Re: [igt-dev] [PATH i-g-t v11 2/2] tests: add slice power programming test

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
	igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATH i-g-t v11 2/2] tests: add slice power programming test
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 13:00:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151852f9-36b4-cdec-58c0-d7b5e30cfc2e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153666635083.4253.10909960072957104960@skylake-alporthouse-com>

On 11/09/2018 12:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-09-11 12:34:17)
>> +igt_main
>> +{
>> +       unsigned int max_slices = 3, max_subslices = 3;
>> +       unsigned int i;
>> +       int fd;
>> +
>> +       igt_fixture {
>> +               fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> +               igt_require_gem(fd);
>> +
>> +               __intel_devid__ = intel_get_drm_devid(fd);
>> +               __intel_gen__ = intel_gen(__intel_devid__);
>> +
>> +               igt_require(kernel_has_per_context_sseu_support(fd));
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       igt_subtest_group {
>> +               igt_fixture {
>> +                       igt_require(!platform_has_per_context_sseu_support());
> 
> Why does the kernel say that the platform has context sseu support?

Note sure what are you aiming at. Here I have a subgroup of tests (well 
one) which test that the kernel and IGT expectation of which platforms 
should support the feature match.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx