All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Cc: g@intel.com, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@selhorst.net>,
	"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" 
	<tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm_crb: map locality registers
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:48:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161011194859.GA11477@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161011182922.GB20253@obsidianresearch.com>

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:29:22PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:01:43AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:23:04PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > In order to provide access to locality registers, this commits adds
> > > > mapping of the head of the CRB registers, which are located right
> > > > before the control area.
> > > 
> > > I think you should squash this into the prior patch, no sense in
> > > changing all these lines twice
> > > 
> > > But looks better to me.
> > 
> > So... do you suggest to squash with request/reliquish locality stuff?
> > Just checking because this is 1/3 :)
> 
> Hm, maybe my mailer went wrong, but I saw the original patch right
> before this one.. Never mind

I did format-patch -o to the same folder where I had the first series so
I posted the RFC patches by accident. Sorry. Should always do --dry-run.

> Jason

/Jarkko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe
	<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Cc: g@intel.com,
	"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER"
	<tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm_crb: map locality registers
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:48:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161011194859.GA11477@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161011182922.GB20253-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:29:22PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:01:43AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:23:04PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > In order to provide access to locality registers, this commits adds
> > > > mapping of the head of the CRB registers, which are located right
> > > > before the control area.
> > > 
> > > I think you should squash this into the prior patch, no sense in
> > > changing all these lines twice
> > > 
> > > But looks better to me.
> > 
> > So... do you suggest to squash with request/reliquish locality stuff?
> > Just checking because this is 1/3 :)
> 
> Hm, maybe my mailer went wrong, but I saw the original patch right
> before this one.. Never mind

I did format-patch -o to the same folder where I had the first series so
I posted the RFC patches by accident. Sorry. Should always do --dry-run.

> Jason

/Jarkko

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-11 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-11  9:23 [PATCH 0/3] Locality support for the CRB driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11  9:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11  9:23 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] tpm_crb: expand struct crb_control_area to struct crb_regs Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11  9:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11  9:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] tpm_crb: map locality registers Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11  9:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11 11:25   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11 11:25     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11 17:01   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-11 17:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-11 18:21     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11 18:21       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11 18:29       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-11 18:29         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-11 19:48         ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2016-10-11 19:48           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11  9:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] tpm_crb: encapsulate crb_wait_for_reg_32 Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11  9:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11 10:21   ` [tpmdd-devel] " Winkler, Tomas
2016-10-11 10:21     ` Winkler, Tomas
2016-10-11 11:29     ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11 11:29       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11  9:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] tpm_crb: request and relinquish locality 0 Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-11  9:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161011194859.GA11477@intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=g@intel.com \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.