All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	f.fainelli@gmail.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	orsonzhai@gmail.com, baolin.wang@linaro.org,
	zhang.lyra@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Unify SPI delays into an `struct spi_delay`
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:22:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190915112205.0007d62d@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190913114550.956-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:45:35 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:

> Initially, I started this patchset thinking: "we need a new delay for
> something-something" (in case someone is curios, we need a CS-hold-time for
> the first transfer, because the CS wakes a chip from sleep-mode).
> 
> Then I added the delay, and felt a bit dirty-inside about adding a new one
> (just like that), and decided to look at maybe cleaning things up a bit,
> and a few days later, I got here.
> 
> Full disclaimer: this patchset is not complete. It's an RFC.
> It's based on top of Jonathan's `iio/togreg` branch which also includes the
> ADIS driver library changes and also includes `cs_change_delay`.
> 
> I'll send a V2 patchset, which just the first 4 patches, since I feel that
> those are a bit more complete.
> 
> I thought about just sending the first 4 patches on-their-own, but I
> figured that the whole series (even if not complete) serves as a better
> explanation about the whole "why?".
> 
> Hopefully, this can sort-of-explain things.
> I'll reference this RFC on the next series.

General approach looks sensible to me. Over to SPI specialists on
whether this is a sensible bit of unification to do.

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Alexandru Ardelean (15):
>   spi: move `cs_change_delay` backwards compat logic outside switch
>   spi: introduce spi_delay struct as "value + unit" &  spi_delay_exec()
>   spi: make `cs_change_delay` the first user of the `spi_delay` logic
>   iio: imu: adis: convert cs_change_delay to spi_delay struct
>   spi: sprd: convert transfer word delay to spi_delay struct
>   spi: orion: use new `word_delay` field for SPI transfers
>   spi: spidev: use new `word_delay` field for spi transfers
>   spi: core,atmel: convert `word_delay_usecs` -> `word_delay` for
>     spi_device
>   spi: introduce `delay` field for `spi_transfer` + spi_transfer_exec()
>   spi: use new `spi_transfer_delay` helper where straightforward
>   spi: tegra114: use `spi_transfer_delay` helper
>   spi: spi-loopback-test: use new `delay` field
>   spi: spidev: use new `delay` field for spi transfers
>   spi: tegra114: change format for `spi_set_cs_timing()` function
>   spi: implement SW control for CS times
> 
>  drivers/iio/imu/adis.c           |  24 ++---
>  drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c          |  29 +++++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c  |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-cavium.c         |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c       |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c       |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c        |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c  |  12 ++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-mpc512x-psc.c    |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx-psc.c    |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-omap-100k.c      |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-orion.c          |   6 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c          |  25 +++--
>  drivers/spi/spi-sc18is602.c      |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-sh-hspi.c        |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c           |  11 ++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c       |  39 +++++---
>  drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-sflash.c |   2 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c   |   7 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-txx9.c           |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-xcomm.c          |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi.c                | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/spi/spidev.c             |   6 +-
>  include/linux/spi/spi.h          |  65 ++++++++++---
>  24 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>,
	<f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	<orsonzhai@gmail.com>, <baolin.wang@linaro.org>,
	<zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Unify SPI delays into an `struct spi_delay`
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:22:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190915112205.0007d62d@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190913114550.956-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:45:35 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:

> Initially, I started this patchset thinking: "we need a new delay for
> something-something" (in case someone is curios, we need a CS-hold-time for
> the first transfer, because the CS wakes a chip from sleep-mode).
> 
> Then I added the delay, and felt a bit dirty-inside about adding a new one
> (just like that), and decided to look at maybe cleaning things up a bit,
> and a few days later, I got here.
> 
> Full disclaimer: this patchset is not complete. It's an RFC.
> It's based on top of Jonathan's `iio/togreg` branch which also includes the
> ADIS driver library changes and also includes `cs_change_delay`.
> 
> I'll send a V2 patchset, which just the first 4 patches, since I feel that
> those are a bit more complete.
> 
> I thought about just sending the first 4 patches on-their-own, but I
> figured that the whole series (even if not complete) serves as a better
> explanation about the whole "why?".
> 
> Hopefully, this can sort-of-explain things.
> I'll reference this RFC on the next series.

General approach looks sensible to me. Over to SPI specialists on
whether this is a sensible bit of unification to do.

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Alexandru Ardelean (15):
>   spi: move `cs_change_delay` backwards compat logic outside switch
>   spi: introduce spi_delay struct as "value + unit" &  spi_delay_exec()
>   spi: make `cs_change_delay` the first user of the `spi_delay` logic
>   iio: imu: adis: convert cs_change_delay to spi_delay struct
>   spi: sprd: convert transfer word delay to spi_delay struct
>   spi: orion: use new `word_delay` field for SPI transfers
>   spi: spidev: use new `word_delay` field for spi transfers
>   spi: core,atmel: convert `word_delay_usecs` -> `word_delay` for
>     spi_device
>   spi: introduce `delay` field for `spi_transfer` + spi_transfer_exec()
>   spi: use new `spi_transfer_delay` helper where straightforward
>   spi: tegra114: use `spi_transfer_delay` helper
>   spi: spi-loopback-test: use new `delay` field
>   spi: spidev: use new `delay` field for spi transfers
>   spi: tegra114: change format for `spi_set_cs_timing()` function
>   spi: implement SW control for CS times
> 
>  drivers/iio/imu/adis.c           |  24 ++---
>  drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c          |  29 +++++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c  |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-cavium.c         |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c       |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c       |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c        |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c  |  12 ++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-mpc512x-psc.c    |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx-psc.c    |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-omap-100k.c      |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-orion.c          |   6 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c          |  25 +++--
>  drivers/spi/spi-sc18is602.c      |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-sh-hspi.c        |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c           |  11 ++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c       |  39 +++++---
>  drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-sflash.c |   2 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c   |   7 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-txx9.c           |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-xcomm.c          |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi.c                | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/spi/spidev.c             |   6 +-
>  include/linux/spi/spi.h          |  65 ++++++++++---
>  24 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, baolin.wang@linaro.org,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, orsonzhai@gmail.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Unify SPI delays into an `struct spi_delay`
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:22:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190915112205.0007d62d@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190913114550.956-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:45:35 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:

> Initially, I started this patchset thinking: "we need a new delay for
> something-something" (in case someone is curios, we need a CS-hold-time for
> the first transfer, because the CS wakes a chip from sleep-mode).
> 
> Then I added the delay, and felt a bit dirty-inside about adding a new one
> (just like that), and decided to look at maybe cleaning things up a bit,
> and a few days later, I got here.
> 
> Full disclaimer: this patchset is not complete. It's an RFC.
> It's based on top of Jonathan's `iio/togreg` branch which also includes the
> ADIS driver library changes and also includes `cs_change_delay`.
> 
> I'll send a V2 patchset, which just the first 4 patches, since I feel that
> those are a bit more complete.
> 
> I thought about just sending the first 4 patches on-their-own, but I
> figured that the whole series (even if not complete) serves as a better
> explanation about the whole "why?".
> 
> Hopefully, this can sort-of-explain things.
> I'll reference this RFC on the next series.

General approach looks sensible to me. Over to SPI specialists on
whether this is a sensible bit of unification to do.

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Alexandru Ardelean (15):
>   spi: move `cs_change_delay` backwards compat logic outside switch
>   spi: introduce spi_delay struct as "value + unit" &  spi_delay_exec()
>   spi: make `cs_change_delay` the first user of the `spi_delay` logic
>   iio: imu: adis: convert cs_change_delay to spi_delay struct
>   spi: sprd: convert transfer word delay to spi_delay struct
>   spi: orion: use new `word_delay` field for SPI transfers
>   spi: spidev: use new `word_delay` field for spi transfers
>   spi: core,atmel: convert `word_delay_usecs` -> `word_delay` for
>     spi_device
>   spi: introduce `delay` field for `spi_transfer` + spi_transfer_exec()
>   spi: use new `spi_transfer_delay` helper where straightforward
>   spi: tegra114: use `spi_transfer_delay` helper
>   spi: spi-loopback-test: use new `delay` field
>   spi: spidev: use new `delay` field for spi transfers
>   spi: tegra114: change format for `spi_set_cs_timing()` function
>   spi: implement SW control for CS times
> 
>  drivers/iio/imu/adis.c           |  24 ++---
>  drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c          |  29 +++++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c  |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-cavium.c         |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c       |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c       |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c        |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c  |  12 ++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-mpc512x-psc.c    |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx-psc.c    |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-omap-100k.c      |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-orion.c          |   6 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c          |  25 +++--
>  drivers/spi/spi-sc18is602.c      |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-sh-hspi.c        |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c           |  11 ++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c       |  39 +++++---
>  drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-sflash.c |   2 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c   |   7 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-txx9.c           |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi-xcomm.c          |   3 +-
>  drivers/spi/spi.c                | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/spi/spidev.c             |   6 +-
>  include/linux/spi/spi.h          |  65 ++++++++++---
>  24 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-15 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-13 11:45 [RFC PATCH 00/15] Unify SPI delays into an `struct spi_delay` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] spi: move `cs_change_delay` backwards compat logic outside switch Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] spi: introduce spi_delay struct as "value + unit" & spi_delay_exec() Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] spi: make `cs_change_delay` the first user of the `spi_delay` logic Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-16 12:25   ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 12:25     ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 12:37     ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-16 12:37       ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-16 12:37       ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-16 12:47       ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 12:47         ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 12:47         ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 13:04         ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-16 13:04           ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-16 13:04           ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-16 13:43           ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 13:43             ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 13:43             ` Mark Brown
2019-09-17  6:05             ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-17  6:05               ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-17  6:05               ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] iio: imu: adis: convert cs_change_delay to spi_delay struct Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] spi: sprd: convert transfer word delay " Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] spi: orion: use new `word_delay` field for SPI transfers Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] spi: spidev: use new `word_delay` field for spi transfers Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] spi: core,atmel: convert `word_delay_usecs` -> `word_delay` for spi_device Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] spi: core, atmel: " Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] spi: core,atmel: " Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] spi: introduce `delay` field for `spi_transfer` + spi_transfer_exec() Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] spi: use new `spi_transfer_delay` helper where straightforward Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] spi: tegra114: use `spi_transfer_delay` helper Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] spi: spi-loopback-test: use new `delay` field Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] spi: spidev: use new `delay` field for spi transfers Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] spi: tegra114: change format for `spi_set_cs_timing()` function Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] spi: implement SW control for CS times Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-15 10:22 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-09-15 10:22   ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] Unify SPI delays into an `struct spi_delay` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-15 10:22   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190915112205.0007d62d@archlinux \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.