All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, axboe@fb.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:38:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160704083849.GA3585@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160704081540.GA2783@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:15:41AM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:59:04PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +static int blk_mq_create_mq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> > +		const struct cpumask *affinity_mask)
> > +{
> > +	int queue = -1, cpu = 0;
> > +
> > +	set->mq_map = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*set->mq_map) * nr_cpu_ids,
> > +			GFP_KERNEL, set->numa_node);
> > +	if (!set->mq_map)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	if (!affinity_mask)
> > +		return 0;	/* map all cpus to queue 0 */
> > +
> > +	/* If cpus are offline, map them to first hctx */
> > +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > +		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, affinity_mask))
> > +			queue++;
> 
> CPUs missing in an affinity mask are mapped to hctxs. Is that intended?

Yes - each CPU needs to be mapped to some hctx, otherwise we can't
submit I/O from that CPU.

> > +		if (queue > 0)
> 
> Why this check?
> 
> > +			set->mq_map[cpu] = queue;

mq_map is initialized to zero already, so we don't really need the
assignment for queue 0.  The reason why this check exists is because
we start with queue = -1 and we never want to assignment -1 to mq_map.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 11/13] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:38:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160704083849.GA3585@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160704081540.GA2783@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016@10:15:41AM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016@09:59:04PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +static int blk_mq_create_mq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> > +		const struct cpumask *affinity_mask)
> > +{
> > +	int queue = -1, cpu = 0;
> > +
> > +	set->mq_map = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*set->mq_map) * nr_cpu_ids,
> > +			GFP_KERNEL, set->numa_node);
> > +	if (!set->mq_map)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	if (!affinity_mask)
> > +		return 0;	/* map all cpus to queue 0 */
> > +
> > +	/* If cpus are offline, map them to first hctx */
> > +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > +		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, affinity_mask))
> > +			queue++;
> 
> CPUs missing in an affinity mask are mapped to hctxs. Is that intended?

Yes - each CPU needs to be mapped to some hctx, otherwise we can't
submit I/O from that CPU.

> > +		if (queue > 0)
> 
> Why this check?
> 
> > +			set->mq_map[cpu] = queue;

mq_map is initialized to zero already, so we don't really need the
assignment for queue 0.  The reason why this check exists is because
we start with queue = -1 and we never want to assignment -1 to mq_map.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-04  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-14 19:58 automatic interrupt affinity for MSI/MSI-X capable devices V2 Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58 ` [PATCH 01/13] irq/msi: Remove unused MSI_FLAG_IDENTITY_MAP Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-16  9:05   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-16  9:05     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-14 19:58 ` [PATCH 02/13] irq: Introduce IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED flag Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15  8:44   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15  8:44     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 10:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 10:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 10:42       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 10:42         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 10:42         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 15:14         ` Keith Busch
2016-06-15 15:14           ` Keith Busch
2016-06-15 15:28           ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 15:28             ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 16:03             ` Keith Busch
2016-06-15 16:03               ` Keith Busch
2016-06-15 19:36               ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 19:36                 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 20:06                 ` Keith Busch
2016-06-15 20:06                   ` Keith Busch
2016-06-15 20:12                   ` Keith Busch
2016-06-15 20:12                     ` Keith Busch
2016-06-15 20:50                     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 20:50                       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-16 15:19                       ` Keith Busch
2016-06-16 15:19                         ` Keith Busch
2016-06-22 11:56                         ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-22 11:56                           ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-22 11:56                           ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-16 15:20                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-16 15:20                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-16 15:39                   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-16 15:39                     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-20 12:22                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20 12:22                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20 12:22                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20 13:21                       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-20 13:21                         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-20 13:21                         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-21 14:31                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-21 14:31                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-21 14:31                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-16  9:08   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-16  9:08     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-14 19:58 ` [PATCH 03/13] irq: Add affinity hint to irq allocation Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58 ` [PATCH 04/13] irq: Use affinity hint in irqdesc allocation Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58 ` [PATCH 05/13] irq/msi: Make use of affinity aware allocations Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58 ` [PATCH 06/13] irq: add a helper spread an affinity mask for MSI/MSI-X vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 21:54   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-06-14 21:54     ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-06-15  8:35     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15  8:35       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15  8:35       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-15 10:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 10:10       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 13:09       ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-06-15 13:09         ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-06-16 15:16         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-16 15:16           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-25 20:05   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-25 20:05     ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-30 17:48     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-30 17:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-30 17:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-01  7:25       ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-01  7:25         ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-14 19:59 ` [PATCH 07/13] pci: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-23 11:16   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-23 11:16     ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-30 16:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-30 16:54       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-30 17:28       ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-30 17:28         ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-30 17:35         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-30 17:35           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59 ` [PATCH 08/13] pci: spread interrupt vectors in pci_alloc_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-25 20:22   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-25 20:22     ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-14 19:59 ` [PATCH 09/13] blk-mq: don't redistribute hardware queues on a CPU hotplug event Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59 ` [PATCH 10/13] blk-mq: only allocate a single mq_map per tag_set Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59 ` [PATCH 11/13] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:15   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-04  8:15     ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-04  8:38     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-07-04  8:38       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  9:35       ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-04  9:35         ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-10  3:41         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-10  3:41           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-12  6:42           ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-12  6:42             ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-14 19:59 ` [PATCH 12/13] nvme: switch to use pci_alloc_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59 ` [PATCH 13/13] nvme: remove the post_scan callout Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-16  9:45 ` automatic interrupt affinity for MSI/MSI-X capable devices V2 Bart Van Assche
2016-06-16  9:45   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-16  9:45   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-16 15:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-16 15:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-26 19:40 ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-26 19:40   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-04  8:39 automatic interrupt affinity for MSI/MSI-X capable devices V3 Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 11/13] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:39   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160704083849.GA3585@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.