All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: rockchip: correctly handle arguments of pinconf options
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:35:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY6pmS=5rphvYdt_8yKYJq8ADu0omy48ncZ3LFtEUf7yg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306141744.21117.heiko@sntech.de>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:

> Change the rockchip pinctrl driver to handle the arguments of 0 or 1 to
> the pull pinconfig options correctly, so that the pull gets disabled when
> either the bias_disable options is set or the pull option has the argument 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

Patch applied so we can move ahead but:

>         case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
>         case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
>         case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
> +               if (!rockchip_pinconf_pull_valid(info->ctrl, param))
> +                       return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> +               if (!arg)
> +                       param = PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE;

This is what I think is counter-intuitive.

Can't you rely on the bias-disable here instead?

> -               *config = 0;
> +               pull = rockchip_get_pull(bank, pin - bank->pin_base);
> +               *config = (pull == param) ? 1 : 0;

And then I guess you should emit PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE
here as well.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: rockchip: correctly handle arguments of pinconf options
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:35:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY6pmS=5rphvYdt_8yKYJq8ADu0omy48ncZ3LFtEUf7yg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306141744.21117.heiko@sntech.de>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Heiko St?bner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:

> Change the rockchip pinctrl driver to handle the arguments of 0 or 1 to
> the pull pinconfig options correctly, so that the pull gets disabled when
> either the bias_disable options is set or the pull option has the argument 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

Patch applied so we can move ahead but:

>         case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
>         case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
>         case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
> +               if (!rockchip_pinconf_pull_valid(info->ctrl, param))
> +                       return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> +               if (!arg)
> +                       param = PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE;

This is what I think is counter-intuitive.

Can't you rely on the bias-disable here instead?

> -               *config = 0;
> +               pull = rockchip_get_pull(bank, pin - bank->pin_base);
> +               *config = (pull == param) ? 1 : 0;

And then I guess you should emit PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE
here as well.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-16 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-14 15:41 [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: fix some issues with new pinconfig dt parsing Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:41 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:41 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: update the documentation for some pinconfig params Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:42   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:42   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:26   ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:26     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:26     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:45     ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:45       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:45       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 12:26       ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 12:26         ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 12:26         ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] pinctrl: clarify some dt pinconfig options Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:42   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:42   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:28   ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:28     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:28     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-19 22:10   ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-19 22:10     ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-19 22:10     ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-24  9:51     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-24  9:51       ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] pinctrl: handle zero found dt pinconfig properties better Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:43   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:43   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:29   ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:29     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:29     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: dynamically alloc temp array when parsing dt pinconf options Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:43   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:43   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:31   ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:31     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:31     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: rockchip: correctly handle arguments of " Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:44   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:44   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:35   ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2013-06-16 10:35     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:35     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 11:02     ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 11:02       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 11:02       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 12:35       ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 12:35         ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 12:35         ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 15:41         ` [PATCH v2] " Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 15:41           ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 15:41           ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-17 15:48           ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 15:48             ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 15:48             ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: fix some issues with new pinconfig dt parsing James Hogan
2013-06-14 15:53   ` James Hogan
2013-06-14 15:53   ` James Hogan
2013-06-17  3:03   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17  3:03     ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACRpkdY6pmS=5rphvYdt_8yKYJq8ADu0omy48ncZ3LFtEUf7yg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.