All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
	narmstrong@baylibre.com, Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
	leon@kernel.org, kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
	jonas@kwiboo.se, airlied@linux.ie, jernej.skrabec@siol.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Introduce "uses" keyword
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:28:27 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200417122827.GD5100@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v9ly3a0w.fsf@intel.com>

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:23:59AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:

> Which means that would have to split up to two. Not ideal, but
> doable.

Why is this not ideal?

I think the one per line is easier to maintain (eg for merge
conflicts) and easier to read than a giant && expression.

I would not complicate things further by extending the boolean
language..

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-17 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-17  1:11 [RFC PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Introduce "uses" keyword Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-17  1:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5: Kconfig: Use "uses" instead of "imply" Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-17  8:08   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-17  6:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Introduce "uses" keyword Jani Nikula
2020-04-17  6:23   ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-17 12:28   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-04-17 14:01     ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-17 14:07       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-04-17 10:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-17 11:35   ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-17 11:35     ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-18 19:00 ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-04-18 19:11   ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-18 20:07     ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-04-20  8:43       ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-20 18:42         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-04-21  4:24         ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-21  4:24           ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-21 13:58           ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-21 13:58             ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-21 16:30             ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-21 16:30               ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-21 18:23               ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-21 18:23                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-22  8:51                 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-22  8:51                   ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-22 21:13                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-22 21:13                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-22 22:37                     ` Randy Dunlap
2020-04-22 22:37                       ` Randy Dunlap
2020-04-23 15:01                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-23 15:01                         ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-23 15:05                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-04-23 15:05                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-04-23 15:11                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-23 15:11                             ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-23 15:16                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-04-23 15:16                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-04-23 15:28                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-23 15:28                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-23 15:33                               ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-23 15:33                                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-23 18:30                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-04-23 18:30                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-04-23 18:52                                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-23 18:52                                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2020-04-20 13:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200417122827.GD5100@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.