From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>, "Alexander Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>, "Krzysztof Hałasa" <khalasa@piap.pl>, "Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, "Lubomir Rintel" <lkundrak@v3.sk>, "Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>, "Hartley Sweeten" <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>, "Viresh Kumar" <vireshk@kernel.org>, "Shiraz Hashim" <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>, "Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>, "Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>, "Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: replace setup_irq() by request_irq() Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:13:32 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200325114332.GA6337@afzalpc> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200317043702.GA5852@afzalpc> Hi arm-soc maintainers, On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:07:02AM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote: > + soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, > in case it helps to reduce the chances of below mail getting slipped > thr' the cracks. > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:15:20PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote: > > Hi Olof, Arnd, > > > > This is regarding cleanup of setup_irq() usages & replacing it w/ > > request_irq(). Earlier it was sent as single series spanning all > > architectures & drivers, later Thomas Gleixner suggested [1] to take it > > thr' relevant maintainers. As for ARM, there is an additional layer of > > sub-architecture maintainers, for ARM, patches were sent to relevant > > subsystem maintainers & mailing list, all copied to LAKML as well. : : > > Of this, > > (1) OMAP, (2) ebsa110 & (3) rpc are already in linux-next. > > (4) footbridge (Russell) - there was a build warning, so he dropped > > after applying to his tree, i have submitted the newer fixed version in > > his patch system. > > (5) orion - Andrew has given Reviewed-by & Gregory mentioned that he will > > take care of it. > > So if things goes as expected 1 & 5 will be coming to you thr' sub-arch > > maintainers, while 2-4 directly via Russell footbridge & orion went into -next around a week back > > Now we are left with five (6-10), > > (6) ep93xx - Alexander has given Acked-by & mentioned to take thr' Arnd > > (7) spear - Viresh has given Acked-by & mentioned to take it thr' Arnd > > (8) cns3xxx - Krzysztof has given Acked-by (though not copied to lists, > > he has been cc'ed here) > > (9) mmp - Lubomir has given Acked-by & Tested-by & mentioned to get it > > thr' Olof > > (10) iop32xx - per get_mantainer, an orphan > > > > Can you please include the patches 6-10 directly into the armsoc tree ?, > > Let me know if anything needs to be done from my side. Can you please consider for inclusion the above 5 patches. Sorry for pestering, i understand that none of the ARM SoC pull requests has been picked up as opposed to what happens normally by this time of development cycle. Still asking as this is part of tree wide series & it is safe to send core removal patch of setup_irq() to Thomas only after all it's usages have been removed. REgards afzal > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>, "Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>, "Hartley Sweeten" <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>, "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>, "Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, "Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>, "Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lubomir Rintel" <lkundrak@v3.sk>, "Krzysztof Hałasa" <khalasa@piap.pl>, "Viresh Kumar" <vireshk@kernel.org>, "Alexander Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>, "Shiraz Hashim" <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: replace setup_irq() by request_irq() Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:13:32 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200325114332.GA6337@afzalpc> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200317043702.GA5852@afzalpc> Hi arm-soc maintainers, On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:07:02AM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote: > + soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, > in case it helps to reduce the chances of below mail getting slipped > thr' the cracks. > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:15:20PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote: > > Hi Olof, Arnd, > > > > This is regarding cleanup of setup_irq() usages & replacing it w/ > > request_irq(). Earlier it was sent as single series spanning all > > architectures & drivers, later Thomas Gleixner suggested [1] to take it > > thr' relevant maintainers. As for ARM, there is an additional layer of > > sub-architecture maintainers, for ARM, patches were sent to relevant > > subsystem maintainers & mailing list, all copied to LAKML as well. : : > > Of this, > > (1) OMAP, (2) ebsa110 & (3) rpc are already in linux-next. > > (4) footbridge (Russell) - there was a build warning, so he dropped > > after applying to his tree, i have submitted the newer fixed version in > > his patch system. > > (5) orion - Andrew has given Reviewed-by & Gregory mentioned that he will > > take care of it. > > So if things goes as expected 1 & 5 will be coming to you thr' sub-arch > > maintainers, while 2-4 directly via Russell footbridge & orion went into -next around a week back > > Now we are left with five (6-10), > > (6) ep93xx - Alexander has given Acked-by & mentioned to take thr' Arnd > > (7) spear - Viresh has given Acked-by & mentioned to take it thr' Arnd > > (8) cns3xxx - Krzysztof has given Acked-by (though not copied to lists, > > he has been cc'ed here) > > (9) mmp - Lubomir has given Acked-by & Tested-by & mentioned to get it > > thr' Olof > > (10) iop32xx - per get_mantainer, an orphan > > > > Can you please include the patches 6-10 directly into the armsoc tree ?, > > Let me know if anything needs to be done from my side. Can you please consider for inclusion the above 5 patches. Sorry for pestering, i understand that none of the ARM SoC pull requests has been picked up as opposed to what happens normally by this time of development cycle. Still asking as this is part of tree wide series & it is safe to send core removal patch of setup_irq() to Thomas only after all it's usages have been removed. REgards afzal > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 11:43 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-03-01 12:19 [PATCH v3] ARM: OMAP: replace setup_irq() by request_irq() afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 12:19 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-04 16:34 ` Tony Lindgren 2020-03-04 16:34 ` Tony Lindgren 2020-03-13 15:45 ` [PATCH v3] ARM: " afzal mohammed 2020-03-13 15:45 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-17 4:37 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-17 4:37 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-25 11:43 ` afzal mohammed [this message] 2020-03-25 11:43 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 10:46 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 10:46 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-03-27 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-03-27 11:10 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 11:10 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 11:29 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 11:29 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-03-27 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-03-27 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM: ep93xx: Replace " afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:41 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ARM: spear: replace " afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:44 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] ARM: cns3xxx: " afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:44 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: mmp: " afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:44 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: iop32x: " afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:44 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:53 ` [PATCH v3] ARM: " afzal mohammed 2020-03-27 12:53 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 12:21 [PATCH v3] ARM: ep93xx: Replace " afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 12:21 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 16:21 ` Alexander Sverdlin 2020-03-01 16:21 ` Alexander Sverdlin 2020-03-01 12:22 [PATCH v3] ARM: mmp: replace " afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 12:22 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-08 14:53 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-08 14:53 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-08 16:19 ` Lubomir Rintel 2020-03-01 12:22 ` [PATCH v3] ARM: iop32x: " afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 12:22 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-09 12:19 ` [PATCH v3] ARM: mmp: " afzal mohammed 2020-03-09 12:19 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 12:23 [PATCH v3] ARM: spear: " afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 12:23 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-02 3:17 ` Viresh Kumar 2020-03-02 3:17 ` Viresh Kumar 2020-03-01 12:23 [PATCH v3] ARM: orion: " afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 12:23 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-01 15:44 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-03-01 15:44 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-03-08 14:37 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-08 14:37 ` afzal mohammed 2020-03-09 16:17 ` Gregory CLEMENT 2020-03-09 16:17 ` Gregory CLEMENT 2020-03-13 20:39 ` Gregory CLEMENT 2020-03-13 20:39 ` Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200325114332.GA6337@afzalpc \ --to=afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com \ --cc=alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com \ --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \ --cc=arm@kernel.org \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \ --cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \ --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \ --cc=khalasa@piap.pl \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=lkundrak@v3.sk \ --cc=olof@lixom.net \ --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \ --cc=shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com \ --cc=soc@kernel.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tony@atomide.com \ --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.