From: Sharma Bhupesh <bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com>
To: Stuart Yoder <b08248@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"bhupesh.linux@gmail.com" <bhupesh.linux@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64: Use generic Layerscape SoC family naming & rename LS2085A to LS2080A
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 03:54:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY1PR0301MB130356EF4A122A23A370611E82520@BY1PR0301MB1303.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALRxmdA=TF=N=6qELR78yhvt_uwEKyHih_08toD9oqCWYtsi0g@mail.gmail.com>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WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com (Sharma Bhupesh)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64: Use generic Layerscape SoC family naming & rename LS2085A to LS2080A
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 03:54:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY1PR0301MB130356EF4A122A23A370611E82520@BY1PR0301MB1303.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALRxmdA=TF=N=6qELR78yhvt_uwEKyHih_08toD9oqCWYtsi0g@mail.gmail.com>
> From: Stuart Yoder [mailto:b08248 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 1:55 AM
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Bhupesh Sharma
> <bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com> wrote:
> > Freescale will be a churning out a host of ARMv8 based SoCs which will
> > be based on a similar overall SoC architecture. So, this patch
> > converts the existing infrastructure in the arm64/dts, arm64/Kconfig
> > and arm64/configs to use the generic convention ARCH_LAYERSCAPE in
> > place of the more specific FSL_LS2085A, to save code duplication
> > later-on.
> >
> > Also Freescale is renaming LS2085A to LS2080A.
> >
> > This patch addresses the above two points.
>
> Suggest splitting this into 2 patches because these 2 changes are really
> orthogonal-- one patch for the ARCH config name change, one for the
> rename ls2085a to ls2080a rename.
I was seeing the compilation breaking up at patch level if I did so.
Will try to see if this can be achieved without breaking up the compilation
for individual patches in v3.
> Not sure why you're describing it as "churning out a host of ARMv8 based
> SoCs".
> Just get to the point-- Layerscape is an SoC family so we're changing
> from the SoC specific ARCH kconfig option to a more general SoC family
> option.
The prologue is to describe that other ARMv8 SoCs with similar architecture
will be put-out, which will be part of the overall Layerscape family.
Regards,
Bhupesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-04 6:57 [PATCH v2 00/10] ARM64: Update support for FSL's LS2085A SoC Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 6:57 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64: Use generic Layerscape SoC family naming & rename LS2085A to LS2080A Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 6:57 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 16:31 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 16:31 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 20:10 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-04 20:10 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-08 20:24 ` Stuart Yoder
2015-09-08 20:24 ` Stuart Yoder
2015-09-09 3:54 ` Sharma Bhupesh [this message]
2015-09-09 3:54 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-04 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] Documentation: DT: Add entry for FSL LS2080A QDS and RDB boards Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 6:57 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] Documentation/dts: Add bindings for QIXIS FPGA controller found on FSL boards Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 6:57 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 16:56 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 16:56 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 20:16 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-04 20:16 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-04 20:16 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-04 21:12 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 21:12 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 21:12 ` Li Yang
2015-09-05 8:11 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-05 8:11 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-05 8:11 ` Sharma Bhupesh
[not found] ` <BY1PR0301MB130339BD3B988DC938AA524482560-M1kb196zaoqj58cWwZvmNZwN6zqB+hSMnBOFsp37pqbUKgpGm//BTAC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-09 23:38 ` Li Yang
2015-09-09 23:38 ` Li Yang
2015-09-09 23:38 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] doc/bindings: Update PCIe devicetree binding documentation for LS2080A Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 6:57 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 17:56 ` Leo Li
2015-09-04 17:56 ` Leo Li
2015-09-04 20:20 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-04 20:20 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-04 20:20 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-06 2:25 ` Lian M.H.
2015-09-06 2:25 ` Lian M.H.
2015-09-06 2:25 ` Lian M.H.
2015-09-06 20:00 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-06 20:00 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-06 20:00 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-07 11:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-07 11:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-08 20:06 ` Li Yang
2015-09-08 20:06 ` Li Yang
2015-09-08 20:06 ` Li Yang
2015-09-09 3:45 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-09 3:45 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-09 3:45 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-09 9:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-09 9:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-09 9:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-09 23:50 ` Li Yang
2015-09-09 23:50 ` Li Yang
2015-09-09 23:50 ` Li Yang
2015-09-10 1:52 ` Lian M.H.
2015-09-10 1:52 ` Lian M.H.
2015-09-10 1:52 ` Lian M.H.
2015-09-04 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] doc/bindings: Update clk-qoriq bindings for FSL's chassis-3.0 SoCs Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 6:57 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-09 16:46 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-09 16:46 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-04 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] clk: qoriq: Add ls2080a support Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 6:57 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2015-09-04 20:01 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 20:01 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 20:09 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-04 20:09 ` Sharma Bhupesh
2015-09-04 21:06 ` Li Yang
2015-09-04 21:06 ` Li Yang
2015-09-09 16:41 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-09 16:41 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-09 16:39 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-09 16:39 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BY1PR0301MB130356EF4A122A23A370611E82520@BY1PR0301MB1303.namprd03.prod.outlook.com \
--to=bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b08248@gmail.com \
--cc=bhupesh.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.