Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: replace setup_irq() by request_irq()

From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
	"Alexander Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>,
	"Krzysztof Hałasa" <khalasa@piap.pl>,
	"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"Lubomir Rintel" <lkundrak@v3.sk>,
	"Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	"Hartley Sweeten" <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
	"Viresh Kumar" <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	"Shiraz Hashim" <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: replace setup_irq() by request_irq()
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:15:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200313154520.GA5375@afzalpc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mu8ppknv.fsf@FE-laptop> <20200302031736.5or4ww5a4l7zomfo@vireshk-i7> <20200308161903.GA156645@furthur.local> <20200301122226.4068-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> <m3ftepbtxm.fsf@t19.piap.pl> <51cebbbb-3ba4-b336-82a9-abcc22f9a69c@gmail.com> <20200304163412.GX37466@atomide.com>

Hi Olof, Arnd,

This is regarding cleanup of setup_irq() usages & replacing it w/
request_irq(). Earlier it was sent as single series spanning all
architectures & drivers, later Thomas Gleixner suggested [1] to take it
thr' relevant maintainers. As for ARM, there is an additional layer of
sub-architecture maintainers, for ARM, patches were sent to relevant
subsystem maintainers & mailing list, all copied to LAKML as well.

There were 10 sub-arch's in ARM that were subjected to the cleanup,

1. OMAP :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301121945.3604-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
2. ebsa110 :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122210.4013-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
3. rpc :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122300.4185-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
4. footbridge :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122131.3902-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
5. orion :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122330.4296-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
6. ep93xx :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122112.3847-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
7. spear :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122315.4240-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
8. cns3xxx :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122155.3957-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
9. mmp :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122243.4129-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
10. iop32x :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122226.4068-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com

Of this,

(1) OMAP, (2) ebsa110 & (3) rpc are already in linux-next.

(4) footbridge (Russell) - there was a build warning, so he dropped
after applying to his tree, i have submitted the newer fixed version in
his patch system.

(5) orion - Andrew has given Reviewed-by & Gregory mentioned that he will
take care of it.

So if things goes as expected 1 & 5 will be coming to you thr' sub-arch
maintainers, while 2-4 directly via Russell

Now we are left with five (6-10),
(6) ep93xx - Alexander has given Acked-by & mentioned to take thr' Arnd
(7) spear - Viresh has given Acked-by & mentioned to take it thr' Arnd
(8) cns3xxx - Krzysztof has given Acked-by (though not copied to lists,
he has been cc'ed here)
(9) mmp - Lubomir has given Acked-by & Tested-by & mentioned to get it
thr' Olof
(10) iop32xx - per get_mantainer, an orphan

Can you please include the patches 6-10 directly into the armsoc tree ?,
Let me know if anything needs to be done from my side.

Regards
afzal

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de