All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	<sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:07:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191213170729.00003539@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191209180514.272727-11-jean-philippe@linaro.org>

On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 19:05:11 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:

> The SMMU can support up to 20 bits of SSID. Add a second level of page
> tables to accommodate this. Devices that support more than 1024 SSIDs now
> have a table of 1024 L1 entries (8kB), pointing to tables of 1024 context
> descriptors (64kB), allocated on demand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>

One tiny little comment inline.  I really don't mind if you ignore it ;)

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 143 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index fc5119f34187..52adcdfda58b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT		GENMASK_ULL(5, 4)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR	0
> +#define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2	2
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 6)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX		GENMASK_ULL(63, 59)
>  
> @@ -263,7 +264,20 @@
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(51, 4)
>  
> -/* Context descriptor (stage-1 only) */
> +/*
> + * Context descriptors.
> + *
> + * Linear: when less than 1024 SSIDs are supported
> + * 2lvl: at most 1024 L1 entries,
> + *       1024 lazy entries per table.
> + */
> +#define CTXDESC_SPLIT			10
> +#define CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES		(1 << CTXDESC_SPLIT)
> +
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS		1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID		1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
> +
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS		8
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_T0SZ		GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
>  #define ARM64_TCR_T0SZ			GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
> @@ -575,7 +589,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_cd_table {
>  };
>  
>  struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg {
> -	struct arm_smmu_cd_table	table;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table	*tables;
> +	size_t				num_tables;
> +	__le64				*l1ptr;
> +	dma_addr_t			l1ptr_dma;
>  	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc	cd;
>  	u8				s1fmt;
>  	u8				s1cdmax;
> @@ -1521,9 +1538,53 @@ static void arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>  {
>  	size_t size = num_entries * (CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS << 3);
>  
> +	if (!table->ptr)
> +		return;
>  	dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, table->ptr, table->ptr_dma);
>  }
>  
> +static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
> +				      struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table)
> +{
> +	u64 val = (table->ptr_dma & CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK) |
> +		  CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID;
> +
> +	WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
> +}
> +
> +static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> +				   u32 ssid)
> +{
> +	__le64 *l1ptr;
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> +	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> +
> +	if (cfg->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR) {
> +		table = &cfg->tables[0];
> +		idx = ssid;
> +	} else {
> +		idx = ssid >> CTXDESC_SPLIT;
> +		if (idx >= cfg->num_tables)
> +			return NULL;
> +
> +		table = &cfg->tables[idx];
> +		if (!table->ptr) {
> +			if (arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table,
> +							 CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES))
> +				return NULL;
> +
> +			l1ptr = cfg->l1ptr + idx * CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS;
> +			arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(l1ptr, table);
> +			/* An invalid L1CD can be cached */
> +			arm_smmu_sync_cd(smmu_domain, ssid, false);
> +		}
> +		idx = ssid & (CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES - 1);
> +	}
> +	return table->ptr + idx * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +}
> +
>  static u64 arm_smmu_cpu_tcr_to_cd(u64 tcr)
>  {
>  	u64 val = 0;
> @@ -1556,8 +1617,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  	u64 val;
>  	bool cd_live;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> -	__le64 *cdptr = smmu_domain->s1_cfg.table.ptr + ssid *
> -			CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +	__le64 *cdptr = arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(smmu_domain, ssid);
> +
> +	if (!cdptr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr[0]);
>  	cd_live = !!(val & CTXDESC_CD_0_V);
> @@ -1604,20 +1667,87 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  
>  static int arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +	size_t size = 0;
> +	size_t max_contexts;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>  
> -	cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> -	return arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table,
> -					    1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> +	max_contexts = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> +
> +	if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_CDTAB) ||
> +	    max_contexts <= CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES) {
> +		cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> +		cfg->num_tables = 1;
> +	} else {
> +		cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2;
> +		cfg->num_tables = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_contexts,
> +					       CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES);
> +
> +		size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size,
> +						 &cfg->l1ptr_dma,
> +						 GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!cfg->l1ptr) {
> +			dev_warn(smmu->dev,
> +				 "failed to allocate L1 context table\n");
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	cfg->tables = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev, sizeof(struct arm_smmu_cd_table) *
> +				   cfg->num_tables, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg->tables) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_free_l1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only allocate a leaf table for linear case. With two levels, leaf
> +	 * tables are allocated lazily.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cfg->l1ptr) {

This might have been the tiniest bit clearer if the check matched the description
by checking it's a linear table rather than what is kind of a side effect of it
not being non linear.

	if (cfg->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)


> +		ret = arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->tables[0],
> +						   max_contexts);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err_free_tables;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_free_tables:
> +	devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> +	cfg->tables = NULL;
> +err_free_l1:
> +	if (cfg->l1ptr) {
> +		dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr, cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = NULL;
> +		cfg->l1ptr_dma = 0;
> +	}
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
>  {
> +	int i;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> +	size_t num_leaf_entries = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table = cfg->tables;
> +
> +	if (cfg->l1ptr) {
> +		size_t size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
>  
> -	arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table, 1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> +		dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr, cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = NULL;
> +		cfg->l1ptr_dma = 0;
> +		num_leaf_entries = CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_tables; i++, table++)
> +		arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table, num_leaf_entries);
> +	devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> +	cfg->tables = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  /* Stream table manipulation functions */
> @@ -1737,6 +1867,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (s1_cfg) {
> +		dma_addr_t ptr_dma = s1_cfg->l1ptr ? s1_cfg->l1ptr_dma :
> +				     s1_cfg->tables[0].ptr_dma;
> +
>  		BUG_ON(ste_live);
>  		dst[1] = cpu_to_le64(
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> @@ -1749,7 +1882,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  		   !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE))
>  			dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
>  
> -		val |= (s1_cfg->table.ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> +		val |= (ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, s1_cfg->s1cdmax) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, s1_cfg->s1fmt);
> @@ -2265,7 +2398,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) {
>  		struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>  
> -		if (cfg->table.ptr) {
> +		if (cfg->tables) {
>  			arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(smmu_domain);
>  			arm_smmu_bitmap_free(smmu->asid_map, cfg->cd.asid);
>  		}



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:07:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191213170729.00003539@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191209180514.272727-11-jean-philippe@linaro.org>

On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 19:05:11 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:

> The SMMU can support up to 20 bits of SSID. Add a second level of page
> tables to accommodate this. Devices that support more than 1024 SSIDs now
> have a table of 1024 L1 entries (8kB), pointing to tables of 1024 context
> descriptors (64kB), allocated on demand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>

One tiny little comment inline.  I really don't mind if you ignore it ;)

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 143 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index fc5119f34187..52adcdfda58b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT		GENMASK_ULL(5, 4)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR	0
> +#define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2	2
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 6)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX		GENMASK_ULL(63, 59)
>  
> @@ -263,7 +264,20 @@
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(51, 4)
>  
> -/* Context descriptor (stage-1 only) */
> +/*
> + * Context descriptors.
> + *
> + * Linear: when less than 1024 SSIDs are supported
> + * 2lvl: at most 1024 L1 entries,
> + *       1024 lazy entries per table.
> + */
> +#define CTXDESC_SPLIT			10
> +#define CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES		(1 << CTXDESC_SPLIT)
> +
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS		1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID		1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
> +
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS		8
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_T0SZ		GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
>  #define ARM64_TCR_T0SZ			GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
> @@ -575,7 +589,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_cd_table {
>  };
>  
>  struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg {
> -	struct arm_smmu_cd_table	table;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table	*tables;
> +	size_t				num_tables;
> +	__le64				*l1ptr;
> +	dma_addr_t			l1ptr_dma;
>  	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc	cd;
>  	u8				s1fmt;
>  	u8				s1cdmax;
> @@ -1521,9 +1538,53 @@ static void arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>  {
>  	size_t size = num_entries * (CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS << 3);
>  
> +	if (!table->ptr)
> +		return;
>  	dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, table->ptr, table->ptr_dma);
>  }
>  
> +static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
> +				      struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table)
> +{
> +	u64 val = (table->ptr_dma & CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK) |
> +		  CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID;
> +
> +	WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
> +}
> +
> +static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> +				   u32 ssid)
> +{
> +	__le64 *l1ptr;
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> +	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> +
> +	if (cfg->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR) {
> +		table = &cfg->tables[0];
> +		idx = ssid;
> +	} else {
> +		idx = ssid >> CTXDESC_SPLIT;
> +		if (idx >= cfg->num_tables)
> +			return NULL;
> +
> +		table = &cfg->tables[idx];
> +		if (!table->ptr) {
> +			if (arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table,
> +							 CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES))
> +				return NULL;
> +
> +			l1ptr = cfg->l1ptr + idx * CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS;
> +			arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(l1ptr, table);
> +			/* An invalid L1CD can be cached */
> +			arm_smmu_sync_cd(smmu_domain, ssid, false);
> +		}
> +		idx = ssid & (CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES - 1);
> +	}
> +	return table->ptr + idx * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +}
> +
>  static u64 arm_smmu_cpu_tcr_to_cd(u64 tcr)
>  {
>  	u64 val = 0;
> @@ -1556,8 +1617,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  	u64 val;
>  	bool cd_live;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> -	__le64 *cdptr = smmu_domain->s1_cfg.table.ptr + ssid *
> -			CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +	__le64 *cdptr = arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(smmu_domain, ssid);
> +
> +	if (!cdptr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr[0]);
>  	cd_live = !!(val & CTXDESC_CD_0_V);
> @@ -1604,20 +1667,87 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  
>  static int arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +	size_t size = 0;
> +	size_t max_contexts;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>  
> -	cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> -	return arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table,
> -					    1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> +	max_contexts = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> +
> +	if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_CDTAB) ||
> +	    max_contexts <= CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES) {
> +		cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> +		cfg->num_tables = 1;
> +	} else {
> +		cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2;
> +		cfg->num_tables = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_contexts,
> +					       CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES);
> +
> +		size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size,
> +						 &cfg->l1ptr_dma,
> +						 GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!cfg->l1ptr) {
> +			dev_warn(smmu->dev,
> +				 "failed to allocate L1 context table\n");
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	cfg->tables = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev, sizeof(struct arm_smmu_cd_table) *
> +				   cfg->num_tables, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg->tables) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_free_l1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only allocate a leaf table for linear case. With two levels, leaf
> +	 * tables are allocated lazily.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cfg->l1ptr) {

This might have been the tiniest bit clearer if the check matched the description
by checking it's a linear table rather than what is kind of a side effect of it
not being non linear.

	if (cfg->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)


> +		ret = arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->tables[0],
> +						   max_contexts);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err_free_tables;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_free_tables:
> +	devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> +	cfg->tables = NULL;
> +err_free_l1:
> +	if (cfg->l1ptr) {
> +		dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr, cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = NULL;
> +		cfg->l1ptr_dma = 0;
> +	}
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
>  {
> +	int i;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> +	size_t num_leaf_entries = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table = cfg->tables;
> +
> +	if (cfg->l1ptr) {
> +		size_t size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
>  
> -	arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table, 1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> +		dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr, cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = NULL;
> +		cfg->l1ptr_dma = 0;
> +		num_leaf_entries = CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_tables; i++, table++)
> +		arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table, num_leaf_entries);
> +	devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> +	cfg->tables = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  /* Stream table manipulation functions */
> @@ -1737,6 +1867,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (s1_cfg) {
> +		dma_addr_t ptr_dma = s1_cfg->l1ptr ? s1_cfg->l1ptr_dma :
> +				     s1_cfg->tables[0].ptr_dma;
> +
>  		BUG_ON(ste_live);
>  		dst[1] = cpu_to_le64(
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> @@ -1749,7 +1882,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  		   !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE))
>  			dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
>  
> -		val |= (s1_cfg->table.ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> +		val |= (ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, s1_cfg->s1cdmax) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, s1_cfg->s1fmt);
> @@ -2265,7 +2398,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) {
>  		struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>  
> -		if (cfg->table.ptr) {
> +		if (cfg->tables) {
>  			arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(smmu_domain);
>  			arm_smmu_bitmap_free(smmu->asid_map, cfg->cd.asid);
>  		}


_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:07:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191213170729.00003539@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191209180514.272727-11-jean-philippe@linaro.org>

On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 19:05:11 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:

> The SMMU can support up to 20 bits of SSID. Add a second level of page
> tables to accommodate this. Devices that support more than 1024 SSIDs now
> have a table of 1024 L1 entries (8kB), pointing to tables of 1024 context
> descriptors (64kB), allocated on demand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>

One tiny little comment inline.  I really don't mind if you ignore it ;)

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 143 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index fc5119f34187..52adcdfda58b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT		GENMASK_ULL(5, 4)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR	0
> +#define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2	2
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 6)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX		GENMASK_ULL(63, 59)
>  
> @@ -263,7 +264,20 @@
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(51, 4)
>  
> -/* Context descriptor (stage-1 only) */
> +/*
> + * Context descriptors.
> + *
> + * Linear: when less than 1024 SSIDs are supported
> + * 2lvl: at most 1024 L1 entries,
> + *       1024 lazy entries per table.
> + */
> +#define CTXDESC_SPLIT			10
> +#define CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES		(1 << CTXDESC_SPLIT)
> +
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS		1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID		1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
> +
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS		8
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_T0SZ		GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
>  #define ARM64_TCR_T0SZ			GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
> @@ -575,7 +589,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_cd_table {
>  };
>  
>  struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg {
> -	struct arm_smmu_cd_table	table;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table	*tables;
> +	size_t				num_tables;
> +	__le64				*l1ptr;
> +	dma_addr_t			l1ptr_dma;
>  	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc	cd;
>  	u8				s1fmt;
>  	u8				s1cdmax;
> @@ -1521,9 +1538,53 @@ static void arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>  {
>  	size_t size = num_entries * (CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS << 3);
>  
> +	if (!table->ptr)
> +		return;
>  	dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, table->ptr, table->ptr_dma);
>  }
>  
> +static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
> +				      struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table)
> +{
> +	u64 val = (table->ptr_dma & CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK) |
> +		  CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID;
> +
> +	WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
> +}
> +
> +static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> +				   u32 ssid)
> +{
> +	__le64 *l1ptr;
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> +	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> +
> +	if (cfg->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR) {
> +		table = &cfg->tables[0];
> +		idx = ssid;
> +	} else {
> +		idx = ssid >> CTXDESC_SPLIT;
> +		if (idx >= cfg->num_tables)
> +			return NULL;
> +
> +		table = &cfg->tables[idx];
> +		if (!table->ptr) {
> +			if (arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table,
> +							 CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES))
> +				return NULL;
> +
> +			l1ptr = cfg->l1ptr + idx * CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS;
> +			arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(l1ptr, table);
> +			/* An invalid L1CD can be cached */
> +			arm_smmu_sync_cd(smmu_domain, ssid, false);
> +		}
> +		idx = ssid & (CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES - 1);
> +	}
> +	return table->ptr + idx * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +}
> +
>  static u64 arm_smmu_cpu_tcr_to_cd(u64 tcr)
>  {
>  	u64 val = 0;
> @@ -1556,8 +1617,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  	u64 val;
>  	bool cd_live;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> -	__le64 *cdptr = smmu_domain->s1_cfg.table.ptr + ssid *
> -			CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +	__le64 *cdptr = arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(smmu_domain, ssid);
> +
> +	if (!cdptr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr[0]);
>  	cd_live = !!(val & CTXDESC_CD_0_V);
> @@ -1604,20 +1667,87 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  
>  static int arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +	size_t size = 0;
> +	size_t max_contexts;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>  
> -	cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> -	return arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table,
> -					    1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> +	max_contexts = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> +
> +	if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_CDTAB) ||
> +	    max_contexts <= CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES) {
> +		cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> +		cfg->num_tables = 1;
> +	} else {
> +		cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2;
> +		cfg->num_tables = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_contexts,
> +					       CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES);
> +
> +		size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size,
> +						 &cfg->l1ptr_dma,
> +						 GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!cfg->l1ptr) {
> +			dev_warn(smmu->dev,
> +				 "failed to allocate L1 context table\n");
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	cfg->tables = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev, sizeof(struct arm_smmu_cd_table) *
> +				   cfg->num_tables, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg->tables) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_free_l1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only allocate a leaf table for linear case. With two levels, leaf
> +	 * tables are allocated lazily.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cfg->l1ptr) {

This might have been the tiniest bit clearer if the check matched the description
by checking it's a linear table rather than what is kind of a side effect of it
not being non linear.

	if (cfg->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)


> +		ret = arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->tables[0],
> +						   max_contexts);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err_free_tables;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_free_tables:
> +	devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> +	cfg->tables = NULL;
> +err_free_l1:
> +	if (cfg->l1ptr) {
> +		dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr, cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = NULL;
> +		cfg->l1ptr_dma = 0;
> +	}
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
>  {
> +	int i;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> +	size_t num_leaf_entries = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table = cfg->tables;
> +
> +	if (cfg->l1ptr) {
> +		size_t size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
>  
> -	arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table, 1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> +		dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr, cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = NULL;
> +		cfg->l1ptr_dma = 0;
> +		num_leaf_entries = CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_tables; i++, table++)
> +		arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table, num_leaf_entries);
> +	devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> +	cfg->tables = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  /* Stream table manipulation functions */
> @@ -1737,6 +1867,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (s1_cfg) {
> +		dma_addr_t ptr_dma = s1_cfg->l1ptr ? s1_cfg->l1ptr_dma :
> +				     s1_cfg->tables[0].ptr_dma;
> +
>  		BUG_ON(ste_live);
>  		dst[1] = cpu_to_le64(
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> @@ -1749,7 +1882,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  		   !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE))
>  			dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
>  
> -		val |= (s1_cfg->table.ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> +		val |= (ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, s1_cfg->s1cdmax) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, s1_cfg->s1fmt);
> @@ -2265,7 +2398,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) {
>  		struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>  
> -		if (cfg->table.ptr) {
> +		if (cfg->tables) {
>  			arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(smmu_domain);
>  			arm_smmu_bitmap_free(smmu->asid_map, cfg->cd.asid);
>  		}



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-13 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-09 18:05 [PATCH v3 00/13] iommu: Add PASID support to Arm SMMUv3 Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drop __GFP_ZERO flag from DMA allocation Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-13 16:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-12-13 16:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-12-13 16:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-12-17 10:59   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 10:59     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 10:59     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] dt-bindings: document PASID property for IOMMU masters Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support platform SSID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 11:05   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 11:05     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 11:05     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 15:21     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 15:21       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 15:21       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 16:46       ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 16:46         ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 16:46         ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 10:17   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 10:17     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 10:17     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:06     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:06       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:06       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] ACPI/IORT: Support PASID for platform devices Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 13:27   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 13:27     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 13:27     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Prepare arm_smmu_s1_cfg for SSID support Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 13:27   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 13:27     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 13:27     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add context descriptor tables allocators Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 13:36   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 13:36     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 13:36     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Substream IDs Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 16:43   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 16:43     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 16:43     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:07     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:07       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:07       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:59       ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:59         ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:59         ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 17:03   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 17:03     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 17:03     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Propate ssid_bits Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 17:07   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 17:07     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 17:07     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:08     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:08       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:08       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 17:00       ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 17:00         ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 17:00         ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Handle failure of arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc() Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 17:24   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 17:24     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 17:24     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-13 17:07   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-12-13 17:07     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-12-13 17:07     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-12-18  9:59   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18  9:59     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18  9:59     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:10     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:10       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:10       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve add_device() error handling Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] PCI/ATS: Add PASID stubs Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-10 21:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-12-10 21:07     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-12-10 21:07     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-12-18 10:02   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 10:02     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 10:02     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI PASID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 10:17   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 10:17     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 10:17     ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:13     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:13       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:13       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-10  5:52 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] iommu: Add PASID support to Arm SMMUv3 zhangfei.gao
2019-12-10  5:52   ` zhangfei.gao
2019-12-13 17:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-12-13 17:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-12-13 17:10   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191213170729.00003539@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.