl_write_regs_extra(struct omap_overlay *ovl) > struct ovl_priv_data *op = get_ovl_priv(ovl); > struct mgr_priv_data *mp; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", ovl->id); > + DSSDBG("%d", ovl->id); > > if (!op->extra_info_dirty) > return; > @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static void dss_mgr_write_regs(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr) > struct mgr_priv_data *mp = get_mgr_priv(mgr); > struct omap_overlay *ovl; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", mgr->id); > + DSSDBG("%d", mgr->id); > > if (!mp->enabled) > return; > @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static void dss_mgr_write_regs_extra(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr) > { > struct mgr_priv_data *mp = get_mgr_priv(mgr); > > - DSSDBGF("%d", mgr->id); > + DSSDBG("%d", mgr->id); > > if (!mp->extra_info_dirty) > return; > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c > index 8d815e3..8304cc6b 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c > @@ -1525,8 +1525,6 @@ int dsi_pll_set_clock_div(struct platform_device *dsidev, > u8 regn_start, regn_end, regm_start, regm_end; > u8 regm_dispc_start, regm_dispc_end, regm_dsi_start, regm_dsi_end; > > - DSSDBGF(); > - > dsi->current_cinfo.clkin = cinfo->clkin; > dsi->current_cinfo.fint = cinfo->fint; > dsi->current_cinfo.clkin4ddr = cinfo->clkin4ddr; > @@ -2334,8 +2332,6 @@ static int dsi_cio_init(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev) > int r; > u32 l; > > - DSSDBGF(); > - > r = dss_dsi_enable_pads(dsi->module_id, dsi_get_lane_mask(dssdev)); > if (r) > return r; > @@ -2686,7 +2682,7 @@ static void dsi_vc_initial_config(struct platform_device *dsidev, int channel) > { > u32 r; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", channel); > + DSSDBG("%d", channel); > > r = dsi_read_reg(dsidev, DSI_VC_CTRL(channel)); > > @@ -2718,7 +2714,7 @@ static int dsi_vc_config_source(struct platform_device *dsidev, int channel, > if (dsi->vc[channel].source == source) > return 0; > > - DSSDBGF("%d", channel); > + DSSDBG("%d", channel); > > dsi_sync_vc(dsidev, channel); > > @@ -3475,7 +3471,7 @@ static int dsi_enter_ulps(struct platform_device *dsidev) > int r, i; > unsigned mask; > > - DSSDBGF(); > + DSSDBG(""); This debug message is even less meaningful than the overlay number =). Again, I think either keep the DSSDBGF, or print something sensible, like "entering ULPS". > > WARN_ON(!dsi_bus_is_locked(dsidev)); > > @@ -4184,7 +4180,7 @@ int omapdss_dsi_set_clocks(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev, > unsigned long pck; > int r; > > - DSSDBGF("ddr_clk %lu, lp_clk %lu", ddr_clk, lp_clk); > + DSSDBG("ddr_clk %lu, lp_clk %lu", ddr_clk, lp_clk); > > mutex_lock(&dsi->lock); > > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h > index 5e9fd769..3a2caab 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h > +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h > @@ -29,38 +29,20 @@ > > #ifdef DEBUG > extern bool dss_debug; You still left the dss_debug option here, even if it's not used by the DSSDBG anymore. What's your plan about this? Tomi [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 6:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-09-25 6:03 [PATCH] OMAPDSS: Cleanup DSSDBG with dynamic pr_debug function Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-25 6:15 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-25 6:24 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message] 2012-09-25 6:24 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-25 9:30 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu 2012-09-25 9:42 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu 2012-09-25 9:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-25 9:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] OMAPDSS: Enable dynamic debug printing Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-26 5:27 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-26 5:15 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] OMAPDSS: Cleanup DSSDBG with dynamic pr_debug function Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-26 5:27 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-26 5:16 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] OMAPDSS: Remove dss_debug variable Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-26 5:28 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-26 14:29 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] OMAPDSS: Enable dynamic debug printing Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-26 14:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-27 10:50 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu 2012-09-27 10:50 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu 2012-09-27 11:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-27 11:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-28 10:23 ` [PATCH V3 0/3] " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-28 10:35 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-28 10:23 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] OMAPDSS: Move definition of DEBUG flag to Makefile Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-28 10:35 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-28 10:23 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] OMAPDSS: Cleanup DSSDBG with dynamic pr_debug function Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-28 10:35 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-28 11:22 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-28 11:22 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-28 11:30 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu 2012-09-28 11:42 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu 2012-09-28 11:37 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-28 11:37 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-28 10:23 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] OMAPDSS: Remove dss_debug variable Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-28 10:35 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-28 11:34 ` [PATCH V3 0/3] OMAPDSS: Enable dynamic debug printing Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-28 11:34 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-09-28 12:11 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu 2012-09-28 12:23 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu 2012-09-29 10:49 ` [PATCH V4 0/5] " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:51 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:49 ` [PATCH V4 1/5] OMAPDSS: Move definition of DEBUG flag to Makefile Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:51 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:49 ` [PATCH V4 2/5] OMAPDSS: Create new debug config options Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:52 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 15:15 ` Sumit Semwal 2012-09-29 15:27 ` Sumit Semwal 2012-10-01 7:48 ` [PATCH V5 " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-10-01 7:51 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:49 ` [PATCH V4 3/5] OMAPDSS: Cleanup DSSDBG with dynamic pr_debug function Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:52 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:49 ` [PATCH V4 4/5] OMAPDSS: Replace multi part debug prints with pr_debug Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:52 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-10-05 12:33 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-10-05 12:33 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-10-10 9:22 ` [PATCH V5 " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-10-10 9:34 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:49 ` [PATCH V4 5/5] OMAPDSS: Remove dss_debug variable Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-09-29 10:52 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra 2012-10-05 12:46 ` [PATCH V4 0/5] OMAPDSS: Enable dynamic debug printing Tomi Valkeinen 2012-10-05 12:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2012-10-10 10:26 ` Sumit Semwal 2012-10-10 10:38 ` Sumit Semwal
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1348554291.2342.8.camel@deskari \ --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \ --cc=cmahapatra@ti.com \ --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.