From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>, Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>, Adam Li <adam.li@amperecomputing.com>, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Subject: [PATCH v5 05/17] perf arm-spe: Use SPE data source for neoverse cores Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 12:28:08 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220604042820.2270916-6-leo.yan@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220604042820.2270916-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> From: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com> When synthesizing data from SPE, augment the type with source information for Arm Neoverse cores. The field is IMPLDEF but the Neoverse cores all use the same encoding. I can't find encoding information for any other SPE implementations to unify their choices with Arm's thus that is left for future work. This change populates the mem_lvl_num for Neoverse cores as well as the deprecated mem_lvl namespace. Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> --- .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c | 1 + .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h | 12 ++ tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 130 +++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c index 5e390a1a79ab..091987dd3966 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static int arm_spe_read_record(struct arm_spe_decoder *decoder) break; case ARM_SPE_DATA_SOURCE: + decoder->record.source = payload; break; case ARM_SPE_BAD: break; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h index 69b31084d6be..46a61df1145b 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ enum arm_spe_op_type { ARM_SPE_ST = 1 << 1, }; +enum arm_spe_neoverse_data_source { + ARM_SPE_NV_L1D = 0x0, + ARM_SPE_NV_L2 = 0x8, + ARM_SPE_NV_PEER_CORE = 0x9, + ARM_SPE_NV_LOCAL_CLUSTER = 0xa, + ARM_SPE_NV_SYS_CACHE = 0xb, + ARM_SPE_NV_PEER_CLUSTER = 0xc, + ARM_SPE_NV_REMOTE = 0xd, + ARM_SPE_NV_DRAM = 0xe, +}; + struct arm_spe_record { enum arm_spe_sample_type type; int err; @@ -40,6 +51,7 @@ struct arm_spe_record { u64 virt_addr; u64 phys_addr; u64 context_id; + u16 source; }; struct arm_spe_insn; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c index d040406f3314..22dcfe07e886 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ #include "arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h" #include "arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h" +#include "../../arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h" #define MAX_TIMESTAMP (~0ULL) struct arm_spe { @@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ struct arm_spe { struct perf_session *session; struct machine *machine; u32 pmu_type; + u64 midr; struct perf_tsc_conversion tc; @@ -387,35 +389,128 @@ static int arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); } -static u64 arm_spe__synth_data_source(const struct arm_spe_record *record) +static const struct midr_range neoverse_spe[] = { + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N1), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N2), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_V1), + {}, +}; + +static void arm_spe__synth_data_source_neoverse(const struct arm_spe_record *record, + union perf_mem_data_src *data_src) { - union perf_mem_data_src data_src = { 0 }; + /* + * Even though four levels of cache hierarchy are possible, no known + * production Neoverse systems currently include more than three levels + * so for the time being we assume three exist. If a production system + * is built with four the this function would have to be changed to + * detect the number of levels for reporting. + */ - if (record->op == ARM_SPE_LD) - data_src.mem_op = PERF_MEM_OP_LOAD; - else if (record->op == ARM_SPE_ST) - data_src.mem_op = PERF_MEM_OP_STORE; - else - return 0; + /* + * We have no data on the hit level or data source for stores in the + * Neoverse SPE records. + */ + if (record->op & ARM_SPE_ST) { + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_NA; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_NA; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NA; + return; + } + + switch (record->source) { + case ARM_SPE_NV_L1D: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L1 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L1; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NONE; + break; + case ARM_SPE_NV_L2: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L2 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L2; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NONE; + break; + case ARM_SPE_NV_PEER_CORE: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L2 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L2; + data_src->mem_snoopx = PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_PEER; + break; + /* + * We don't know if this is L1, L2 but we do know it was a cache-2-cache + * transfer, so set SNOOPX_PEER + */ + case ARM_SPE_NV_LOCAL_CLUSTER: + case ARM_SPE_NV_PEER_CLUSTER: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L3 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L3; + data_src->mem_snoopx = PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_PEER; + break; + /* + * System cache is assumed to be L3 + */ + case ARM_SPE_NV_SYS_CACHE: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L3 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L3; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_HIT; + break; + /* + * We don't know what level it hit in, except it came from the other + * socket + */ + case ARM_SPE_NV_REMOTE: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_REM_CCE1; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_ANY_CACHE; + data_src->mem_remote = PERF_MEM_REMOTE_REMOTE; + data_src->mem_snoopx = PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_PEER; + break; + case ARM_SPE_NV_DRAM: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_LOC_RAM | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_RAM; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NONE; + break; + default: + break; + } +} +static void arm_spe__synth_data_source_generic(const struct arm_spe_record *record, + union perf_mem_data_src *data_src) +{ if (record->type & (ARM_SPE_LLC_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS)) { - data_src.mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L3; + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L3; if (record->type & ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS) - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_MISS; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_MISS; else - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; } else if (record->type & (ARM_SPE_L1D_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS)) { - data_src.mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L1; + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L1; if (record->type & ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS) - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_MISS; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_MISS; else - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; } if (record->type & ARM_SPE_REMOTE_ACCESS) - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_REM_CCE1; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_REM_CCE1; +} + +static u64 arm_spe__synth_data_source(const struct arm_spe_record *record, u64 midr) +{ + union perf_mem_data_src data_src = { 0 }; + bool is_neoverse = is_midr_in_range(midr, neoverse_spe); + + if (record->op == ARM_SPE_LD) + data_src.mem_op = PERF_MEM_OP_LOAD; + else if (record->op == ARM_SPE_ST) + data_src.mem_op = PERF_MEM_OP_STORE; + else + return 0; + + if (is_neoverse) + arm_spe__synth_data_source_neoverse(record, &data_src); + else + arm_spe__synth_data_source_generic(record, &data_src); if (record->type & (ARM_SPE_TLB_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_TLB_MISS)) { data_src.mem_dtlb = PERF_MEM_TLB_WK; @@ -436,7 +531,7 @@ static int arm_spe_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq) u64 data_src; int err; - data_src = arm_spe__synth_data_source(record); + data_src = arm_spe__synth_data_source(record, spe->midr); if (spe->sample_flc) { if (record->type & ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS) { @@ -1178,6 +1273,8 @@ int arm_spe_process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, struct perf_record_auxtrace_info *auxtrace_info = &event->auxtrace_info; size_t min_sz = sizeof(u64) * ARM_SPE_AUXTRACE_PRIV_MAX; struct perf_record_time_conv *tc = &session->time_conv; + const char *cpuid = perf_env__cpuid(session->evlist->env); + u64 midr = strtol(cpuid, NULL, 16); struct arm_spe *spe; int err; @@ -1197,6 +1294,7 @@ int arm_spe_process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, spe->machine = &session->machines.host; /* No kvm support */ spe->auxtrace_type = auxtrace_info->type; spe->pmu_type = auxtrace_info->priv[ARM_SPE_PMU_TYPE]; + spe->midr = midr; spe->timeless_decoding = arm_spe__is_timeless_decoding(spe); -- 2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>, Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>, Adam Li <adam.li@amperecomputing.com>, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Subject: [PATCH v5 05/17] perf arm-spe: Use SPE data source for neoverse cores Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 12:28:08 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220604042820.2270916-6-leo.yan@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220604042820.2270916-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> From: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com> When synthesizing data from SPE, augment the type with source information for Arm Neoverse cores. The field is IMPLDEF but the Neoverse cores all use the same encoding. I can't find encoding information for any other SPE implementations to unify their choices with Arm's thus that is left for future work. This change populates the mem_lvl_num for Neoverse cores as well as the deprecated mem_lvl namespace. Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> --- .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c | 1 + .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h | 12 ++ tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 130 +++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c index 5e390a1a79ab..091987dd3966 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static int arm_spe_read_record(struct arm_spe_decoder *decoder) break; case ARM_SPE_DATA_SOURCE: + decoder->record.source = payload; break; case ARM_SPE_BAD: break; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h index 69b31084d6be..46a61df1145b 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ enum arm_spe_op_type { ARM_SPE_ST = 1 << 1, }; +enum arm_spe_neoverse_data_source { + ARM_SPE_NV_L1D = 0x0, + ARM_SPE_NV_L2 = 0x8, + ARM_SPE_NV_PEER_CORE = 0x9, + ARM_SPE_NV_LOCAL_CLUSTER = 0xa, + ARM_SPE_NV_SYS_CACHE = 0xb, + ARM_SPE_NV_PEER_CLUSTER = 0xc, + ARM_SPE_NV_REMOTE = 0xd, + ARM_SPE_NV_DRAM = 0xe, +}; + struct arm_spe_record { enum arm_spe_sample_type type; int err; @@ -40,6 +51,7 @@ struct arm_spe_record { u64 virt_addr; u64 phys_addr; u64 context_id; + u16 source; }; struct arm_spe_insn; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c index d040406f3314..22dcfe07e886 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ #include "arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.h" #include "arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h" +#include "../../arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h" #define MAX_TIMESTAMP (~0ULL) struct arm_spe { @@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ struct arm_spe { struct perf_session *session; struct machine *machine; u32 pmu_type; + u64 midr; struct perf_tsc_conversion tc; @@ -387,35 +389,128 @@ static int arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); } -static u64 arm_spe__synth_data_source(const struct arm_spe_record *record) +static const struct midr_range neoverse_spe[] = { + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N1), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N2), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_V1), + {}, +}; + +static void arm_spe__synth_data_source_neoverse(const struct arm_spe_record *record, + union perf_mem_data_src *data_src) { - union perf_mem_data_src data_src = { 0 }; + /* + * Even though four levels of cache hierarchy are possible, no known + * production Neoverse systems currently include more than three levels + * so for the time being we assume three exist. If a production system + * is built with four the this function would have to be changed to + * detect the number of levels for reporting. + */ - if (record->op == ARM_SPE_LD) - data_src.mem_op = PERF_MEM_OP_LOAD; - else if (record->op == ARM_SPE_ST) - data_src.mem_op = PERF_MEM_OP_STORE; - else - return 0; + /* + * We have no data on the hit level or data source for stores in the + * Neoverse SPE records. + */ + if (record->op & ARM_SPE_ST) { + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_NA; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_NA; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NA; + return; + } + + switch (record->source) { + case ARM_SPE_NV_L1D: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L1 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L1; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NONE; + break; + case ARM_SPE_NV_L2: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L2 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L2; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NONE; + break; + case ARM_SPE_NV_PEER_CORE: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L2 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L2; + data_src->mem_snoopx = PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_PEER; + break; + /* + * We don't know if this is L1, L2 but we do know it was a cache-2-cache + * transfer, so set SNOOPX_PEER + */ + case ARM_SPE_NV_LOCAL_CLUSTER: + case ARM_SPE_NV_PEER_CLUSTER: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L3 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L3; + data_src->mem_snoopx = PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_PEER; + break; + /* + * System cache is assumed to be L3 + */ + case ARM_SPE_NV_SYS_CACHE: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L3 | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L3; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_HIT; + break; + /* + * We don't know what level it hit in, except it came from the other + * socket + */ + case ARM_SPE_NV_REMOTE: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_REM_CCE1; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_ANY_CACHE; + data_src->mem_remote = PERF_MEM_REMOTE_REMOTE; + data_src->mem_snoopx = PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_PEER; + break; + case ARM_SPE_NV_DRAM: + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_LOC_RAM | PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl_num = PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_RAM; + data_src->mem_snoop = PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NONE; + break; + default: + break; + } +} +static void arm_spe__synth_data_source_generic(const struct arm_spe_record *record, + union perf_mem_data_src *data_src) +{ if (record->type & (ARM_SPE_LLC_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS)) { - data_src.mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L3; + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L3; if (record->type & ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS) - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_MISS; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_MISS; else - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; } else if (record->type & (ARM_SPE_L1D_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS)) { - data_src.mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L1; + data_src->mem_lvl = PERF_MEM_LVL_L1; if (record->type & ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS) - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_MISS; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_MISS; else - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT; } if (record->type & ARM_SPE_REMOTE_ACCESS) - data_src.mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_REM_CCE1; + data_src->mem_lvl |= PERF_MEM_LVL_REM_CCE1; +} + +static u64 arm_spe__synth_data_source(const struct arm_spe_record *record, u64 midr) +{ + union perf_mem_data_src data_src = { 0 }; + bool is_neoverse = is_midr_in_range(midr, neoverse_spe); + + if (record->op == ARM_SPE_LD) + data_src.mem_op = PERF_MEM_OP_LOAD; + else if (record->op == ARM_SPE_ST) + data_src.mem_op = PERF_MEM_OP_STORE; + else + return 0; + + if (is_neoverse) + arm_spe__synth_data_source_neoverse(record, &data_src); + else + arm_spe__synth_data_source_generic(record, &data_src); if (record->type & (ARM_SPE_TLB_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_TLB_MISS)) { data_src.mem_dtlb = PERF_MEM_TLB_WK; @@ -436,7 +531,7 @@ static int arm_spe_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq) u64 data_src; int err; - data_src = arm_spe__synth_data_source(record); + data_src = arm_spe__synth_data_source(record, spe->midr); if (spe->sample_flc) { if (record->type & ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS) { @@ -1178,6 +1273,8 @@ int arm_spe_process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, struct perf_record_auxtrace_info *auxtrace_info = &event->auxtrace_info; size_t min_sz = sizeof(u64) * ARM_SPE_AUXTRACE_PRIV_MAX; struct perf_record_time_conv *tc = &session->time_conv; + const char *cpuid = perf_env__cpuid(session->evlist->env); + u64 midr = strtol(cpuid, NULL, 16); struct arm_spe *spe; int err; @@ -1197,6 +1294,7 @@ int arm_spe_process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, spe->machine = &session->machines.host; /* No kvm support */ spe->auxtrace_type = auxtrace_info->type; spe->pmu_type = auxtrace_info->priv[ARM_SPE_PMU_TYPE]; + spe->midr = midr; spe->timeless_decoding = arm_spe__is_timeless_decoding(spe); -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-04 4:29 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-06-04 4:28 [PATCH v5 00/17] perf c2c: Support data source and display for Arm64 Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] perf: Add SNOOP_PEER flag to perf mem data struct Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-07-20 18:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-07-20 18:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-07-20 18:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-07-20 18:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-07-21 0:27 ` Leo Yan 2022-07-21 0:27 ` Leo Yan 2022-08-08 16:40 ` ping " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 02/17] perf tools: sync addition of PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_PEER Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 03/17] perf mem: Print snoop peer flag Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] perf arm-spe: Don't set data source if it's not a memory operation Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan [this message] 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] perf arm-spe: Use SPE data source for neoverse cores Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] perf mem: Add statistics for peer snooping Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] perf c2c: Output " Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 08/17] perf c2c: Add dimensions for peer load operations Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] perf c2c: Add dimensions of peer metrics for cache line view Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] perf c2c: Add mean dimensions for peer operations Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] perf c2c: Use explicit names for display macros Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] perf c2c: Rename dimension from 'percent_hitm' to 'percent_costly_snoop' Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] perf c2c: Refactor node header Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] perf c2c: Refactor display string Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] perf c2c: Sort on peer snooping for load operations Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] perf c2c: Use 'peer' as default display for Arm64 Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] perf c2c: Update documentation for new display option 'peer' Leo Yan 2022-06-04 4:28 ` Leo Yan 2022-08-10 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 00/17] perf c2c: Support data source and display for Arm64 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-08-10 13:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-08-11 6:41 ` Leo Yan 2022-08-11 6:41 ` Leo Yan 2022-08-12 12:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-08-12 12:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-08-12 15:20 ` Leo Yan 2022-08-12 15:20 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220604042820.2270916-6-leo.yan@linaro.org \ --to=leo.yan@linaro.org \ --cc=acme@kernel.org \ --cc=adam.li@amperecomputing.com \ --cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \ --cc=german.gomez@arm.com \ --cc=irogers@google.com \ --cc=james.clark@arm.com \ --cc=jmario@redhat.com \ --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \ --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.