All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] binfmt_flat: use __be32 for the on-disk format
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:57:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <462a7406-19df-7910-4499-8f0acd52bc82@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610212015.9157-8-hch@lst.de>

On 6/10/19 10:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So far binfmt_flat has onl been supported on 32-bit platforms, so the
			^^^^
			only
> variable size of the fields didn't matter.  But the upcoming RISC-V
> nommu port supports 64-bit CPUs, and we now have a conflict between
> the elf2flt creation tool that always uses 32-bit fields and the kernel
> that uses (unsigned) long field.  Switch to the userspace view as the
> rest of the binfmt_flat format is completely architecture neutral,
> and binfmt_flat isn't the right binary format for huge executables to
> start with.
> 
> While we're at it also ensure these fields are using __be types as
> they big endian and are byteswapped when loaded.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> wip
  ^^^
Unintended?

> ---
>  include/linux/flat.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)


With comment message fixed:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>

> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/flat.h b/include/linux/flat.h
> index 21d901ba191b..59e892d5fadb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/flat.h
> +++ b/include/linux/flat.h
> @@ -24,26 +24,26 @@
>   */
>  
>  struct flat_hdr {
> -	char magic[4];
> -	unsigned long rev;          /* version (as above) */
> -	unsigned long entry;        /* Offset of first executable instruction
> -	                               with text segment from beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long data_start;   /* Offset of data segment from beginning of
> -	                               file */
> -	unsigned long data_end;     /* Offset of end of data segment
> -	                               from beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long bss_end;      /* Offset of end of bss segment from beginning
> -	                               of file */
> +	char	magic[4];
> +	__be32	rev;          /* version (as above) */
> +	__be32	entry;        /* Offset of first executable instruction
> +				 with text segment from beginning of file */
> +	__be32	data_start;   /* Offset of data segment from beginning of
> +				 file */
> +	__be32	data_end;     /* Offset of end of data segment from beginning
> +				 of file */
> +	__be32	bss_end;      /* Offset of end of bss segment from beginning
> +				 of file */
>  
>  	/* (It is assumed that data_end through bss_end forms the bss segment.) */
>  
> -	unsigned long stack_size;   /* Size of stack, in bytes */
> -	unsigned long reloc_start;  /* Offset of relocation records from
> -	                               beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long reloc_count;  /* Number of relocation records */
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned long build_date;   /* When the program/library was built */
> -	unsigned long filler[5];    /* Reservered, set to zero */
> +	__be32	stack_size;   /* Size of stack, in bytes */
> +	__be32	reloc_start;  /* Offset of relocation records from beginning of
> +				 file */
> +	__be32	reloc_count;  /* Number of relocation records */
> +	__be32	flags;
> +	__be32	build_date;   /* When the program/library was built */
> +	__u32	filler[5];    /* Reservered, set to zero */
>  };
>  
>  #define FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x0001 /* load program entirely into RAM */
> @@ -67,19 +67,19 @@ struct flat_hdr {
>  #define OLD_FLAT_RELOC_TYPE_BSS		2
>  
>  typedef union {
> -	unsigned long	value;
> +	u32		value;
>  	struct {
>  # if defined(mc68000) && !defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE)
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # else
>  #   	error "Unknown bitfield order for flat files."
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] binfmt_flat: use __be32 for the on-disk format
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:57:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <462a7406-19df-7910-4499-8f0acd52bc82@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610212015.9157-8-hch@lst.de>

On 6/10/19 10:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So far binfmt_flat has onl been supported on 32-bit platforms, so the
			^^^^
			only
> variable size of the fields didn't matter.  But the upcoming RISC-V
> nommu port supports 64-bit CPUs, and we now have a conflict between
> the elf2flt creation tool that always uses 32-bit fields and the kernel
> that uses (unsigned) long field.  Switch to the userspace view as the
> rest of the binfmt_flat format is completely architecture neutral,
> and binfmt_flat isn't the right binary format for huge executables to
> start with.
> 
> While we're at it also ensure these fields are using __be types as
> they big endian and are byteswapped when loaded.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> wip
  ^^^
Unintended?

> ---
>  include/linux/flat.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)


With comment message fixed:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>

> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/flat.h b/include/linux/flat.h
> index 21d901ba191b..59e892d5fadb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/flat.h
> +++ b/include/linux/flat.h
> @@ -24,26 +24,26 @@
>   */
>  
>  struct flat_hdr {
> -	char magic[4];
> -	unsigned long rev;          /* version (as above) */
> -	unsigned long entry;        /* Offset of first executable instruction
> -	                               with text segment from beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long data_start;   /* Offset of data segment from beginning of
> -	                               file */
> -	unsigned long data_end;     /* Offset of end of data segment
> -	                               from beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long bss_end;      /* Offset of end of bss segment from beginning
> -	                               of file */
> +	char	magic[4];
> +	__be32	rev;          /* version (as above) */
> +	__be32	entry;        /* Offset of first executable instruction
> +				 with text segment from beginning of file */
> +	__be32	data_start;   /* Offset of data segment from beginning of
> +				 file */
> +	__be32	data_end;     /* Offset of end of data segment from beginning
> +				 of file */
> +	__be32	bss_end;      /* Offset of end of bss segment from beginning
> +				 of file */
>  
>  	/* (It is assumed that data_end through bss_end forms the bss segment.) */
>  
> -	unsigned long stack_size;   /* Size of stack, in bytes */
> -	unsigned long reloc_start;  /* Offset of relocation records from
> -	                               beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long reloc_count;  /* Number of relocation records */
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned long build_date;   /* When the program/library was built */
> -	unsigned long filler[5];    /* Reservered, set to zero */
> +	__be32	stack_size;   /* Size of stack, in bytes */
> +	__be32	reloc_start;  /* Offset of relocation records from beginning of
> +				 file */
> +	__be32	reloc_count;  /* Number of relocation records */
> +	__be32	flags;
> +	__be32	build_date;   /* When the program/library was built */
> +	__u32	filler[5];    /* Reservered, set to zero */
>  };
>  
>  #define FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x0001 /* load program entirely into RAM */
> @@ -67,19 +67,19 @@ struct flat_hdr {
>  #define OLD_FLAT_RELOC_TYPE_BSS		2
>  
>  typedef union {
> -	unsigned long	value;
> +	u32		value;
>  	struct {
>  # if defined(mc68000) && !defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE)
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # else
>  #   	error "Unknown bitfield order for flat files."
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] binfmt_flat: use __be32 for the on-disk format
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:57:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <462a7406-19df-7910-4499-8f0acd52bc82@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610212015.9157-8-hch@lst.de>

On 6/10/19 10:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So far binfmt_flat has onl been supported on 32-bit platforms, so the
			^^^^
			only
> variable size of the fields didn't matter.  But the upcoming RISC-V
> nommu port supports 64-bit CPUs, and we now have a conflict between
> the elf2flt creation tool that always uses 32-bit fields and the kernel
> that uses (unsigned) long field.  Switch to the userspace view as the
> rest of the binfmt_flat format is completely architecture neutral,
> and binfmt_flat isn't the right binary format for huge executables to
> start with.
> 
> While we're at it also ensure these fields are using __be types as
> they big endian and are byteswapped when loaded.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> wip
  ^^^
Unintended?

> ---
>  include/linux/flat.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)


With comment message fixed:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>

> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/flat.h b/include/linux/flat.h
> index 21d901ba191b..59e892d5fadb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/flat.h
> +++ b/include/linux/flat.h
> @@ -24,26 +24,26 @@
>   */
>  
>  struct flat_hdr {
> -	char magic[4];
> -	unsigned long rev;          /* version (as above) */
> -	unsigned long entry;        /* Offset of first executable instruction
> -	                               with text segment from beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long data_start;   /* Offset of data segment from beginning of
> -	                               file */
> -	unsigned long data_end;     /* Offset of end of data segment
> -	                               from beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long bss_end;      /* Offset of end of bss segment from beginning
> -	                               of file */
> +	char	magic[4];
> +	__be32	rev;          /* version (as above) */
> +	__be32	entry;        /* Offset of first executable instruction
> +				 with text segment from beginning of file */
> +	__be32	data_start;   /* Offset of data segment from beginning of
> +				 file */
> +	__be32	data_end;     /* Offset of end of data segment from beginning
> +				 of file */
> +	__be32	bss_end;      /* Offset of end of bss segment from beginning
> +				 of file */
>  
>  	/* (It is assumed that data_end through bss_end forms the bss segment.) */
>  
> -	unsigned long stack_size;   /* Size of stack, in bytes */
> -	unsigned long reloc_start;  /* Offset of relocation records from
> -	                               beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long reloc_count;  /* Number of relocation records */
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned long build_date;   /* When the program/library was built */
> -	unsigned long filler[5];    /* Reservered, set to zero */
> +	__be32	stack_size;   /* Size of stack, in bytes */
> +	__be32	reloc_start;  /* Offset of relocation records from beginning of
> +				 file */
> +	__be32	reloc_count;  /* Number of relocation records */
> +	__be32	flags;
> +	__be32	build_date;   /* When the program/library was built */
> +	__u32	filler[5];    /* Reservered, set to zero */
>  };
>  
>  #define FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x0001 /* load program entirely into RAM */
> @@ -67,19 +67,19 @@ struct flat_hdr {
>  #define OLD_FLAT_RELOC_TYPE_BSS		2
>  
>  typedef union {
> -	unsigned long	value;
> +	u32		value;
>  	struct {
>  # if defined(mc68000) && !defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE)
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # else
>  #   	error "Unknown bitfield order for flat files."
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] binfmt_flat: use __be32 for the on-disk format
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:57:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <462a7406-19df-7910-4499-8f0acd52bc82@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610212015.9157-8-hch@lst.de>

On 6/10/19 10:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So far binfmt_flat has onl been supported on 32-bit platforms, so the
			^^^^
			only
> variable size of the fields didn't matter.  But the upcoming RISC-V
> nommu port supports 64-bit CPUs, and we now have a conflict between
> the elf2flt creation tool that always uses 32-bit fields and the kernel
> that uses (unsigned) long field.  Switch to the userspace view as the
> rest of the binfmt_flat format is completely architecture neutral,
> and binfmt_flat isn't the right binary format for huge executables to
> start with.
> 
> While we're at it also ensure these fields are using __be types as
> they big endian and are byteswapped when loaded.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> wip
  ^^^
Unintended?

> ---
>  include/linux/flat.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)


With comment message fixed:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>

> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/flat.h b/include/linux/flat.h
> index 21d901ba191b..59e892d5fadb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/flat.h
> +++ b/include/linux/flat.h
> @@ -24,26 +24,26 @@
>   */
>  
>  struct flat_hdr {
> -	char magic[4];
> -	unsigned long rev;          /* version (as above) */
> -	unsigned long entry;        /* Offset of first executable instruction
> -	                               with text segment from beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long data_start;   /* Offset of data segment from beginning of
> -	                               file */
> -	unsigned long data_end;     /* Offset of end of data segment
> -	                               from beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long bss_end;      /* Offset of end of bss segment from beginning
> -	                               of file */
> +	char	magic[4];
> +	__be32	rev;          /* version (as above) */
> +	__be32	entry;        /* Offset of first executable instruction
> +				 with text segment from beginning of file */
> +	__be32	data_start;   /* Offset of data segment from beginning of
> +				 file */
> +	__be32	data_end;     /* Offset of end of data segment from beginning
> +				 of file */
> +	__be32	bss_end;      /* Offset of end of bss segment from beginning
> +				 of file */
>  
>  	/* (It is assumed that data_end through bss_end forms the bss segment.) */
>  
> -	unsigned long stack_size;   /* Size of stack, in bytes */
> -	unsigned long reloc_start;  /* Offset of relocation records from
> -	                               beginning of file */
> -	unsigned long reloc_count;  /* Number of relocation records */
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned long build_date;   /* When the program/library was built */
> -	unsigned long filler[5];    /* Reservered, set to zero */
> +	__be32	stack_size;   /* Size of stack, in bytes */
> +	__be32	reloc_start;  /* Offset of relocation records from beginning of
> +				 file */
> +	__be32	reloc_count;  /* Number of relocation records */
> +	__be32	flags;
> +	__be32	build_date;   /* When the program/library was built */
> +	__u32	filler[5];    /* Reservered, set to zero */
>  };
>  
>  #define FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x0001 /* load program entirely into RAM */
> @@ -67,19 +67,19 @@ struct flat_hdr {
>  #define OLD_FLAT_RELOC_TYPE_BSS		2
>  
>  typedef union {
> -	unsigned long	value;
> +	u32		value;
>  	struct {
>  # if defined(mc68000) && !defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE)
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -		signed long offset : 30;
> -		unsigned long type : 2;
> +		s32	offset : 30;
> +		u32	type : 2;
>  #   	define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # else
>  #   	error "Unknown bitfield order for flat files."
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 152+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-10 21:20 binfmt_flat cleanups and RISC-V support Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 01/15] binfmt_flat: remove flat_reloc_valid Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:44   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:44     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:44     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:44     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 02/15] binfmt_flat: remove flat_set_persistent Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:45   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:45     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:45     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:45     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 03/15] binfmt_flat: provide a default version of flat_get_relocate_addr Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:46   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:46     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:46     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:46     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 04/15] binfmt_flat: remove flat_old_ram_flag Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  6:04   ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  6:04     ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  6:04     ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  6:04     ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  7:36     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  7:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  7:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  7:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 13:07       ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11 13:07         ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11 13:07         ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11 13:07         ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  9:47   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:47     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:47     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:47     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 05/15] binfmt_flat: replace flat_argvp_envp_on_stack with a Kconfig variable Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:49   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:49     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:49     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:49     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 06/15] binfmt_flat: remove the uapi <linux/flat.h> header Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:51   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:51     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:51     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:51     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 07/15] binfmt_flat: use __be32 for the on-disk format Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  8:25   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-11  8:25     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-11  8:25     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-11  8:25     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-11  9:57   ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2019-06-11  9:57     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:57     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:57     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 08/15] binfmt_flat: add endianess annotations Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:58   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:58     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:58     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:58     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 09/15] binfmt_flat: add a ARCH_HAS_BINFMT_FLAT option Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:59   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:59     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:59     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:59     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 10/15] binfmt_flat: make support for old format binaries optional Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 11/15] binfmt_flat: provide an asm-generic/flat.h Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 10:01   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11 10:01     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11 10:01     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11 10:01     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 12/15] binfmt_flat: remove the persistent argument from flat_get_addr_from_rp Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 13/15] binfmt_flat: move the MAX_SHARED_LIBS definition to binfmt_flat.c Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 14/15] binfmt_flat: don't offset the data start Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 15/15] riscv: add binfmt_flat support Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  8:16   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  8:16     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  8:16     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  8:16     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  6:51 ` binfmt_flat cleanups and RISC-V support Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  6:51   ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  6:51   ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  6:51   ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  7:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  7:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  7:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  7:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 13:02     ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11 13:02       ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11 13:02       ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11 13:02       ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  8:05 ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  8:05   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  8:05   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  8:05   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  8:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  8:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  8:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  8:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 10:08     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11 10:08       ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11 10:08       ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11 10:08       ` Vladimir Murzin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=462a7406-19df-7910-4499-8f0acd52bc82@arm.com \
    --to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.