From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pcie-rockchip: use probe_err helpers instead of open coding
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 13:42:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201812221357.HUtdYMbm%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181221083238.10020-1-a.hajda@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6047 bytes --]
Hi Andrzej,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on rockchip/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.20-rc7]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrzej-Hajda/PCI-pcie-rockchip-use-probe_err-helpers-instead-of-open-coding/20181222-044838
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git for-next
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=8.1.0 make.cross ARCH=ia64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c: In function 'rockchip_pcie_parse_dt':
>> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c:73:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'probe_err_ptr'; did you mean 'probe_irq_off'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->core_rst,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
probe_irq_off
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +73 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
24
25 int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
26 {
27 struct device *dev = rockchip->dev;
28 struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
29 struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
30 struct resource *regs;
31 int err;
32
33 if (rockchip->is_rc) {
34 regs = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
35 IORESOURCE_MEM,
36 "axi-base");
37 rockchip->reg_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, regs);
38 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->reg_base))
39 return PTR_ERR(rockchip->reg_base);
40 } else {
41 rockchip->mem_res =
42 platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
43 "mem-base");
44 if (!rockchip->mem_res)
45 return -EINVAL;
46 }
47
48 regs = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
49 "apb-base");
50 rockchip->apb_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, regs);
51 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->apb_base))
52 return PTR_ERR(rockchip->apb_base);
53
54 err = rockchip_pcie_get_phys(rockchip);
55 if (err)
56 return err;
57
58 rockchip->lanes = 1;
59 err = of_property_read_u32(node, "num-lanes", &rockchip->lanes);
60 if (!err && (rockchip->lanes == 0 ||
61 rockchip->lanes == 3 ||
62 rockchip->lanes > 4)) {
63 dev_warn(dev, "invalid num-lanes, default to use one lane\n");
64 rockchip->lanes = 1;
65 }
66
67 rockchip->link_gen = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(node);
68 if (rockchip->link_gen < 0 || rockchip->link_gen > 2)
69 rockchip->link_gen = 2;
70
71 rockchip->core_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "core");
72 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->core_rst))
> 73 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->core_rst,
74 "missing core reset property in node\n");
75
76 rockchip->mgmt_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "mgmt");
77 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_rst))
78 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->mgmt_rst,
79 "missing mgmt reset property in node\n");
80
81 rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev,
82 "mgmt-sticky");
83 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst))
84 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst,
85 "missing mgmt-sticky reset property in node\n");
86
87 rockchip->pipe_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pipe");
88 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->pipe_rst))
89 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->pipe_rst,
90 "missing pipe reset property in node\n");
91
92 rockchip->pm_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pm");
93 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->pm_rst))
94 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->pm_rst,
95 "missing pm reset property in node\n");
96
97 rockchip->pclk_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pclk");
98 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->pclk_rst))
99 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->pclk_rst,
100 "missing pclk reset property in node\n");
101
102 rockchip->aclk_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "aclk");
103 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->aclk_rst))
104 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->aclk_rst,
105 "missing aclk reset property in node\n");
106
107 if (rockchip->is_rc) {
108 rockchip->ep_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "ep", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
109 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->ep_gpio))
110 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->ep_gpio,
111 "missing ep-gpios property in node\n");
112 }
113
114 rockchip->aclk_pcie = devm_clk_get(dev, "aclk");
115 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->aclk_pcie))
116 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->aclk_pcie,
117 "aclk clock not found\n");
118
119 rockchip->aclk_perf_pcie = devm_clk_get(dev, "aclk-perf");
120 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->aclk_perf_pcie))
121 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->aclk_perf_pcie,
122 "aclk_perf clock not found\n");
123
124 rockchip->hclk_pcie = devm_clk_get(dev, "hclk");
125 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->hclk_pcie))
126 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->hclk_pcie,
127 "hclk clock not found\n");
128
129 rockchip->clk_pcie_pm = devm_clk_get(dev, "pm");
130 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->clk_pcie_pm))
131 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->clk_pcie_pm,
132 "pm clock not found\n");
133
134 return 0;
135 }
136 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rockchip_pcie_parse_dt);
137
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 52333 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
kbuild-all@01.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pcie-rockchip: use probe_err helpers instead of open coding
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 13:42:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201812221357.HUtdYMbm%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181221083238.10020-1-a.hajda@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6047 bytes --]
Hi Andrzej,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on rockchip/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.20-rc7]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrzej-Hajda/PCI-pcie-rockchip-use-probe_err-helpers-instead-of-open-coding/20181222-044838
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git for-next
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=8.1.0 make.cross ARCH=ia64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c: In function 'rockchip_pcie_parse_dt':
>> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c:73:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'probe_err_ptr'; did you mean 'probe_irq_off'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->core_rst,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
probe_irq_off
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +73 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
24
25 int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
26 {
27 struct device *dev = rockchip->dev;
28 struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
29 struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
30 struct resource *regs;
31 int err;
32
33 if (rockchip->is_rc) {
34 regs = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
35 IORESOURCE_MEM,
36 "axi-base");
37 rockchip->reg_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, regs);
38 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->reg_base))
39 return PTR_ERR(rockchip->reg_base);
40 } else {
41 rockchip->mem_res =
42 platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
43 "mem-base");
44 if (!rockchip->mem_res)
45 return -EINVAL;
46 }
47
48 regs = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
49 "apb-base");
50 rockchip->apb_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, regs);
51 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->apb_base))
52 return PTR_ERR(rockchip->apb_base);
53
54 err = rockchip_pcie_get_phys(rockchip);
55 if (err)
56 return err;
57
58 rockchip->lanes = 1;
59 err = of_property_read_u32(node, "num-lanes", &rockchip->lanes);
60 if (!err && (rockchip->lanes == 0 ||
61 rockchip->lanes == 3 ||
62 rockchip->lanes > 4)) {
63 dev_warn(dev, "invalid num-lanes, default to use one lane\n");
64 rockchip->lanes = 1;
65 }
66
67 rockchip->link_gen = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(node);
68 if (rockchip->link_gen < 0 || rockchip->link_gen > 2)
69 rockchip->link_gen = 2;
70
71 rockchip->core_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "core");
72 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->core_rst))
> 73 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->core_rst,
74 "missing core reset property in node\n");
75
76 rockchip->mgmt_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "mgmt");
77 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_rst))
78 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->mgmt_rst,
79 "missing mgmt reset property in node\n");
80
81 rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev,
82 "mgmt-sticky");
83 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst))
84 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst,
85 "missing mgmt-sticky reset property in node\n");
86
87 rockchip->pipe_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pipe");
88 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->pipe_rst))
89 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->pipe_rst,
90 "missing pipe reset property in node\n");
91
92 rockchip->pm_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pm");
93 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->pm_rst))
94 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->pm_rst,
95 "missing pm reset property in node\n");
96
97 rockchip->pclk_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pclk");
98 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->pclk_rst))
99 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->pclk_rst,
100 "missing pclk reset property in node\n");
101
102 rockchip->aclk_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "aclk");
103 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->aclk_rst))
104 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->aclk_rst,
105 "missing aclk reset property in node\n");
106
107 if (rockchip->is_rc) {
108 rockchip->ep_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "ep", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
109 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->ep_gpio))
110 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->ep_gpio,
111 "missing ep-gpios property in node\n");
112 }
113
114 rockchip->aclk_pcie = devm_clk_get(dev, "aclk");
115 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->aclk_pcie))
116 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->aclk_pcie,
117 "aclk clock not found\n");
118
119 rockchip->aclk_perf_pcie = devm_clk_get(dev, "aclk-perf");
120 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->aclk_perf_pcie))
121 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->aclk_perf_pcie,
122 "aclk_perf clock not found\n");
123
124 rockchip->hclk_pcie = devm_clk_get(dev, "hclk");
125 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->hclk_pcie))
126 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->hclk_pcie,
127 "hclk clock not found\n");
128
129 rockchip->clk_pcie_pm = devm_clk_get(dev, "pm");
130 if (IS_ERR(rockchip->clk_pcie_pm))
131 return probe_err_ptr(dev, rockchip->clk_pcie_pm,
132 "pm clock not found\n");
133
134 return 0;
135 }
136 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rockchip_pcie_parse_dt);
137
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 52333 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-22 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20181220102258eucas1p1ca5abb0b48d1f13d9234a4a7702a13da@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-12-20 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] driver core: add probe error check helper Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 10:22 ` Andrzej Hajda
[not found] ` <CGME20181220102259eucas1p2f748c68e01cd4e09a266da879722e218@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-12-20 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] driver core: add probe_err log helper Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 10:22 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 10:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-12-20 10:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-12-20 11:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-12-20 11:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-12-20 11:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 11:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-21 22:47 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-21 22:47 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-22 7:24 ` [PATCH] driver core: platform: Add an error message to platform_get_irq*() Stephen Boyd
2018-12-22 7:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-22 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-22 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-28 21:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-28 21:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-24 9:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] driver core: add probe_err log helper Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-24 9:29 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-28 21:56 ` [PATCH v2] driver core: platform: Add an error message to platform_get_irq*() Stephen Boyd
2018-12-28 21:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-30 10:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-12-30 10:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-01-02 18:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-02 18:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-02 18:51 ` [PATCH v3] " Stephen Boyd
2019-01-02 18:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-03 9:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-03 9:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-03 16:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-03 16:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-03 17:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-03 17:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-03 17:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-03 17:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-03 17:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-03 17:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-03 17:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-01-03 17:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <CGME20181220102259eucas1p1884a0b68ce342239c2a43a74cc50725a@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-12-20 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] driver core: add deferring probe reason to devices_deferred property Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 10:22 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-12-20 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-12-20 12:27 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 12:27 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 11:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-12-20 11:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-12-20 11:51 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 11:51 ` Andrzej Hajda
[not found] ` <CGME20181220102300eucas1p210735c7753688a52a73ccf026884dd11@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-12-20 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] driver core: add probe_err_ptr helper Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 10:22 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-20 11:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-12-20 11:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-12-20 11:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-12-20 11:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <CGME20181221083246eucas1p22cade911a455344d351db6060d39ddce@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-12-21 8:32 ` [PATCH] PCI: pcie-rockchip: use probe_err helpers instead of open coding Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-21 8:32 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-12-22 5:42 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-12-22 5:42 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201812221357.HUtdYMbm%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.