From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, rob.herring@linaro.org, nm@ti.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, mike.turquette@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org, l.stach@pengutronix.de, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ta.omasab@gmail.com, kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com, khilman@linaro.org, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] opp: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 15:41:34 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <2910042.ys2zsBBKt2@amdc1976> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1b5a393f2162752cbb773956dff15739e7525a1d.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Hi, On Monday, June 15, 2015 05:27:31 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > This adds support in OPP library to parse and create list of OPPs from > operating-points-v2 bindings. It takes care of most of the properties of > new bindings (except shared-opp, which will be handled separately). > > For backward compatibility, we keep supporting earlier bindings. We try > to search for the new bindings first, in case they aren't present we > look for the old deprecated ones. > > There are few things marked as TODO: > - Support for multiple OPP tables > - Support for multiple regulators > > They should be fixed separately. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/base/power/opp.c | 238 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 213 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c > index 2ac48ff9c1ef..3198c3e77224 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c [...] > @@ -675,6 +692,100 @@ static int _opp_add_dynamic(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, > } > > /** > + * _opp_add_static_v2() - Allocate static OPPs (As per 'v2' DT bindings) > + * @dev: device for which we do this operation > + * @np: device node > + * > + * This function adds an opp definition to the opp list and returns status. The > + * opp can be controlled using dev_pm_opp_enable/disable functions and may be > + * removed by dev_pm_opp_remove. > + * > + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. > + * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks > + * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure > + * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where > + * mutex cannot be locked. > + * > + * Return: > + * 0 On success OR > + * Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and opp->available > + * -EEXIST Freq are same and volt are different OR > + * Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and !opp->available > + * -ENOMEM Memory allocation failure > + * -EINVAL Failed parsing the OPP node > + */ > +static int _opp_add_static_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) > +{ > + struct device_opp *dev_opp; > + struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp; > + int ret; > + > + /* Hold our list modification lock here */ > + mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); > + > + new_opp = _allocate_opp(dev, &dev_opp); > + if (!new_opp) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto unlock; > + } > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "opp-hz", (u32 *)&new_opp->rate); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "%s: opp-hz not found\n", __func__); > + goto free_opp; > + } Isn't using u32 for storing frequency (in Hz) too small by today's standards? [ Please note that the old v1 binding uses kHz not Hz. ] Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b.zolnierkie@samsung.com (Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 05/10] opp: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 15:41:34 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <2910042.ys2zsBBKt2@amdc1976> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1b5a393f2162752cbb773956dff15739e7525a1d.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Hi, On Monday, June 15, 2015 05:27:31 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > This adds support in OPP library to parse and create list of OPPs from > operating-points-v2 bindings. It takes care of most of the properties of > new bindings (except shared-opp, which will be handled separately). > > For backward compatibility, we keep supporting earlier bindings. We try > to search for the new bindings first, in case they aren't present we > look for the old deprecated ones. > > There are few things marked as TODO: > - Support for multiple OPP tables > - Support for multiple regulators > > They should be fixed separately. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/base/power/opp.c | 238 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 213 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c > index 2ac48ff9c1ef..3198c3e77224 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c [...] > @@ -675,6 +692,100 @@ static int _opp_add_dynamic(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, > } > > /** > + * _opp_add_static_v2() - Allocate static OPPs (As per 'v2' DT bindings) > + * @dev: device for which we do this operation > + * @np: device node > + * > + * This function adds an opp definition to the opp list and returns status. The > + * opp can be controlled using dev_pm_opp_enable/disable functions and may be > + * removed by dev_pm_opp_remove. > + * > + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. > + * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks > + * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure > + * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where > + * mutex cannot be locked. > + * > + * Return: > + * 0 On success OR > + * Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and opp->available > + * -EEXIST Freq are same and volt are different OR > + * Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and !opp->available > + * -ENOMEM Memory allocation failure > + * -EINVAL Failed parsing the OPP node > + */ > +static int _opp_add_static_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) > +{ > + struct device_opp *dev_opp; > + struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp; > + int ret; > + > + /* Hold our list modification lock here */ > + mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); > + > + new_opp = _allocate_opp(dev, &dev_opp); > + if (!new_opp) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto unlock; > + } > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "opp-hz", (u32 *)&new_opp->rate); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "%s: opp-hz not found\n", __func__); > + goto free_opp; > + } Isn't using u32 for storing frequency (in Hz) too small by today's standards? [ Please note that the old v1 binding uses kHz not Hz. ] Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 13:41 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-06-15 11:57 [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] opp: Relocate few routines Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-24 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] OPP: Create _remove_device_opp() for freeing dev_opp Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-24 17:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] OPP: Allocate dev_opp from _add_device_opp() Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-03 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-03 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-06 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-06 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-24 17:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] OPP: Break _opp_add_dynamic() into smaller functions Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-24 17:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] opp: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:13 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:13 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 6:38 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 6:38 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 16:07 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 16:07 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-03 6:08 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-03 6:08 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-08 13:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message] 2015-07-08 13:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-09 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-24 18:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 18:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-28 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-28 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-29 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-29 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] OPP: Add clock-latency-ns support Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:27 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:27 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] opp: Add OPP sharing information to OPP library Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 22:51 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-17 22:51 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-18 6:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-18 6:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-20 17:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-20 17:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-21 2:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-21 2:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:20 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:20 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] OPP: Add support for opp-suspend Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-17 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-18 6:32 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-18 6:32 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] opp: Add helpers for initializing CPU OPPs Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq-dt: Add support for operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-09 16:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 16:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 16:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 16:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-15 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-15 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-30 16:44 ` [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support " Viresh Kumar 2015-06-30 16:44 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 2:36 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 2:36 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=2910042.ys2zsBBKt2@amdc1976 \ --to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \ --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \ --cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \ --cc=khilman@linaro.org \ --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \ --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mike.turquette@linaro.org \ --cc=nm@ti.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \ --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \ --cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \ --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \ --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --cc=viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.