All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: debug@rivosinc.com
To: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, cleger@rivosinc.com,
	atishp@atishpatra.org, alex@ghiti.fr, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
	alexghiti@rivosinc.com
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, oleg@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	shuah@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, debug@rivosinc.com,
	guoren@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com, evan@rivosinc.com,
	xiao.w.wang@intel.com, apatel@ventanamicro.com,
	mchitale@ventanamicro.com, waylingii@gmail.com,
	greentime.hu@sifive.com, heiko@sntech.de, jszhang@kernel.org,
	shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, david@redhat.com,
	charlie@rivosinc.com, panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn,
	willy@infradead.org, vincent.chen@sifive.com,
	andy.chiu@sifive.com, gerg@kernel.org,
	jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com, mason.huo@starfivetech.com,
	ancientmodern4@gmail.com, mathis.salmen@matsal.de,
	cuiyunhui@bytedance.com, bhe@redhat.com, chenjiahao16@huawei.com,
	ruscur@russell.cc, bgray@linux.ibm.com, alx@kernel.org,
	baruch@tkos.co.il, zhangqing@loongson.cn,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, revest@chromium.org,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, shr@devkernel.io,
	omosnace@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 15/28] riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() syscall
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:21:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240125062739.1339782-16-debug@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125062739.1339782-1-debug@rivosinc.com>

From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>

As discussed extensively in the changelog for the addition of this
syscall on x86 ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall") the
existing mmap() and madvise() syscalls do not map entirely well onto the
security requirements for guarded control stacks since they lead to
windows where memory is allocated but not yet protected or stacks which
are not properly and safely initialised. Instead a new syscall
map_shadow_stack() has been defined which allocates and initialises a
shadow stack page.

This patch implements this syscall for riscv. riscv doesn't require token
to be setup by kernel because user mode can do that by itself. However to
provide compatiblity and portability with other architectues, user mode can
specify token set flag.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile      |   2 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c     | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h |   1 +
 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
index fee22a3d1b53..8c668269e886 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
@@ -102,3 +102,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= compat_vdso/
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_64BIT)		+= pi/
 obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI) += usercfi.o
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..35ede2cbc05b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos, Inc.
+ * Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mman.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
+#include <linux/user.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/prctl.h>
+#include <asm/csr.h>
+#include <asm/usercfi.h>
+
+#define SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE sizeof(void *)
+
+/*
+ * Writes on shadow stack can either be `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. `sspush` can happen
+ * implicitly on current shadow stack pointed to by CSR_SSP. `ssamoswap` takes pointer to
+ * shadow stack. To keep it simple, we plan to use `ssamoswap` to perform writes on shadow
+ * stack.
+ */
+static noinline unsigned long amo_user_shstk(unsigned long *addr, unsigned long val)
+{
+	/*
+	 * In case ssamoswap faults, return -1.
+	 * Never expect -1 on shadow stack. Expect return addresses and zero
+	 */
+	unsigned long swap = -1;
+
+	__enable_user_access();
+	asm_volatile_goto(
+				".option push\n"
+				".option arch, +zicfiss\n"
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+				"1: ssamoswap.d %0, %2, %1\n"
+#else
+				"1: ssamoswap.w %0, %2, %1\n"
+#endif
+				_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, %l[fault])
+				RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
+				".option pop\n"
+				: "=r" (swap), "+A" (*addr)
+				: "r" (val)
+				: "memory"
+				: fault
+			);
+	__disable_user_access();
+	return swap;
+fault:
+	__disable_user_access();
+	return -1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Create a restore token on the shadow stack.  A token is always XLEN wide
+ * and aligned to XLEN.
+ */
+static int create_rstor_token(unsigned long ssp, unsigned long *token_addr)
+{
+	unsigned long addr;
+
+	/* Token must be aligned */
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(ssp, SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* On RISC-V we're constructing token to be function of address itself */
+	addr = ssp - SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE;
+
+	if (amo_user_shstk((unsigned long __user *)addr, (unsigned long) ssp) == -1)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (token_addr)
+		*token_addr = addr;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned long allocate_shadow_stack(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size,
+				unsigned long token_offset,
+				bool set_tok)
+{
+	int flags = MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
+	unsigned long populate, tok_loc = 0;
+
+	if (addr)
+		flags |= MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE;
+
+	mmap_write_lock(mm);
+	addr = do_mmap(NULL, addr, size, PROT_SHADOWSTACK, flags,
+				VM_SHADOW_STACK, 0, &populate, NULL);
+	mmap_write_unlock(mm);
+
+	if (!set_tok || IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
+		goto out;
+
+	if (create_rstor_token(addr + token_offset, &tok_loc)) {
+		vm_munmap(addr, size);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	addr = tok_loc;
+
+out:
+	return addr;
+}
+
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
+{
+	bool set_tok = flags & SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN;
+	unsigned long aligned_size = 0;
+
+	if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack())
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	/* Anything other than set token should result in invalid param */
+	if (flags & ~SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Unlike other architectures, on RISC-V, SSP pointer is held in CSR_SSP and is available
+	 * CSR in all modes. CSR accesses are performed using 12bit index programmed in instruction
+	 * itself. This provides static property on register programming and writes to CSR can't
+	 * be unintentional from programmer's perspective. As long as programmer has guarded areas
+	 * which perform writes to CSR_SSP properly, shadow stack pivoting is not possible. Since
+	 * CSR_SSP is writeable by user mode, it itself can setup a shadow stack token subsequent
+	 * to allocation. Although in order to provide portablity with other architecture (because
+	 * `map_shadow_stack` is arch agnostic syscall), RISC-V will follow expectation of a token
+	 * flag in flags and if provided in flags, setup a token at the base.
+	 */
+
+	/* If there isn't space for a token */
+	if (set_tok && size < SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE)
+		return -ENOSPC;
+
+	if (addr && (addr % PAGE_SIZE))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	aligned_size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
+	if (aligned_size < size)
+		return -EOVERFLOW;
+
+	return allocate_shadow_stack(addr, aligned_size, size, set_tok);
+}
diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h
index 57e8195d0b53..0c0ac6214de6 100644
--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h
+++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h
@@ -19,4 +19,5 @@
 #define MCL_FUTURE	2		/* lock all future mappings */
 #define MCL_ONFAULT	4		/* lock all pages that are faulted in */
 
+#define SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN (1ULL << 0)     /* Set up a restore token in the shadow stack */
 #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_MMAN_H */
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: debug@rivosinc.com
To: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, cleger@rivosinc.com,
	atishp@atishpatra.org, alex@ghiti.fr, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
	alexghiti@rivosinc.com
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, oleg@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	shuah@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, debug@rivosinc.com,
	guoren@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com, evan@rivosinc.com,
	xiao.w.wang@intel.com, apatel@ventanamicro.com,
	mchitale@ventanamicro.com, waylingii@gmail.com,
	greentime.hu@sifive.com, heiko@sntech.de, jszhang@kernel.org,
	shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, david@redhat.com,
	charlie@rivosinc.com, panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn,
	willy@infradead.org, vincent.chen@sifive.com,
	andy.chiu@sifive.com, gerg@kernel.org,
	jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com, mason.huo@starfivetech.com,
	ancientmodern4@gmail.com, mathis.salmen@matsal.de,
	cuiyunhui@bytedance.com, bhe@redhat.com, chenjiahao16@huawei.com,
	ruscur@russell.cc, bgray@linux.ibm.com, alx@kernel.org,
	baruch@tkos.co.il, zhangqing@loongson.cn,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, revest@chromium.org,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, shr@devkernel.io,
	omosnace@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 15/28] riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() syscall
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:21:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240125062739.1339782-16-debug@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125062739.1339782-1-debug@rivosinc.com>

From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>

As discussed extensively in the changelog for the addition of this
syscall on x86 ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall") the
existing mmap() and madvise() syscalls do not map entirely well onto the
security requirements for guarded control stacks since they lead to
windows where memory is allocated but not yet protected or stacks which
are not properly and safely initialised. Instead a new syscall
map_shadow_stack() has been defined which allocates and initialises a
shadow stack page.

This patch implements this syscall for riscv. riscv doesn't require token
to be setup by kernel because user mode can do that by itself. However to
provide compatiblity and portability with other architectues, user mode can
specify token set flag.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile      |   2 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c     | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h |   1 +
 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
index fee22a3d1b53..8c668269e886 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
@@ -102,3 +102,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= compat_vdso/
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_64BIT)		+= pi/
 obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI) += usercfi.o
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..35ede2cbc05b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos, Inc.
+ * Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mman.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
+#include <linux/user.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/prctl.h>
+#include <asm/csr.h>
+#include <asm/usercfi.h>
+
+#define SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE sizeof(void *)
+
+/*
+ * Writes on shadow stack can either be `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. `sspush` can happen
+ * implicitly on current shadow stack pointed to by CSR_SSP. `ssamoswap` takes pointer to
+ * shadow stack. To keep it simple, we plan to use `ssamoswap` to perform writes on shadow
+ * stack.
+ */
+static noinline unsigned long amo_user_shstk(unsigned long *addr, unsigned long val)
+{
+	/*
+	 * In case ssamoswap faults, return -1.
+	 * Never expect -1 on shadow stack. Expect return addresses and zero
+	 */
+	unsigned long swap = -1;
+
+	__enable_user_access();
+	asm_volatile_goto(
+				".option push\n"
+				".option arch, +zicfiss\n"
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+				"1: ssamoswap.d %0, %2, %1\n"
+#else
+				"1: ssamoswap.w %0, %2, %1\n"
+#endif
+				_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, %l[fault])
+				RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
+				".option pop\n"
+				: "=r" (swap), "+A" (*addr)
+				: "r" (val)
+				: "memory"
+				: fault
+			);
+	__disable_user_access();
+	return swap;
+fault:
+	__disable_user_access();
+	return -1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Create a restore token on the shadow stack.  A token is always XLEN wide
+ * and aligned to XLEN.
+ */
+static int create_rstor_token(unsigned long ssp, unsigned long *token_addr)
+{
+	unsigned long addr;
+
+	/* Token must be aligned */
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(ssp, SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* On RISC-V we're constructing token to be function of address itself */
+	addr = ssp - SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE;
+
+	if (amo_user_shstk((unsigned long __user *)addr, (unsigned long) ssp) == -1)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (token_addr)
+		*token_addr = addr;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned long allocate_shadow_stack(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size,
+				unsigned long token_offset,
+				bool set_tok)
+{
+	int flags = MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
+	unsigned long populate, tok_loc = 0;
+
+	if (addr)
+		flags |= MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE;
+
+	mmap_write_lock(mm);
+	addr = do_mmap(NULL, addr, size, PROT_SHADOWSTACK, flags,
+				VM_SHADOW_STACK, 0, &populate, NULL);
+	mmap_write_unlock(mm);
+
+	if (!set_tok || IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
+		goto out;
+
+	if (create_rstor_token(addr + token_offset, &tok_loc)) {
+		vm_munmap(addr, size);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	addr = tok_loc;
+
+out:
+	return addr;
+}
+
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
+{
+	bool set_tok = flags & SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN;
+	unsigned long aligned_size = 0;
+
+	if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack())
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	/* Anything other than set token should result in invalid param */
+	if (flags & ~SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Unlike other architectures, on RISC-V, SSP pointer is held in CSR_SSP and is available
+	 * CSR in all modes. CSR accesses are performed using 12bit index programmed in instruction
+	 * itself. This provides static property on register programming and writes to CSR can't
+	 * be unintentional from programmer's perspective. As long as programmer has guarded areas
+	 * which perform writes to CSR_SSP properly, shadow stack pivoting is not possible. Since
+	 * CSR_SSP is writeable by user mode, it itself can setup a shadow stack token subsequent
+	 * to allocation. Although in order to provide portablity with other architecture (because
+	 * `map_shadow_stack` is arch agnostic syscall), RISC-V will follow expectation of a token
+	 * flag in flags and if provided in flags, setup a token at the base.
+	 */
+
+	/* If there isn't space for a token */
+	if (set_tok && size < SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE)
+		return -ENOSPC;
+
+	if (addr && (addr % PAGE_SIZE))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	aligned_size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
+	if (aligned_size < size)
+		return -EOVERFLOW;
+
+	return allocate_shadow_stack(addr, aligned_size, size, set_tok);
+}
diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h
index 57e8195d0b53..0c0ac6214de6 100644
--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h
+++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h
@@ -19,4 +19,5 @@
 #define MCL_FUTURE	2		/* lock all future mappings */
 #define MCL_ONFAULT	4		/* lock all pages that are faulted in */
 
+#define SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN (1ULL << 0)     /* Set up a restore token in the shadow stack */
 #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_MMAN_H */
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-25  6:21 [RFC PATCH v1 00/28] riscv control-flow integrity for usermode debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/28] riscv: abstract envcfg CSR debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-02-12 10:23   ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-12 10:23     ` Andrew Jones
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/28] riscv: envcfg save and restore on trap entry/exit debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  7:19   ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-01-25  7:19     ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-01-25 17:09     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 17:09       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 17:54       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 17:54         ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/28] riscv: define default value for envcfg debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/28] riscv/Kconfig: enable HAVE_EXIT_THREAD for riscv debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/28] riscv: zicfiss/zicfilp enumeration debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25 17:59   ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 17:59     ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 18:26     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 18:26       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 18:46       ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 18:46         ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/28] riscv: zicfiss/zicfilp extension csr and bit definitions debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/28] riscv: kernel handling on trap entry/exit for user cfi debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  7:29   ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-01-25  7:29     ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-01-25 17:30     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 17:30       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 19:47       ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-01-25 19:47         ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-01-26  0:25         ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-26  0:25           ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/28] mm: Define VM_SHADOW_STACK for RISC-V debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  8:17   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-01-25  8:17     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-01-25 17:05     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 17:05       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/28] mm: abstract shadow stack vma behind `arch_is_shadow_stack` debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  8:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-01-25  8:18     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-01-25 17:07     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 17:07       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-13 10:34       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-13 10:34         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-22  1:32         ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-22  1:32           ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/28] riscv/mm : Introducing new protection flag "PROT_SHADOWSTACK" debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/28] riscv: Implementing "PROT_SHADOWSTACK" on riscv debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-02-09 20:44   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-09 20:44     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-22  0:39     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-22  0:39       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/28] riscv mm: manufacture shadow stack pte debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/28] riscv mmu: teach pte_mkwrite to manufacture shadow stack PTEs debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/28] riscv mmu: write protect and shadow stack debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` debug [this message]
2024-01-25  6:21   ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/28] riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() syscall debug
2024-01-25 21:24   ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-25 21:24     ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-26  0:44     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-26  0:44       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-06 16:01   ` Mark Brown
2024-02-06 16:01     ` Mark Brown
2024-02-22  0:47     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-22  0:47       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-22 13:33       ` Mark Brown
2024-02-22 13:33         ` Mark Brown
2024-02-09 20:44   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-09 20:44     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-22  0:50     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-22  0:50       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/28] riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/28] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/28] prctl: arch-agnostic prtcl for indirect branch tracking debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-02-06 16:13   ` Mark Brown
2024-02-06 16:13     ` Mark Brown
2024-02-22  0:42     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-22  0:42       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/28] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/28] riscv: Implements arch argnostic indirect branch tracking prctls debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/28] riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/28] riscv sigcontext: adding cfi state field in sigcontext debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 23/28] riscv signal: Save and restore of shadow stack for signal debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/28] riscv: select config for shadow stack and landing pad instr support debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25 18:04   ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 18:04     ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 18:12     ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 18:12       ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 18:44       ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 18:44         ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 19:26         ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 19:26           ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/28] riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 26/28] riscv: Documentation for landing pad / indirect branch tracking debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 27/28] riscv: Documentation for shadow stack on riscv debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug
2024-01-25  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 28/28] kselftest/riscv: kselftest for user mode cfi debug
2024-01-25  6:21   ` debug

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240125062739.1339782-16-debug@rivosinc.com \
    --to=debug@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=ancientmodern4@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy.chiu@sifive.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
    --cc=bgray@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=chenjiahao16@huawei.com \
    --cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=cuiyunhui@bytedance.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=gerg@kernel.org \
    --cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mason.huo@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=mathis.salmen@matsal.de \
    --cc=mchitale@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=shr@devkernel.io \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.chen@sifive.com \
    --cc=waylingii@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhangqing@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.