From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>, g@intel.com Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@selhorst.net>, "moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" <tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm_crb: map locality registers Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 21:21:00 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20161011182100.GC6900@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20161011170143.GC6881@obsidianresearch.com> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:01:43AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:23:04PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > In order to provide access to locality registers, this commits adds > > mapping of the head of the CRB registers, which are located right > > before the control area. > > I think you should squash this into the prior patch, no sense in > changing all these lines twice > > But looks better to me. So... do you suggest to squash with request/reliquish locality stuff? Just checking because this is 1/3 :) > > - priv->cca = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, buf->control_address, > > - sizeof(struct crb_control_area)); > > - if (IS_ERR(priv->cca)) > > - return PTR_ERR(priv->cca); > > + if (priv->flags & CRB_FL_CRB_START) { > > + priv->regs_h = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, io_res.start, > > + sizeof(struct crb_regs_head)); > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->regs_h)) > > + return PTR_ERR(priv->regs_h); > > + } > > + > > + priv->regs_t = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, buf->control_address, > > + sizeof(struct crb_regs_tail)); > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->regs_t)) > > + return PTR_ERR(priv->regs_t); > > So.. The ACPI IO region starts at the head area and continues to > include the control area, as one nice sane region - except for some > older stuff that puts the control area outside the ACPI IO region? Yes. The old hardware triggered SMM to do a DMA transfer (those that so called ACPI start). As a workaround for some of the hardware the driver always sets the CRB start flag also in the control area. That's why I also propose that we replace them with a single flag. > That makes a lot more sense.. > > Maybe chuck in a > > if (priv->flags & CRB_FL_CRB_START) { > if (buf->control_address != io_res.start + sizeof(struct > crb_regs_head)) > dev_warn(dev, FIRMWARE_BUG "Bad ACPI memory layout") > > Jason As a sanity check this would probably make sense. /Jarkko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>, g@intel.com Cc: "moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" <tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>, open list <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm_crb: map locality registers Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 21:21:00 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20161011182100.GC6900@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20161011170143.GC6881-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:01:43AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:23:04PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > In order to provide access to locality registers, this commits adds > > mapping of the head of the CRB registers, which are located right > > before the control area. > > I think you should squash this into the prior patch, no sense in > changing all these lines twice > > But looks better to me. So... do you suggest to squash with request/reliquish locality stuff? Just checking because this is 1/3 :) > > - priv->cca = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, buf->control_address, > > - sizeof(struct crb_control_area)); > > - if (IS_ERR(priv->cca)) > > - return PTR_ERR(priv->cca); > > + if (priv->flags & CRB_FL_CRB_START) { > > + priv->regs_h = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, io_res.start, > > + sizeof(struct crb_regs_head)); > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->regs_h)) > > + return PTR_ERR(priv->regs_h); > > + } > > + > > + priv->regs_t = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, buf->control_address, > > + sizeof(struct crb_regs_tail)); > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->regs_t)) > > + return PTR_ERR(priv->regs_t); > > So.. The ACPI IO region starts at the head area and continues to > include the control area, as one nice sane region - except for some > older stuff that puts the control area outside the ACPI IO region? Yes. The old hardware triggered SMM to do a DMA transfer (those that so called ACPI start). As a workaround for some of the hardware the driver always sets the CRB start flag also in the control area. That's why I also propose that we replace them with a single flag. > That makes a lot more sense.. > > Maybe chuck in a > > if (priv->flags & CRB_FL_CRB_START) { > if (buf->control_address != io_res.start + sizeof(struct > crb_regs_head)) > dev_warn(dev, FIRMWARE_BUG "Bad ACPI memory layout") > > Jason As a sanity check this would probably make sense. /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-11 18:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-10-11 9:23 [PATCH 0/3] Locality support for the CRB driver Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 9:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 9:23 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] tpm_crb: expand struct crb_control_area to struct crb_regs Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 9:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 9:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] tpm_crb: map locality registers Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 9:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 11:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 11:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 17:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2016-10-11 17:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2016-10-11 18:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message] 2016-10-11 18:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 18:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2016-10-11 18:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2016-10-11 19:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 19:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 9:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] tpm_crb: encapsulate crb_wait_for_reg_32 Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 9:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 10:21 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Winkler, Tomas 2016-10-11 10:21 ` Winkler, Tomas 2016-10-11 11:29 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 11:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 9:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] tpm_crb: request and relinquish locality 0 Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-11 9:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20161011182100.GC6900@intel.com \ --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=g@intel.com \ --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \ --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \ --cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.