From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> To: 'Michael Ellerman' <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Subject: RE: mainline build failure of powerpc allmodconfig for prom_init_check Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 07:51:45 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <72a95f0949d149d1b07bd161f3d59cc1@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87cze3docs.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> From: Michael Ellerman > Sent: 18 July 2022 05:41 ... > So we're memsetting all of args to 254, not zero. > > That's happening because allmodconfig with gcc 12 enables > CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_PATTERN, whereas gcc 11 doesn't. I can't help feeling it would be better if that generated a call to a memset64() function. Saving loads of tests at the top of the function, and (most of?) the constant expansion to 64bit. Although and explicit 'stack clear' function would be better for the kernel - since it would give the option of patching it away at startup. I really can't help feeling that initialising on-stack arrays will kill performance. While kernel stack frames have to be relatively small, in userspace very large on-stack arrays can be allocated (and correctly bound checked) knowing that the cost is minimal (maybe a TLB miss). David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> To: 'Michael Ellerman' <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org> Subject: RE: mainline build failure of powerpc allmodconfig for prom_init_check Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 07:51:45 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <72a95f0949d149d1b07bd161f3d59cc1@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87cze3docs.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> From: Michael Ellerman > Sent: 18 July 2022 05:41 ... > So we're memsetting all of args to 254, not zero. > > That's happening because allmodconfig with gcc 12 enables > CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_PATTERN, whereas gcc 11 doesn't. I can't help feeling it would be better if that generated a call to a memset64() function. Saving loads of tests at the top of the function, and (most of?) the constant expansion to 64bit. Although and explicit 'stack clear' function would be better for the kernel - since it would give the option of patching it away at startup. I really can't help feeling that initialising on-stack arrays will kill performance. While kernel stack frames have to be relatively small, in userspace very large on-stack arrays can be allocated (and correctly bound checked) knowing that the cost is minimal (maybe a TLB miss). David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-18 7:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-07-14 8:55 mainline build failure of powerpc allmodconfig for prom_init_check Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) 2022-07-14 8:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) 2022-07-17 9:12 ` Sudip Mukherjee 2022-07-17 9:12 ` Sudip Mukherjee 2022-07-17 14:44 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-17 14:44 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-17 19:54 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-17 19:54 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-18 3:52 ` Michael Ellerman 2022-07-18 3:52 ` Michael Ellerman 2022-07-18 14:56 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-18 14:56 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-17 20:25 ` Sudip Mukherjee 2022-07-17 20:25 ` Sudip Mukherjee 2022-07-17 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-17 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-17 20:38 ` Sudip Mukherjee 2022-07-17 20:38 ` Sudip Mukherjee 2022-07-17 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-17 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-17 20:56 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-17 20:56 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-17 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-17 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-17 21:45 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-17 21:45 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-18 1:38 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-18 1:38 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-18 4:41 ` Michael Ellerman 2022-07-18 4:41 ` Michael Ellerman 2022-07-18 7:51 ` David Laight [this message] 2022-07-18 7:51 ` David Laight 2022-07-18 13:44 ` [PATCH] powerpc/64s: Disable stack variable initialisation for prom_init Michael Ellerman 2022-07-18 13:44 ` Michael Ellerman 2022-07-18 15:03 ` Sudip Mukherjee 2022-07-18 15:03 ` Sudip Mukherjee 2022-07-18 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-18 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-27 12:02 ` Michael Ellerman 2022-07-18 19:06 ` mainline build failure of powerpc allmodconfig for prom_init_check Linus Torvalds 2022-07-18 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-18 22:08 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-18 22:08 ` Segher Boessenkool 2022-07-18 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-18 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-07-19 13:35 ` Michael Ellerman 2022-07-19 13:35 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=72a95f0949d149d1b07bd161f3d59cc1@AcuMS.aculab.com \ --to=david.laight@aculab.com \ --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \ --cc=keescook@chromium.org \ --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.