From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, rob.herring@linaro.org, nm@ti.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, ta.omasab@gmail.com, khilman@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com, broonie@kernel.org, mike.turquette@linaro.org, Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, l.stach@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] opp: Add OPP sharing information to OPP library Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:50:58 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20150727032058.GI19944@linux> (raw) In-Reply-To: <55AD33F3.4000302@codeaurora.org> On 20-07-15, 10:46, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >+static struct device_opp *_managed_opp(const struct device_node *np) > >+{ > >+ struct device_opp *dev_opp; > >+ > >+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(dev_opp, &dev_opp_list, node) > >+ if (dev_opp->np == np) { > >+ /* > >+ * Multiple devices can point to the same OPP table and > >+ * so will have same node-pointer, np. > >+ * > >+ * But the OPPs will be considered as shared only if the > >+ * OPP table contains a "opp-shared" property. > >+ */ > >+ if (dev_opp->shared_opp) > >+ return dev_opp; > >+ else > >+ return NULL; > >+ > > The janitors will probably find this and say that it could be > simplified to an if () and a return without the else. And I am trying to make the janitors happy with this: diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c index eb920e3f115b..8c81784fe473 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static struct device_opp *_managed_opp(const struct device_node *np) { struct device_opp *dev_opp; - list_for_each_entry_rcu(dev_opp, &dev_opp_list, node) + list_for_each_entry_rcu(dev_opp, &dev_opp_list, node) { if (dev_opp->np == np) { /* * Multiple devices can point to the same OPP table and @@ -177,11 +177,9 @@ static struct device_opp *_managed_opp(const struct device_node *np) * But the OPPs will be considered as shared only if the * OPP table contains a "opp-shared" property. */ - if (dev_opp->shared_opp) - return dev_opp; - else - return NULL; + return dev_opp->shared_opp ? dev_opp : NULL; } + } return NULL; } -- viresh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 07/10] opp: Add OPP sharing information to OPP library Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:50:58 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20150727032058.GI19944@linux> (raw) In-Reply-To: <55AD33F3.4000302@codeaurora.org> On 20-07-15, 10:46, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >+static struct device_opp *_managed_opp(const struct device_node *np) > >+{ > >+ struct device_opp *dev_opp; > >+ > >+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(dev_opp, &dev_opp_list, node) > >+ if (dev_opp->np == np) { > >+ /* > >+ * Multiple devices can point to the same OPP table and > >+ * so will have same node-pointer, np. > >+ * > >+ * But the OPPs will be considered as shared only if the > >+ * OPP table contains a "opp-shared" property. > >+ */ > >+ if (dev_opp->shared_opp) > >+ return dev_opp; > >+ else > >+ return NULL; > >+ > > The janitors will probably find this and say that it could be > simplified to an if () and a return without the else. And I am trying to make the janitors happy with this: diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c index eb920e3f115b..8c81784fe473 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static struct device_opp *_managed_opp(const struct device_node *np) { struct device_opp *dev_opp; - list_for_each_entry_rcu(dev_opp, &dev_opp_list, node) + list_for_each_entry_rcu(dev_opp, &dev_opp_list, node) { if (dev_opp->np == np) { /* * Multiple devices can point to the same OPP table and @@ -177,11 +177,9 @@ static struct device_opp *_managed_opp(const struct device_node *np) * But the OPPs will be considered as shared only if the * OPP table contains a "opp-shared" property. */ - if (dev_opp->shared_opp) - return dev_opp; - else - return NULL; + return dev_opp->shared_opp ? dev_opp : NULL; } + } return NULL; } -- viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 3:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-06-15 11:57 [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] opp: Relocate few routines Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-24 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] OPP: Create _remove_device_opp() for freeing dev_opp Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-24 17:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] OPP: Allocate dev_opp from _add_device_opp() Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-03 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-03 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-06 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-06 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-24 17:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] OPP: Break _opp_add_dynamic() into smaller functions Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-24 17:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] opp: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:13 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:13 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 6:38 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 6:38 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 16:07 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 16:07 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-03 6:08 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-03 6:08 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-08 13:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-08 13:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-09 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-24 18:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 18:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-28 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-28 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-29 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-29 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] OPP: Add clock-latency-ns support Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:27 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:27 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] opp: Add OPP sharing information to OPP library Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 22:51 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-17 22:51 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-18 6:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-18 6:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-20 17:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-20 17:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-21 2:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-21 2:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:20 ` Viresh Kumar [this message] 2015-07-27 3:20 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] OPP: Add support for opp-suspend Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-17 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-18 6:32 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-18 6:32 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] opp: Add helpers for initializing CPU OPPs Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq-dt: Add support for operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-09 16:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 16:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 16:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 16:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-15 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-15 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-30 16:44 ` [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support " Viresh Kumar 2015-06-30 16:44 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 2:36 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 2:36 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20150727032058.GI19944@linux \ --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \ --cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \ --cc=khilman@linaro.org \ --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \ --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mike.turquette@linaro.org \ --cc=nm@ti.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \ --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \ --cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \ --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \ --cc=viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.