All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: "cpufreq: fix serialization issues with freq change notifiers" breaks cpufreq too
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:50:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3488595.xbBYlylYai@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomuJNQmk5fg5en5usPgipj7hzXUVNMhz1MjAS-47X4Ggg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:06:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 September 2013 06:13, Rafael J. Wysocki
> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> wrote:
> > Yes, if you can point to a specific driver having this problem.
> 
> There are so many of those (I know it because I went through almost all drivers
> recently with my cleanup series): cpufreq-cpu0, omap-cpufreq,
> exynos-cpufreq, etc..
> 
> They all do this:
> 
> A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage
> B. Change freq
> C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage

Well, if there's more than one it's even simpler.  You can just pick one. :-)

Like, "for example, <driver name> does the following ... which may cause the
hardware to misbehave, because ...".

Thanks,
Rafael


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "cpufreq: fix serialization issues with freq change notifiers" breaks cpufreq too
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:01:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3488595.xbBYlylYai@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomuJNQmk5fg5en5usPgipj7hzXUVNMhz1MjAS-47X4Ggg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:06:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 September 2013 06:13, Rafael J. Wysocki
> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> wrote:
> > Yes, if you can point to a specific driver having this problem.
> 
> There are so many of those (I know it because I went through almost all drivers
> recently with my cleanup series): cpufreq-cpu0, omap-cpufreq,
> exynos-cpufreq, etc..
> 
> They all do this:
> 
> A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage
> B. Change freq
> C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage

Well, if there's more than one it's even simpler.  You can just pick one. :-)

Like, "for example, <driver name> does the following ... which may cause the
hardware to misbehave, because ...".

Thanks,
Rafael


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "cpufreq: fix serialization issues with freq change notifiers" breaks cpufreq too
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:01:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3488595.xbBYlylYai@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomuJNQmk5fg5en5usPgipj7hzXUVNMhz1MjAS-47X4Ggg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:06:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 September 2013 06:13, Rafael J. Wysocki
> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> wrote:
> > Yes, if you can point to a specific driver having this problem.
> 
> There are so many of those (I know it because I went through almost all drivers
> recently with my cleanup series): cpufreq-cpu0, omap-cpufreq,
> exynos-cpufreq, etc..
> 
> They all do this:
> 
> A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage
> B. Change freq
> C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage

Well, if there's more than one it's even simpler.  You can just pick one. :-)

Like, "for example, <driver name> does the following ... which may cause the
hardware to misbehave, because ...".

Thanks,
Rafael


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: "cpufreq: fix serialization issues with freq change notifiers" breaks cpufreq too
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:01:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3488595.xbBYlylYai@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomuJNQmk5fg5en5usPgipj7hzXUVNMhz1MjAS-47X4Ggg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:06:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 September 2013 06:13, Rafael J. Wysocki
> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> wrote:
> > Yes, if you can point to a specific driver having this problem.
> 
> There are so many of those (I know it because I went through almost all drivers
> recently with my cleanup series): cpufreq-cpu0, omap-cpufreq,
> exynos-cpufreq, etc..
> 
> They all do this:
> 
> A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage
> B. Change freq
> C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage

Well, if there's more than one it's even simpler.  You can just pick one. :-)

Like, "for example, <driver name> does the following ... which may cause the
hardware to misbehave, because ...".

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-12 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-09 15:11 "cpufreq: fix serialization issues with freq change notifiers" breaks cpufreq too Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09 15:11 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09 15:11 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09 15:11 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-09 21:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-09 21:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-09 21:42   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09 21:42     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09 21:42     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09 23:12     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-09 23:12       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-09 23:12       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10  1:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10  1:46         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 11:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 11:41   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 11:29   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 11:29   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 11:49   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 11:49     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 11:49     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 11:49     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 15:14     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 15:26       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 15:14       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 15:14       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 19:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 19:46         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 19:46         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 19:46         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-11  8:38         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:50           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:38           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:38           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11 13:18           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-11 13:18             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-11 13:18             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-11 13:18             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12  0:39             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  0:51               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  0:39               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  0:39               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  0:43               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12  0:43                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12  0:43                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12  0:43                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12  5:36                 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  5:48                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  5:36                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  5:36                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 10:50                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-09-12 11:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12 11:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12 11:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12 10:52                     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 10:52                       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 10:52                       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12 10:52                       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 15:12   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 15:12     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 15:12     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 15:12     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 15:26     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 15:38       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 15:26       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 15:26       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 16:22       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 16:22         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 16:22         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 16:22         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 16:34         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 16:46           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 16:34           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 16:34           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-10 17:07           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 17:07             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 17:07             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-10 17:07             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-11  8:06             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:18               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:06               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:06               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:15               ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-11  8:15                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-11  8:15                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-11  8:15                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-11  8:39                 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:51                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:39                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11  8:39                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-11 13:28                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-11 13:28                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-11 13:28                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-11 13:28                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-12  7:47               ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-12  7:47                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-12  7:47                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-12  7:47                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-12  7:51                 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  7:51                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  7:51                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-09-12  7:51                   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3488595.xbBYlylYai@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.